Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 10:2 (2015) ► pp. 186220
References
Alario, F.X., & Caramazza, A
(2002) The production of determiners: Evidence from French. Cognition, 821, 179–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arad, M
2003Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 211, 737–778. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M
(1994) Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloem, I., & La Heij, W
(2003) Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 481, 468–488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J.K
(1995) Producing agreement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 81, 56–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J.K., & Cutting, J.C
(1992) Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 311, 99–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J.K., & Eberhard, K.M
(1993) Meaning, sound and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 81, 57–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J.K., Eberhard, K.M., & Cutting, J.C
(2004) Producing number agreement: How pronouns equal verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 511, 251–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J.K., & Miller, C.A
(1991) Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 231, 45–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bordag, D., & Pechmann, T
(2008) Grammatical gender in speech production: Evidence from Czech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 371, 69–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A
(1997) How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 141, 177–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., Miozzo, M., Costa, A., Schiller, N.O., & Alario, F.X
(2001) Lexical selection: A cross-language investigation of determiner production. In E. Dupoux (Ed.), Language, brain, and cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler (pp. 209–226). 
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, G.G
(1991) Gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Kovacic, D., Fedorenko, E., & Caramazza, A
(2003) The gender congruency effect and the selection of freestanding and bound morphemes: Evidence from Croatian. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 291, 1270–1282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Sebastian-Galles, N., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A
(1999) The gender congruity effect: Evidence from Spanish and Catalan. Language and Cognitive Processes, 141, 381–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cubelli, R., Lotto, L., Girelli, M., Paolieri, D., & Job, R
(2005) Grammatical gender is selected in bare noun production: Evidence from the picture–word interference paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 531, 42–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cutting, J.C., & Ferrerira, V.S
(1999) Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 251, 318–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Damian, M.F., & Martin, R.C
(1999) Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 251, 345–361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dank, M., & Deutsch, A
(2010) The role of morpho-phonological factors in subject–predicate gender agreement in Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 251, 1380–1410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dell, G
(1986) Spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 931, 283–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dell, G.S. & O’Seaghdha, P.G
(1992) Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 421, 287–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, A
in press). The separability of morphological processes from semantic meaning and syntactic class in production of single words: Evidence from the Hebrew root morpheme. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. Crossref
(2014) The role of roots and word-pattern morphemes in single-word production in Hebrew. Paper presented in: An international conference on the cross-linguistic comparison of Indo-Germanic and semitic languages: “The stuff words are made of “Konstanz, Germany.
Deutsch, A., & Dank, M
(2011) Symmetric and asymmetric patterns of attraction errors in producing subject–predicate agreement in Hebrew: An issue of morphological structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 261, 24–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, A., & Meir, A
(2011) The role of the root morpheme in mediating word production in Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 261, 716–744. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K
(2000) Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language & Cognitive Processes, 151, 487–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, K.M
(1997) The marked effect of number on subject-verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 361, 147–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Finocchiaro, G., Alario, F.X., Schiller, N.O., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A
(2011) Gender congruency goes Europe: A cross-linguistic study of the gender congruency effect in Romance and Germanic languages. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 231, 161–198.Google Scholar
Foucart, A., Branigan, H., & Bard, E
(2010) Determiner congruency effect in Romance languages: Evidence from French. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 36 (6), 1414–1421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., Antón-Méndez, I., Collina, S., & Frauenfelder, U.H
(2008) The interplay of syntax and form in sentence production: A cross-linguistic study of form effects on agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 231, 329–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Biran, M
(2003) When is gender accessed? A study of paraphasias in Hebrew anomia. Cortex, 391, 441–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R
(2012) Towards a universal model of reading. Target article. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 351, 263–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., Forster, K.I., & Deutsch, A
(1997) What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew: A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 231, 829–856. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., & Plaut, D
(2005) The word-frequency database for printed Hebrew. Available: http://​word​-freq​.mscc​.huji​.ac​.il/.
Garrett, M.F
(1988) Processes in language production. In F.J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The cambridge curvey, III: Language, psychological, and biological aspects (pp. 69–96), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldrick, M., & Blumstein, S.E
(2006) Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 211, 649–683. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gollan T., & Frost, R
(2001) The syntactic route to grammatical gender. Journal Of Psycholinguistic Research, 301, 627–651. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T.H., & Silverberg, N.B
(2001) Tip-of-the-tongue states in Hebrew-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 41, 63–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gough, P.B
(1996) How children learn to read and why they fail. Annals of Dyslexia, 461, 3–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hantsch, A., Jeschaniak, J.D., & Schriefers, H
(2009) Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture–word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 351, 1443–1453. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, G.W., Lloyd-Jones, T.J., & Fias, W
(1995) Semantic interference effects on naming using a postcue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 211, 961–980. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jescheniak, J.D., Schriefers, H., & Hantsch, A
(2001) Semantic and phonological activation in noun and pronoun production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 271, 1058–1078. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jescheniak, J.D., Schriefers, H., & Lemhöfer, K
(2014) Selection of freestanding and bound gender-morphemes in speech production: A review. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 291, 684–694. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kolan, L., Leiken, M., & Zwitserlood, P
(2011) Morphological processing and lexical access in speech production in Hebrew: Evidence from picture–word interference. Journal of Memory and Language, 651, 286–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
La Heij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J., & Willeboordse, E
(1998) The gender-congruency effect in picture-word tasks. Psychological Research, 611, 209–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., Schriefers, H., & Jescheniak, J.D
(2006) The processing of free and bound gender-marked morphemes in speech production: Evidence from Dutch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 321, 437–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M
(1992) Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 421, 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S
(1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 221, 1–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorimor, H., Bock, K., Zalkind, E., Sheyman, A., & Beard, R
(2008) Agreement and attraction in Russian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 231, 769–799. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malinovitch, T. & Deutsch, A
(2014) The role of the nominal-pattern morpheme in lexical access during speech production in Hebrew: Evidence from the picture-word-interference paradigm. Poster presented at the Israeli society for sognitive psychology, Acre, Israel.Google Scholar
Meir, I
(2006) Morphological levels and diachronic change in modern Hebrew plural formation. Studies in Language, 301, 777–806. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A.S
(1996) Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 351, 477–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A
(1997) Retrieval of lexical-syntactic features in tip-of-the-tongue states. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 231, 1410–1423. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 251, 907–922. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Rourke P
(2007) The gender congruency effect in bare noun production in Spanish. In Brewer, J., O’rourke, P., & Richtsmeier, P. (Eds.), Coyote papers: Working papers in linguistics, 15, University of Arizona Linguistics Circle, 66–89.Google Scholar
Paolieri, D., Lotto, L., Morales, L., Bajo, T., Cubelli, R., & Job, R
(2010) Grammatical gender processing in Romance languages: Evidence from bare noun production in Italian and Spanish. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 221, 335–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perea, M., & Lupker, S.J
(2004) Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 511, 231–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R., & Carreiras, M
(2010) The search of an input coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 171, 375–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, E
(1993) Where is gender? Linguistic Inquiry, 241, 795–803.Google Scholar
Roelofs, A
(1992) A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 421, 107–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Serial order in planning the production of successive morphemes of a word. Journal of Memory and Language, 351, 854–876. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 641, 249–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, N.O., & Caramazza, A
(2003) Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 481, 169–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, N.O., & Costa, A
(2006) Different selection principles of freestanding and bound morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 321, 1201–1207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, N.O., Fikkert, P., & Levelt, C.C
(2004) Stress priming in picture naming. Brain and Language, 901, 231–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J
(2004) Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 191, 333–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schriefers, H
(1993) Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 191, 841–850. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schriefers, H., Jescheniak, J.D., & Hantsch, A
(2002) Determiner selection in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 281, 941–950. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Selection of gender marked morphemes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 311, 159–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schriefers, H., Meyer, A.S., & Levelt, W.J.M
(1990) Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture–word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 291, 86–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E
(2000) Grammatical gender in noun phrase production: The gender interference effect in German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 261, 1368–1377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzwald (Rodrigue), O
(2002) Studies in Hebrew morphology. Tel Aviv: The Open University of Israel (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Shimron, J
(2006) Reading Hebrew: The language and the psychology of reading it. New York: Erlbaum. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Starreveld, P.A., & La Heij, W
(1996) Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 221, 896–918. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Velan, H., & Frost, R
(2007) Cambridge University vs. Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 141, 913–918. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 611, 285–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Velan, H., Deutsch, A., & Frost, R
(2013) The flexibility of letter-position flexibility: evidence from eye-movements in reading Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 391, 1143–1152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Antonini, A., & Garrett, M.F
(1997) Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science, 81, 314–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Garrett, M.F
(1996) Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: Differences in the role of conceptual constraints. Cognition, 611, 261–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Semenza, C
(1995) Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 341, 186–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zandvoort, R.W
(1961) Varia syntactica. In Language and society: Essays presented to Arthur M. Jensen on His 70th Birthday. Copenhagen: Det Berlins Bogtrykkeri.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Deutsch, Avital & Maya Dank
2019. Morphological structure mediates the notional meaning of gender marking: Evidence from the gender-congruency effect in Hebrew speech production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72:3  pp. 389 ff. Crossref logo
Deutsch, Avital, Hadas Velan, Yiska Merzbach & Tamar Michaly
2021. The dependence of root extraction in a non-concatenated morphology on the word-specific orthographic context. Journal of Memory and Language 116  pp. 104182 ff. Crossref logo
Sá-Leite, Ana Rita, Juan Haro, Montserrat Comesaña & Isabel Fraga
2021. Of Beavers and Tables: The Role of Animacy in the Processing of Grammatical Gender Within a Picture-Word Interference Task. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Sá-Leite, Ana Rita, Karlos Luna, Ângela Tomaz, Isabel Fraga & Montserrat Comesaña
2022. The mechanisms underlying grammatical gender selection in language production: A meta-analysis of the gender congruency effect. Cognition 224  pp. 105060 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.