Electrifying the lexical decision
Examining a P3 ERP component reflecting early lexical categorization
Nancy Azevedo | McGill University / Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal-Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital
Eva Kehayia | McGill University / Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal-Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital
The current research utilizes lexical decision within an oddball ERP paradigm to study early lexical processing. Nineteen undergraduate students completed four blocks of the oddball lexical decision task (Nonword targets among Words, Word targets among Nonwords, Word targets among Pseudowords, and Pseudoword targets among Words). We observed a reliable P3 ERP component in conditions where the distinction between rare and frequent trials could be made solely based on lexical status (Words among Nonwords and Nonwords among Words). We saw a reliable P3 to rare words among frequent pseudowords, but no P3 was observed when participants were asked to detect pseudowords in the context of frequent word stimuli. We argue that this observed modulation of the P3 results is consistent with psycholinguistic literature that suggests that two criteria are available during lexical access when performing a lexicality judgement, a non-lexical criterion that relies on global activation at the word level and a lexical criterion that relies on activation of a lexical representation (Coltheart, Rastle, Perry, Langdon, & Ziegler, 2001; Grainger & Jacobs, 1996).
References (57)
Allison, T., Puce, A., Spencer, D.D., & McCarthy, G. (1999). Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by faces and non-face stimuli. Cerebral Cortex, 9(5), 415–430. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ashford, J.W., Coburn, K.L., Rose, T.L., & Bayley, P.J. (2011). P300 energy loss in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 261, 229–238. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Atchley, R.A., Halderman, L., Kwasny, K., & Buchanan, L. (2003). The processing of pseudohomophones by adults with a history of developmental language disabilities. Brain and Cognition, 53(2), 139–144. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Balota, D.A., Yap, M.J., & Cortese, M.J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 21, 285–375. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barber, H.A., & Kutas, M. (2007). Interplay between computational models and cognitive electrophysiology in visual word recognition. Brain Research Reviews, 53(1), 98–123. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bentin, S., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M.H., Echallier, J.F., & Pernier, J. (1999). ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: Time course and scalp distribution. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(3), 235–260. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brandeis, D., Banaschewski, T., Baving, L., Georgiewa, P., Blanz, B., et al. (2002). Multicenter P300 brain mapping of impaired attention to cues in hyperkinetic children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 411, 990–998. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Barber, H. (2005). Early event-related potential effects of syllabic processing during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(11), 1803–1817. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coch, D., & Mitra, P. (2010). Word and pseudoword superiority effects reflected in the ERP waveform. Brain Research, 13291, 159–174. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cohen, J., & Polich, J. (1997). On the number of trials needed for P300. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 25(3), 249–255. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLong, K.A., Quante, L., & Kutas, M. (2014). Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 611, 150–162. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deacon, D., Dynowska, A., Ritter, W., & Grose‐Fifer, J. (2004). Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: Implications for theories of N400 and word recognition. Psychophysiology, 41(1), 60–74. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Donchin, E., & Coles, M.G.H. (1991). Behavior cognition and event-related brain potentials. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14(04), 735–739. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., & Federmeier, K.D. (2007). Event-related brain potentials: Methods, theory, and applications. In J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, & G.G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology, 3rd ed. (pp. 85–119). New York: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A.M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103(3), 518–565. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P.J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time‐course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 128–156. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gratton, G., Coles, M.G.H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55(4), 468–484. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grossi, G., & Coch, D. (2005). Automatic word form processing in masked priming: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 421, 343–355. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hasko, S., Groth, K., Bruder, J., Bartling, J., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2013). The time course of reading processes in children with and without dyslexia: An ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 570. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hauk, O., Davis, M.H., Ford, M., Pulvermuller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage, 30(4), 1383–1400. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hauk, O., Patterson, K., Woollams, A., Watling, L., Pulvermüller, F., & Rogers, T.T. (2006). [Q:] When would you prefer a SOSSAGE to a SAUSAGE? [A:] At about 100 msec. ERP correlates of orthographic typicality and lexicality in written word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(5), 818–832. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herring, D.R., Taylor, J.H., White, K.R., & Crites Jr, S.L. (2011). Electrophysiological responses to evaluative priming: The LPP is sensitive to incongruity. Emotion, 11(4), 794–806. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holcomb, P.J., & Grainger, J. (2006). On the time course of visual word recognition: An event-related potential investigation using masked repetition priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(10), 1631–1643. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ilardi, S.S., Atchley, R.A., Enloe, A., Kwasny, K., & Garratt, G. (2007). Disentangling attentional biases and attentional deficits in depression: An event-related potential P300 analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31(2), 175–187. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Juckel, G., Karch, S., Kawohl, W., Kirsch, V., Jäger, et al. (2012). Age effects on the P300 potential and the corresponding fMRI BOLD-signal. Neuroimage, 60(4), 2027–2034. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaan, E. (2007). Event-related potentials and language processing: A brief overview. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(6), 571–591. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuperberg, G.R., Paczynski, M., & Ditman, T. (2011). Establishing causal coherence across sentences: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(5), 1230–1246. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S.A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Y., & Perfetti, C.A. (2003). The time course of brain activity in reading English and Chinese: An ERP study of Chinese bilinguals. Human Brain Mapping, 18(3), 167–175. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mado Proverbio, A., Vecchi, L., & Zani, A. (2004). From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of Grapheme-to-Phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(2), 301–317. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Massol, S., Midgley, K.J., Holcomb, P.J., & Grainger, J. (2011). When less is more: feedback, priming, and the pseudoword superiority effect. Brain Research, 13861, 153–164. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Massol, S., Grainger, J., Midgley, K.J., & Holcomb, P.J. (2012). Masked repetition priming of letter-in-string identification: An ERP investigation. Brain Research, 14721, 74–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maurer, U., Brandeis, D., & McCandliss, B.D. (2005). Fast, visual specialization for reading in English revealed by the topography of the N170 ERP response. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 1(1), 13. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maurer, U., Brem, S., Bucher, K., & Brandeis, D. (2005). Emerging neurophysiological specialization for letter strings. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(10), 1532–1552. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maurer, U., & McCandliss, B.D. (2008). The development of visual expertise for words: The contribution of electrophysiology. In E.L. Grigorenko & A.J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (pp. 43–63). New York: Taylor and Francis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCallum, W.C., Farmer, S.F., & Pocock, P.V. (1984). The effects of physical and semantic incongruites on auditory event-related potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 59(6), 477–488. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molinaro, N., Barber, H.A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex, 47(8), 908–930. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nobre, A., Allison, T., & McCarthy, G. (1994). Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe. Nature, 372(6503), 260–263. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olichney, J.M., Yang, J.C., Taylor, J., & Kutas, M. (2011). Cognitive event-related potentials: biomarkers of synaptic dysfunction across the stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 261, 215–228. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P.J. (1995). Event-related potentials and language comprehension. In M.D. Rugg & M.G.H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 171–215). New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 1181, 2128–2148. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Polich, J., & Corey-Bloom, J. (2005). Alzheimer’s disease and P300: Review and evaluation of task and modality. Current Alzheimer Research, 2(5), 515–525. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Proverbio, A.M., & Adorni, R. (2008). Orthographic familiarity, phonological legality and number of orthographic neighbours affect the onset of ERP lexical effects. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 4(1), 27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review, 1111, 159–182. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruz, M., & Nobre, A.C. (2008). Attention modulates initial stages of visual word processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(9), 1727–1736. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simon, G., Bernard, C., Largy, P., Lalonde, R., & Rebai, M. (2004). Chronometry of visual word recognition during passive and lexical decision tasks: An ERP investigation. International Journal of Neuroscience, 114(11), 1401–1432. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2006). USENET orthographic frequencies for 111,627 English words (2005–2006). Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta (downloaded from [URL]).
Spironelli, C., & Angrilli, A. (2007). Influence of phonological, semantic and orthographic tasks on the early linguistic components N150 and N350. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 64(2), 190–198. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spironelli, C., & Angrilli, A. (2009). Developmental aspects of automatic word processing: Language lateralization of early ERP components in children, young adults and middle-aged subjects. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 35–45. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spironelli, C., Penolazzi, B., & Angrilli, A. (2010). Gender differences in reading in school-aged children: An early ERP study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(4), 357–375. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stadtlander, L.M. (1995). Age differences in orthographic and frequency neighborhoods. Advances in Psychology, 1101, 72–86. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swaab, T.Y., Ledoux, K., Camblin, C.C., & Boudewyn, M.A. (2012). Language-related ERP components. In S.J. Luck & E.S. Kapperman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 397–439). New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thornhill, D.E., & Van Petten, C. (2012). Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: Frontal positivity and N400 ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(3), 382–392. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, C.L., Perfetti, C.A., & Schmalhofer, F. (2007). Event-related potential indicators of text integration across sentence boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1), 55–89. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ziegler, J.C., Besson, M., Jacobs, A.M., Nazir, T.A., & Carr, T.H. (1997). Word, pseudoword, and nonword processing: A multitask comparison using event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(6), 758–775. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Azevedo, Nancy, Ruth Ann Atchley, N. P. Vasavan Nair & Eva Kehayia
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.