Article published in:
Semantics and Psychology of Complex Words
Edited by Christina L. Gagné and Thomas L. Spalding
[The Mental Lexicon 15:1] 2020
► pp. 101122
References

References

Adams, V.
(1973) An introduction to modern English word-formation. Longman.Google Scholar
Arnaud, P. J. L.
(2003) Les composés timbre-poste. Presses Universitaires de Lyon.Google Scholar
(2008) Semantic complexity in English [NN]ₙ compounds. Anglophonia. French Journal of English Linguistics, 12(24), 7–21.Google Scholar
Arnaud, Pierre J. L.
(2016) Categorizing the modification relations in French relational subordinative [NN]N compounds. In Pius ten Hacken (ed.), The semantics of compounding, 71–93. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A.
(2008) The interaction of metonymy and metaphor in the meaning and form of ‘bahuvrihi’ – compounds. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 208–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L.
(1979) On the need for pragmatics in the study of nominal compounding. Journal of Pragmatics, 3(1), 45–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Compounds and compounding. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L., & Tarasova, E.
(2013) The meaning link in nominal compounds. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 10(3), 2–18.Google Scholar
Blank, A.
(2003) Words and concepts in time: Towards a diachronic cognitive onomasiology. In R. Eckardt, K. von Heusinger, & C. Schwarze (Eds.), Words in time: Diachronic semantics from different points of view (pp. 37–65). Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonhomme, M.
(1987) Linguistique de la métonymie. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bourque, Y. S.
(2014) Toward a typology of semantic transparency: The case of French compounds [PhD dissertation]. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R.
(2014) Where does metonymy begin? Some comments on Janda (2011). Cognitive Linguistics, 25(2), 313–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brekle, H. E.
(1970) Generative Satzsemantik und transformationelle Syntax im System der englischen Nominalkomposition. Fink.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
forthc.). Morphosyntax: Constructions of the world’s languages. Cambridge University Press.
Downing, P.
(1977) On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language, 810–842. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fortis, J. -M.
(2011) On localism in the history of linguistics. Handout 4eme Colloque International de l’Association Française de Linguistique Cognitive, Lyon.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(1993) Process and products in making sense of tropes. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 252–276). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M., & Tadmor, U.
(Eds.) (2009) World Loanword Database. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wold​.clld​.org. Crossref
Hatcher, A. G.
(1960) An introduction to the analysis of English noun compounds. Word, 16(3), 356–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(2016) English noun-noun compounds in Conceptual Semantics. In P. ten Hacken (Ed.), The semantics of compounding (pp. 15–53). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janda, L. A.
(2011) Metonymy in word-formation. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(2), 359–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O.
(1942) A modern English grammar on historical principles. Part 6: Morphology. George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Johnston, M., & Busa, F.
(1999) Qualia structure and the compositional interpretation of compounds. In E. Viegas (Ed.), Breadth and depth of semantic lexicons (pp. 167–187). Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koch, P.
(1999) Frame and contiguity. In K. -U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 139–167). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Lexical typology from a cognitive and linguistic point of view. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook (pp. 1142–1178). de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Koziol, H.
(1937) Handbuch der englischen Wortbildungslehre. Winter.Google Scholar
Lees, R. B.
(1960) The grammar of English nominalizations (Vol. 12). Indiana University.Google Scholar
(1970) Problems in the grammatical analysis of English nominal compounds. In M. Bierwisch & K. E. Heidolph (Eds.), Progress in Linguistics (pp. 174–186). Mouton.Google Scholar
Levi, J. N.
(1978) The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Li, C. N.
(1971) Semantics and the structure of compounds in Chinese [PhD dissertation]. University of California.Google Scholar
Lieber, R.
(2016) Compounding in the lexical semantic framework. In P. ten Hacken (Ed.), The semantics of compounding (pp. 38–53). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, H.
(1960) The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Mätzner, E.
(1860) Englische Grammatik: Vol. 1 Die Lehre vom Worte. Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Nakov, P.
(2013) On the interpretation of noun compounds: Syntax, semantics, and entailment. Natural Language Engineering, 19(3), 291–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noailly, M.
(1990) Le substantif épithète. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Ó Séaghdha, D.
(2007) Designing and evaluating a semantic annotation scheme for compound nouns. Proceedings of the 4th Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL-07). Cambridge University Computer Laboratory, 1–17.Google Scholar
Olsen, S.
(2012) 80. Semantics of compounds. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Volume 3 (pp. 2120–2150). De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirsman, Y., & Geeraerts, D.
(2006) Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3), 269–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pepper, S.
(2002) The TAO of Topic Maps: Finding the way in the age of infoglut. Ontopia.Google Scholar
(2009) The Italian Opera Topic Map (Version 2.1) [Computer software]. Ontopia. http://​bit​.ly​/2iTFZZR
(2020a) The typology and semantics of binominal lexemes: Noun-noun compounds and their functional equivalents [PhD dissertation]. University of Oslo.Google Scholar
(2020b) The Bourquifier: An application for applying the Hatcher-Bourque classification (Version 3) [MS Excel]. http://​folk​.uio​.no​/stevepe​/Bourquifier​.xlsx
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. In K. -U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rainer, F.
(2013) Can relational adjectives really express any relation? An onomasiological perspective. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 10(1), 12–40.Google Scholar
Schifko, P.
(1979) Die Metonymie als universales sprachliches Strukturprinzip. Grazer Linguistische Studien, 10, 240–264.Google Scholar
Søgaard, A.
(2005) Compounding theories and linguistic diversity. In Z. Frajzyngier, A. Hodges, & D. S. Rood (Eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories (pp. 319–337). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Štekauer, P.
(1998) An onomasiological theory of English word-formation. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
(2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. MIT Press.Google Scholar
ten Hacken, P.
(2013) Compounds in English, in French, in Polish, and in general. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 10(1), 97–113.Google Scholar
Tratz, S., & Hovy, E.
(2010) A taxonomy, dataset, and classifier for automatic noun compound interpretation. 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 678–687.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S.
(1969) Précis de sémantique française (4th ed.). Francke.Google Scholar
Warren, B.
(1978) Semantic patterns of noun-noun compounds. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
(1992) Sense developments: A contrastive study of the development of slang senses and novel standard senses in English. (Vol. 80). Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(1999) Aspects of referential metonymy. In K. -U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar