Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 12:2 (2017) ► pp.219233


Asher, N.
(2011) Lexical meaning in context: A web of words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bierwisch, M.
(1988) On the grammar of local prepositions. In: M. Bierwisch, W. Motsch, I. Zimmermann. (Eds). Syntax, Semantik und Lexikon (pp. 1–65). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Kretzschmar, F., Tune, S., Wang, L., Genç, S., Philipp, M., Roehm, D., & Schlesewsky, M.
(2011) Think globally: Cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension. Brain and language, 117(3), 133–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, H., & Hoeks, J. C.
(2013) A time and place for language comprehension: mapping the N400 and the P600 to a minimal cortical network. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 71, 758. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Copestake, A., & Briscoe, T.
(1995) Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. Journal of Semantics, 121, 15–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egg, M.
(2010) Semantic underspecification. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(3), 166–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishbein, J., & Harris, J. A.
(2014) Making sense of Kafka: structural biases induce early sense commitment for metonyms. Journal of Memory and Language, 761, 94–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisch, S., & Schlesewsky, M.
(2001) The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing. NeuroReport, 12(15), 3391–3394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisson, S., & Frazier, L.
(2005) Carving up word meaning: Portioning and grinding. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(2), 277–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J.
(1999) The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1366–1383.Google Scholar
(2007) The processing of familiar and novel senses of a word: Why reading Dickens is easy but reading Needham can be hard. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), 595–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H.
(2000) Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 121, 556–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S.
(1970) Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurements designs have exact F-distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65(332), 1582–1589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(1997) The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keppel, G.
(1991) Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kim, A., & Osterhout, L.
(2005) The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 205–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M. & K. D. Federmeier
(2011) Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 621: 621–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D.
(2008) A cortical network for semantics:(de) constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920–933. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowder, M. W., & Gordon, P. C.
(2013) It’s hard to offend the college: Effects of sentence structure on figurative-language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 993.Google Scholar
Piñango, M. M., Zhang, M., Foster‐Hanson, E., Negishi, M., Lacadie, C., & Constable, R. T.
(2016) Metonymy as Referential Dependency: Psycholinguistic and Neurolinguistic Arguments for a Unified Linguistic Treatment. Cognitive science, 1–28.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J.
(1995) The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schumacher, P. B.
(2011) The hepatitis called … : Electrophysiological evidence for enriched composition. In J. Meibauer & M. Steinbach (Eds.), Experimental pragmatics / semantics (p. 199–219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) When combinatorial processing results in reconceptualization: toward a new approach of compositionality. Frontiers in Psychology, 41, 677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Content and context in incremental processing: ’the ham sandwich’ revisited. Philosophical Studies, 168(1), 151–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, P. B., & Hung, Y. C.
(2012) Positional influences on information packaging: Insights from topological fields in German. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(2), 295–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weckerly, J., & Kutas, M.
(1999) An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology, 36(05), 559–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiland, H., Bambini, V., & Schumacher, P. B.
(2014) The role of literal meaning in figurative language comprehension: evidence from masked priming ERP. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 81, 583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., & Min, B.
(2012) Neural dynamics of animacy processing in language comprehension: ERP evidence from the interpretation of classifier–noun combinations. Brain and Language, 120(3), 321–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Lombard, Alizée, Richard Huyghe, Lucie Barque & Doriane Gras
2023. Regular polysemy and novel word-sense identification. The Mental Lexicon 18:1  pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Ortega-Andrés, Marina & Agustín Vicente
2019. Polysemy and co-predication. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Schumacher, Petra B.
2017. Semantic‐Pragmatic Processing. In The Handbook of Psycholinguistics,  pp. 392 ff. DOI logo
Schumacher, Petra B.
2018. On type composition and agentivity. Theoretical Linguistics 44:1-2  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Schumacher, Petra B., Patrick Brandt & Hanna Weiland-Breckle
2018. Online Processing of “Real” and “Fake”: The Cost of Being Too Strong. In The Semantics of Gradability, Vagueness, and Scale Structure [Language, Cognition, and Mind, 4],  pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Schumacher, Petra B., Hanna Weiland-Breckle, Guendalina Reul & Ingmar Brilmayer
2023. Tracking meaning evolution in the brain: Processing consequences of conventionalization. Cognition 240  pp. 105598 ff. DOI logo
Vicente, Agustin
2021. Approaches to co-predication: Inherent polysemy and metaphysical relations. Journal of Pragmatics 182  pp. 348 ff. DOI logo
Weiland-Breckle, Hanna & Petra B. Schumacher
2018. A direct comparison of metonymic and metaphoric relations in adjective–noun pairs. Acta Linguistica Academica 65:2-3  pp. 443 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.