Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 10:2 (2015) ► pp.286311
References
Andrews, S
(1989) Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 151, 802–814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4 (4), 439–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Appell, J., Kertesz, A. & Fisman, M
(1982) A study of language functioning in Alzheimer patients. Brain and Language, 171, 73–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balota, D.A., Cortese, M.J., Sergent-Marshall, S.D., Spieler, D.H., & Yap, M
(2004) Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133 (2), 283–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayles, K.A., & Kaszniak, A.W
(1987) The brain and age-related dementing diseases. In K.A. Bayles & A.W. Kaszakniak (Eds.), Communication and cognition in normal aging and dementia. Boston, Ma: College-Hill Press.Google Scholar
Braun, M., Jacobs, A.M., Hahne, A., Ricker, B., Hofmann, M., & Hutzler, F
(2006) Model-­generated lexical activity predicts graded ERP amplitudes in lexical decision. Brain Research, 10731, 431–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caza, N., & Moscovitch, M
(2005) Effects of cumulative frequency, but not of frequency trajectory, in lexical decision times of older adults and patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Memory and Language, 53 (3), 456–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q., & Mirman, D
(2012) Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological Review, 119 (2), 417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J.F., & Besner, D
(1977) Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention & Performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Duñabeitia, J.A., Marín, A., & Carreiras, M
(2009) Associative and orthographic neighborhood density effects in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 23 (6), 759–764. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duong, A., Whitehead, V., Hanratty, K., & Chertkow, H
(2006) The nature of lexico-semantic processing deficits in mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia, 44 (10), 1928–1935. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farcnik, K., Persyko, M., & Bassel, C
(2002) The presentation of aphasia in Alzheimer disease and other neurological disorders. Geriatrics & Aging, 5 (1), 30–34.Google Scholar
Feldman, H.H., & Woodward, M
(2005) The staging and assessment of moderate to severe Alzheimer disease. Neurology, 65 (6 suppl 3), S10–S17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, H.H., Van Baelen, B., Kavanagh, S.M., & Torfs, K.E
(2005) Cognition, function, and caregiving time patterns in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease: A 12-month analysis. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 19 (1), 29–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R
(1975) “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 121, 189–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folstein, M.F., Robins, L.N., & Helzer, J.E
(1983) The mini-mental state examination. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40 (7), 812. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, K.I., & Shen, D
(1996) No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22 (3), 696–713. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garlock, V.M., Walley, A.C., & Metsala, J.L
(2001) Age-of-acquisition, word frequency, and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Memory and language, 45 (3), 468–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glosser, G., Kohn, S.E., Friedman, R.B., Sands, L., & Grugan, P
(1997) Repetition of single words and nonwords in Alzheimer’s disease. Cortex, 331, 653–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J.K., & Kurczek, J.C
(2014) The ageing neighbourhood: Phonological density in naming. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29 (3), 326–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, J
(1990) Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 291, 228–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A.M
(1996) Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103 (3), 518–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R.T
(1988) Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G.M. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. advances in research and theory, 22 (pp. 193–225). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Henry, J.D., Crawford, J.R., & Phillips, L.H
(2004) Verbal fluency performance in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 42 (9), 1212–1222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holcomb, P.J., Grainger, J., & O’Rourke, T
(2002) An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 (6), 938–950. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huntsman, L.A., & Lima, S.D
(2002) Orthographic neighbors and visual word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(3), 289–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joubert, S., Joncas, S., Barbeau, E., Joanette, Y., & Ska, B
(2006) Cognition. In S. Gauthier (Ed), Clinical diagnosis and management of Alzheimer’s disease, third edition (pp. 165–176). Abington: Informa Healthcare. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T.K., & Streeter, L.A
(1973) Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 121, 119–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madden, D.J., Welsh-Bohmer, K.A., & Tupler, L.A
(1999) Task complexity and signal detection analyses of lexical decision performance in Alzheimer’s disease. Developmental Neuropsychology, 16 (1), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E.M
(1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease report of the NINCDS‐ADRDA work Group* under the auspices of department of health and human services task force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology, 34 (7), 939–939. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendiondo, M.S., Ashford, J.W., Kryscio, R.J., & Schmitt, F.A
(2000) Modelling mini mental state examination changes in Alzheimer’s disease. Statistics in Medicine, 19 (11–12), 1607–1616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myerson, J., Hale, S., Chen, J., & Lawrence B
(1997) General lexical slowing and the semantic priming effect: The roles of age and ability. Acta Psychologica, 961, 83–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nasreddine, Z.S., Phillips, N.A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., et al.
(2005) The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53 (4), 695–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nebes, R.D., & Brady, C.B
(1992) Generalized cognitive slowing and severity of dementia in Alzheimer’s disease: Implications for the interpretation of response-time data. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 14 (2), 317–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pate, D.S., & Margolin, D.I
(1994) Cognitive slowing in Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s patients. Distinguishing bradyphrenia from dementia. Neurology, 44 (4), 669–669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Binder, K.S
(1999) The effects of “neighborhood size” in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 251, 1142–1158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G
(2004) A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the lexical-decision task. Psychology and Aging, 19 (2), 278–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robert, C., & Mathey, S
(2007) Aging and lexical inhibition: The orthographic neighborhood frequency effect in young and older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 62B1, 340–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sears, C.R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S.J
(1995) Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 211, 876–876. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C
(2006) Word frequency effects in high-dimensional co-occurrence models: A new approach. Behavior Research Methods, 38 (2), 190–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snyder, L.S., Holland, A.L., & Forbes, M
(1996) Lexical decisions in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: Some notes on automatic versus controlled processing. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29 (5), 389–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spieler, D.H., & Balota, D.A
(2000) Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 15 (2), 225–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stadtlander, L.M
(1995) Age differences in orthographic and frequency neighborhoods. Advances in Psychology, 1101, 72–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taler, V., Aaron, G.P., Steinmetz, L.G., & Pisoni, D.B
(2010) Lexical neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition and production in healthy aging. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65B1, 551–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taler, V., & Phillips, N.A
(2008) Language performance in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: a comparative review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30 (5), 501–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Azevedo, Nancy, Ruth Ann Atchley, N. P. Vasavan Nair & Eva Kehayia
2021. Processing lexicality in healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease. The Mental Lexicon 16:2-3  pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Azevedo, Nancy, Gianluca U. Sorrento, Eva Kehayia, Gonia Jarema, Rachel Kizony & Joyce Fung
2019. 2019 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR),  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.