Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 14:1 (2019) ► pp. 6897


Abel, S., Dressel, K., Bitzer, R., Kümmerer, D., Mader, I., Weiller, C., & Huber, W.
(2009) The separation of processing stages in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm. Neuroimage, 44(3), 1113–1124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, L., White, K. K., & Eitel, S. L.
(2003) Isolating phonological components that increase tip-of-the-tongue resolution. Memory & Cognition, 31(8), 1153–1162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W.
(2004) Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech. Brain and language, 88(1), 148–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alario, F.-X., & Ferrand, L.
(1999) A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(3), 531–552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2014) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823.Google Scholar
Best, W., Herbert, R., Hickin, J., Osborne, F., & Howard, D.
(2002) Phonological and orthographic facilitation of word-retrieval in aphasia: immediate and delayed effects. Aphasiology, 16 (1–2). pp. 151–168. ISSN 02687038. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 89 ]
Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Méot, A., & Chalard, M.
(2003) A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 158–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, N. L., & Poon, L. W.
(1985) Effects of priming in word retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(2), 272–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Canny, J.
(1986) A Computational Approach to Edge Detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI- 8(6), 679–698. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cappa, S. F., Binetti, G., Pezzini, A., Padovani, A., Rozzini, L., & Trabucchi, M.
(1998) Object and action naming in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 50(2), 351–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cholin, J., Levelt, W. J., & Schiller, N. O.
(2006) Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99(2), 205–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. R., & Tranel, D.
(1993) Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90(11), 4957–4960. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N.
(2009) Exploring phonological encoding through repeated segments. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 685–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Damian, M. F., & Martin, R. C.
(1999) Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(2), 345–361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Damian, M. F., Martin, R. C., & Martin, I. C.
(1999) Semantic and Phonological Codes Interact in Single Word Production.Google Scholar
De Zubicaray, G. I., & McMahon, K. L.
(2009) Auditory context effects in picture naming investigated with event-related fMRI. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(3), 260–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Zubicaray, G. I., McMahon, K. L., Eastburn, M. M., & Wilson, S. J.
(2002) Orthographic/Phonological Facilitation of Naming Responses in the Picture–Word Task: An Event-Related fMRI Study Using Overt Vocal Responding. NeuroImage, 16(4), 1084–1093. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dell, G. S.
(1986) A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dell, G. S., & O’Seaghdha, P. G.
(1992a) Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 42(1–3), 287–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992b) Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 42(1–3), 287–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A.
(1997) Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801–838. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dhooge, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J.
(2010) The distractor frequency effect in picture–word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(4), 878–891. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 90 ]
Druks, J.
(2000) Object and action naming battery. Psychology Press. Consulté à l’adresse http://​discovery​.ucl​.ac​.uk​/87465/
Estes, W. K.
(1955) Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. Psychological review, 62(5), 369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, M. T., & Abrams, L.
(2014) Picture-word interference reveals inhibitory effects of syllable frequency on lexical selection. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 67(3), 525–541. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, N. P., Reilly, M., & Blumstein, S. E.
(2015) Phonological neighborhood competition affects spoken word production irrespective of sentential context. Journal of memory and language, 83, 97–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, J. L., & Landauer, T. K.
(2014) Retrieval of long-term memory: “Tip-of-the-tongue” phenomenon. Psychonomic Science, 4(8), 309–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gahl, S., Yao, Y., & Johnson, K.
(2012) Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of memory and language, 66(4), 789–806. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
(1997) Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and cognitive Processes, 12(5–6), 613–656. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B.
(2002) A restricted interaction account (RIA) of spoken word production: The best of both worlds. Aphasiology, 16(1–2), 20–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F., & Itzler, J.
(1984) Can semantic constraint reduce the role of word frequency during spoken-word recognition? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22(3), 180–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, M. K., Ober, B. A., & Shenaut, G. K.
(1999) Naturally occurring and experimentally induced tip-of-the-tongue experiences in three adult age groups. Psychology and Aging, 14(3), 445–457. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heller, J. R., & Goldrick, M.
(2014) Grammatical constraints on phonological encoding in speech production. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 21(6), 1576–1582. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, C., & Lambon Ralph, M. A.
(2008) Mimicking aphasic semantic errors in normal speech production: Evidence from a novel experimental paradigm. Brain and Language, 104(1), 89–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. F., Furth, K., & Hilliard, C.
(2012) Incremental Phonological Encoding during Unscripted Sentence Production. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
James, L. E., & Burke, D. M.
(2000) Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1378–1391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H.
(2001) Priming effects from phonologically related distractors in picture-word interference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 54(2), 371–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laganaro, M., & Alario, F.-X.
(2006) On the locus of the syllable frequency effect in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 178–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 91 ]
Laganaro, M., Chetelat-Mabillard, D., & Frauenfelder, U. H.
(2013) Facilitatory and interfering effects of neighbourhood density on speech production: Evidence from aphasic errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 30(3), 127–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J.
(1999) Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 223–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S.
(1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38; discussion 38–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, A. G., & Healy, A. F.
(1985) The roles of phoneme frequency, similarity, and availability in the experimental elicitation of speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(6), 717–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Longe, O., Randall, B., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K.
(2006) Grammatical categories in the brain: The role of morphological structure. Cerebral Cortex, 17(8), 1812–1820. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lüttmann, H., Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J.
(2011) Sharing morphemes without sharing meaning: Production and comprehension of German verbs in the context of morphological relatives. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 65(3), 173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
(1987) Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25(1), 71–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A.
(1978) Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10(1), 29–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K.
(1980) The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8(1), 1–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., & Zwitserlood, P.
(1989) Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 15(3), 576.Google Scholar
Mätzig, S., Druks, J., Masterson, J., & Vigliocco, G.
(2009) Noun and verb differences in picture naming: Past studies and new evidence. Cortex, 45(6), 738–758. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A. S., & Bock, K.
(1992) The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation? Memory & Cognition, 20(6), 715–726. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H.
(1991) Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(6), 1146–1160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A.
(2003) When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 228–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mirman, D., Kittredge, A. K., & Dell, G. S.
(2010) Effects of near and distant phonological neighbors on picture naming. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 32). Consulté à l’adresse http://​escholarship​.org​/uc​/item​/5620c08n​.pdf
[ p. 92 ]
Mirman, D., Strauss, T. J., Dixon, J. A., & Magnuson, J. S.
(2010) Effect of representational distance between meanings on recognition of ambiguous spoken words. Cognitive Science, 34(1), 161–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L.
(2004) Lexique 2 : A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 516–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A.
(2000) Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(03), 299–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nusbaum, H. C., Pisoni, D. B., & Davis, C. K.
(1984) Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words. Research on speech perception progress report, 10(10), 357–376.Google Scholar
Oldfield, R. C., & Wingfield, A.
(1965) Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17(4), 273–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P.
(1998) Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(3), 539–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pisoni, A., Cerciello, M., Cattaneo, Z., & Papagno, C.
(2017) Phonological facilitation in picture naming: When and where? A tDCS study. Neuroscience, 352, 106–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Posnansky, C. J., & Rayner, K.
(1977) Visual-Feature and Response Components in a Picture – Word Interference Task with Beginning and Skilled Readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Protopapas, A.
(2007) CheckVocal: a program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 859–862. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, A.
(1992) A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42(1–3), 107–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64(3), 249–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Modeling the relation between the production and recognition of spoken word forms. Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities, 115–158.Google Scholar
(2004) Seriality of phonological encoding in naming objects and reading their names. Memory & Cognition, 32(2), 212–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) 3 Spoken word planning, comprehending, and self-monitoring: Evaluation ofWEAVER+. Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech, 42.Google Scholar
Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & M, J.
(1996) Interaction between semantic and orthographic factors in conceptually driven naming: Comment on Starreveld and La Heij (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 246–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Costa, A., & Alario, F. X.
(2014) Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis. Cognitive psychology, 68, 33–58.Google Scholar
[ p. 93 ]
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A.
(2002) E-Prime reference guide. ittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.Google Scholar
Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M.
(1990) Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 86–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwitter, V., Boyer, B., Méot, A., Bonin, P., & Laganaro, M.
(2004) French normative data and naming times for action pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 564–576. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Starreveld, P. A.
(2000) On the Interpretation of Onsets of Auditory Context Effects in Word Production. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(4), 497–525. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W.
(1995) Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 686–698. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(4), 896–918. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, L. K., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
(1977) The on-line effects of semantic context on syntactic processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(6), 683–692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., & Hartsuiker, R. J.
(2002) The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in sentence production. Psychological bulletin, 128(3), 442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S.
(1997) The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. Language and Speech, 40(3), 211–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 735.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A.
(1999) Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(3), 374–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition. Journal of memory and language, 52(2), 193–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S., & Sommers, M. S.
(2003) The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 31(4), 491–504. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich, A., & Ziegler, W.
(2011) Facilitation of picture-naming in anomic subjects: Sound vs mouth shape. Aphasiology, 25(2), 202–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar