Article published In:
The Mental LexiconVol. 11:1 (2016) ► pp.55–75
Implicit acquisition of tone-suffix connections in L2 learners of Swedish
Swedish native speakers (NSs) unconsciously use tones realized on word stems to predict upcoming suffixes during speech comprehension. The present response time study investigated whether relatively proficient second language (L2) learners of Swedish have acquired the underlying association between tones and suffixes without explicit instruction, internalizing a feature that is specific to their L2. Learners listened to sentences in which the tone on the verb stem either validly or invalidly cued the following present or past tense inflection. Invalidly cued suffixes led to increased decision latencies in a verb tense identification task, suggesting that learners pre-activated suffixes associated with stem tones in a manner similar to NSs. Thus, L2 learners seemed to have acquired the tone-suffix connections through implicit mechanisms. Correctly cued suffixes were associated with a smaller processing advantage in the L2 group relative to NSs performing the same task; nevertheless, results suggest a tendency for increasingly native-like tone processing with cumulative language experience. The way suffix type affected response times also indicates exposure-related effects.
References
Bannert, R
(2004) På väg mot svenskt uttal. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Bruce, G
(1977) Swedish word accents in sentence perspective. Lund: Gleerups.
Chan, R.K.W., & Leung, J.H.C
(2014) Implicit learning of L2 word stress regularities. Second Language Research, 301, 463–484. 
Clausen, S.J., & Kristensen, L.B.
(2015) The cognitive status of stød. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 381, 163–187.
Davis, M.H., Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Gaskell, M.G.
(2002) Leading up the lexical garden-path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 281, 218–244.
De Diego-Balaguer, R., Toro, J.M., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Bachoud-Levi, A.C
(2007) Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech. PLoS ONE, 21, e1175.
Dell, G.S., Reed, K.D., Adams, D.R., & Meyer, A.S.
(2000) Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: A study of the role of experience in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 261, 1355–1367.
DeKeyser, R
(2005) What makes second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55 (Suppl. 1), 1–25.
Dienes, Z., Altmann, G., Kwan, L., & Goode, A
(1995) Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 211, 1322–1338.
Dulany, D.E., Carlson, R.A., & Dewey, G.I.
(1984) A case of syntactical learning and judgment: how conscious and how abstract? Journal Experimental Psychology: General, 1131, 541–555.
Dörnyei, Z
(2005) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ellis, N.C.
(2006) Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 271, 164–94.
Francis, A.P., Schmidt, G.L., Carr, T.H., & Clegg, B.A.
(2009) Incidental learning of abstract rules for non-dominant word orders. Psychological Research, 731, 60–74.
Gardner, R.C.
(1985) Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Granena, G
(2013) Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood, Language Learning, 631, 1–39.
Göransson, U., & Parada, M
(1997) På svenska! 1 (2nd ed.). Lund: Folkuniversitetets förlag.
Hao, Y.-C
(2012) Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones by tonal and non-tonal language speakers, Journal of Phonetics, 401, 269–279.
Hoffmann, J., & Sebald, A
(2005) When obvious covariations are not even learned implicitly. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 171, 449–480.
Jiang, N
(2007) Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 571, 1–33.
Jiménez, L., & Méndez, C
(1999) Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 251, 236–259.
Karpicke, J.D., & Pisoni, D.B.
(2004) Using immediate memory span to measure implicit learning. Memory & Cognition, 321, 956–964.
Kemps, R.J.J.K., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H.
(2005) Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: The case of Dutch plural nouns. Memory & Cognition, 331, 430–446.
Lardiere, D
(1998) Case and tense in the “fossilized” steady state. Second Language Research, 141, 1–26.
Lee, Y.-S., Vakoch, D.A., & Wurm, L.H.
(1996) Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 251, 527–542.
Leung, J., & Williams, J.N.
(2011) The implicit learning of mappings between forms and contextually-derived meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 331, 33–55.
Levy Scherrer, P., & Lindemalm, K
(2007) Rivstart: A1 + A2 Textbok. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
Maclntyre, P.D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K.A.
(1998) Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situated model of confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 821, 545–62.
Morgan-Short, K., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M.T.
(2012) Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 241, 933–947.
Nyborg, R., Pettersson, N.-O., & Holm, B
(2001) Svenska utifrån. Stockholm: Svenska institutet.
Onishi, K., Chambers, K., & Fisher, C
(2002) Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience. Cognition, 831, B13–B23.
Paulsson, M
(2006) Välkomna!: Schwedisch Lehrbuch mit 2 Audio-CDs. Stuttgart, Germany: Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Perruchet, P
(2008) Implicit learning. In J. Byrne (Series Ed.) & H.L. Roediger, III (Vol. Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference. Vol. 2: Cognitive psychology of memory (pp. 597–621), Oxford: Elsevier.
Perruchet, P., & Pacton, S
(2006) Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 101, 233–238.
Pienemann, M., & Håkansson, G
(1999) A unified approach towards the development of Swedish as L2: A processability account. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 211, 383–420.
Pierrehumbert, J
(2001) Stochastic phonology. GLOT, 51, 195–207.
Portin, M., Lehtonen, M., Harrer, G., Wande, E., Niemi, J., & Laine, M
(2008) L1 effects on the processing of inflected nouns in L2. Acta Psychologica, 1281, 452–465.
Reber, A.S.
(1967) Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 61, 855–63.
(1993) Implicit learning and Tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Reber, A.S., & Allen, R
(1978) Analogy and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: A functionalist interpretation. Cognition, 61, 189–221.
Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J.N.
(2012) Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 331, 829–56.
Rehnqvist, G
(2010) Svenska för utländska studenter (2nd ed.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Riad, T
(2014) The phonology of Swedish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roll, M
(2015) A neurolinguistic study of South Swedish word accents: Electrical brain potentials in nouns and verbs. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 38(2), 149–162.
Roll, M., Horne, M., & Lindgren, M
(2010) Word accents and morphology – ERPs of Swedish word processing. Brain Research, 13301, 114–123.
Roll, M., Söderström, P., & Horne, M
(2013) Word-stem tones cue suffixes in the brain. Brain Research, 15201, 116–120.
Roll, M., Söderström, P., Mannfolk, P., Shtyrov, Y., Johansson, M., van Westen, D., & Horne, M
(2015) Word tones cueing morphosyntactic structure: Neuroanatomical substrates and activation time course assessed by EEG-fMRI. Brain and Language, 1501, 14–21.
Salverda, A., Dahan, D., & McQueen, J
(2003) The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition, 901, 51–89.
Schmidt, R
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Skehan, P
(2015) Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 361, 367–384.
Söderström, P., Roll, M., & Horne, M
Thunberg, L
(2008) Börja öva svensk grammatik. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Toro, J.M., Sinnett, S., & Soto-Faraco, S
(2005) Speech segmentation by statistical learning depends on attention. Cognition, 971, B25–B34.
Wayland, R.P., & Guion, S.G.
(2004) Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 541, 681–712.
Cited by
Cited by 12 other publications
Althaus, Nadja, Allison Wetterlin & Aditi Lahiri
2021. Features of low functional load in mono- and bilinguals’ lexical access: evidence from Swedish tonal accent. Phonetica 78:3 ► pp. 175 ff. 
Fernández-Arroyo, Laura, Nuria Sagarra & Kaylee Fernández
2022. Differential effects of language proficiency and use on L2 lexical prediction. The Mental Lexicon 17:2 ► pp. 213 ff.
Gosselke Berthelsen, Sabine, Merle Horne, K. Jonas Brännström, Yury Shtyrov & Mikael Roll
2018. Neural processing of morphosyntactic tonal cues in second-language learners. Journal of Neurolinguistics 45 ► pp. 60 ff.
Hed, Anna, Andrea Schremm, Merle Horne & Mikael Roll
2019. Neural correlates of second language acquisition of tone-grammar associations. The Mental Lexicon 14:1 ► pp. 98 ff.
Lozano-Argüelles, Cristina & Nuria Sagarra
2021. Interpreting experience enhances the use of lexical stress and syllabic structure to predict L2 word endings. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:5 ► pp. 1135 ff.
Lozano-Argüelles, Cristina, Nuria Sagarra & Joseph V. Casillas
2020. Slowly but surely: Interpreting facilitates L2 morphological anticipation based on suprasegmental and segmental information. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:4 ► pp. 752 ff.
Lozano-Argüelles, Cristina, Nuria Sagarra & Joseph V. Casillas
2023. Interpreting experience and working memory effects on L1 and L2 morphological prediction. Frontiers in Language Sciences 1
Sagarra, Nuria & Joseph V. Casillas
2018. Suprasegmental information cues morphological anticipation during L1/L2 lexical access. Journal of Second Language Studies 1:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Sagarra, Nuria & Joseph V. Casillas
2023. Practice beats age: co-activation shapes heritage speakers’ lexical access more than age of onset. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Sagarra, Nuria, Laura Fernández‐Arroyo, Cristina Lozano‐Argüelles & Joseph V. Casillas
2024. Unraveling the Complexities of Second Language Lexical Stress Processing: The Impact of First Language Transfer, Second Language Proficiency, and Exposure. Language Learning
Schremm, Andrea, Anna Hed, Merle Horne & Mikael Roll
2017. Training predictive L2 processing with a digital game: Prototype promotes acquisition of anticipatory use of tone-suffix associations. Computers & Education 114 ► pp. 206 ff.
Wee, Lian-Hee
2019. Phonological Tone,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.