Two lexical decision experiments were conducted to study the recognition of two-character Chinese monomorphemic and compound words by adult native Chinese readers. In Experiment 1, the words appeared non-spaced, whereas in Experiment 2 a space was inserted between the two characters. An interaction between word type and spacing reflects a trend for spacing to slow down the recognition of monomorphemic words and speed up that of compound words. The word frequency effect was steeper for monomorphemic than compound words. The number of strokes in the first and the second character influenced the recognition time for compound words, but not for monomorphemic words. The results are interpreted in the light of the parallel dual route model of morphological processing. The holistic route is more prevalent in recognizing Chinese monomorphemic, while the morphological decomposition route is more prevalent in processing Chinese compound words.
Bai, X., Yan, G., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 341, 1277–1287.
Bronk, M., Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J. (2013). Manipulations of word frequency reveal differences in the processing of morphologically complex and simple words in German. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 41, 1–14.
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PloS ONE, 5(6), e10729.
Chen, C., Huang, X., & Yu, H. (2002). The processing mechanism of structurally symmetrical Chinese character recognition: An experimental research on radical-level process. Psychological Science (China), 251, 187–190.
Cui, L., Drieghe, D., Yan, G., Bai, X., Chi, H., & Liversedge, P. S. (2013). Parafoveal processing across different lexical constituents in Chinese reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(2), 403–416.
Cui, L., Yan, G., Bai, X., Hyönä, J., Wang, S., & Liversedge, P. S. (2013). Processing of compound-word characters in reading Chinese: An eye-movement-contingent display change study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 527–547.
Drieghe, D., Pollatsek, A., Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2010). Parafoveal processing during reading is reduced across a morphological boundary. Cognition, 1161, 136–142.
Feng, G. (2006). Eye movements as time-series random variables: A stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 71, 70–95.
Hoosain, R. (1992). Psychological reality of the word in Chinese. In H.-C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 111–130). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
Hsu, S.-H., & Huang, K.-C. (2000). Interword spacing in Chinese text layout. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 911, 355–365.
Huang, B., & Wei, L. (2012). Modern Chinese (Chapter 4: Word), Peking University Press.
Inhoff, A. W., Briihl, D., & Schwartz, J. (1996). Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming, and delayed naming tasks. Memory & Cognition, 241, 466–476.
Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1992). Testing a semi-stochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 181, 1174–1188.
Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2011). Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 651, 406–430.
Juhasz, B. J., Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (2005). The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compound words. Language & Cognitive Processes, 201, 291–316.
Lai, Y., & Myers, J. (2012). The recognition of spoken mono-morphemic compounds in Chinese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 101, 41–88.
Laine, M., Vainio, S., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Lexical access routes to nouns in a morphologically rich language. Journal of Memory and Language, 401, 109–135.
Lexicon of Common Words in Contemporary Chinese. (2008). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Li, H., & Chen, H-C. (1999). Radical processing in Chinese character recognition: Evidence from illusory conjunction. Psychological Science (China), 221, 213–217.
Li, X. S., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 581, 525–552.
Liu, Y., & Peng, D. (1997). Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Eds.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 219–232). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Mattingly, I. G., & Xu, Y. (1993). Word superiority in Chinese. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-l13, 145–152.
Myers, J. (2006). Processing Chinese compounds: A survey of the literature. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 169–196). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Myers, J. (in press). Processing of Chinese compounds. In R. Sybesma, W. Behr, Y. Gu, Z. Handel, C.-T. J. Huang, & J. Myers (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 261, 820–833.
R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL].
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 71, 65–81.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 1241, 372–422.
Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Eds.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 151, 607–620.
Taft, M., Huang, J. & Zhu, X. (1994). The influence of character frequency on word recognition responses in Chinese. In H.-W. Chang, J. T. Huang, C.-W. Hue & O. Tzeng (Eds.), Advances in the study of Chinese language processing. Taipei: Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University.
Yan, G., Tian, H., Bai, X., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 971, 259–268.
Yeh, S.-L., & Li, J.-L. (2002). Role of structure and component in judgments of visual similarity of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 281, 933–947.
Zhou, X.Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 141, 525–565.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Hyönä, Jukka, Lei Cui, Timo T. Heikkilä, Birgitta Paranko, Yun Gao & Xingzhi Su
2024. Reading compound words in Finnish and Chinese: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language 134 ► pp. 104474 ff.
Zhang, Zhongpei
2024. Frequency effects can modulate the neural correlates of prosodic processing in Mandarin. NeuroReport 35:6 ► pp. 399 ff.
Wei, Yanjun, Ying Niu, Marcus Taft & Manuel Carreiras
2023. Morphological decomposition in Chinese compound word recognition: Electrophysiological evidence. Brain and Language 241 ► pp. 105267 ff.
Bonin, Patrick, Betty Laroche & Alain Méot
2021. Psycholinguistic norms for a set of 506 French compound words. Behavior Research Methods 54:1 ► pp. 393 ff.
2021. Compound word frequency modifies the effect of character frequency in reading Chinese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 74:4 ► pp. 610 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.