References

References

Axel, Katrin
(2007) Studies on Old High German Syntax. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Axel-Tober, Katrin
(2018) Origins of verb-second in Old High German. In Jäger, Agnes, Gisella Ferraresi and Helmut Weiß (eds.), Clause structure and word order in the history of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 22–47.Google Scholar
Brandt, Margareta, Marga Reis, Inger Rosengren & Ilse Zimmermann
(1992) Satztyp, Satzmodus und Illokution. In Rosengren, Inger (ed.), Satztyp und Illokution. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1–90.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
(1986) Barriers. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans
(1977 [1983]) On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules. In Abraham, Werner (Hg.), On the formal syntax of the Westgermania. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 47–131.Google Scholar
Duke, E. A.
(1995) Platon: Platonis opera tomus I tetralogias I-II continens. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dürscheid, Christa
(1989) Zur Vorfeldbesetzung in deutschen Verbzweit-Strukturen. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Eggers, Hans
(1964) Der althochdeutsche Isidor. Nach der Pariser Handschrift und den Monseer Fragmenten. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Elliger, K. & W. Rudolph
(1990) Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer
(2001) Movement Operations after Syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 555–595. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grewendorf, Günter
(2002) Minimalistische Syntax. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Svetlana Petrova
(2010) From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 120, 315–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Rhetorical relations and verb placement in Old High German. In Chiarcos, Christian, Berry Claus & Michael Grabski (Hgg.), Salience. Multidisciplinary perspectives on its function in discourse. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 173–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Isidor of Sevilla
(1964) Der althochdeutsche Isidor: nach der Pariser Handschrift und den Monseer Fragmenten. Ed. by Hans Eggers. Tübingen: Niemeyer. http://​titus​.uni​-frankfurt​.de​/texte​/ects​/germ​/ahd​/isidor​/isido​.htm (accessed July 15, 2016)Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
(2001) The Dimensions of Topic-Comment. Linguistics, 39: 641–681. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
(1995) Indo-European origins of Germanic sntax. In Battye, Adrian & Ian Roberts (eds.), Clause structure and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 140–169.Google Scholar
Masser, Achim
(1994) Tatian: Die lateinisch-althochdeutsche Tatianbilingue Stiftsbibliothek St. Gallen Cod.56. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Önnerfors, Olaf
(1997) Verb-erst-Deklarativsätze. Grammatik und Pragmatik. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Panhuis, Dirk G. J.
(1982) The communicative perspective in the sentence. A Study of Latin Word Order. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinkster, Harm
(1990) Latin Syntax and Semantics. London / New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
(1999) .‘How Not to Mark Topics: ‘Topicalization’ in English and Yiddish’. in Texas Linguistics Forum, Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
(1982) ‘Pragmatics and Linguistics: An Analysis of Sentence Topics’. Philosophica, 27: 53–94.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
(1997) The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (Hg.): Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin & Werner Frey
(2004) ‘Integrated’ and ‘Non-Integrated’ Left-peripheral Elements in German and English. In Shaer, Benjamin, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (Hgg.), Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop. ZASPiL 35(2). Berlin: ZAS, 465–502.Google Scholar
Speyer, Augustin
(2008) German Vorfeld-filling as Constraint Interaction. In Benz, Anton und Peter Kühnlein (Hgg.) Constraints in Discourse. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins, 267–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009a) Versuch zur Syntax im Protoindoeuropäischen. In Rieken, Elisabeth & Paul Widmer (Hgg.), Pragmatische Kategorien. Form, Funktion und Diachronie. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 287–305.Google Scholar
(2009b) Das Vorfeldranking und das Vorfeld-es . Linguistische Berichte 219, 323–353.Google Scholar
(2010) Filling the Vorfeld in spoken and written discourse. In Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa, et al. (Hgg.), Discourses in Interaction. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins, 263–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Topichood and the margins of the German clause from a historical perspective. In Molnár, Valéria, Verner Egland & Susanne Winkler (eds.), Architecture of Topic. Berlin /New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 337–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speyer, Augustin & Helmut Weiß
(2018) The prefield after the Old High German period. In Jäger, Agnes, Gisella Ferraresi and Helmut Weiß (eds.), Clause structure and word order in the history of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 64–81.Google Scholar
Thiersch, Craig
(1978) Topics in German Syntax. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Ma.Google Scholar
Watts, W. S.
(1958) M. Tulli Ciceronis epistulae. Tom. III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Robert
(1983) Vulgata: Biblia sacra iuxta vulgatam versionem. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Wöllstein, Angelika
(2010) Topologisches Satzmodell. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar