We examine unintentional spelling errors on verb homophones in informal online chat conversations of Flemish adolescents. In experiments, these verb forms yielded an effect of homophone dominance, i.e., most errors occurred on the lower-frequency form (Sandra et al., 1999). Verb homophones are argued to require the conscious application of a spelling rule, which may cause a temporary overload of working memory resources and trigger automatic retrieval of the higher-frequency spelling from the mental lexicon. Unlike most previous research, we investigate homophone intrusions in a natural writing context. Thus, we test the ‘ecological validity’ of psycholinguistic experiments. Importantly, this study relates these psycholinguistic constructs to different social variables in social media writing to test a prediction that directly follows from Sandra et al.’s account. Whereas social factors likely affect the error rates, they should not affect the error pattern: the number of working memory failures occurs at another processing level than the homophone intrusions. Hence, the focus is on the interaction between homophone dominance and the social variables. The errors for two types of verb homophones reveal (a) an impact of all social variables, (b) an effect of homophone dominance, and (c) no interaction between this effect and the social factors.
Androutsopoulos, J. (2011). Language change and digital media: a review of conceptions and evidence. In T. Kristiansen & N. Coupland (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp. 145–161). Oslo: Novus.
Baayen, R. H. (2014). Multivariate statistics. In R. Podesva & D. Sharma (Eds.), Research Methods in Linguistics (pp. 337–372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database(Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (1997). Masked repetition priming of words and nonwords: Evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 371, 268–293.
Coates, J. (1993). Woman, men and language. A sociolinguistic account of sex differences in language. London: Longman.
De Decker, B. & Vandekerckhove, R. (2017). Global features of online communication in local Flemish: social and medium-related determinants. Folia Linguistica, 511, 253–281.
Eisikovits, E. (2006). Girl-talk/Boy-talk: Sex differences in adolescent speech. In: J. Coates (Ed.), Language and gender. A reader (pp. 42–54). Oxford: Blackwell.
Ernestus, M., & Mak, W. M. (2005). Analogical effects in reading Dutch verb forms. Memory & Cognition, 33(7), 1160–1173.
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 680–698.
Frisson, S., & Sandra, D. (2002). Homophonic Forms of Regularly Inflected Verbs Have Their Own Orthographic Representations: A Developmental Perspective on Spelling Errors. Brain and Language, 811, 545–554.
Hastie, T. J., Tibshirani, R., & Tibshirani, R. J. (2017). Extended Comparisons of Best Subset Selection, Forward Stepwise Selection, and the Lasso.
Hilte, L. (2019). The social in social media writing: The impact of age, gender and social class indicators on adolescents’ informal online writing practices. Antwerp: University of Antwerp (doctoral thesis).
Kapatsinski, V. (2010). What is it I am writing?! Lexical frequency effects in spelling Russian prefixes: Uncertainty and competition in an apparently regular system. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6(2), 157–215.
Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new frequency measure for Dutch words based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650.
Kim, H. Y. (2017). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 42(2), 152–155. Retrieved from:
Labov, W. (2001). Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Largy, P., Fayol, M., & Lemaire, P. (1996). The homophone effect in written French: The case of verb-noun inflection errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 111, 217–255.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1061, 226–254.
Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E., & Ross, K. L. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 151, 1003–1019.
Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1301, 401–426.
R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Ryan, T. P., & Woodall, W. H. (2005). The most-cited statistical papers. Journal of Applied Statistics, 321, 461–474.
Sandra, D. (2010). Homophone Dominance at the Whole-word and Sub-word Levels: Spelling Errors Suggest Full-form Storage of Regularly Inflected Verb Forms. Language and Speech, 53(3), 405–444.
Sandra, D., Frisson, S., & Daems, F. (1999). Why simple verb forms can be so difficult to spell: the influence of homophone frequency and distance in Dutch. Brain and Language, 681, 277–283.
Surkyn, H., Vandekerckhove, R., & Sandra, D. (2019). Errors Outside the Lab: The Interaction of a Psycholinguistic and a Sociolinguistic Variable in the Production of Verb Spelling Errors in Informal Computer-Mediated Communication. In J. Longhi & C. Marinica (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference on CMC and Social Media Corpora for the Humanities (CMC-Corpora2019) (pp. 59–62). Paris.
Tagliamonte, S. (2011). Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Tagliamonte, S. (2016). Teen talk: The language of adolescents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Bergh, H. & van Es, A., & Spijker, S. (2011). Spelling op verschillende niveaus: werkwoordspelling aan het einde van de basisschool en het einde van het voorgezet onderwijs. [Spelling at different levels: verb spelling at the end of primary school and at the end of secondary education]. Levende Talen Tijdschrift, 12(1), 3–14.
Van der Horst, M., van den Bergh, H., & Evers-Vermeul, J. (2012). Kunnen leerlingen wat ze moeten kunnen? Onderzoek naar de doorlopende leerlijn op het gebied van werkwoordspelling. [Can students do what they need to be able to do? Research into the continuous learning line in the field of verb spelling]. Levende Talen Tijdschrift, 21, 33–42.
Van der Velde, I. (1956). De tragedie der werkwoordsvormen. Een taalhistorische en taaldidactische studie. [The tragedy of verb forms. A language historical and language didactic study]. Groningen: Noordhoff Uitgevers.
Vandekerckhove, R. & Sandra, D. (2016). De potentiële impact van informele online communicatie op de spellingpraktijk van Vlaamse tieners in schoolcontext. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 38(3), 201–234.
Verhaert, N. (2016). Rules or regularities? The Homophone Dominance effect in spelling and reading regular Dutch verb forms. Antwerp: University of Antwerp (doctoral thesis).
Verhaert, N., & Sandra, D. (2016). Homofoondominantie veroorzaakt dt-fouten tijdens het spellen en maakt er ons blind voor tijdens het lezen. [Homophone dominance causes dt-errors during spelling and makes us blind to them while reading]. Levende Talen Tijdschrift, 17(4), 37–46.
Vignette on emmeans Package R (Basics of estimated marginal means). (n.d.). Retrieved from: [URL]
VVKSO. (2006). Leerplan Nederlands secundair onderwijs bso. [Curriculum Dutch secondary education bso]. Brussel: Vlaams Verbond van het Katholiek Secundair Onderwijs. Retrieved from: [URL]
VVKSO. (2014). Leerplan Nederlands secundair onderwijs aso-kso-tso. [Curriculum Dutch secondary education aso-kso-tso]. Brussel: Vlaams Verbond van het Katholiek Secundair Onderwijs. Retrieved from: [URL]
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Berg, Kristian, Stefan Hartmann & Daniel Claeser
2024. Are some morphological units more prone to spelling variation than others? A case study using spontaneous handwritten data. Morphology 34:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Sandra, Dominiek, Dorit Ravid & Ingo Plag
2024. The orthographic representation of a word’s morphological structure: beneficial and detrimental effect for spellers. Morphology 34:2 ► pp. 103 ff.
Sandra, Dominiek
2022. Too Little Morphology Can Kill You: The Interplay Between Low-Frequency Morpho-Orthographic Rules and High-Frequency Verb Homophones in Spelling Errors. In Developing Language and Literacy [Literacy Studies, 23], ► pp. 191 ff.
2022. Adolescents and Verb Spelling: The Impact of Gender and Educational Track on Rule Knowledge and Linguistic Attitudes. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 11
2023. When correct spelling hardly matters: Teenagers’ production and perception of spelling error corrections in Dutch social media writing. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 0:0
Chamalaun, Robert J. P. M., Anna M. T. Bosman & Mirjam T. C. Ernestus
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.