Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 16:1 (2021) ► pp. 6997
References

References

Albright, A., & Hayes, B.
(2003) Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study. Cognition, 90(2), 119–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berent, I., Marcus, G., Shimron, J., & Gafos, A.
(2002) The scope of linguistic generalizations: Evidence from Hebrew word formation. Cognition, 83(2), 113–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berent, I., & Pinker, S.
(2007) The dislike of regular plurals in compounds: Phonological familiarity or morphological constraint? The Mental Lexicon, 2(2), 129–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berent, I., Pinker, S., & Shimron, J.
(2002) The nature of regularity and irregularity: Evidence from Hebrew nominal inflection. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(5), 459–502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, J.
(2016) Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
(2013) Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.51).Google Scholar
Borg, A., & Azzopardi-Alexander, M.
(1997) Maltese. Routledge.Google Scholar
Bugeja, K. P.
(2017) Kelmet il-malti dictionary. TBWA.Google Scholar
Camilleri, J. J.
(2013) A computational grammar and lexicon for Maltese. [Master Thesis, University of Gothenburg]. http://​publications​.lib​.chalmers​.se​/records​/fulltext​/185320​/185320​.pdf
Clahsen, H.
(1999) Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991–1060. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A., & Marcus, G. F.
(1992) Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition, 45(3), 225–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daelemans, W.
(2002) A comparison of analogical modeling to memory-based language processing. In R. Skousen, D. Lonsdale, & D. B. Parkinson (Eds.), Analogical modeling (pp. 157–179). Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dawdy-Hesterberg, L. G., & Pierrehumbert, J. B.
(2014) Learnability and generalisation of Arabic broken plural nouns. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(10), 1268–1282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drake, S.
(2018a) The form and productivity of the Maltese morphological diminutive. Morphology, 28, 297–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018b) L1 biases in learning root-and-pattern morphology. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona]. http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/10150​/630543
Draxler, C., & Jänsch, K.
(2004) SpeechRecorder – a Universal Platform Independent Multi-Channel Audio Recording Software. Proc. of LREC, 559–562.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C.
(1984) Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 680–698. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R.
(1987) Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39(2), 211–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gatt, A., & Čéplö, S.
(2013) Digital corpora and other electronic resources for Maltese. In A. Hardie & R. Love (Eds.), Corpus linguistics (p. 96–97). Lancaster: UCREL.Google Scholar
Geary, J., & Ussishkin, A.
(2018) Root-letter priming in Maltese visual word recognition. The Mental Lexicon, 13, 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hay, J. B., & Baayen, H. R.
(2005) Shifting paradigms: gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 342–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kielar, A., Joanisse, M. F., & Hare, M. L.
(2008) Priming English past tense verbs: Rules or statistics? Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 327–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. J., Pinker, S., Prince, A., & Prasada, S.
(1991) Why no mere mortal has ever out to center field. Cognitive Science (15), 173–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
(2017) lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lück, M., Hahne, A., & Clahsen, H.
(2006) Brain potentials to morphologically complex words during listening. Brain Research, 1077, 144–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S.
(1995) German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive psychology, 29(3), 189–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K.
(1998) Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(11), 428–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L.
(1994) Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. S.
(1990) Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8(2), 209–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W.
(2004) Regularity and irregularity in French verbal inflection. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(4), 561–580. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakisa, R., Plunkett, K., & Hahn, U.
(2001) Single-and dual-route models of inflectional morphology. In P. Broeder & J. Murre (Eds.), Models of language acquisition: Inductive and deductive approaches (pp. 201–222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nieder, J., van de Vijver, R., & Mitterer, H.
(2020) Knowledge of Maltese singular-plural mappings. Analogy explains it best. Morphology. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pastizzo, M. J., & Feldman, L. B.
(2002) Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological faciliation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28(1), 244–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, J., Gray, J., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., … Lindelov, J.
(2019) PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behaviour Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1998) Words and rules. Lingua, 106, 219–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S., & Prince, A.
(1988) On language and connectionism: Analysis of parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28(1–2), 73–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Post, B., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Randall, B., & Tyler, L. K.
(2008) The processing of English regular inflections: Phonological cues to morphological structure. Cognition, 109(1), 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Royle, P., Beritognolo, G., & Bergeron, E.
(2012) Regularity, sub-regularity and irregularity in French acquisition. In T. Stolz, H. Otsuka, A. Urdze, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), Irregularity in morphology (and beyond) (p. 227). Akademie Verlag Berlin.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J.
(1986) On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing. MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schembri, T.
(2012) The Broken Plural in Maltese: A Description. Univ.-Verl. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L.
(1989) A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & Plaut, D. C.
(2014) Quasiregularity and its discontents: The legacy of the past tense debate. Cognitive Science, 38, 1190–1228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skousen, R.
(1992) Analogy and structure. Springer Netherlands. 34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sonnenstuhl, I., Eisenbeiss, S., & Clahsen, H.
(1999) Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition, 72, 203–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spagnol, M.
(2011) A Tale of Two Morphologies: Verb structure and argument alternations in Maltese. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Konstanz]. https://​kops​.unikonstanz​.de​/handle​/123456789​/16372
Twist, A. E.
(2006) A Psycholinguistic Investigation of the Verbal Morphology of Maltese. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona]. https://​repository​.arizona​.edu​/handle​/10150​/194996
van de Vijver, R., & Baer-Henney, D.
(2014) Developing biases. Frontiers in Psychology – Section Language Sciences, 5, Article 634. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Paradigms in the mental lexicon: Evidence from German. Frontiers in Communication, 3, 65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weyerts, H., Penke, M., Dohrn, U., Clahsen, H., & Münte, T. F.
(1997) Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German plurals. NeuroReport, 8(4), 957–962. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H.
(2016) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wray, S. C.
(2016) Decomposability and the effects of morpheme frequency in lexical access. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona]. http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/10150​/621751