Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 14:3 (2019) ► pp.415423
References
Ahmed, S., Bryant, L., Tizro, Z., & Shickle, D.
(2012) Interpretations of informed choice in antenatal screening: A cross-cultural, Q-methodology study. Social Science & Medicine, 74(7), 997–1004. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alberts, K., & Ankenmann, B.
(2001) Simulating Pearson’s and Spearman’s Correlations in Q-Sorts Using Excel. Social Science Computer Review, 191, 221–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barker, J.
(2008) Q-methodology: An alternative approach to research in nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 281, 917–925. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, S.
(1996) Q Methodology and Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 61, 561–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Block, J.
(1961) The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) The Q-sort in character appraisal: Encoding subjective impressions of persons quantitatively. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A., & Kuperman, V.
(2014) Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 461, 904–911. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
(2010–) The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. Retrieved from [URL]
Freberg, K., Lutfallah, S., Saling, K., & Freberg, L.
(2019) What Makes an Influencer Influential? Using the California Q-sort to Predict Social Media Influence. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Ghandour, B., Madison Donner, Zoe Ross-Nash, Maryn Hayward, Madalyn Pinto, & Tara DeAngelis
(2018) Perfectionism in past and present anorexia nervosa. North American Journal of Psychology, 20(3), 671–690.Google Scholar
Goodrich, M.
(2016) Exploring School Counselors’ Motivations to Work with Lgbtqqi Students in Schools: A Q Methodology Study. Professional School Counseling 2016, 21(1a). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ho, G. W. K.
(2017) Examining perceptions and attitudes: A review of Likert-type scales versus Q-methodology. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 39(5), 674–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Correa, J. C., Sakarkar, G., Ngo, G., Ruiz-Fernández, S., Butcher, N., & Yamada, Y.
(2017) Placing joy, surprise and sadness in space: A cross-linguistic study. Psychological Research, 81(4), 750–763. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serfass, D., & Sherman, R.
(2013) A methodological note on ordered Q-Sort ratings. Journal Of Research In Personality, 47(6), 853–858. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snefjella, B., Généreux, M., & Kuperman, V.
(2018) Historical evolution of concrete and abstract language revisited. Behavior Research Methods. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warriner, A., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M.
(2013) Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yarar, N., & Orth, U. R.
(2018) Consumer lay theories on healthy nutrition: A Q methodology application in Germany. Appetite, 1201(Complete), 145–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

Alanazi, Ahmed S., Heather Wharrad, Fiona Moffatt, Michael Taylor & Muhammad Ladan
2021. Q Methodology in the COVID-19 Era. Healthcare 9:11  pp. 1491 ff. DOI logo
Azizah, Fahma Fiqhiyyah Nur, Hiroe Ishihara, Aiora Zabala, Yutaro Sakai, Gede Suantika & Nobuyuki Yagi
2020. Diverse Perceptions on Eco-Certification for Shrimp Aquaculture in Indonesia. Sustainability 12:22  pp. 9387 ff. DOI logo
Burak, Durmuş & Ahmet Simsar
2022. THE PREFERRED MENTORING ATTRIBUTES AND PRACTICES FOR EFFECTIVE SCIENCE TEACHING. Journal of Baltic Science Education 21:1  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Bučková, Hana & Jiří Dostál
2020. Kurikulum informatiky a digitálních technologií z pohledu učitelů 2. stupně základních škol, DOI logo
Calaguas, Noriel P.
2022. Divergent Perspectives of Filipino PLWH, Their Partners, and Care Providers on Sexuality After an HIV Diagnosis: A Q-Methodological Analysis. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care Publish Ahead of Print DOI logo
Du, Xiangyun & Adrian Lundberg
2021. Examining emic viewpoints on a pedagogical development program’s long-term effects using Q methodology. Studies in Educational Evaluation 71  pp. 101088 ff. DOI logo
Du, Xiangyun, Adrian Lundberg, Mohamed A. Ayari, Khalid K. Naji & Alaa Hawari
2022. Examining engineering students' perceptions of learner agency enactment in problem‐ and project‐based learning using Q methodology. Journal of Engineering Education 111:1  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Dussart, Pascal, Lise A. van Oortmerssen & Bé Albronda
2021. Perspectives on knowledge integration in cross-functional teams in information systems development. Team Performance Management: An International Journal 27:3/4  pp. 316 ff. DOI logo
Heath, Abigail & Matthew Cotton
2022. Responsibility, engagement, and policy strategy for ocean plastic waste management: a Q-method study of stakeholder perspectives. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Johnson, Malcolm S., Vanessa M. Adams, Jason Byrne & Rebecca M. B. Harris
2022. The benefits of Q + PPGIS for coupled human-natural systems research: A systematic review. Ambio DOI logo
Migchelbrink, Koen & Steven Van de Walle
2022. Serving Multiple Masters? Public Managers’ Role Perceptions in Participatory Budgeting. Administration & Society 54:3  pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
Nelson, Laura K., Molly Bogeberg, Alison Cullen, Laura E. Koehn, Astrea Strawn & Phillip S. Levin
2022. Perspectives on managing fisheries for community wellbeing in the face of climate change. Maritime Studies DOI logo
Van den Branden, Laura, Natacha Van de Craen, Luka Van Leugenhaege, Eveline Mestdagh, Olaf Timmermans, Bart Van Rompaey & Yvonne J Kuipers
2022. Flemish midwives’ perspectives on supporting women during the transition to motherhood – A Q-methodology study. Midwifery 105  pp. 103213 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Peng & Yanyan Wang
2021. Investigating Business English Teachers’ Belief About Online Assessment: Q Methodology Conducted During COVID-19 Period. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 30:6  pp. 621 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.