Aufhören (‘stop’) activates hören (‘hear’) but not Musik
(‘music’)
The difference between lexical and semantic processing of German particle verbs
Eva Smolka | University of Konstanz | University of Vienna
This study examines whether the lexical processing of German particle verbs differs from their processing in a
semantic network. To this end, we explored whether the processing of particle verbs induces access to the stem (Experiment 1) and
to a semantic associate of the stem (Experiment 2). In two cross-modal priming experiments, participants listened to particle
verbs that were (a) semantically transparent (e.g. anhören, ‘listen to’), (b) semantically opaque (e.g.
aufhören, ‘stop’), or (c) form-related (e.g. aushöhlen, ‘mold’) with respect to their stem
(e.g., hören, ‘hear’). Participants made lexical decisions about visually presented stems (e.g.,
hören, ‘hear’) and about semantic associates to the stem (e.g., Musik, ‘music’) in
Experiments 1 and 2, respectively.
Relative to form controls, semantically transparent and opaque particle verbs induced equivalent stem priming
(Experiment 1), indicating that the lexical processing of particle verbs occurs via the stem regardless of semantic transparency.
However, neither semantically transparent nor opaque particle verbs primed semantic associates of the stem (Experiment 2). These
findings indicate that stem access during lexical processing does not extend to a semantic level where the meaning of the stem is
processed. We discuss these findings regarding present models of lexical processing.
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 390–412.
Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P.
(2010) Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H.
(1993) The CELEX lexical database (on CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Baayen, R. H., & Smolka, E.
(2019) Modeling morphological priming without morphemes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Bates, D.
(2005) Fitting linear mixed models in R. R news, 5(1), 27–30.
Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J.
(2003) Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 101, 645–652.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
(2009) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Amsterdam. Retrieved from [URL]
Brunel, N., & Lavigne, F.
(2009) Semantic priming in a cortical network model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(12), 2300–2319.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F.
(1975) A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428.
De Grauwe, S., Lemhöfer, K., & Schriefers, H.
(2019) Processing derived verbs: the role of motor-relatedness and type of morphological priming. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(8), 973–990.
Dell, G. S.
(1986) A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 931, 283–321.
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J.
(2005) Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1–2), 75–114.
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J.
(2009) Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: the case of prefixed words. Memory and Cognition, 37(6), 895–908.
Dudenredaktion
(2009) Die deutsche Rechtschreibung. Das umfassende Standardwerk auf der Grundlage der neuen amtlichen Regeln (25th ed). Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
Eisenberg, P.
(2004) Grundriß der deutschen Grammatik: Das Wort (2nd ed. Vol. 11). Stuttgart-Weimar: J. B. Metzler.
Feldman, L. B., Barac-Cikoja, D., & Kostić, A.
(2002) Semantic aspects of morphological processing: Transparency effects in Serbian. Memory and Cognition, 301, 629–636.
Feldman, L. B., & Larabee, J.
(2001) Morphological facilitation following prefixed but not suffixed primes: Lexical architecture or modality-specific processes?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 680–691.
Feldman, L. B., & Soltano, E. G.
(1999) Morphological priming: The role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position. Brain and Language, 681, 33–39.
Fickel, J. & Smolka, E.
(2014) The processing of German stems in zero derivation, Umlaut, and Ablaut. International Conference on the Cross-Linguistic Comparison of Indo-Germanic and Semitic Languages (CoGS), Konstanz, Germany.
Fleischer, W., & Barz, I.
(1992) Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S.
(2007) Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 323–345.
Günther, F., Smolka, E., & Marelli, M.
(2019) ‘Understanding’ differs between English and German: Capturing systematic language differences of complex words. Cortex, 1161, 158–175.
Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.
(2011) Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(4), 406–430.
Longtin, C., Segui, J., & Hallé, P.
(2003) Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 181, 313–334.
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L.
(1994) Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3–33.
Milin, P., Smolka, E., & Feldman, L. B.
(2017) Models of Lexical Access and Morphological Processing. In E. M. Fernandéz & H. S. Cairns (Eds.), The Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 240–268). Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Pastizzo, M. J., & Feldman, L. B.
(2002) Does prime modality influence morphological processing?Brain and Language, 811, 28–41.
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K.
(2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 507–537.
Rueckl, J. G., & Galantucci, B.
(2005) The locus and time course of long-term morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 201, 115–138.
Smolka, E., Gondan, M., & Rösler, F.
(2015) Take a stand on understanding: Electrophysiological evidence for stem access in German complex verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(62).
Smolka, E., Komlósi, S., & Rösler, F.
(2009) When semantics means less than morphology: Processing of German prefixed verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(3), 337–375.
Smolka, E., & Libben, G.
(2017) ‘Can you wash off the hogwash?’ – semantic transparency of first and second constituents in the processing of German compounds. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 32(4), 514–531.
Smolka, E., Libben, G., & Dressler, W. U.
(2019) When Morphological Structure Overrides Meaning: Evidence from German Prefix and Particle Verbs. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 34(5), 599–614.
Smolka, E., & Eulitz, C.
(2018) Psycholinguistic measures for German verb pairs: Semantic trans-parency, semantic relatedness, verb family size, and age of reading acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1540–1562.
Smolka, E., Preller, K., & Eulitz, C.
(2014) ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological Structure Overrides Semantic Compositionality in the Lexical Representation of German Complex Verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 721, 16–36.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I.
(1975) Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 141, 638–647.
Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M.
(2010) A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 277–296.
Xu, J., & Taft, M.
(2015) The effects of semantic transparency and base frequency on the recognition of English complex words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(3), 904–910.
Zwitserlood, P., Bolwiender, A., & Drews, E.
(2005) Priming morphologically complex verbs by sentence contexts: Effects of semantic transparency and ambiguity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 201, 395–415.
Zwitserlood, P., Drews, E., Bolwiender, A., & Neuwinger, E.
(1996) Kann man Geschenke umbringen? Assoziative Bahnungsexperimente zur Bedeutungsheterogenität von Verben. In C. Habel & S. Kanngießer (Eds.), Perspektiven der kognitiven Linguistik: Modelle und Methoden (pp. 211–232).
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Creemers, Ava & David Embick
2021. Retrieving stem meanings in opaque words during auditory lexical processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 36:9 ► pp. 1107 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.