Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 10:1 (2015) ► pp. 5387
References
Alegre, M., & Gordon, P.
(1996) Red rats eater exposes recursion in children’s word formation. Cognition, 60, 65–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allan, D.
(2004) Oxford placement test 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., Pine, J.M., Rowland, C.F., & Young, C.R.
(2008) The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adults’ graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition, 106, 87–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M.
(1976) Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R., Davidson, D., & Bates, D.
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Banga, A., Hanssen, E., Neijt, A., & Schreuder, R.
(2013) Plurals as modifiers in Dutch and English noun-noun compounds express plurality in production. The Mental Lexicon, 8, 53–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., & Sarkar, D.
(2007) lme4: linear mixed effects models using S4 classes (R package version 0.999999-0).
Berent, I., & Pinker, S.
(2007) The dislike of regular plurals in compounds: Phonological familiarity or morphological constraint? The Mental Lexicon, 2, 129–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Binder, K., Duffy S., & Rayner, K.
(2001) The effects of thematic fit and discourse context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 297–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, H.
(1988) On the morphological parallelism between compounds and constructs. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1988 (pp. 45–66). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Buck-Gengler, C., Menn, L., & Healy, A.
(2004) What “mice trap” tells us about the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 90, 453–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L., Shu, H., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., & Li, P.
(2007) ERP signatures of subject-verb agreement in L2 learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 161–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H.
(1995) German plurals in adult second language development: Evidence for a dual-mechanism model of inflection. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), The Current State of Interlanguage (pp. 123–137). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Almazan, M.
(2001) Compounding and inflection in language impairment: Evidence from Williams Syndrome (and SLI). Lingua, 111, 729–757. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
(2006a) Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006b) How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 564–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Marcus, G., Bartke, S., & Wiese, R.
(1996) Compounding and inflection in German child language. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995 (pp. 115–142). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cunnings, I., & Clahsen, H.
(2007) The time-course of morphological constraints: Evidence from eye-movements during reading. Cognition, 104, 476–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dell, G., Burger, L.K., & Svec, W.R.
(1997) Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, A., & Williams, E.
(1987) On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Felser, C., & Cunnings, I.
(2012) Processing reflexives in a second language: The timing of structural and discourse-level constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 571–603. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Felser, C., Cunnings, I., Batterham, C., & Clahsen, H.
(2012) The timing of island effects in nonnative sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 67–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A.L., & Marchman, V.A.
(2008) Looking while listening: Using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children. In I.A. Sekerina, E.M. Fernandez, & H. Clahsen (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics: Online methods in children’s language processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fiorentino R., Bost, J., Abel, A.D., & Zuccarelli, J.
(2012) The recruitment of knowledge regarding plurality and compound formation during language comprehension. The Mental Lexicon, 7, 34–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M.P.
(2006) Synthetic compounding in the English interlanguage of Basque-Spanish bilinguals. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3, 231–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P.
(1985) Level ordering in lexical development. Cognition, 21, 73–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J.H.
(1966) Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grodner, D., Gibson, E., & Tunstall, S.
(2002) Syntactic complexity in ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 267–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haskell, T.R., MacDonald, M.C., & Seidenberg, M.S.
(2003) Language learning and innateness: Some implications of compounds research. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 119–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heister, J., Würzner, K.-M., Bubenzer, J., Pohl, E., Hanneforth, T., Geyken, A., & Kliegl, R.
(2011) dlexDB – Eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung. Psychologische Rundschau, 62, 10–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, G., & Felser, C.
. (in press). Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Crossref
Jaensch, C., Heyer, V., Gordon, P., & Clahsen, H.
(2014) What plurals and compounds reveal about constraints in word formation. Language Acquisition, 21, 319–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P.
(1982) From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations (part 1). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(1995a) L2 acquisition of English synthetic compounding is not constrained by level-ordering (and neither, probably, is L1). Second Language Research, 11, 20–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995b) ‘Differential’ treatment of regular vs. irregular inflection in compounds as nonevidence for level-ordering. Second Language Research, 11, 267–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S.
(1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J.
(2006) Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G.
(1995) L2 learners treat regular and irregular inflection differently in compounding. Second Language Research, 11, 88–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mirman, D., Dixon, J.A., & Magnuson, J.S.
(2008) Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 475–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, V.
(2000) Compounding and the representation of L2 inflectional morphology. Language Learning, 50, 153–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, V.A., & Hayes, J.
(2010) Processing English compounds in the first and second language: The influence of the middle morpheme. Language Learning, 60, 194–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oetting, J.B., & Rice, M.L.
(1993) Plural acquisition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36, 1236–1248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1999) Words and rules: The ingredients of language. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team
(2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 
R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (URL http://​www​.R​-project​.org).
Ramscar, M., & Dye, M.
(2010) Learning language from the input: Why innate constraints can’t explain noun compounding. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L., & Felser, C.
(2011) Plausibility and recovery from garden-paths in second-language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 299–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sabourin, L.L., & Haverkort, M.
(2003) Neural substrates of representation and processing of a second language. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, & R.J. Towell (Eds.), The Lexicon-Syntax Interface in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 175–195). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M.S., MacDonald, M.C., & Haskell, T.R.
(2007) Semantics and phonology constrain compound formation. The Mental Lexicon, 2, 287–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E.
(1982) The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Senghas, A., Kim, J.J., Pinker, S., & Collins, C.
(2005) The plurals-in-compounds effect. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Barnard College.Google Scholar
Silva R., Gerth, S., & Clahsen, H.
(2013) Morphological constraints in children’s spoken language comprehension: A visual world study of plurals inside compounds in English. Cognition, 129, 457–469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spivey, M.J., Tanenhaus, M.K., Eberhard, K.M., & Sedivy, J.C.
(2002) Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 447–481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, D.J., & Bever, T.G.
(2001) Sentence Comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Trueswell, J.C.
(2008) Using eye movements as a developmental measure within psycholinguistics. In I.A. Sekerina, E.M. Fernández, & H. Clahsen (Eds.), Developmental Psycholinguistics: On-line methods in children’s language processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, J., & Papafragou, A.
(2010) Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 64–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H.K.J., & Christian, V.
(2000) Lexical word formation in children with grammatical SLI: A grammar-specific versus input-processing deficit? Cognition, 75, 33–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiese, R.
(1996) Phrasal compounds and the theory of word syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 27, 183–193.Google Scholar
Zukowski, A.
(2005) Knowledge of constraints on compounding in children and adolescents with Williams syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 79–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Clahsen, Harald & Claudia Felser
2018. SOME NOTES ON THE SHALLOW STRUCTURE HYPOTHESIS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:3  pp. 693 ff. Crossref logo
FARHY, YAEL, JOÃO VERÍSSIMO & HARALD CLAHSEN
2018. Do late bilinguals access pure morphology during word recognition? A masked-priming study on Hebrew as a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21:5  pp. 945 ff. Crossref logo
Heyer, Vera & Dana Kornishova
2018. Semantic transparency affects morphological priming . . . eventually. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71:5  pp. 1112 ff. Crossref logo
Jessen, Anna, João Veríssimo & Harald Clahsen
2018. Variability and consistency in late bilinguals’ morphology. The Mental Lexicon 13:2  pp. 186 ff. Crossref logo
Song, Yoonsang, Youngah Do, Arthur L. Thompson, Eileen R. Waegemaekers & Jongbong Lee
2020. SECOND LANGUAGE USERS EXHIBIT SHALLOW MORPHOLOGICAL PROCESSING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
VERÍSSIMO, JOÃO
2016. Extending a Gradient Symbolic approach to the native versus non-native contrast: The case of plurals in compounds. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19:5  pp. 900 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.