Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 14:1 (2019) ► pp. 98123
References

References

Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., and Tanenhaus, M. K.
(1998) Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barber, H., & Carreiras, M.
(2005) Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(1), 137–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breen, M., Dilley, L. C., McAuley, J. D., & Sanders, L. D.
(2014) Auditory evoked potentials reveal early perceptual effects of distal prosody on speech segmentation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 1132–1146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, G.
(1977) Swedish word accents in sentence perspective. Lund: Gleerups.Google Scholar
Bruce, G., & Gårding, E.
(1978) A prosodic typology for Swedish dialects. In E. Gårding, G. Bruce, & R. Bannert (Eds.), Nordic Prosody (pp. 219–228). Lund: Gleerups.Google Scholar
Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Kutas, M.
(1998) Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(1), 21–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M.
(2005) Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Natural Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dikker, S., & Pylkkänen, L.
(2013) Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation. Brain and Language, 127, 55–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, S., Brunellière, A., & Frauenfelder, U. H.
(2013) Tracking the time course of word-frequency effects in auditory word recognition with event-related potentials. Cognitive Science, 37, 489–507. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ejerhed, E., Källgren, G., Wennstedt, O., & Åström, M.
(1992) The linguistic annotation system of the Stockholm-Umeå Corpus project. Technical Report 33. Umeå: Department of General Linguistics, Umeå University.Google Scholar
Foucart, A., Ruiz-Tada, E., & Costa, A.
(2015) How do you know I was about to say “book”? Anticipation processes affect speech processing and lexical recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 768–780. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Francis, A. L., Ciocca, V., Ma, L., & Fenn, K.
(2008) Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 268–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 119 ]
Gagnepain, P., Henson, R. N., & Davis, M. H.
(2012) Temporal predictive codes for spoken words in auditory cortex. Current Biology, 22, 615–621. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gosselke Berthelsen, S., Horne, M., Brännström, J., Shtyrov, Y., & Roll, M.
(2018) Neural processing of morphosyntactic tonal cues in second-language learners. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 45, 60–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gross, M., Say, T., Kleingers, M., Clahsen, H., & Münte, T. F.
(1998) Human brain potentials to violations in morphologically complex Italian words. Neuroscience Letters, 241, 83–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H.
(2000) Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 556–568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H.
(2016) Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 32, 277–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, C. R.
(2013) Early effects of neighborhood density and phonotactic probability of spoken words on event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 127, 463–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jung, T.-P., Makeig, S., Humphries, C., Lee, T.-W., McKeown, M. J., Iragui, V., Sejnowski, T. J.
2000Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 37, 163–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E.
(2014) Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4, 257–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E., Wayland, R., Bao, M., & Barkley, C. M.
(2007) Effects of native language and training on lexical tone perception: An event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1148, 113–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, R.
(2011) Do Germans produce and perceive the Swedish word accent contrast? A cross-language analysis. TMH-QPSR, 51, 51, 93–96.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M.
(2003) How word frequency affects morphological processing in monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(3), 213–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehtonen, M., Niska, H., Wande, E., Niemi, J., & Laine, M.
(2006) Recognition of inflected words in a morphologically limited language: Frequency effects in monolinguals and bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(2), 121–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehtonen, M., Vorobyev, V., Soveri, A., Hugdahl, K., Tuokkolae, T., & Laine, M.
(2009) Language-specific activations in the brain: Evidence from inflectional processing in bilinguals. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 495–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, S., Wayland, R., Kaan, E.
(2015) Effects of production training and perception training on lexical tone perception – A behavioral and ERP study. Brain Research, 1624, 28–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lück, M., Hahne, A., & Clahsen, H.
(2006) Brain potentials to morphologically complex words during listening. Brain Research, 1077, 144–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 120 ]
Morris, J., & Holcomb, P.
(2005) Event-related potentials to violations of inflectional verb morphology in English. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 963–981. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newman, A. J., Ullman, M. T., Pancheva, R., Waligura, D. L., & Neville, H. J.
(2007) An ERP study of regular and irregular English past tense inflection. Neuroimage, 34(1), 435–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ojima, S., Nakata, H., & Kakigi, R.
2005An ERPs study of second language learning after childhood: Effects of proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1212–1228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P.
(1992) Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785–806. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A.
(1995) Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 739–773. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Penke, M., Weyerts, H., Gross, M., Zander, E., Münte, T., & Clahsen, H.
(1997) How the brain processes complex words: An event-related potential study of German verb inflections. Cognitive Brain Research, 6, 37–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1991) Rules of language. Science, 253, 530–535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y.
(2003) Automatic processing of grammar in the human brain as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Neuroimage, 20, 159–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Regel, S., Kotz, S. A., Henseler, I., & Friederici, A. D.
(2017) Left inferior frontal gyrus mediates morphosyntax: ERP evidence from verb processing in left-hemisphere damaged patients. Cortex, 86, 156–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riad, T.
(2013) The phonology of Swedish. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Prosodin i svenskans morfologi. Stockholm: Morfem.Google Scholar
Righi, G., Blumstein, S. E., Mertus, J., & Worden, M. S.
(2010) Neural systems underlying lexical competition: an eyetracking and fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 213–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rischel, J.
(1963) Morphemic tone and word tone in Eastern Norwegian. Phonetica, 10, 154–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Clahsen, H., Lleó, C., Zaake, W., & Münte, T. F.
(2001) Event-related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan. Cognitive Brain Research, 11(1), 47–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roll, M.
(2015) A neurolinguistic study of South Swedish word accents: Electrical brain potentials in nouns and verbs. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 38, 149–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roll, M., Horne, M., & Lindgren, M.
(2010) Word accents and morphology – ERPs of Swedish word processing. Brain Research, 1330, 114–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roll, M., Horne, M., & Söderström, P.
(2013) Word-stem tones cue suffixes in the brain. Brain Research, 1520, 116–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roll, M., Söderström, P., Frid, J., Mannfolk, P., & Horne, M.
(2017) Forehearing words: Pre-activation of word endings at word onset. Neuroscience Letters, 658, 57–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 121 ]
Roll, M., Söderström, P., Mannfolk, P., Shtyrov, Y., Johansson, M., van Westen, D., & Horne, M.
(2015) Word tones cueing morphosyntactic structure: Neuroanatomical substrates and activation time-course assessed by EEG and fMRI. Brain and Language, 150, 14–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, S., Gugler, M. F., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A.
2006The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 2030–2048. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schremm, A., Söderström, P., Horne, M., & Roll, M.
(2016) Implicit acquisition of tone-suffix connections in L2 learners of Swedish. The Mental Lexicon 11(1), 55–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schremm, A., Hed, A., Horne, M., & Roll, M.
(2017) Training predictive L2 processing with a digital game: prototype promotes acquisition of anticipatory use of Swedish tone-suffix associations. Computers and Education, 114, 206–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schremm, A., Novén, M., Horne, M., & Roll, M.
(2019) Brain responses to morphologically complex verbs: An electrophysiological study of Swedish regular and irregular past tense forms. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 51, 76–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schremm, A., Novén, M., Horne, M., Söderström, P., Westen, D. v., & Roll, M.
(2018) Cortical thickness of planum temporale and pars opercularis in native language tone processing. Brain and Language, 176, 42–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Söderström, P., Roll, M., & Horne, M.
(2012) Processing morphologically conditioned word accents. The Mental Lexicon, 7(1), 77–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Söderström, P., Horne, M., Frid, J., & Roll, M.
(2016) Pre-activation negativity (PrAN) in brain potentials to unfolding words. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Söderström, P., Horne, M., & Roll, M.
(2017a) Stem tones pre-activate suffixes in the brain. Journal of Psycholinguistic research, 46(2), 271–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Söderström, P., Horne, M., Mannfolk, P., van Westen, D., & Roll, M.
(2017b) Tone-grammar association within words: Concurrent ERP and fMRI show rapid neural pre-activation and involvement of left inferior frontal gyrus in pseudoword processing. Brain and Language, 174, 119–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teleman, U., Hellberg, S., & Andersson, E.
(1999) Svenska Akademiens grammatik. Stockholm: Svenska Akademien.Google Scholar
Tronnier, M., & Zetterholm, E.
(2013) Tendencies of Swedish word accent production by L2 Learners with tonal and non-tonal L1. In E. L. Asu & P. Lippus (Eds.), Nordic Prosody, Proceedings of the XIth Conference, Tartu 2012 (pp. 391–400).Google Scholar
van Berkum, J. J., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Haagort, P.
(2005) Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 31, 443–467.Google Scholar
Van Dommelen, W., & Husby, O.
(2009) Perception of Norwegian word tones by Chinese and German listeners. In M. A. Watkins, A. S. Rauber & B. O. Babtista (Eds.), Recent research in second language phonetics/phonology: Perception and production (pp. 308–321). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
[ p. 122 ]
van Hell, J. G., & Tokowicz, N.
(2010) Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 26, 43–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A.
(1998) When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 9, 325–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 374–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J.
(1999) Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 106(6), 3649–3658. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Jongman, A., Sereno, J., & Hirsch, J.
(2003) FMRI evidence for cortical modification during learning of Mandarin lexical tone. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. G.
(2004) Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: a preliminary report. Language Learning, 54, 681–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weyerts, H., Penke, M., Dohrn, U., Clahsen, H., & Münte, T. F.
(1997) Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German plurals. Neuroreport, 8(4). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J., Segalowitz, N., & Leclair, T.
(2014) Estimating second language productive vocabulary size. The Mental Lexicon, 9(1), 23–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 123 ]
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Gosselke Berthelsen, Sabine, Merle Horne, Yury Shtyrov & Mikael Roll
2020. Different neural mechanisms for rapid acquisition of words with grammatical tone in learners from tonal and non-tonal backgrounds: ERP evidence. Brain Research 1729  pp. 146614 ff. Crossref logo
Gosselke Berthelsen, Sabine, Merle Horne, Yury Shtyrov & Mikael Roll
2021. Phonological transfer effects in novice learners: A learner's brain detects grammar errors only if the language sounds familiar. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24:4  pp. 656 ff. Crossref logo
Novén, Mikael, Andrea Schremm, Merle Horne & Mikael Roll
2021. Cortical thickness and surface area of left anterior temporal areas affects processing of phonological cues to morphosyntax. Brain Research 1750  pp. 147150 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.