Cover not available
Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 13:1 (2018) ► pp.1–25

Root-letter priming in Maltese visual word recognition

| University of Arizona
| University of Arizona

We report on a visual masked priming experiment designed to explore the role of morphology in Maltese visual word recognition. In a lexical decision task, subjects were faster to judge Maltese words of Semitic origin that were primed by triconsonantal letter-strings corresponding to their root-morphemes. In contrast, they were no faster to judge Maltese words of non-Semitic origin that were primed by an equivalent, but non-morphemic, set of three consonant letters, suggesting that morphological overlap, rather than simple form overlap, drives this facilitatory effect. Maltese is unique among the Semitic languages for its orthography: Maltese alone uses the Latin alphabet and requires that all vowels are written, making such triconsonantal strings illegal non-words to which Maltese readers are never exposed, as opposed to other Semitic languages such as Hebrew in which triconsonantal strings often correspond to real words. Under a decomposition-based account of morphological processing, we interpret these results as suggesting that across reading experience Maltese readers have abstracted out and stored root-morphemes for Semitic-origin words lexically, such that these morphemic representations can be activated by exposure to root-letters in isolation and thus prime morphological derivatives.

Keywords: visual masked priming, lexical access, Semitic, Maltese, root and pattern morphology
Article outline
  • Methods
    • Subjects
    • Stimulus materials
    • Procedures
    • Data Analysis
  • Results
    • RT analysis
    • Error rate analysis
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.18001.gea
References
Amenta, S., and Crepaldi, D.
(2012) Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 31, 232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andrews, S.
(1997) The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 41, 439–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aquilina, J.
(1987–1990) Maltese-English-Maltese dictionary. Malta: Midsea Books.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., and Baayen, H.
(2015) Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv: 1506.04967v1. [[URL]].
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 671, 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R.
(1978) Modern Hebrew structure. Tel-Aviv: University Publishing Projects.Google Scholar
Beyersmann, E., Cavalli, E., Casalis, S., and Colé, P.
(2016) Embedded stem priming effects in prefixed and suffixed pseudowords. Scientific Studies of Reading, 201, 220–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beyersmann, E., and Grainger, J.
(2018) Support from the morphological family when unembedding the stem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 441, 135–142.Google Scholar
Borg, A.
(1976) The imaala in Maltese. Israel Oriental Studies VI, 191–223.Google Scholar
Borg, C., Fabri, R., Gatt, A., and Rosner, M.
(2012) Korpus Malti: A corpus of contemporary Maltese, v.2.0. Available at [URL].
Boudelaa, S., and Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
(2001) The time-course of morphological, phonological, and semantic processes in reading Modern Standard Arabic. Proceedings of the Twenty Third Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 138–143). Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
(2004) Allomorphic variation in Arabic: implications for lexical processing and representation. Brain and Language, 901, 106–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bovingdon, R., and Dalli, A.
(2006) Statistical analysis of the source origin of Maltese. In Wilson, A., Archer, D., and Rayson, P. (Eds.), Corpus linguistics around the world (pp. 63–76). New York: Rodop. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brincat, J.
(2011) Maltese and other languages: a linguistic history of Malta. Sta Venera, Malta: Midsea Books.Google Scholar
Deutsch, A., Frost, R., and Forster, K. I.
(1998) Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 241, 1238–1255.Google Scholar
Diependaele, K., Brysbaert, M., and Neri, P.
(2012) How noisy is lexical decision? Frontiers in Psychology, 31, 348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B., and Bentin, S.
(1994) Morphological analysis of disrupted morphemes: evidence from Hebrew. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A1, 407–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B., Milin, P., Cho, K. W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., and O’Connor, P. A.
(2015) Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 91, 111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., and Azuma, T.
(2000) Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: does submit prime permit? Language and Cognitive Processes, 151, 539–561. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., and Davis, C.
(1984) Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 101, 680–698.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., and Forster, J. C.
(2003) DMDX: a Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 351, 116–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francom, J., Woudstra, D., and Ussishkin, A.
(2009) Creating a web-based lexical corpus and information-extraction tools for the Semitic language Maltese. Proceedings of the SEPLN-SALTMIL 2009 Workshop: Information Retrieval and Information Extraction for Less Resourced Languages (pp. 9–16), University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar
Frost, R., Deutsch, A., and Forster, K. I.
(2000) Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 261, 751–765.Google Scholar
Frost, R., Forster, K. I., and Deutsch, A.
(1997) What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 231, 829–856.Google Scholar
Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., and Forster, K. I.
(2005) Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 311, 1293–1326.Google Scholar
Grainger, J., Cole, P., and Segui, J.
(1991) Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 301, 370–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jared, D., Jouravlev, O., and Joanisse, M. F.
(2017) The effect of semantic transparency on the processing of morphologically derived words: evidence from decision latencies and event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 431, 422–450.Google Scholar
Kliegl, R., Masson, M. E. J., and Richter, E. M.
(2010) A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming. Visual Cognition, 181, 655–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., and Christensen, R. H. B.
(2016) lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. [R package v. 2.0-32]. [URL].
Longtin, C., Segui, J., and Hallé, P. A.
(2003) Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 181, 313–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luke, S. G.
(2017) Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 491, 1494–1502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., and Older, L.
(1994) Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 1011, 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milin, P., Feldman, L. B., Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., and Baayen, R. H.
(2017) Discrimination in lexical decision. PLoS One, 121, e0171935. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milin, P., Smolka, E., and Feldman, L. B.
(2017) Models of lexical access and morphological processing. In Fernandez, E. M., and Smith Cairns, H. (Eds.), The Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 249–268). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perea, M., Gatt, A., Moret-Tatay, C., and Fabri, R.
(2012) Are all Semitic languages immune to letter transpositions? The case of Maltese. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 191, 942–947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., and New, B.
(2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 111, 1090–1098. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL].
Schmidtke, D., Matsuki, K., and Kuperman, V.
(2017) Surviving blind decomposition: a distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory, and Cognition, 431, 1793–1820.Google Scholar
Twist, A. E.
(2006) A psycholinguistic investigation of the verbal morphology of Maltese (PhD Thesis). University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar
Ussishkin, A., Dawson, C. R., Wedel, A., and Schluter, K.
(2015) Auditory masked priming in Maltese spoken word recognition. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 301, 1096–1115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velan, H., and Frost, R.
(2007) Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: the impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 141, 913–918. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Letter-transposition effects are not universal: the impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 611, 285–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Words with and without internal structure: what determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition, 1181, 141–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witzel, J., Cornelius, S., Witzel, N., Forster, K. I., and Forster, J. C.
(2013) Testing the viability of webDMDX for masked priming experiments. The Mental Lexicon, 81, 372–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Berrebi, Si, Outi Bat-El & Aya Meltzer-Asscher
2023. The roots of consonant bias in semitic languages: a critical review of psycholinguistic studies of languages with non-concatenative morphology. Morphology 33:3 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Nieder, Jessica, Ruben van de Vijver & Holger Mitterer
2021. Priming Maltese plurals. The Mental Lexicon 16:1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Lily, Elizabeth Solá-Llonch, Huilei Wang & Megha Sundara
2023. A meta-analytic review of morphological priming in Semitic languages. The Mental Lexicon 18:2 ► pp. 300 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.