Cover not available
Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 10:2 (2015) ► pp.186–220

Morphological structure governs the process of accessing grammatical gender in the course of production

The present study investigated the process of accessing gender information when producing inanimate nouns in Hebrew. The Picture Word Interference paradigm was used to manipulate gender congruency between target pictures and spoken distractors. Naming latency and accuracy were measured. The gender congruency effect has been tested in various Indo-European languages, with mixed results. It seems to depend on both language-specific attributes and the syntactic context of the utterance. Speakers’ insensitivity to gender congruency was observed at 3 SOAs (Experiment 1a–1c). Neither the production of bare nouns (Experiments 1 & 3) nor gender-marked NPs (Experiment 2) elicited the effect. Nevertheless, the same procedure and targets revealed a semantic effect. The present findings in Hebrew deviate from previous results obtained with Indo-European languages. The results are discussed in connection with Hebrew’s nonconcatenative morphological features and the way linguistic characteristics govern the organizational principles of the mental lexicon and lexical access.

Keywords: gender effect in production, gender effect in Hebrew, picture word interference, gender congruency effect
Published online: 11 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.10.2.02dan
References
Alario, F.X., & Caramazza, A
(2002) The production of determiners: Evidence from French. Cognition, 821, 179–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arad, M
2003 Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 211, 737–778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M
(1994) Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloem, I., & La Heij, W
(2003) Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 481, 468–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, J.K
(1995) Producing agreement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 81, 56–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, J.K., & Cutting, J.C
(1992) Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 311, 99–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, J.K., & Eberhard, K.M
(1993) Meaning, sound and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 81, 57–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, J.K., Eberhard, K.M., & Cutting, J.C
(2004) Producing number agreement: How pronouns equal verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 511, 251–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, J.K., & Miller, C.A
(1991) Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 231, 45–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bordag, D., & Pechmann, T
(2008) Grammatical gender in speech production: Evidence from Czech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 371, 69–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A
(1997) How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 141, 177–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., Miozzo, M., Costa, A., Schiller, N.O., & Alario, F.X
(2001) Lexical selection: A cross-language investigation of determiner production. In E. Dupoux (Ed.), Language, brain, and cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler (pp. 209–226). 
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, G.G
(1991) Gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Kovacic, D., Fedorenko, E., & Caramazza, A
(2003) The gender congruency effect and the selection of freestanding and bound morphemes: Evidence from Croatian. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 291, 1270–1282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Sebastian-Galles, N., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A
(1999) The gender congruity effect: Evidence from Spanish and Catalan. Language and Cognitive Processes, 141, 381–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cubelli, R., Lotto, L., Girelli, M., Paolieri, D., & Job, R
(2005) Grammatical gender is selected in bare noun production: Evidence from the picture–word interference paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 531, 42–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutting, J.C., & Ferrerira, V.S
(1999) Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 251, 318–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damian, M.F., & Martin, R.C
(1999) Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 251, 345–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dank, M., & Deutsch, A
(2010) The role of morpho-phonological factors in subject–predicate gender agreement in Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 251, 1380–1410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dell, G
(1986) Spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 931, 283–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dell, G.S. & O’Seaghdha, P.G
(1992) Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 421, 287–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, A
in press). The separability of morphological processes from semantic meaning and syntactic class in production of single words: Evidence from the Hebrew root morpheme. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. DOI logo
(2014) The role of roots and word-pattern morphemes in single-word production in Hebrew. Paper presented in: An international conference on the cross-linguistic comparison of Indo-Germanic and semitic languages: “The stuff words are made of “Konstanz, Germany.
Deutsch, A., & Dank, M
(2011) Symmetric and asymmetric patterns of attraction errors in producing subject–predicate agreement in Hebrew: An issue of morphological structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 261, 24–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, A., & Meir, A
(2011) The role of the root morpheme in mediating word production in Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 261, 716–744. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K
(2000) Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language & Cognitive Processes, 151, 487–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, K.M
(1997) The marked effect of number on subject-verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 361, 147–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finocchiaro, G., Alario, F.X., Schiller, N.O., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A
(2011) Gender congruency goes Europe: A cross-linguistic study of the gender congruency effect in Romance and Germanic languages. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 231, 161–198.Google Scholar
Foucart, A., Branigan, H., & Bard, E
(2010) Determiner congruency effect in Romance languages: Evidence from French. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 36 (6), 1414–1421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., Antón-Méndez, I., Collina, S., & Frauenfelder, U.H
(2008) The interplay of syntax and form in sentence production: A cross-linguistic study of form effects on agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 231, 329–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Biran, M
(2003) When is gender accessed? A study of paraphasias in Hebrew anomia. Cortex, 391, 441–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frost, R
(2012) Towards a universal model of reading. Target article. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 351, 263–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., Forster, K.I., & Deutsch, A
(1997) What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew: A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 231, 829–856. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., & Plaut, D
(2005) The word-frequency database for printed Hebrew. Available: [URL].
Garrett, M.F
(1988) Processes in language production. In F.J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The cambridge curvey, III: Language, psychological, and biological aspects (pp. 69–96), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldrick, M., & Blumstein, S.E
(2006) Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 211, 649–683. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gollan T., & Frost, R
(2001) The syntactic route to grammatical gender. Journal Of Psycholinguistic Research, 301, 627–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T.H., & Silverberg, N.B
(2001) Tip-of-the-tongue states in Hebrew-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 41, 63–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gough, P.B
(1996) How children learn to read and why they fail. Annals of Dyslexia, 461, 3–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hantsch, A., Jeschaniak, J.D., & Schriefers, H
(2009) Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture–word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 351, 1443–1453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, G.W., Lloyd-Jones, T.J., & Fias, W
(1995) Semantic interference effects on naming using a postcue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 211, 961–980. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jescheniak, J.D., Schriefers, H., & Hantsch, A
(2001) Semantic and phonological activation in noun and pronoun production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 271, 1058–1078. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jescheniak, J.D., Schriefers, H., & Lemhöfer, K
(2014) Selection of freestanding and bound gender-morphemes in speech production: A review. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 291, 684–694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolan, L., Leiken, M., & Zwitserlood, P
(2011) Morphological processing and lexical access in speech production in Hebrew: Evidence from picture–word interference. Journal of Memory and Language, 651, 286–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
La Heij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J., & Willeboordse, E
(1998) The gender-congruency effect in picture-word tasks. Psychological Research, 611, 209–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., Schriefers, H., & Jescheniak, J.D
(2006) The processing of free and bound gender-marked morphemes in speech production: Evidence from Dutch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 321, 437–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M
(1992) Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 421, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S
(1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 221, 1–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorimor, H., Bock, K., Zalkind, E., Sheyman, A., & Beard, R
(2008) Agreement and attraction in Russian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 231, 769–799. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malinovitch, T. & Deutsch, A
(2014) The role of the nominal-pattern morpheme in lexical access during speech production in Hebrew: Evidence from the picture-word-interference paradigm. Poster presented at the Israeli society for sognitive psychology, Acre, Israel.Google Scholar
Meir, I
(2006) Morphological levels and diachronic change in modern Hebrew plural formation. Studies in Language, 301, 777–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A.S
(1996) Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 351, 477–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A
(1997) Retrieval of lexical-syntactic features in tip-of-the-tongue states. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 231, 1410–1423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 251, 907–922. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Rourke P
(2007) The gender congruency effect in bare noun production in Spanish. In Brewer, J., O’rourke, P., & Richtsmeier, P. (Eds.), Coyote papers: Working papers in linguistics, 15, University of Arizona Linguistics Circle, 66–89.Google Scholar
Paolieri, D., Lotto, L., Morales, L., Bajo, T., Cubelli, R., & Job, R
(2010) Grammatical gender processing in Romance languages: Evidence from bare noun production in Italian and Spanish. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 221, 335–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perea, M., & Lupker, S.J
(2004) Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 511, 231–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R., & Carreiras, M
(2010) The search of an input coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 171, 375–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritter, E
(1993) Where is gender? Linguistic Inquiry, 241, 795–803.Google Scholar
Roelofs, A
(1992) A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 421, 107–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Serial order in planning the production of successive morphemes of a word. Journal of Memory and Language, 351, 854–876. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 641, 249–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiller, N.O., & Caramazza, A
(2003) Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 481, 169–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiller, N.O., & Costa, A
(2006) Different selection principles of freestanding and bound morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 321, 1201–1207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiller, N.O., Fikkert, P., & Levelt, C.C
(2004) Stress priming in picture naming. Brain and Language, 901, 231–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J
(2004) Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 191, 333–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schriefers, H
(1993) Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 191, 841–850. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schriefers, H., Jescheniak, J.D., & Hantsch, A
(2002) Determiner selection in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 281, 941–950. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Selection of gender marked morphemes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 311, 159–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schriefers, H., Meyer, A.S., & Levelt, W.J.M
(1990) Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture–word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 291, 86–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E
(2000) Grammatical gender in noun phrase production: The gender interference effect in German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 261, 1368–1377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarzwald (Rodrigue), O
(2002) Studies in Hebrew morphology. Tel Aviv: The Open University of Israel (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Shimron, J
(2006) Reading Hebrew: The language and the psychology of reading it. New York: Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starreveld, P.A., & La Heij, W
(1996) Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 221, 896–918. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velan, H., & Frost, R
(2007) Cambridge University vs. Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 141, 913–918. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 611, 285–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velan, H., Deutsch, A., & Frost, R
(2013) The flexibility of letter-position flexibility: evidence from eye-movements in reading Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 391, 1143–1152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Antonini, A., & Garrett, M.F
(1997) Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science, 81, 314–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Garrett, M.F
(1996) Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: Differences in the role of conceptual constraints. Cognition, 611, 261–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Semenza, C
(1995) Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 341, 186–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zandvoort, R.W
(1961) Varia syntactica. In Language and society: Essays presented to Arthur M. Jensen on His 70th Birthday. Copenhagen: Det Berlins Bogtrykkeri.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Dank, Maya & Avital Deutsch
2023. Phonological instantiation of grammatical gender in the course of production is sensitive to words’ internal structure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 76:8 ► pp. 1760 ff. DOI logo
Deutsch, Avital & Maya Dank
2019. Morphological structure mediates the notional meaning of gender marking: Evidence from the gender-congruency effect in Hebrew speech production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72:3 ► pp. 389 ff. DOI logo
Deutsch, Avital, Hadas Velan, Yiska Merzbach & Tamar Michaly
2021. The dependence of root extraction in a non-concatenated morphology on the word-specific orthographic context. Journal of Memory and Language 116 ► pp. 104182 ff. DOI logo
Sá-Leite, Ana Rita, Montserrat Comesaña, Carlos Acuña-Fariña & Isabel Fraga
2023. A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of “in/animates”. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Sá-Leite, Ana Rita, Juan Haro, Montserrat Comesaña & Isabel Fraga
2021. Of Beavers and Tables: The Role of Animacy in the Processing of Grammatical Gender Within a Picture-Word Interference Task. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Sá-Leite, Ana Rita, Karlos Luna, Ângela Tomaz, Isabel Fraga & Montserrat Comesaña
2022. The mechanisms underlying grammatical gender selection in language production: A meta-analysis of the gender congruency effect. Cognition 224 ► pp. 105060 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.