Perry, Scott James, Matthew C. Kelley & Benjamin V. Tucker
2024.
Documenting and modeling the acoustic variability of intervocalic alveolar taps in conversational Peninsular Spanish.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 155:1
► pp. 294 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Jacobs, Cassandra L. & Maryellen C. MacDonald
2023.
A chimpanzee by any other name: The contributions of utterance context and information density on word choice.
Cognition 230
► pp. 105265 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Krauska, Alexandra & Ellen Lau
2023.
Moving away from lexicalism in psycho- and neuro-linguistics.
Frontiers in Language Sciences 2
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Sidtis, Diana Van Lancker & Seung Yun Yang
2021.
Perception of Formulaic Speech. In
The Handbook of Speech Perception,
► pp. 309 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lorenz, Antje, Andreas Mädebach & Jörg D Jescheniak
2018.
Grammatical-gender effects in noun–noun compound production: Evidence from German.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71:5
► pp. 1134 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lorenz, Antje, Stefanie Regel, Pienie Zwitserlood & Rasha Abdel Rahman
2018.
Age-related effects in compound production: Intact lexical representations but more effortful encoding.
Acta Psychologica 191
► pp. 289 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana & John J. Sidtis
2018.
Cortical-subcortical production of formulaic language: A review of linguistic, brain disorder, and functional imaging studies leading to a production model.
Brain and Cognition 126
► pp. 53 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Rammell, C. Sophia, Diana Van Lancker Sidtis & David B. Pisoni
Yang, Seung-yun, Diana Sidtis & Seung Nam Yang
2017.
Listeners’ identification and evaluation of Korean idiomatic utterances produced by persons with left- or right-hemisphere damage.
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 31:2
► pp. 155 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Smolka, Eva, Matthias Gondan & Frank Rösler
2015.
Take a stand on understanding: electrophysiological evidence for stem access in German complex verbs.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana, JiHee Choi, Amy Alken & John J. Sidtis
2015.
Formulaic Language in Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease: Complementary Effects of Subcortical and Cortical Dysfunction.
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 58:5
► pp. 1493 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Yang, Seung-yun, Ji Sook Ahn & Diana Van Lancker Sidtis
2015.
The perceptual and acoustic characteristics of Korean idiomatic and literal sentences.
Speech, Language and Hearing 18:3
► pp. 166 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
CARROL, GARETH & KATHY CONKLIN
2014.
Getting your wires crossed: Evidence for fast processing of L1 idioms in an L2.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17:4
► pp. 784 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hyun, JungMoon, Peggy S. Conner & Loraine K. Obler
Smolka, Eva, Katrin H. Preller & Carsten Eulitz
2014.
‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs.
Journal of Memory and Language 72
► pp. 16 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bridges, Kelly Ann & Diana Van Lancker Sidtis
2013.
Formulaic language in Alzheimer's disease.
Aphasiology 27:7
► pp. 799 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Holsinger, Edward
2013.
Representing Idioms: Syntactic and Contextual Effects on Idiom Processing.
Language and Speech 56:3
► pp. 373 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Legallois, Dominique
2013.
Les greffes phraséologiques – ou quand la syntaxe se compromet.
Langages n° 189:1
► pp. 103 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Boers, Frank & Seth Lindstromberg
2012.
Experimental and Intervention Studies on Formulaic Sequences in a Second Language.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32
► pp. 83 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
van Lancker Sidtis, Diana
2012.
Two‐Track Mind: Formulaic and Novel Language Support a Dual‐Process Model. In
The Handbook of the Neuropsychology of Language,
► pp. 342 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana
2012.
Formulaic Language and Language Disorders.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32
► pp. 62 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana
2015.
Formulaic Language in an Emergentist Framework. In
The Handbook of Language Emergence,
► pp. 578 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Conner, Peggy S., Jungmoon Hyun, Barbara O'Connor Wells, Inge Anema, Mira Goral, Marie-Michelle Monéreau-Merry, Daniel Rubino, Raija Kuckuk & Loraine K. Obler
2011.
Age-related differences in idiom production in adulthood.
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 25:10
► pp. 899 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kuiper, Koenraad, Georgie Columbus & Norbert Schmitt
2009.
The Acquisition of Phrasal Vocabulary. In
Language Acquisition,
► pp. 216 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
[no author supplied]
2021.
References. In
Foundations of Familiar Language,
► pp. 386 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.