Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 14:3 (2019) ► pp.415423
References (17)
References
Ahmed, S., Bryant, L., Tizro, Z., & Shickle, D. (2012). Interpretations of informed choice in antenatal screening: A cross-cultural, Q-methodology study. Social Science & Medicine, 74(7), 997–1004. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alberts, K., & Ankenmann, B. (2001). Simulating Pearson’s and Spearman’s Correlations in Q-Sorts Using Excel. Social Science Computer Review, 191, 221–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barker, J. (2008). Q-methodology: An alternative approach to research in nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 281, 917–925. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. (1996). Q Methodology and Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 61, 561–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Block, J. (1961). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). The Q-sort in character appraisal: Encoding subjective impressions of persons quantitatively. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 461, 904–911. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. (2010–). The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. Retrieved from [URL]
Freberg, K., Lutfallah, S., Saling, K., & Freberg, L. (2019). What Makes an Influencer Influential? Using the California Q-sort to Predict Social Media Influence. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Ghandour, B., Madison Donner, Zoe Ross-Nash, Maryn Hayward, Madalyn Pinto, & Tara DeAngelis. (2018). Perfectionism in past and present anorexia nervosa. North American Journal of Psychology, 20(3), 671–690.Google Scholar
Goodrich, M. (2016). Exploring School Counselors’ Motivations to Work with Lgbtqqi Students in Schools: A Q Methodology Study. Professional School Counseling, 2016, 21(1a). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ho, G. W. K. (2017). Examining perceptions and attitudes: A review of Likert-type scales versus Q-methodology. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 39(5), 674–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Correa, J. C., Sakarkar, G., Ngo, G., Ruiz-Fernández, S., Butcher, N., & Yamada, Y. (2017). Placing joy, surprise and sadness in space: A cross-linguistic study. Psychological Research, 81(4), 750–763. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serfass, D., & Sherman, R. (2013). A methodological note on ordered Q-Sort ratings. Journal Of Research In Personality, 47(6), 853–858. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snefjella, B., Généreux, M., & Kuperman, V. (2018). Historical evolution of concrete and abstract language revisited. Behavior Research Methods. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warriner, A., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yarar, N., & Orth, U. R. (2018). Consumer lay theories on healthy nutrition: A Q methodology application in Germany. Appetite, 1201(Complete), 145–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (48)

Cited by 48 other publications

Apine, Elina & Tim Stojanovic
2024. Is the coastal future green, grey or hybrid? Diverse perspectives on coastal flood risk management and adaptation in the UK. Cambridge Prisms: Coastal Futures 2 DOI logo
Becker, Emily
2024. Exploring the Peer Leadership Network of Rehabilitation Healthcare Professionals Following Leader Development Training. Journal of Healthcare Leadership Volume 16  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Blay, Basilia E. & Alma S. Espartinez
2024. Improving Digital Learning in Higher Education: Students’ Perspectives on Design Thinking Using Q-Methodology. Journal of Technology Education 35:2  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Claassen, Casper Hendrik, Eric Bidet, Junki Kim & Yeanhee Choi
2024. How social enterprise executives perceive their relationship with the government in South Korea: Insights from a Q‐methodological study. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 34:3  pp. 589 ff. DOI logo
Garbellini, Simon, Angela Dew, Christine Imms, Simon Darcy, Keith McVilly & Gisselle Gallego
2024. Identifying priorities for Australian disability research using Q methodology. Disability and Health Journal 17:3  pp. 101634 ff. DOI logo
Hulme, Moira, Carrie Adamson & Dominic Griffiths
2024. What helps young people at risk of exclusion to remain in high school? Using Q methodology to hear student voices. Pastoral Care in Education 42:2  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Moore, James G, Gregory W Hartley, Raine Osborne, Kendra L Harrington & Mary Jane Rapport
2024. Identifying Perspectives on Physical Therapist Residency Program Goals: Hallmarks of Success and Excellence. Physical Therapy 104:1 DOI logo
Rogers, Beth A., Laura A. Killam, Robin D. Lockhart, Kelly Foltz-Ramos, Marian Luctkar-Flude, Suzanne H. Campbell, Jane Tyerman, Melissa Ehmke & Ashley E. Franklin
2024. Prioritizing Simulation Facilitators’ Competencies for Professional Development Using Q-Methodology. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 90  pp. 101527 ff. DOI logo
Slaughter, Yvette, Renata Aliani, Gary Bonar & Anne Keary
2024. Early childhood educators’ viewpoints on linguistic and cultural diversity: A Q methodology analysis. Linguistics and Education 79  pp. 101265 ff. DOI logo
Wilfong, Matthew, Debasmita Patra, Mitchell Pavao-Zuckerman & Paul T. Leisnham
2024. Diffusing responsibility, decentralizing infrastructure: hydrosocial relationships within the shifting stormwater management paradigm. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 67:4  pp. 830 ff. DOI logo
Broussard, Ashlynn, Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Jean Hugé
2023. Diversity of perspectives in biodiversity conservation: A case study of port land use in Antwerp and Rotterdam. Journal of Environmental Management 341  pp. 117937 ff. DOI logo
Gantt‐Howrey, Alexandra & Gülşah Kemer
2023. Counselor educators’ views on cognitively complex trainees: A Q method study. Counselor Education and Supervision 62:4  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Green, Abbey, Gerry Chan & Rita Orji
2023. 2023 10th International Conference on Behavioural and Social Computing (BESC),  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kratzer, Simon, Markus Westner & Susanne Strahringer
2023. Factors for Fractional CIO engagement success. Information & Management 60:5  pp. 103793 ff. DOI logo
Low, Robinson R., Darby P. Swayne, Caitlin L. Magel, Jessie Israel & Phillip S. Levin
2023. “At the end of the day, you need to do something”: discourses on prioritization of stormwater solutions. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 5 DOI logo
Lundberg, Adrian & Martin Stigmar
2023. University teachers’ shifting views of successful learning environments in the future. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 67:6  pp. 964 ff. DOI logo
Lyngdorf, Niels Erik Ruan, Xiangyun Du & Adrian Lundberg
2023. First-year engineering students’ learner agency sources in a systemic PBL environment: a Q study. European Journal of Engineering Education 48:6  pp. 1130 ff. DOI logo
Maczka, Krzysztof, Aleksandra Lis-Plesińska & Katarzyna Iwińska
2023. Epistemic justice impossible? Expert perceptions of the participatory monitoring of geo-energy projects in Poland. Energy Research & Social Science 102  pp. 103154 ff. DOI logo
Maczka, Krzysztof, Piotr Matczak, Marcin Mielewczyk, Patrycja Przewoźna, Adam Inglot, Piotr Wężyk, Karolina Zięba-Kulawik & Paweł Hawryło
2023. Narratives on cutting down trees on private land. A comparison of urban and rural municipalities in Poland using the Q-deliberation method. Land Use Policy 133  pp. 106843 ff. DOI logo
Mantzalas, Jane, Amanda L. Richdale, Cheryl Dissanayake & Yu-Wei Ryan Chen
2023. Examining subjective understandings of autistic burnout using Q methodology: A study protocol. PLOS ONE 18:5  pp. e0285578 ff. DOI logo
Nicholas, Sean Olivia, Shiloh Groot & Niki Harré
2023. Understanding urban agriculture in context: environmental, social, and psychological benefits of agriculture in Singapore. Local Environment 28:11  pp. 1446 ff. DOI logo
Parfitt, Anne & Stuart Read
2023. Educator views regarding young people’s aspirations in peripheral coastal communities in England: a Q study. Oxford Review of Education 49:6  pp. 764 ff. DOI logo
Shaw, Anne
2023. Inclusion of higher education disabled students: a Q-methodology study of lecturers’ attitudes. Teaching in Higher Education  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wiarda, Martijn, Tom B.J. Coenen & Neelke Doorn
2023. Operationalizing contested problem-solution spaces: The case of Dutch circular construction. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 48  pp. 100752 ff. DOI logo
Andersen, Christopher R., Justin Presseau, Victoria Saigle, Emily Fitzgerald, Madeline Lamanna, Phil Talbot, Anthony Delaney & Shane W. English
2022. Prioritizing outcome measures after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A q-sort survey of patients, health care providers and researchers. Frontiers in Neurology 13 DOI logo
Burak, Durmuş & Ahmet Simsar
2022. THE PREFERRED MENTORING ATTRIBUTES AND PRACTICES FOR EFFECTIVE SCIENCE TEACHING. Journal of Baltic Science Education 21:1  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Calaguas, Noriel P.
2022. Divergent Perspectives of Filipino PLWH, Their Partners, and Care Providers on Sexuality After an HIV Diagnosis: A Q-Methodological Analysis. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care 33:4  pp. 478 ff. DOI logo
Du, Xiangyun, Aida Guerra, Bente Nørgaard, Youmen Chaaban, Adrian Lundberg & Niels Erik Ruan Lyngdorf
2022. University Teachers’ Change Readiness to Implement Education for Sustainable Development through Participation in a PBL-Based PD Program. Sustainability 14:19  pp. 12079 ff. DOI logo
Du, Xiangyun, Adrian Lundberg, Mohamed A. Ayari, Khalid K. Naji & Alaa Hawari
2022. Examining engineering students' perceptions of learner agency enactment in problem‐ and project‐based learning using Q methodology. Journal of Engineering Education 111:1  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Heath, Abigail & Matthew Cotton
2022. Responsibility, engagement, and policy strategy for ocean plastic waste management: a Q-method study of stakeholder perspectives. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 65:13  pp. 2412 ff. DOI logo
Herrick, Nicole, Tala Al-Rousan, Carla Rodriguez, Ji Hae Lee, Anne Marie Valente, Jordan Stone, Gladys Ramos, Bendelyn Asante-Boateng, Howaida El-Said, Maria Moceri-Casas & Laith Alshawabkeh
2022. Priorities and Understanding of Pregnancy Among Women With Congenital Heart Disease. JACC: Advances 1:4  pp. 100112 ff. DOI logo
Johnson, Malcolm S., Vanessa M. Adams, Jason Byrne & Rebecca M. B. Harris
2022. The benefits of Q + PPGIS for coupled human-natural systems research: A systematic review. Ambio 51:8  pp. 1819 ff. DOI logo
Leong, Rachel, Camille Lebarbenchon, Jingru Zhang & Joanna L. Coleman
2022. Q-methodology to understand stakeholder discourses on bat conservation and management in view of the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Conservation Science 3 DOI logo
Martins, Ana Carolina Tardin, Luciana Pereira Freire Martins, Renata Velozo Timbó, Natanael Victor Furtunato Bezerra, Ada Amalia Ayala Urdapilleta, Florival Martins Passos Filho & Ciro Martins Gomes
2022. Measuring educational neglect using the Q method: A model based on the burden of disseminated tungiasis. Frontiers in Epidemiology 2 DOI logo
Migchelbrink, Koen & Steven Van de Walle
2022. Serving Multiple Masters? Public Managers’ Role Perceptions in Participatory Budgeting. Administration & Society 54:3  pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
Nelson, Laura K., Molly Bogeberg, Alison Cullen, Laura E. Koehn, Astrea Strawn & Phillip S. Levin
2022. Perspectives on managing fisheries for community wellbeing in the face of climate change. Maritime Studies 21:2  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Seynhaeve, Shauny, B. Deygers & E. Simon
2022. Newly arrived migrant students’ perceptions of emergency remote teaching: A Q methodology study. International Journal of Educational Research Open 3  pp. 100169 ff. DOI logo
Van den Branden, Laura, Natacha Van de Craen, Luka Van Leugenhaege, Eveline Mestdagh, Olaf Timmermans, Bart Van Rompaey & Yvonne J Kuipers
2022. Flemish midwives’ perspectives on supporting women during the transition to motherhood – A Q-methodology study. Midwifery 105  pp. 103213 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Edward, Tala Al-Rousan, Wali Mansour, Diego Oliva, Nicole Herrick, Birju Desai & Laith Alshawabkeh
2022. Language Barriers in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease. JACC: Advances 1:4  pp. 100077 ff. DOI logo
Wilson, Carly J., Lindsey E. Eberman, Ansley S. Redinger, Elizabeth R. Neil, Zachary K. Winkelmann & Chris Connaboy
2022. Athletic trainers’ viewpoints of patient-centered care: Preliminary findings. PLOS ONE 17:9  pp. e0274577 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Chen & Sophia Jowett
2022. Coach leadership in a crisis context: Investigating effective coach behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic with a process view. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Alanazi, Ahmed S., Heather Wharrad, Fiona Moffatt, Michael Taylor & Muhammad Ladan
2021. Q Methodology in the COVID-19 Era. Healthcare 9:11  pp. 1491 ff. DOI logo
Du, Xiangyun & Adrian Lundberg
2021. Examining emic viewpoints on a pedagogical development program’s long-term effects using Q methodology. Studies in Educational Evaluation 71  pp. 101088 ff. DOI logo
Dussart, Pascal, Lise A. van Oortmerssen & Bé Albronda
2021. Perspectives on knowledge integration in cross-functional teams in information systems development. Team Performance Management: An International Journal 27:3/4  pp. 316 ff. DOI logo
Medina-Cortes, DiMaris
2021. Nonprofit Fraud Detection and Prevention Techniques From A Leader’s Perspective: A Q-Methodology Study. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Wu, Peng & Yanyan Wang
2021. Investigating Business English Teachers’ Belief About Online Assessment: Q Methodology Conducted During COVID-19 Period. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 30:6  pp. 621 ff. DOI logo
Azizah, Fahma Fiqhiyyah Nur, Hiroe Ishihara, Aiora Zabala, Yutaro Sakai, Gede Suantika & Nobuyuki Yagi
2020. Diverse Perceptions on Eco-Certification for Shrimp Aquaculture in Indonesia. Sustainability 12:22  pp. 9387 ff. DOI logo
Bučková, Hana & Jiří Dostál
2020. Kurikulum informatiky a digitálních technologií z pohledu učitelů 2. stupně základních škol, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.