Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 12:1 (2017) ► pp. 5170


Effects of Danger, Usefulness, and Body-Object Interaction in picture naming


Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, B. M.
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R.
(2007) The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W.
(1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S. D. R., Burnett, A. N., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M.
(2011) Imageability and body-object interaction ratings for 599 multisyllabic nouns. Behavior Research, 43, 1100–1109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S., & Bargh, J. A.
(1999) Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavior predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25 (5–6), 215–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P.
(2002) Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, D., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M.
(2012), The influence of print exposure on the body-object interaction effect in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(113), 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves, I. S., Leonard, G. A., Pexman, P. M., Pittman, D. J., Siakaluk, P. D., & Goodyear, B. G.
(2012) Neural correlates of the body-object interaction effect in semantic processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(22), 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 66 ]
Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F.
(2004) Neurophysiological Distinction of Action Words in the Fronto-Central Cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 21(3), 191–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., & Rinck, M.
(2007) Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 436–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D., & Schubert, T. W.
(2009) Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1169–1174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kryuchkova, T., Tucker, B. V., Wurm, L. H., & Baayen, R. H.
(2012) Danger and usefulness are detected early in auditory lexical processing: Evidence from electroencephalography. Brain and Language, 122, 81–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N.
(2010) Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1423–1425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M. M. & Jeuniaux, P.
(2010) The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition, 114(1), 96–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D.
(2004) Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15(4), 243–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myung, J.-y., Blumstein, S. E., & Sedivy, J. C.
(2006) Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: Manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition, 98(3), 223–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newcombe, P. I., Campbell, C., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M.
(2012) Effects of emotional and sensorimotor knowledge in semantic processing of concrete and abstract nouns. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(275), 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Proffitt, D. R., Stefanucci, J., Banton, T., & Epstein, W.
(2003) The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological Science, 14(2), 106–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Härle, M., & Hummel, F.
(2001) Walking or talking?: Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing. Brain and Language, 78, 143–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., & llmoniemi, R. J.
(2005) Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21(3), 793–797. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R core team
(2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://​www​.R​-project​.org.
Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Aguilera, L., Owen, W. J., & Sears, C. R.
(2008a) Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body-object interaction effect. Cognition, 106(1), 433–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Sears, C. R., Wilson, K., Locheed, K., & Owen, W. J.
(2008b) The benefits of sensorimotor knowledge: Body-object interaction facilitates semantic processing. Cognitive Science, 32(3), 591–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sidhu, D. M., Kwan, R., Pexman, P., & Siakaluk, P. D.
(2014) Effects of relative embodiment in lexical and semantic processing. Acta Psychologica, 149, 32–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M.
(1980) A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S.
(1988) Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 768–777. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 67 ]
Szekely, A., Jacobsen, T., D’Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Andonova, E., Herron, D., et al.
(2004) A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 247–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S.
(2007) Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
Tillotson, S. M., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M.
(2008) Body-object interaction ratings for 1,618 monosyllabic nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 1075–1078. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tom, G., Pettersen, P., Lau, T., Burton, T., & Cook, J.
(1991) The role of overt head movement in the formation of affect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(3), 281–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tousignant, C. & Pexman, P.
(2012) Flexible recruitment of semantic richness: context modulates body-object interaction effects in lexical-semantic processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(53), 1–7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vakoch, D. A., & Wurm, L. H.
(1997) Emotional connotation in speech perception: Semantic associations in the general lexicon. Cognition and Emotion, 11(4), 337–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Havermaet, L. R., & Wurm, L. H.
(2014) Semantic effects in word recognition are moderated by body-object interaction. The Mental Lexicon, 9(1), 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wellsby, M., Siakaluk, P. D., Owen, W. J., & Pexman, P. M.
(2011) Embodied semantic processing: The body-object interaction effect in a non-manual task. Language and Cognition, 3(1), 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M.
(1988) MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine-usable dictionary, Version 2.00. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 20(1), 6–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Witherell, D., Wurm, L. H., Seaman, S. R., Brugnone, N. A., & Fulford, E. T.
(2012) Danger and Usefulness effects as a function of concept ancientness. The Mental Lexicon, 7(2), 183–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurm, L. H.
(2007) Danger and usefulness: An alternative framework for understanding rapid evaluation effects in perception? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1218–1225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Auditory and visual processing of novel stimuli are affected by subjective connotations of danger and usefulness. The Mental Lexicon, 10(1), 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurm, L. H., & Seaman, S. R.
(2008) Semantic effects in naming and perceptual identification, but not in delayed naming: Implications for models and tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 381–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurm, L. H., & Vakoch, D. A.
(2000) The adaptive value of lexical connotation in speech perception. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 177–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurm, L. H., Vakoch, D. A., Seaman, S. R., & Buchanan, L.
(2004) Semantic effects in auditory word recognition. Mental Lexicon Working Papers, 1, 47–62.Google Scholar
Wurm, L. H., Whitman, R. D., Seaman, S. R., Hill, L., & Ulstad, H. M.
(2007) Semantic processing in auditory lexical decision: Ear-of-presentation and sex differences. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1470–1495. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C.-B., & Leonardelli, G. J.
(2008) Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 19(9), 838–842. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C.-B., & Liljenquist, K.
(2006) Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313(5792), 1451–1452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 68 ]
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Heard, Alison, Christopher R. Madan, Andrea B. Protzner & Penny M. Pexman
2019. Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical–semantic processing. Behavior Research Methods 51:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.