Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 11:1 (2016) ► pp. 55–75

Implicit acquisition of tone-suffix connections in L2 learners of Swedish

| Lund University
| Lund University
| Lund University
| Lund University

Swedish native speakers (NSs) unconsciously use tones realized on word stems to predict upcoming suffixes during speech comprehension. The present response time study investigated whether relatively proficient second language (L2) learners of Swedish have acquired the underlying association between tones and suffixes without explicit instruction, internalizing a feature that is specific to their L2. Learners listened to sentences in which the tone on the verb stem either validly or invalidly cued the following present or past tense inflection. Invalidly cued suffixes led to increased decision latencies in a verb tense identification task, suggesting that learners pre-activated suffixes associated with stem tones in a manner similar to NSs. Thus, L2 learners seemed to have acquired the tone-suffix connections through implicit mechanisms. Correctly cued suffixes were associated with a smaller processing advantage in the L2 group relative to NSs performing the same task; nevertheless, results suggest a tendency for increasingly native-like tone processing with cumulative language experience. The way suffix type affected response times also indicates exposure-related effects.

Keywords: response times, word accents, second language acquisition, morphology, implicit learning
Published online: 16 June 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.11.1.03sch
References
Bannert, R
(2004) På väg mot svenskt uttal. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Bruce, G
(1977) Swedish word accents in sentence perspective. Lund: Gleerups.Google Scholar
Chan, R.K.W., & Leung, J.H.C
(2014) Implicit learning of L2 word stress regularities. Second Language Research, 301, 463–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clausen, S.J., & Kristensen, L.B.
(2015) The cognitive status of stød. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 381, 163–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, M.H., Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Gaskell, M.G.
(2002) Leading up the lexical garden-path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 281, 218–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Diego-Balaguer, R., Toro, J.M., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Bachoud-Levi, A.C
(2007) Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech. PLoS ONE, 21, e1175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dell, G.S., Reed, K.D., Adams, D.R., & Meyer, A.S.
(2000) Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: A study of the role of experience in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 261, 1355–1367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R
(2005) What makes second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55 (Suppl. 1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dienes, Z., Altmann, G., Kwan, L., & Goode, A
(1995) Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 211, 1322–1338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dulany, D.E., Carlson, R.A., & Dewey, G.I.
(1984) A case of syntactical learning and judgment: how conscious and how abstract? Journal Experimental Psychology: General, 1131, 541–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z
(2005) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C.
(2006) Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 271, 164–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francis, A.P., Schmidt, G.L., Carr, T.H., & Clegg, B.A.
(2009) Incidental learning of abstract rules for non-dominant word orders. Psychological Research, 731, 60–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R.C.
(1985) Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Granena, G
(2013) Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood, Language Learning, 631, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Göransson, U., & Parada, M
(1997) På svenska! 1 (2nd ed.). Lund: Folkuniversitetets förlag.Google Scholar
Hao, Y.-C
(2012) Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones by tonal and non-tonal language speakers, Journal of Phonetics, 401, 269–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, J., & Sebald, A
(2005) When obvious covariations are not even learned implicitly. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 171, 449–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N
(2007) Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 571, 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, L., & Méndez, C
(1999) Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 251, 236–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karpicke, J.D., & Pisoni, D.B.
(2004) Using immediate memory span to measure implicit learning. Memory & Cognition, 321, 956–964. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemps, R.J.J.K., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H.
(2005) Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: The case of Dutch plural nouns. Memory & Cognition, 331, 430–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D
(1998) Case and tense in the “fossilized” steady state. Second Language Research, 141, 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y.-S., Vakoch, D.A., & Wurm, L.H.
(1996) Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 251, 527–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leung, J., & Williams, J.N.
(2011) The implicit learning of mappings between forms and contextually-derived meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 331, 33–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy Scherrer, P., & Lindemalm, K
(2007) Rivstart: A1 + A2 Textbok. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.Google Scholar
Maclntyre, P.D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K.A.
(1998) Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situated model of confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 821, 545–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M.T.
(2012) Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 241, 933–947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nyborg, R., Pettersson, N.-O., & Holm, B
(2001) Svenska utifrån. Stockholm: Svenska institutet.Google Scholar
Onishi, K., Chambers, K., & Fisher, C
(2002) Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience. Cognition, 831, B13–B23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paulsson, M
(2006) Välkomna!: Schwedisch Lehrbuch mit 2 Audio-CDs. Stuttgart, Germany: Ernst Klett Sprachen.Google Scholar
Perruchet, P
(2008) Implicit learning. In J. Byrne (Series Ed.) & H.L. Roediger, III (Vol. Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference. Vol. 2: Cognitive psychology of memory (pp. 597–621), Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perruchet, P., & Pacton, S
(2006) Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 101, 233–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Håkansson, G
(1999) A unified approach towards the development of Swedish as L2: A processability account. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 211, 383–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J
(2001) Stochastic phonology. GLOT, 51, 195–207.Google Scholar
Portin, M., Lehtonen, M., Harrer, G., Wande, E., Niemi, J., & Laine, M
(2008) L1 effects on the processing of inflected nouns in L2. Acta Psychologica, 1281, 452–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reber, A.S.
(1967) Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 61, 855–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) Implicit learning and Tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reber, A.S., & Allen, R
(1978) Analogy and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: A functionalist interpretation. Cognition, 61, 189–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J.N.
(2012) Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 331, 829–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rehnqvist, G
(2010) Svenska för utländska studenter (2nd ed.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Riad, T
(2014) The phonology of Swedish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roll, M
(2015) A neurolinguistic study of South Swedish word accents: Electrical brain potentials in nouns and verbs. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 38(2), 149–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roll, M., Horne, M., & Lindgren, M
(2010) Word accents and morphology – ERPs of Swedish word processing. Brain Research, 13301, 114–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roll, M., Söderström, P., & Horne, M
(2013) Word-stem tones cue suffixes in the brain. Brain Research, 15201, 116–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roll, M., Söderström, P., Mannfolk, P., Shtyrov, Y., Johansson, M., van Westen, D., & Horne, M
(2015) Word tones cueing morphosyntactic structure: Neuroanatomical substrates and activation time course assessed by EEG-fMRI. Brain and Language, 1501, 14–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salverda, A., Dahan, D., & McQueen, J
(2003) The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition, 901, 51–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P
(2015) Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 361, 367–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Söderström, P., Roll, M., & Horne, M
(2012) Processing morphologically conditioned word accents. The Mental Lexicon, 7(1), 77–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thunberg, L
(2008) Börja öva svensk grammatik. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Toro, J.M., Sinnett, S., & Soto-Faraco, S
(2005) Speech segmentation by statistical learning depends on attention. Cognition, 971, B25–B34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wayland, R.P., & Guion, S.G.
(2004) Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 541, 681–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Althaus, Nadja, Allison Wetterlin & Aditi Lahiri
2021. Features of low functional load in mono- and bilinguals’ lexical access: evidence from Swedish tonal accent. Phonetica 78:3 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Arroyo, Laura, Nuria Sagarra & Kaylee Fernández
2023. Differential effects of language proficiency and use on L2 lexical prediction. The Mental Lexicon DOI logo
Gosselke Berthelsen, Sabine, Merle Horne, K. Jonas Brännström, Yury Shtyrov & Mikael Roll
2018. Neural processing of morphosyntactic tonal cues in second-language learners. Journal of Neurolinguistics 45 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Hed, Anna, Andrea Schremm, Merle Horne & Mikael Roll
2019. Neural correlates of second language acquisition of tone-grammar associations. The Mental Lexicon 14:1 ► pp. 98 ff. DOI logo
Lozano-Argüelles, Cristina & Nuria Sagarra
2021. Interpreting experience enhances the use of lexical stress and syllabic structure to predict L2 word endings. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:5 ► pp. 1135 ff. DOI logo
Lozano-Argüelles, Cristina, Nuria Sagarra & Joseph V. Casillas
2020. Slowly but surely: Interpreting facilitates L2 morphological anticipation based on suprasegmental and segmental information. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:4 ► pp. 752 ff. DOI logo
Sagarra, Nuria & Joseph V. Casillas
2018. Suprasegmental information cues morphological anticipation during L1/L2 lexical access. Journal of Second Language Studies 1:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Schremm, Andrea, Anna Hed, Merle Horne & Mikael Roll
2017. Training predictive L2 processing with a digital game: Prototype promotes acquisition of anticipatory use of tone-suffix associations. Computers & Education 114 ► pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Wee, Lian-Hee
2019. . In Phonological Tone, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.