Emotional arousal and lexical specificity modulate response times differently depending on ear of presentation in a dichotic listening task
We investigated possible hemispheric differences in the processing of four different lexical semantic categories: SPECIFIC (e.g. bird), GENERAL (e.g. animal), ABSTRACT (e.g. advice), and EMOTIONAL (e.g. love). These wordtypes were compared using a dichotic listening paradigm and a semantic category classification task. Response times (RTs) were measured when participants classified testwords as concrete or abstract. In line with previous findings, words were expected to be processed faster following right-ear presentation. However, lexical specificity and emotional arousal were predicted to modulate response times differently depending on the ear of presentation. For left-ear presentation, relatively faster RTs were predicted for SPECIFIC and EMOTIONAL words as opposed to GENERAL and ABSTRACT words. An interaction of ear and wordtype was found. For right-ear presentation, RTs increased as testwords’ imageability decreased along the span SPECIFIC–GENERAL–EMOTIONAL–ABSTRACT. In contrast, for left ear presentation, EMOTIONAL words were processed fastest, while SPECIFIC words gave rise to long RTs on par with those for ABSTRACT words. Thus, the prediction for EMOTIONAL words presented in the left ear was borne out, whereas the prediction for SPECIFIC words was not. This might be related to previously found differences in processing of stimuli at a global or local level.
References
Altarriba, J., Bauer, L.M., & Benvenuto, C
(
1999)
Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words.
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31>1, 578–602.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Altarriba, J., & Bauer, L.M
(
2004)
The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words.
The American Journal of Psychology, 117(3), 389–410.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bayazıt, O., Öniz, A., Hahn, C., Güntürkün, O., & Özgören, M
(
2009)
Dichotic listening revisited: Trial-by-trial ERP analyses reveal intra- and interhemispheric differences.
Neuropsychologia, 47 (2), 536–545.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Binder, J.R., Westbury, C., McKiernan, K.A., Possing, E.T., & Medler, D.A
(
2005)
Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 (6), 905–917.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borod, J.C., Andelman, F., Obler, L.K., Tweedy, J.R., & Wilkowitz, J
(
1992)
Right hemisphere specialization for the identification of emotional words and sentences: Evidence from stroke patients.
Neuropsychologia, 30 (9), 827–844.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brännström, K.J., & Grenner, J
(
2008a)
Long-term measurement of binaural intensity matches and pitch matches.
I. Normal hearing. International Journal of Audiology, 47 (2), 59–66.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brännström, K.J, & Grenner, J
(
2008b)
Clinical application of long-term intensity and pitch matches in fluctuating low-frequency hearing loss.
International Journal of Audiology, 47 (7), 412–419.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buchanan, T.W., Lutz, K., Mirzazade, S., Specht, K., Shah, N.J., Zilles, K., & Jäncke, L
(
2000)
Recognition of emotional prosody and verbal components of spoken language: an fMRI study.
Cognitive Brain Research, 9 (3), 227–238.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coltheart, M
(
1981)
The MRC psycholinguistic database.
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33 (4), 497–505.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crutch, S.J., & Warrington, E.K
(
2003)
Preservation of propositional speech in a pure anomic: The importance of an abstract vocabulary.
Neurocase, 9 (6), 465–481.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ely, P.W., Graves, R.E., & Potter, S.M
(
1989)
Dichotic listening indices of right hemisphere semantic processing.
Neuropsychologia, 27 (7), 1007–1015.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ejerhed, E., Källgren, G., Wennstedt, O., & Åström, M
1992 The linguistic annotation system of the Stockholm-Umeå corpus roject.
Tech. rep. 331, Department of General Linguistics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fink, G.R., Halligan, P.W., Marshall, J.C., Frith, C.D., Frackowiak, R.S.J., & Dolan, R.J
(
1996)
Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? Nature, 382 (6592), 626–628.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fink, G.R., Marshall, J.C., & Halligan, P.W
(
2000)
Neuronal activity in early visual areas during global and local processing: A comment on Heinze, Hinrichs, Scholz, Burchert, and Mangun.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (2), 355–356.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Han, S., Weaver, J.A., Murray, S.O., Kang, X., & Yund, E.W
(
2002)
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Global/Local Processing: Effects of stimulus position and spatial frequency.
NeuroImage, 171, 1290–1299.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F
(
2004)
Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex.
Human Brain Mapping, 21 (3), 191–201.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D
(
2007)
The cortical organization of speech processing.
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8 (5), 393–402.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hugdahl, K
(
2000)
Lateralization of cognitive processes in the brain.
Acta Psychologica, 105 (2–3), 211–235.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khader, P.H., Jost, K., Mertens, M., Bien, S., & Rösler, F
(
2010)
Neural correlates of generating visual nouns and motor verbs in a minimal phrase context.
Brain Research, 1318 (C), 122–132.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kimura, D
(
1967)
Functional Asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening.
Cortex, 3 (2), 163–178.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kousta, S.-T., Vinson, D.P., & Vigliocco, G
(
2009)
Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words.
Cognition, 112 (3), 473–481.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D.P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E
(
2011)
The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140 (1), 14–34.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laeng, B., Zarrinpar, A., & Kosslyn, S.M
(
2003)
Do separate processes identify objects as exemplars versus members of basic-level categories? Evidence from hemispheric specialization.
Brain and Cognition, 53 (1), 15–27.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ley, R.G., & Bryden, M.P
(
1982)
A dissociation of right and left hemispheric effects for recognizing emotional tone and verbal content.
Brain and Cognition, 1 (1), 3–9.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mårtensson, F., Roll, M., Apt, P., & Horne, M
(
2011)
Modeling the meaning of words: Neural correlates of abstract and concrete noun processing.
Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 711, 455–478.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mårtensson, F., Roll, M., Lindgren, M., Apt, P., & Horne, M
(
2014)
Sensory-specific anomic aphasia following left occipital lesions: Data from free oral descriptions of concrete word meanings.
Neurocase, 20 (2), 192–207.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McFarland, K., McFarland, M.L., Bain, J.D., & Ashton, R
(
1978)
Ear differences of abstract and concrete word recognition.
Neuropsychologia, 161, 555–561.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Navon, D
(
1977)
Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception.
Cognitive Psychology, 9 (3), 353–383.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oldfield, R.C
(
1971)
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory.
Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oliveira, J., Perea, M.V., Ladera, V., & Gamito, P
(
2013)
The roles of word concreteness and cognitive load on interhemispheric processes of recognition.
Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 18 (2), 203–215.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paivio, A
(
1990)
Mental representations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Preacher, K.J
(
2001,
April).
Calculation for the chi-square test: An interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fit and independence [Computer software]. Available from
[URL].
Prior, M.R., Cumming, G., & Hendy, J
(
1984)
Recognition of abstract and concrete words in a dichotic listening paradigm.
Cortex, 20 (1), 149–157.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pujol, J., Deus, J., Losilla, J.M., & Capdevila, A
(
1999)
Cerebral lateralization of language in normal left-handed people studied by functional MRI.
Neurology, 52 (5), 1038–1038.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robertson, L.C., & Lamb, M.R
(
1991)
Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization.
Cognitive Psychology, 231, 299–330.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roll, M., Mårtensson, F., Sikström, S., Apt, P., Arnling-Bååth, R., & Horne, M
(
2012)
Atypical associations to abstract words in Broca’s aphasia.
Cortex, 48 (8), 1068–1072.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., & Boyes-Braem, P
(
1976)
Basic objects in natural categories.
Cognitive Psychology, 8 (3), 382–439.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rutten, G.J.M., Ramsey, N.F., van Rijen, P.C., Alpherts, W.C., & van Veelen, C.W.M
(
2002)
fMRI-determined language ateralization in patients with inilateral or mixed language dominance according to the wada test.
NeuroImage, 17 (1), 447–460.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sabsevitz, D.S., Medler, D.A., Seidenberg, M., & Binder, J.R
(
2005)
Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability.
NeuroImage, 27 (1), 188–200.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sandberg, C., & Kiran, S
(
2014)
Analysis of abstract and concrete word processing in persons with aphasia and age-matched neurologically healthy adults using fMRI.
Neurocase, 20 (4), 361–388.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wada, J., & Rasmussen, T
(
1960)
Intracarotid injection of sodium amythal for the lateralization of cerebral speech dominance: Experimental and clinical observations.
Journal of Neurosurgery, 171, 266–282.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Warrington, E.K
(
1975)
The selective impairment of semantic memory.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27 (4), 635–657.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westbury, C., & Moroschan, G
Westbury, C.F., Shaoul, C., Hollis, G., Smithson, L., Briesemeister, B.B., Hofmann, M.J., &
Jacobs, A.M
(
2013)
Now you see it, now you don’t: On emotion, context, & the algorithmic prediction of human imageability judgments.
Frontiers in Psychology, 41, 991.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yasin, I
(
2007)
Hemispheric differences in processing dichotic meaningful and non-meaningful words.
Neuropsychologia, 45 (12), 2718–2729.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Blomberg, Frida, Mikael Roll, Johan Frid, Magnus Lindgren & Merle Horne
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.