Cover not available
Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 10:2 (2015) ► pp.271–285

Lexical access in mild cognitive impairment

The effects of context

We examined the use of sentence context in lexical processing in aging and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Younger and older adults and participants with MCI completed a lexical decision task in which target words were primed by sentences biasing a related or unrelated word (e.g., prime: “The baby put the spoon in his ______”, biased word: “mouth”, related target: “KISS”, unrelated target: “LEASH”). Biased items were of high or low frequency. All participants responded more quickly when the biased word was of high than low frequency, regardless of whether the target and biased word were related. Frequency effects were stronger in related than unrelated stimuli, and MCI participants – but not controls – responded more slowly when the target was related to a low-frequency word than when it was unrelated. We hypothesize that this effect results from slowed lexical activation in MCI: low frequency expected words are not completely activated when the target word is presented, leading to increased competition between the expected and target items, and resultant slowing in lexical decision on the target. These results indicate that MCI participants can use contextual information to make predictions about upcoming lexical items, and that information about lexical associations remains available in MCI.

Keywords: mild cognitive impairment, sentence context, lexical access, associative priming
Published online: 11 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.10.2.05tal
References
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H
(1993) The CELEX Lexical database (Release 1) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania [Distributor].Google Scholar
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., & ­Treiman, R
(2002) The English Lexicon project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords [Electronic database].
Bush, A. L., Allen, P. A., Kaut, K. P., & Ogrocki, P. K
(2007) Influence of mild cognitive impairment on visual word recognition. Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition, 141, 329–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chertkow, H
(2002) Mild cognitive impairment. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 151, 401–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M
(1981) The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 331, 497–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A
(2000) California verbal learning test-second edition: Adult version manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Duong, A., Whitehead, V., Hanratty, K., & Chertkow, H
(2006) The nature of lexico-semantic processing deficits in mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia, 44(10), 1928–1935. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Duchek, J. M., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Smith, S
(1997) Inhibitory control during sentence comprehension in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Brain and Language, 571, 225–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glosser, G., & Friedman, R. B
(1991) Lexical but not semantic priming in Alzheimer’s disease. Psychology and Aging, 6(4), 522–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glosser, G., Friedman, R. B., Grugan, P. K., Lee, J. H., & Grossman, M
(1998) Lexical semantic and associative priming in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 12(2), 218–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. A
(1948) A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 381, 404–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, K. A
(2003) Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? 
A microanalytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(4), 785–813. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, E. F., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S
(1983) Boston naming test. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Madden, D. J
(1988) Adult age differences in the effects of sentence context and stimulus degradation during visual word recognition. Psychology and Aging, 31, 167–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bedirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., ­Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H
(2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 531, 695–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A
(1998) The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. from [URL]
Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G., & Kokmen, E
(1999) Mild cognitive impairment: Clinical characterization and outcome. Archives of Neurology, 561, 303–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, S. L., & Friedman, R. B
(2008) The underlying mechanisms of semantic memory loss in Alzheimer’s disease and semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia, 46(1), 12–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, T. J., Federmeier, K. D., Van Petten, C., Salmon, D. P., & Kutas, M
(2003) Electrophysiological analysis of context effects in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 17(2), 187–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommers, M. S., & Danielson, S. M
(1999) Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: The interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. Psychology and Aging, 141, 458–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F
(1983) On priming by a sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 1121, 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taler, V., & Jarema, G
(2006) On-line lexical processing in AD and MCI: An early measure of cognitive impairment? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 191, 38–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taler, V., & Phillips, N. A
(2008) Language performance in Alzheimer’s disease and mild ­cognitive impairment: A comparative review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 301, 501–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E., & Gold, C
(1963) Stimulus information and contextual information as determinants of tachistoscopic recognition of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 661, 319–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J
(2012) Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 831, 176–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D
(1997) Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-III). San Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wlotko, E. W., Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M
(2012) To predict or not to predict: Age-related differences in the use of sentential context. Psychology and Aging, 271, 975–988. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kawa, Jacek, Adam Bednorz, Paula Stępień, Jarosław Derejczyk & Monika Bugdol
2017. Spatial and dynamical handwriting analysis in mild cognitive impairment. Computers in Biology and Medicine 82 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.