Cover not available
Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 16:1 (2021) ► pp.2–22

The impact of embodied simulation in vocabulary learning

| EMC Laboratory, University Lyon2
| EMC Laboratory, University Lyon2
| EMC Laboratory, University Lyon2
| EMC Laboratory, University Lyon2

The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the multisensory nature of vocabulary knowledge by using learning designed to encourage the simulation of sensorimotor experiences.

Forty participants were instructed to learn pseudowords together with arbitrary definitions, either by mentally experiencing (sensorimotor simulation) the definitions, or by mentally repeating them. A test phase consisting of three tasks was then administered: in a recognition task, participants had to recognize learned pseudowords among distractors. In a categorization task, they had to categorize pseudowords as representing either living or non-living items. Finally, in a sentence completion task, participants had to decide whether pseudowords were congruent with context sentences. As expected, the sensorimotor simulation condition induced better performances only in the categorization task and the sentence completion task. The results converge with data from the literature in demonstrating that knowledge emergence implies sensorimotor simulation and showing that vocabulary learning can benefit from encoding that encourages the simulation of sensorimotor experiences.

Keywords: vocabulary learning, embodied cognition, sensorimotor simulation, adults
Article outline
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Apparatus and material
    • Procedure
    • Test phase
      • Recognition task
      • Semantic categorization task
      • Sentence completion task
  • Results
    • Recognition task
      • Proportion of correct responses
      • Response times
  • Semantic categorization task
    • Proportion of correct responses
    • Response times
  • Sentence completion task
    • Proportion of correct responses
    • Response times
  • General discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Conflict of interest
  • References
Published online: 8 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20011.ver
References
Anders, P., Bos, C., & Filip, D.
(1984) The effect of semantic feature analysis of the reading comprehension of learning-disabled students. In J. A. Niles, & L. A. Harris (Eds.), Changing perspectives on research in reading/language processing and instruction. National Reading Conference Yearbook (Vol. 331) (pp. 162–166). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W.
(1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(04). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W., Kyle Simmons, W., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D.
(2003) Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 84–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boronat, C. B., Buxbaum, L. J., Coslett, H. B., Tang, K., Saffran, E. M., Kimberg, D. Y., & Detre, J. A.
(2005) Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research, 23(2–3), 361–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bos, C. S., Anders, P. L., Filip, D., & Jaffe, L. E.
(1989) The Effects of an Interactive Instructional Strategy for Enhancing Reading Comprehension and Content Area Learning for Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(6), 384–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brouillet, D.
(2020) Enactive memory. Frontiers in psychology, 111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brouillet, D., Vagnot, C., Milhau, A., Brunel, L., Briglia, J., Versace, R., & Rousset, S.
(2015) Sensory–motor properties of past actions bias memory in a recognition task. Psychological Research, 79(4), 678–686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brouillet, T., Heurley, L., Martin, S., & Brouillet, D.
(2010) The embodied cognition theory and the motor component of “yes” and “no” verbal responses. Acta Psychologica, 134(3), 310–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brouillet, D., & Versace, R.
(2019) The nature of the traces and the dynamics of memory. Psychol. Behav. Sci, 81, 151–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunel, L., Lesourd, M., Labeye, E., & Versace, R.
(2010) The sensory nature of knowledge: Sensory priming effects in semantic categorization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(5), 955–964. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z.
(2006) The organisation of conceptual knowledge in the brain: The future’s past and some future directions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(1), 13–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chao, L. L., & Martin, A.
(2000) Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream. NeuroImage, 12(4), 478–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, R. L.
(1989) Memory for action events: The power of enactment. Educational Psychology Review, 1(1), 57–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F.
(1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, S. W., Yip, T. K., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
(2010) Gesturing makes memories that last. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 465–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S.
(1972) Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E.
(1975) Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Tucker, M.
(2000) Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91(4), 451–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farah, M. J., & McClelland, J. L.
(1991) A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120(4), 339–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M.
(1997) What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(01). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F.
(2004) Somatotopic Representation of Action Words in Human Motor and Premotor Cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hintzman, D. L.
(1984) Minerva 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16(2), 96–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986) “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychol. Rev. 931, 411–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95(4), 528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hommel, B.
(2013) Ideomotor Action Control: On the Perceptual Grounding of Voluntary Actions and Agents. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Éd.), Action Science (p. 112–136). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W.
(2001) The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–878. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horchak, O. V., Giger, J.-C., Cabral, M., & Pochwatko, G.
(2014) From demonstration to theory in embodied language comprehension: A review. Cognitive Systems Research, 29–301, 66–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, W.
(1890) The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M.
(1981) On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(3), 306–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormi-nouri, R.
(1995) The nature of memory for action events: An episodic integration view. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 337–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormi-Nouri, R., Nyberg, L., & Nilsson, L.-G.
(1994) The effect of retrieval enactment on recall of subject-performed tasks and verbal tasks. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 723–728. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, A., Haxby, J. V., Lalonde, F. O. M., Wiggs, C. L., & Ungerleider, L. G.
(1995) Discrete Cortical Regions Associated with Knowledge of Color and Knowledge of Action. Science, 270(5233), 102–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Alex
(2007) The Representation of Object Concepts in the Brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 25–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, A., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V.
(2000) Category specificity and the brain: The sensory/motor model of semantic representations of objects. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 839–847). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Alex, Wiggs, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V.
(1996) Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature, 379(6566), 649–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L.
(2004) Lexique 2 : A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 516–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nyberg, L., & Nilsson, L.-G.
(1995) The role of enactment in implicit and explicit memory. Psychological Research, 57(3–4), 215–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ouellette, G., & Beers, A.
(2010) A not-so-simple view of reading: how oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 189–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ouellette, G. P.
(2006) What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prinz, W.
(1997) Perception and Action Planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Protopapas, A., Mouzaki, A., Sideridis, G. D., Kotsolakou, A., & Simos, P. G.
(2013) The Role of Vocabulary in the Context of the Simple View of Reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 29(2), 168–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulvermüller, F.
(1999) Words in the brain’s language. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 253–279; discussion 280–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W.
(1984) Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rey, A. E., Riou, B., Vallet, G. T., & Versace, R.
(2017) The automatic visual simulation of words: A memory reactivated mask slows down conceptual access. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 71(1), 14–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Bjork, R. A.
(1988) Measures of Memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 39(1), 475–543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadoski, M.
(2005) A Dual Coding View of Vocabulary Learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 221–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Reading Comprehension is Embodied: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 331–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simmons, W. K., Ramjee, V., Beauchamp, M. S., McRae, K., Martin, A., & Barsalou, L. W.
(2007) A common neural substrate for perceiving and knowing about color. Neuropsychologia, 45(12), 2802–2810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slotnick, S. D.
(2004) Visual Memory and Visual Perception Recruit Common Neural Substrates. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(4), 207–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squire, L. R.
(2004) Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 82(3), 171–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A.
(2001) The Effect of Implied Orientation Derived from Verbal Context on Picture Recognition. Psychological Science, 12(2), 153–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K.
(2006) Relationships Between Word Knowledge and Reading Comprehension in Third-Grade Children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 381–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E.
Organization of memory: Quo vadis? In: Gazzaniga MS, ed. The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT Press 1995: 839–47.Google Scholar
Versace, R., & Rose, M.
(2007) The role of emotion in multimodal integration. Current Psychology Letters, Behaviour, Brain & Cognition, 211, 16–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Versace, R., Labeye, É., Badard, G., & Rose, M.
(2009) The contents of long-term memory and the emergence of knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 522–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Versace, R., Vallet, G. T., Riou, B., Lesourd, M., Labeye, É., & Brunel, L.
(2014) Act-In: An integrated view of memory mechanisms. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 280–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vingerhoets, G.
(2008) Knowing about tools: Neural correlates of tool familiarity and experience. NeuroImage, 40(3), 1380–1391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T.
(1984) CATEGORY SPECIFIC SEMANTIC IMPAIRMENTS. Brain, 107(3), 829–853. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whittlesea, B. W. A.
(1987) Preservation of specific experiences in the representation of general knowledge. Cognition 131, 3–171.Google Scholar
Witt, J. K., Kemmerer, D., Linkenauger, S. A., & Culham, J.
(2010) A Functional Role for Motor Simulation in Identifying Tools. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1215–1219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, L., & Barsalou, L. W.
(2009) Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: Evidence from property generation. Acta Psychologica, 132(2), 173–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., and Kaschak, M. P.
(2008) “Language in the brain, body, and world,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, eds P. Robbins and M. Aydede (New York: Cambridge University Press), 368–381.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J.
(2005) Embodied Sentence Comprehension. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Éd.), Grounding Cognition (p. 224–245). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H.
(2002) Language Comprehenders Mentally Represent the Shapes of Objects. Psychological Science, 13(2), 168–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar