Cover not available
Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 18:2 (2023) ► pp.300–337

A meta-analytic review of morphological priming in Semitic languages

| UCLA Department of Linguistics
| UCLA Department of Linguistics
| UCLA Department of Linguistics
| UCLA Department of Linguistics

Two types of discontinuous morphemes are thought to be the basic building blocks of words in Semitic languages: roots and templates. However, the role of these morphemes in lexical access and representation is debated. Priming experiments, where reaction times to target words are predicted to be faster when preceded by morphologically-related primes compared to unrelated control primes, provide conflicting evidence bearing on this debate. We used meta-analysis to synthesise the findings from 229 priming experiments on 4710 unique Semitic speakers. With Bayesian modelling of the aggregate effect sizes, we found credible root and template priming in both nouns and verbs in Arabic and Hebrew. Our results show that root priming effects can be distinguished from the effects of overlap in form and meaning. However, more experiments are needed to determine if template priming effects can be distinguished from overlap in form and morphosyntactic function.

Keywords: roots, templates, word patterns, Bayesian modelling
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Priming of abstract morphemes in Semitic languages
    • 1.2Is Semitic morphology represented in the mental lexicon?
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Paper identification and selection
    • 2.2Data entry
    • 2.2Derived variables
      • 2.2.1Effect size
      • 2.2.2Standard deviation
    • 2.3Analyses
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Evaluating bias in the morphological priming literature
      • 3.1.1Evidence for selective submission or publication bias
      • 3.1.2No evidence of p-hacking
    • 3.2Overall effect size and methodological factors influencing the size of the priming effect
      • 3.2.1Is there root and template priming?
      • 3.2.2Methodological factors
        • 3.2.2.1Root priming effects are smallest with visual primes, do not vary with masking of the visual prime, and are minimally affected by SOA
        • 3.2.2.2Template priming is affected by SOA but not prime and target modality
        • 3.2.2.3No difference in root or template priming effects found with lexical decision or naming tasks
    • 3.3Substantive effects on root priming
      • 3.3.1Root priming does not differ across word class or language
      • 3.3.2Root priming is independent of both semantic and form overlap
    • 3.4Substantive effects on template priming
      • 3.4.1Verbal templates prime more than nominal templates in both Arabic and Hebrew
      • 3.4.2Mixed evidence that template priming is independent of morphosyntactic overlap
      • 3.4.3Template priming is independent of form overlap
  • 4.General discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 22 December 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.00024.xu
References
Abu-Rabia, S. & Awwad, J.
(2004) Morphological structures in visual word recognition: The case of Arabic. Journal of Research in Reading, 27 (3), 321–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albright, A., & Hayes, B.
(2003) Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition, 90 (2), 119–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Chuang, Y. Y., Shafaei-Bajestan, E., & Blevins, J. P.
(2019) The discriminative lexicon: A unified computational model for the lexicon and lexical processing in comprehension and production grounded not in (de) composition but in linear discriminative learning. Complexity, vol. 20191, Article 4895891. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bat-El, O.
(1994) Stem modification and cluster transfer in Modern Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistics Theory, 12 1, 571–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) The fate of the consonantal root and the binyan in Optimality Theory. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, (32), 31–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentin, S. & Feldman, L. B.
(1990) The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42 (4), 693–711. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, C., Tsuji, S., Piccinini, P. E., Lewis, M. L., Braginsky, M., Frank, M. C. & Cristia, A.
(2018) Promoting replicability in developmental research through meta-analyses: Insights from language acquisition research. Child Development, 89 1, 1996–2009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berent, I. & Pinker, S.
(2007) The dislike of regular plurals in compounds: Phonological or morphological? The Mental Lexicon, 2 (2), 129–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, J. P.
(2016) Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boudelaa, S. & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
(2000) Non-concatenative morphemes in language processing: Evidence from modern standard Arabic. In A. Cutler, J. McQueen, & R. Zondervan (Eds.), Proceedings of SWAP (Workshop on Spoken Word Access Processes) (vol. 11, pp. 23–26). Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
(2005) Discontinuous morphology in time: Incremental masked priming in Arabic. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20 (1), 207–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Productivity and priming: Morphemic decomposition in Arabic. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26 (4–6), 624–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Morphological structure in the Arabic mental lexicon: Parallels between standard and dialectal Arabic. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28 (10), 1453–1473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Structure, form, and meaning in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Arabic. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30 (8), 955–992. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bürkner, P. C.
(2017) brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of statistical software, 80 1, 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. & McClelland, J. L.
(2005) Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition. The Linguistic Review, 22 (2–4), 381–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chuang, Y. Y., Kang, M., Xuefeng, L., & Harald, B. R.
(2021) Vector space morphology with linear discriminative learning. In D. Crepaldi (Ed.), Linguistic morphology in the mind and brain (pp. 167–183). Routledge.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A. & Marcus, G.
(1992) Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition, 45 (3), 225–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creemers, A., Davies, A. G., Wilder, R. J., Tamminga, M., & Embick, D.
(2020) Opacity, transparency, and morphological priming: A study of prefixed verbs in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 110 1, Article 104055. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristia, A.
(2018) Can infants learn phonology in the lab? A meta-analytic answer. Cognition, 170 1, 312–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, A., Frost, R. & Forster, K. I.
(1998) Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24 (5), 1238–1255.Google Scholar
Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A. & Rayner, K.
(2000) Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15 (4–5), 487–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K.
(2005) Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1–2), 341–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dufour, S.
(2008) Phonological priming in auditory word recognition: when both controlled and automatic processes are responsible for the effects. Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 62 (1), 33–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C.
(1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315 (7109), 629–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W.
(2000) Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition, 28 (8), 1277–1288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A.
(1997) What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23 (4), 829–856.Google Scholar
Geary, J. A. & Ussishkin, A.
(2018) Root-letter priming in Maltese visual word recognition. The Mental Lexicon, 13 (1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S.
(2007) Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136 (2), 323–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T., & Ebert, D. D.
(2019) dmetar: Companion R Package for The Guide ‘Doing Meta-Analysis in R’ (Version 0.0. 9000) [Computer software]. [URL]
Heitmeier, M., Chuang, Y. Y., & Baayen, R. H.
(2022) How trial-to-trial learning shapes mappings in the mental lexicon: Modelling Lexical Decision with Linear Discriminative Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.00430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holes, C.
(2004) Modern Arabic: Structures, functions, and varieties. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Kastner, I., Pylkkänen, L., & Marantz, A.
(2018) The form of morphemes: MEG evidence from masked priming of two Hebrew templates. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kastner, I.
(2019) Templatic morphology as an emergent property: Roots and functional heads in Hebrew. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 37 1, 571–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüdecke, D.
(2019) esc: effect size computation for meta analysis (Version 0.5.1) [Computer software]. [URL]
Lukatela, V., Gligorijević, B., Kostić, A., & Turvey, M. T.
(1980) Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory & Cognition, 8 (5), 415–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. J.
(1979) Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Milin, P., Feldman, L. B., Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., & Baayen, R. H.
(2017) Discrimination in lexical decision. PLOS ONE, 12 (2), Article e0171935. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nieder, J., Tomaschek, F., Cohrs, E., & de Vijver, R. V.
(2022) Modelling Maltese noun plural classes without morphemes. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37 (3), 381–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nieder, J., van de Vijver, R., & Mitterer, H.
(2021) Priming Maltese plurals: Representation of sound and broken plurals in the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 16 (1), 69–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perea, M., Gotor, A., Rosa, E., & Algarabel, S.
(1995) Time course of semantic activation for different prime-target pairs in the lexical decision task [Poster presentation]. The 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, USA.
Prunet, J.
(2006) External evidence and the Semitic root. Morphology, 16 (1), 41–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Seidenberg, M. S. & Gonnerman, L. M.
(2000) Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (9), 353–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K.
(2009) Combining estimates of effect size. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 257–277). Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Shalhoub-Awwad, Y.
(2020) The role of nominal word pattern in Arabic reading acquisition: Insights from cross-modal priming. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24 (4), 307–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shalhoub-Awwad, Y., & Leikin, M.
(2016) The lexical status of the root in processing morphologically complex words in Arabic. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20 (4), 296–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slowiaczek, L. M., & Hamburger, M. B.
(1992) Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18 (6), 1239–1250.Google Scholar
Smolka, E., Libben, G., & Dressler, W. U.
(2019) When morphological structure overrides meaning: Evidence from German prefix and particle verbs. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34 (5), 599–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smolka, E., Preller, K. H., & Eulitz, C.
(2014) ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72 1, 16–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sterne, J. A. C., & Egger, M.
(2001) Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 54 (10), 1046–1055. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sterne, J. A. C., & Harbord, R. M.
(2004) Funnel plots in meta-analysis. The Stata Journal, 4 (2), 127–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stockall, L., & Marantz, A.
(2006) A single route, full decompositional model of morphological complexity. The Mental Lexicon, 1 (1), 85–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sundara, M., Zhou, Z. L., Breiss, C., Katsuda, H., & Steffman, J.
(2021) Infants’ developing sensitivity to native language phonotactics: A meta-analysis. Cognition, 221 1, 104993. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taft, M.
(1988) A morphological-decomposition model of lexical representation. Linguistics, 26 (4), 657–667. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 47 (4), 745–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I.
(1975) Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verb Learning and Verb Behavior, 14 (6), 638–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Twist, A. E.
(2006) A psycholinguistic investigation of the verbal morphology of Maltese [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Arizona.
Ussishkin, A.
(1999) The inadequacy of the consonantal root: Modern Hebrew denominal verbs and output–output correspondence. Phonology, 16 (3), 401–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) A fixed prosodic theory of nonconcatenative templatic morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23 (1), 169–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ussishkin, A., Dawson, C. R., Wedel, A., & Schluter, K.
(2015) Auditory masked priming in Maltese spoken word recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30 (9), 1096–1115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasishth, S., Mertzen, D., Jäger, L. A., & Gelman, A.
(2018) The statistical significance filter leads to overoptimistic expectations of replicability. Journal of Memory and Language, 103 1, 151–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar