Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 2:3 (2007) ► pp. 313357
Cited by

Cited by 22 other publications

Boers, Frank & Seth Lindstromberg
2012. Experimental and Intervention Studies on Formulaic Sequences in a Second Language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Bridges, Kelly Ann & Diana Van Lancker Sidtis
2013. Formulaic language in Alzheimer's disease. Aphasiology 27:7  pp. 799 ff. Crossref logo
Cacciari, Cristina
2014. Processing multiword idiomatic strings. The Mental Lexicon 9:2  pp. 267 ff. Crossref logo
CARROL, GARETH & KATHY CONKLIN
2014. Getting your wires crossed: Evidence for fast processing of L1 idioms in an L2. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17:4  pp. 784 ff. Crossref logo
Conner, Peggy S., Jungmoon Hyun, Barbara O'Connor Wells, Inge Anema, Mira Goral, Marie-Michelle Monéreau-Merry, Daniel Rubino, Raija Kuckuk & Loraine K. Obler
2011. Age-related differences in idiom production in adulthood. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 25:10  pp. 899 ff. Crossref logo
Holsinger, Edward
2013. Representing Idioms: Syntactic and Contextual Effects on Idiom Processing. Language and Speech 56:3  pp. 373 ff. Crossref logo
Hyun, JungMoon, Peggy S. Conner & Loraine K. Obler
2014. Idiom properties influencing idiom production in younger and older adults. The Mental Lexicon 9:2  pp. 294 ff. Crossref logo
Kuiper, Koenraad, Georgie Columbus & Norbert Schmitt
2009.  In Language Acquisition,  pp. 216 ff. Crossref logo
Lorenz, Antje, Andreas Mädebach & Jörg D Jescheniak
2018. Grammatical-gender effects in noun–noun compound production: Evidence from German. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71:5  pp. 1134 ff. Crossref logo
Lorenz, Antje, Stefanie Regel, Pienie Zwitserlood & Rasha Abdel Rahman
2018. Age-related effects in compound production: Intact lexical representations but more effortful encoding. Acta Psychologica 191  pp. 289 ff. Crossref logo
Rammell, C. Sophia, Diana Van Lancker Sidtis & David B. Pisoni
2017. Perception of formulaic and novel expressions under acoustic degradation. The Mental Lexicon 12:2  pp. 234 ff. Crossref logo
Sidtis, Diana Van Lancker & Seung Yun Yang
2021.  In The Handbook of Speech Perception,  pp. 309 ff. Crossref logo
Smolka, Eva, Matthias Gondan & Frank Rösler
2015. Take a stand on understanding: electrophysiological evidence for stem access in German complex verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9 Crossref logo
Smolka, Eva, Katrin H. Preller & Carsten Eulitz
2014. ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language 72  pp. 16 ff. Crossref logo
van Lancker Sidtis, Diana
2012.  In The Handbook of the Neuropsychology of Language,  pp. 342 ff. Crossref logo
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana
2012. Formulaic Language and Language Disorders. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32  pp. 62 ff. Crossref logo
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana
2020.  In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70],  pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana, JiHee Choi, Amy Alken & John J. Sidtis
2015. Formulaic Language in Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease: Complementary Effects of Subcortical and Cortical Dysfunction. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 58:5  pp. 1493 ff. Crossref logo
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana & John J. Sidtis
2018. Cortical-subcortical production of formulaic language: A review of linguistic, brain disorder, and functional imaging studies leading to a production model. Brain and Cognition 126  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana
2015.  In The Handbook of Language Emergence,  pp. 578 ff. Crossref logo
Yang, Seung-yun, Ji Sook Ahn & Diana Van Lancker Sidtis
2015. The perceptual and acoustic characteristics of Korean idiomatic and literal sentences. Speech, Language and Hearing 18:3  pp. 166 ff. Crossref logo
Yang, Seung-yun, Diana Sidtis & Seung Nam Yang
2017. Listeners’ identification and evaluation of Korean idiomatic utterances produced by persons with left- or right-hemisphere damage. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 31:2  pp. 155 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.