Article published In:
The Mental LexiconVol. 16:1 (2021) ► pp.98–132
Romance N Prep N constructions in visual word recognition
An eye-tracking study of French, Spanish and Portuguese
N Prep N constructions such as Sp. bicicleta de montaña ‘mountain bike’ are very productive and frequent in Romance languages. They commonly have been classified as syntagmatic compounds that show no orthographic union and exhibit an internal structure that resembles free syntactic structures, such as Sp. libro para niños ‘book for children’. There is no consensus on how to best distinguish lexical from syntactic N Prep N constructions. The present paper presents an explorative eye-tracking study on N Prep N constructions, varying both lexical type (lexical vs. syntactic) and preposition across three languages, French, Spanish and Portuguese. The task of the eye-tracking study was a reading aloud paradigm of the constructions in sentence context. Constructions were fixated on less when more frequent, independent of lexical status. There was also modest evidence that a higher construction frequency afforded shorter total fixation durations, but only for lower deciles of the response distribution. The (construction-initial) head noun also received fewer fixations as construction frequency increased, and also when the head noun was more frequent. The second fixation durations on the head noun also revealed an effect of lexical status, with syntactic constructions receiving shorter fixations at the 5th and 7th deciles. The probability of a fixation on the preposition decreased with preposition frequency, but first fixations on the preposition increased with preposition frequency. The prepositions of Portuguese, the language with the richest inventory of prepositions, received more fixations than the prepositions of French and Spanish. The observed pattern of results is consistent with models of lexical processing in which reading is guided by knowledge of both higher-level constructions and knowledge of key constituents such as the head noun and the preposition.
Article outline
- Introduction
- State of the art in the literature
- Participants
- Materials
- Design
- Procedure
- Predictor variables
- Results
- Fixation counts
- Analysis of fixation durations
- General discussion
- Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
Arnon, I. & Snider, N.
(2010) More
than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and
Language 621. 67–82. 
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.
(1989) Functionalism
and the competition model. The crosslinguistic study of sentence
processing, 31, 73–112.
Baayen, R. H., Chuang, Y. Y., Shafaei-Bajestan, E., & Blevins, J. P.
(2019) The
discriminative lexicon: A unified computational model for the lexicon and lexical processing in comprehension and production
grounded not in (de) composition but in linear discriminative
learning. Complexity. [URL]
Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R.
(1997) Singulars
and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and
Language, 371, 94–117.
Baayen, R. H., Kuperman, V., & Bertram, R.
(2010) Frequency
effects in compound processing. Compounding, Amsterdam/Philadelphia:
Benjamins, 257–270.
Baayen, R. H., Hendrix, P., & Ramscar, M.
(2013) Sidestepping
the combinatorial explosion: An explanation on n-gram frequency effects based on naive discriminative
learning. Language and
Speech 561, 329–347.
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., & Ramscar, M.
(2016) Frequency
in lexical
processing. Aphasiology, 30(11), 1174–1220.
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M.
(2011) An
amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative
learning. Psychological
review, 118(3), 438.
Bisetto, A., & Scalise, S.
(2005) The
classification of compounds. Lingue e
linguaggio, 4(2), 319–0.
Booij, G.
(2010) Compound
constructions: Schemas or analogy? A construction morphologist
perspective. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary
issues in compounding (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory
311), 93–109. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2018) The
construction of words: Introduction and Overview. In Gert Booij (ed.), The
construction of words: Advances in construction morphology (Studies in Morphology
4), 3–18. Cham: Springer.
Buenafuentes de la Mata, C.
(2009) La
formación de palabras compuestas: del latín al español. In Diachronic
linguistics (pp. 213–238). Documenta Universitaria.
(2010) La
composición sintagmática en español. San Millán de la Cogolla: Cilengua.
Bybee, J.
(2010) Language,
usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N.
(1965) Aspects
of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
Cutler, A.
(1983) Lexical
complexity and sentence processing. In Flores d’Arcais & Jarvella (eds). The
Process of Language
Understanding. Chichester: Wiley.
Ellis, N. C.
(2002) Frequency
Effects in Language Processing. In Studies in Second Language
Acquisition 24 (2). 143–188.
Fasiolo, M., Goude, Y., Nedellec, R., & Wood, S. N.
Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & del Prado Martín, F. M.
(2009) Early
morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of
word recognition. Psychonomic bulletin &
review, 16(4), 684–691.
Fradin, B.
(2009) Romance:
French. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of
compounding, 417–435. Oxford: University Press.
Frost, R., Forster, K. & Deutsch, A.
(1997) What
can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological
representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory &
Cognition 23(4). 829–856.
Gagné, C. L. & Shoben, E.J.
(1997) Influence
of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory &
Cognition 23(1). 71–87.
Gagné, C. L. & Spalding, T.L.
(2009) Constituent
integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational
structures? Journal of Memory and
Language 60(1). 20–35.
(2013) Conceptual
composition: The role of relational competition in the comprehension of modifier-noun phrases and noun-noun
compounds. In Brian H. Ross (ed.), The
psychology of learning and
motivation (Volume 591), 97–130. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
Gagné, C. L. & Spalding, T.L.
(2014) Conceptual
composition: The role of relational competition in the comprehension of modifier-noun phrases and noun-noun
compounds. Psychology of Learning and
Motivation 591. 97–130.
Gagné, C. L. & Spalding, T.L.
(2014) Relation
diversity and ease of processing for opaque and transparent English
compounds. In Rainer, F.; Dressler, W.; Gardini, F. and Luschützky, H. C. (Eds.). Morphology
and Meaning: Current Issues in Linguistic
Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 153–162.
Gahl, S., Garnsey, S. M.
(2004) Knowledge
of grammar, knowledge of usage: syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation
variation. In Language 80(4). 748–774.
Geeraert, K., Newman, J., and Baayen, R. H.
(2017) Idiom
variation: Experimental data and a blueprint of a computational
model. In Christiansen, M., and Arnon, I. (Eds.) More
than Words: The Role of Multiword Sequences in Language Learning and Use. Special issue of Topics in Cognitive
Science, 91, 653–669.
Gernsbacher, M. A.
(1984) Resolving
20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and
polysemy. Journal of experimental psychology:
General, 113(2), 256.
Giraudo, Hélène S. & Jonathan Grainger
(2001) Priming
complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin
&
Review 8(1). 127–131.
Girju, R., Moldovan, D., Tatu, M., & Antohe, D.
(2005) On
the semantics of noun compounds. Computer speech &
language, 19(4), 479–496.
Guevara, E. R.
(2012) Spanish
compounds. Probus. International Journal of Latin and Romance
Linguistics 24(1). 175–195.
Hennecke, I.
(2019) Internal
constituent variability and semantic transparency in N Prep N constructions in Romance
languages. In Sabine Schulte im Walde & Eva Smolka (eds.), The
role of constituents in multiword expressions: An interdisciplinary, cross-lingual
perspective, 131–156. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Hennecke, I. & Baayen, H.
(2017) A
Quantitative Survey of N Prep N Constructions in Romance Languages and Prepositional
Variability. Quaderns de Filologia: Estudis
Lingüístics 221. 129–146.
Jarema, G., Busson, C., Nikolova, R., Tsapkini, K., & Libben, G.
(1999) Processing
compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and
Language, 68(1–2), 362–369.
Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L.
(2003) The
effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye
fixations. British Journal of
Psychology, 94(2), 223–244.
Kornfeld, L. M.
(2009) IE,
romance: Spanish. In The Oxford handbook of
compounding.
Kuperman, V., Bertram, R. & Baayen, R. H.
(2008) Morphological
dynamics in compound processing, Language and Cognitive
Processes, 231:7–8, 1089–1132.
Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H.
(2009) Reading
polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 35(3), 876.
Lau, E., Rozanova, K., Phillips, C.
(2007) Syntactic
prediction and lexical frequency effects in sentence processing. University of Maryland Working Papers.
Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D.
(2003) Compound
fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and
language, 84(1), 50–64.
Libben, G., Goral, M., & Baayen, R. H.
(2018) What
does constituent priming mean in the investigation of compound processing? The Mental
Lexicon, 13(2), 269–284.
Maguire, Phil & Arthur Cater
(2004) Is
conceptual combination influenced by word order? 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for
Computational Linguistics. [URL] (19 Nov (2019)
Marelli, M., Crepaldi, D. & Luzzatti, C.
(2009) Head
position and the mental representation of nominal compounds. A constituent priming study in
Italian. In: The Mental
Lexicon 4(3). 430–454.
Masini, F.
(2009) Phrasal
lexemes, compounds and phrases: A constructionist perspective. Word
structure, 2(2), 254–271.
Pierrehumbert, J. B.
(2001) Exemplar
dynamics: Word frequency. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic
structure, 451, 137.
Pinker, S.
(1991) Rules
of
language. Science, 253(5019), 530–535.
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T.
(2002) The
past and future of the past tense. Trends in cognitive
sciences, 6(11), 456–463.
Pylkkänen, L., Feintuch, S., Hopkins, E., & Marantz, A.
(2004) Neural
correlates of the effects of morphological family frequency and family size: an MEG
study. Cognition, 91(3), B35–B45.
Rainer, F.
(2016) Italian. In: O.
Peter Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen und Franz Rainer (Hg.): Word Formation. An International Handbook of the
Languages of Europe, Bd. 4. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, S. 2712–2731.
R Core Team
(2017) R: A language and
environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: [URL]
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B.
(2004) The
broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word
recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review, 11(6), 1090–1098.
Rio-Torto, G., & Ribeiro, S.
(2009) Compounds
in portuguese. Lingue e
linguaggio, 8(2), 271–292.
(2010) Unidades
pluriverbais – Processamento e ensino. In: As interfaces da
gramática, 151–165, Araraquara, SP: UNESP Editora.
(2012) Portuguese
compounds. Probus, 24(1), 119–145.
Rummelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & PDP
Research Group
(1986) Parallel distributed
processing. MIT Press, Cambridge.
Shaoul, C., Westbury, C. F., & Baayen, H. R.
(2013) The
subjective frequency of word
n-grams. Psihologija, 46(4), 497–537.
Schmidtke, D., Kuperman, V., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.
(2016) Competition
between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy. Psychonomic
bulletin &
review, 23(2), 556–570.
Schmidtke, D., Matsuki, K., & Kuperman, V.
(2017) Surviving
blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word
recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 43(11), 1793–1820.
Shoben, E. J.
(1991) Predicating
and nonpredicating combinations. In P. J. Schwanenflugal (ed.), The
psychology of word meanings, 117–135. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Snider, N. & Arnon, I.
(2012) A
unified lexicon and grammar? Compositional and non-compositional phrases in the
lexicon. In Dagmar Divjak & Stefan Th. Gries (eds.), Frequency
effects in language representation, 127–164. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Solomyak, O., & Marantz, A.
(2010) Evidence
for early morphological decomposition in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 22(9), 2042–2057.
Štekauer, P.
(2005) “Onomasiological
Approach to Word-formation.” In: Pavel Štekauer and Rochelle Lieber (eds.), Handbook
of
Word-formation. Dordrecht: Springer.
Spalding, T. L., Gagné, C. L., Mullaly, A., & Ji, H.
(2010) Relation-based
interpretation of noun-noun phrases: A new theoretical approach. New impulses in
word-formation, 283–315.
Spalding, Thomas L. & Christina L. Gagné
(2011) Relation
priming in established compounds: Facilitation? Memory &
Cognition 39(8). 1472–1486.
Spalding, T. L. & Gagné, C. L.
(2014) Relational diversity
affects ease of processing even for opaque English compounds. The Mental
Lexicon, 91, 48–66.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I.
(1976) Lexical
storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of verbal learning and
verbal
behavior, 15(6), 607–620.
Tremblay, A., and Baayen, R. H.
(2010) Holistic
processing of regular four-word sequences: A behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability
on immediate free recall. In D. Wood, Perspectives
on formulaic language: Acquisition and
communication. London: The Continuum International Publishing Group, 151–173.
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C.
(2011) Processing
advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall
tasks. Language
learning, 61(2), 569–613.
Ullman, M. T.
(2001) The
declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of psycholinguistic
research, 30(1), 37–69.
(2004) Contributions
of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural
model. Cognition, 92(1–2), 231–270.
Val Àlvaro, J. F.
(1999) La
composición. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática
descriptiva de la lengua
española. Madrid: Espasa, 757–4841.
Villoing, F.
(2012) French
compounds. Probus, 24(1), 29–60.
Wood S.
(2017) Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R, 2nd
edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Zwitserlood, P.
(2018) Processing
and representation of morphological complexity in native language comprehension and
production. In Geert Booij (ed.), The
construction of words: Advances in construction morphology (Studies in Morphology
4), 583–602. Cham: Springer.