Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 13:1 (2018) ► pp.74104
References (31)
References
Altmann, L. J., & McClung, J. S. (2008). Effects of semantic impairment on language use in Alzheimer’s disease. Seminars in speech and language, 29(1), 18–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beck, I., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary development. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Bordag, D., Kirschenbaum, A., Rogahn, M., Opitz, A., & Tschirner, E. (2016). Semantic representation of newly learned L2 words and their integration in the L2 lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bordag, D., Kirschenbaum, A., Tschirner, E., & Opitz, A. (2015). Incidental acquisition of new words during reading in L2: Inference of meaning and its integration in the L2 mental lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(3), 372–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borovsky, A., Kutas, M., & Elman, J. (2010). Learning to use words: Event-related potentials index single-shot contextual word learning. Cognition, 116(2), 289–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breitenstein, C., Zwitserlood, P., de Vries, M. H., Feldhues, C., Knecht, S., & Dobel, C. (2007). Five days versus a lifetime: Intense associative vocabulary training generates lexically integrated words. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 25(5), 493–500.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B. C., & Romani, C. (1990). The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7(3), 161–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carr, T. H., & Dagenbach, D. (1990). Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: Evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 341–350.Google Scholar
Clay, F., Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2007). Teaching adults new words: The role of practice and consolidation. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 33(5), 970–976. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dagenbach, D., Carr, T. H., & Barnhardt, T. M. (1990). Inhibitory semantic priming of lexical decisions due to failure to retrieve weakly activated codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 328–340.Google Scholar
Dagenbach, D., Horst, S., & Carr, T. H. (1990). Adding new information to semantic memory: How much learning is enough to produce automatic priming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 581–591.Google Scholar
Devitto, Z., & Burgess, C. (2004). Theoretical and methodological implications of language experience and vocabulary skill: Priming of strongly and weakly associated words. Brain and Cognition, 55(2), 295–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elgort, I. (2011). Deliberate learning and vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 61(2), 367–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francis, W. S. (2005). Bilingual semantic and conceptual representation. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 251–267). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Götz, D., Haensch, G., & Wellmann, H. (1998). Langenscheidts Großwörterbuch, Deutsch als Fremdsprache (1., neubearb. A., Nachdr. 2002.). München, Berlin: Langenscheidt KG.Google Scholar
Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1201, 358–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keatley, C. W., Spinks, J. A., & De Gelder, B. (1994). Asymmetrical cross-language priming effects. Memory & Cognition, 22(1), 70–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leitner, S. (1972). So lernt man lernen. Der Weg zum Erfolg (How to learn to learn). Freiburg i. Br.: Herder.Google Scholar
Melinger, A. & Weber, A. (2006). Database of Noun Associations for German. [URL].
Mestres-Missé, A., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Münte, T. F. (2007). Watching the brain during meaning acquisition. Cerebral Cortex, 17(8), 1858–1866. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moss, H. E., Tyler, L. K., & Taylor, K. I. (2007). Conceptual structure. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 217–234). Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). University of South Florida Free Association Norms. Retrieved from [URL]. Cerebral Cortex, 17(8), 1858–1866.
Perfetti, C., Wlotko, E., & Hart, L. A. (2005). Word learning and individual differences in word learning reflected in event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 311, 1281–1292.Google Scholar
Qiao, X., & Forster, K. I. (2013). Novel word lexicalization and the prime lexicality effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 39(4), 1064–1074.Google Scholar
(2017). Is the L2 lexicon different from the L1 lexicon? Evidence from novel word lexicalization. Cognition, 1581, 147–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rehbock, H. (2010). Semantisches Merkmal. In Helmut Glück (Eds.): Metzler Lexikon Sprache. 4. Auflage. Stuttgart, Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar
Shtyrov, Y., Nikulin, V. V., & Pulvermüller, F. (2010). Rapid cortical plasticity underlying novel word learning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(50), 16864–16867 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, K. I., Devereux, B. J., & Tyler, L. K. (2011). Conceptual structure: Towards an integrated neurocognitive account. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(9), 1368–1401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tamminen, J., & Gaskell, M. G. (2013). Novel word integration in the mental lexicon: Evidence from unmasked and masked semantic priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(5), 1001–1025. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, L. K., & Moss, H. E. (2001). Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(6), 244–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Lewis, W., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48(4), 422–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

García-Castro, Verónica & Norbert Vanek
2024. Syntactic engagement of new words: The garden-path method applied to track sensitivity to structural ambiguity. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 3:3  pp. 100137 ff. DOI logo
Shang, Nan
2024. Developing Chinese lexical representations in Korean learner’s mind. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo
Bordag, Denisa, Kira Gor & Andreas Opitz
2022. Ontogenesis Model of the L2 Lexical Representation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 25:2  pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Bordag, Denisa & Andreas Opitz
2022. Employing General Linguistic Knowledge in Incidental Acquisition of Grammatical Properties of New L1 and L2 Lexical Representations: Toward Reducing Fuzziness in the Initial Ontogenetic Stage. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Gor, Kira, Svetlana Cook, Denisa Bordag, Anna Chrabaszcz & Andreas Opitz
2021. Fuzzy Lexical Representations in Adult Second Language Speakers. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Snefjella, Bryor, Nadia Lana & Victor Kuperman
2020. How emotion is learned: Semantic learning of novel words in emotional contexts. Journal of Memory and Language 115  pp. 104171 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.