Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 11:1 (2016) ► pp.7693
References
Belica, C
(2011) Semantische Nähe als Ähnlichkeit von Kookkurrenzprofilen. In A. Abel & R. Zanin (Eds.), Korpora in Lehre und Forschung (pp. 155–178). Bolzano: Bozen-Bolzano University Press.Google Scholar
Block, H.D., & Marschak, J
(1960) Random orderings and stochastic theories of responses. In I. Olkin, S. Ghurye, H. Hoeffding, W. Madow, & H. Mann (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics (pp. 97–132). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Burchardt, A., Erk, K., Frank, K.A., Pado, S., & Pinkal, M
(2006) The SALSA Corpus: A German corpus resource for lexical semantics. Proceedings of the 5th International language resources and evaluation conference (pp. 969–974). Genoa.
Bybee, J., & Eddington, D
(2006) A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of becoming. Language, 821, 323–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diaz, S., Garcia-Lapresta, J., & Montes, S
(2008) Consistent models of transitivity for reciprocal preferences on a finite ordinal scale. Information Sciences, 178, 13, 2832–2848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, G., & Frisch, S
(2006) Effects of processing difficulty on judgments of acceptability. In G. Fanselow, C. Fery, M. Schlesewsky, & R. Vogel (Eds.), Gradience in grammar (pp. 291–316). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fürstenau, H
(2011) Semi-supervised Semantic Role Labeling via Graph Alignment. Saarbrücken Dissertations in Computational Linguistics and Language Technology, Volume 321. German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence and Saarland University, Germany.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, G., Bien, H., de Vries, M., Lüttmann, H., & Schwall, J
(2010) OR-VIS: Open-source software to conduct online rating studies. Behavior Research Methods. 42, 2, 542–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klavans, J.L., & Chodorow, M
(1992) Degrees of Stativity: The lexical representation of verb aspect. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics . DOI logo
Kupietz, M., & Keibel, H
(2009) Gebrauchsbasierte Grammatik: Statistische Regelhaftigkeit. In M. Konopka & B. Strecker (Eds.), Deutsche Grammatik – Regeln, Normen, Sprachgebrauch (pp. 33–50). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Levin, B
(1993) English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Luce, R.D., & Suppes, P
(1965) Preference, utility and subjective probability. In R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, Vol. 31 (pp. 249–410). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Miller, G.A., & Charles, W.G.
(1991) Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Cognitive Processes, 6(1), 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Öztürk, P., Vulchanova, M., Martinez, L., Tumyr, C., & Kabath, D
(2011) Assessing the feature-driven nature of similarity-based sorting of verbs. Polibits Research Journal on Computer Science and Computer Engeneering with Applications, 431, 1–22.Google Scholar
Pahikkala, T., Waegeman, W., Tsivtsivadze, E., De Baets, B.D., & Salakoski, T
(2009) From ranking to intransitive preference learning: Rock-Raper-Scissors and beyond. In E. Hüllermeier & J. Fürnkranz (Eds.), Proceedings of the ECML/PKDD-Workshop on Preference Learning (PL-09) (pp. 84–100).Google Scholar
Regenwetter, M.J., Dana, J., & Davis-Stober, C
(2011) Transitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 1181, 42–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richter, M., & van Hout, R
(2010) Why some verbs can form a resultative construction While others cannot: Decomposing Semantic Binding. Lingua 120(8), 2006–2021. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) A classification of German verbs using empirical data and conceptions of Vendler and Dowty. Sprache und Datenverarbeitung – International Journal for Language Data Processing, 38 (1:2).Google Scholar
Rips, L.J.
(2011) Split identity: Intransitive judgments of the identity of objects. Cognition, 1191, 356–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulte im Walde, S., & Brew, C
(2002) Inducing German semantic verb classes from purely syntactic subcategorisation information. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) , 223–230. Philadelphia.
Schulte im Walde, S
(2003) Experiments on the automatic induction of German semantic verb classes. Dissertation Universität Stuttgart (=Arbeitspapiere des Instituts für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung Lehrstuhl für Theoretische Computerlinguistik, Vol. 91, Nr. 2).Google Scholar
(2004) Automatic induction of semantic classes for German verbs. In S. Langer & D. Schnorbusch (Eds.), Semantik im Lexikon (pp. 59–86). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Schulte im Walde, S. & Melinger, S.A.
(2005) Identifying semantic relations and functional properties of human verb associations. Proceedings of the joint Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing ; 612–619. Vancouver. DOI logo
Schulte im Walde, S
(2006a) Human verb associations as the basis for Gold Standard verb classes: Validation against GermaNet and FrameNet. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation , 825–830. Genoa.
(2006b) Can human verb associations help identify salient features for semantic verb classification? Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning , 69–76. New York City.
Schumacher, H
(1986) Verben in Feldern. Valenzwörterbuch zur Syntax und Semantik deutscher Verben. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shimodaira, H
(2004) Approximately unbiased tests of region using multistep-multiscale bootstrap resampling. The Annals of Statistics, 32(6), 2616–2641. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, E.V.
(1997) Learning methods for combining linguistic indicators to classify verbs. Proceedings of the Second Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing .
Siegel, E.V., & McKeown, K.R.
(2000) Learning methods to combine linguistic indicators: Improving aspectual classification and revealing linguistic insights. Computational Linguistics, 26(4), 595–627. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, R., & Shimodaira, H
(2006a) Pvclust: An R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics, 22(12), 1540–1542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A
(2005) Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the use of grammaticality judgment tasks in linguistic theory. Second Language Studies, 241, 129–167.Google Scholar
Tversky, A
(1969) Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 761, 31–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z
(1967) Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaka, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, R., & Shimodaira, H
(2006b) Pvclust. An R package for hierarchical clustering with p-values. [URL]