Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 16:1 (2021) ► pp. 98132
Arnon, I. & Snider, N.
(2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 621. 67–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.
(1989) Functionalism and the competition model. The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, 31, 73–112.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Chuang, Y. Y., Shafaei-Bajestan, E., & Blevins, J. P.
(2019) The discriminative lexicon: A unified computational model for the lexicon and lexical processing in comprehension and production grounded not in (de) composition but in linear discriminative learning. Complexity. https://​www​.hindawi​.com​/journals​/complexity​/2019​/4895891/
Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R.
(1997) Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 371, 94–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Kuperman, V., & Bertram, R.
(2010) Frequency effects in compound processing. Compounding, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 257–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Hendrix, P., & Ramscar, M.
(2013) Sidestepping the combinatorial explosion: An explanation on n-gram frequency effects based on naive discriminative learning. Language and Speech 561, 329–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., & Ramscar, M.
(2016) Frequency in lexical processing. Aphasiology, 30(11), 1174–1220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M.
(2011) An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological review, 118(3), 438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bisetto, A., & Scalise, S.
(2005) The classification of compounds. Lingue e linguaggio, 4(2), 319–0.Google Scholar
Booij, G.
(2010) Compound constructions: Schemas or analogy? A construction morphologist perspective. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 311), 93–109. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) The construction of words: Introduction and Overview. In Gert Booij (ed.), The construction of words: Advances in construction morphology (Studies in Morphology 4), 3–18. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buenafuentes de la Mata, C.
(2009) La formación de palabras compuestas: del latín al español. In Diachronic linguistics (pp. 213–238). Documenta Universitaria.Google Scholar
(2010) La composición sintagmática en español. San Millán de la Cogolla: Cilengua.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, A.
(1983) Lexical complexity and sentence processing. In Flores d’Arcais & Jarvella (eds). The Process of Language Understanding. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2002) Frequency Effects in Language Processing. In Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24 (2). 143–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fasiolo, M., Goude, Y., Nedellec, R., & Wood, S. N.
(2017) Fast calibrated additive quantile regression. URL: https://​arxiv​.org​/abs​/1707​.03307
Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & del Prado Martín, F. M.
(2009) Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 16(4), 684–691. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fradin, B.
(2009) Romance: French. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 417–435. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Frost, R., Forster, K. & Deutsch, A.
(1997) What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 23(4). 829–856.Google Scholar
Gagné, C. L. & Shoben, E.J.
(1997) Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 23(1). 71–87.Google Scholar
Gagné, C. L. & Spalding, T.L.
(2009) Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language 60(1). 20–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Conceptual composition: The role of relational competition in the comprehension of modifier-noun phrases and noun-noun compounds. In Brian H. Ross (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Volume 591), 97–130. Amsterdam: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gagné, C. L. & Spalding, T.L.
(2014) Conceptual composition: The role of relational competition in the comprehension of modifier-noun phrases and noun-noun compounds. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 591. 97–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, C. L. & Spalding, T.L.
(2014) Relation diversity and ease of processing for opaque and transparent English compounds. In Rainer, F.; Dressler, W.; Gardini, F. and Luschützky, H. C. (Eds.). Morphology and Meaning: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 153–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gahl, S., Garnsey, S. M.
(2004) Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation. In Language 80(4). 748–774. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraert, K., Newman, J., and Baayen, R. H.
(2017) Idiom variation: Experimental data and a blueprint of a computational model. In Christiansen, M., and Arnon, I. (Eds.) More than Words: The Role of Multiword Sequences in Language Learning and Use. Special issue of Topics in Cognitive Science, 91, 653–669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A.
(1984) Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 113(2), 256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giraudo, Hélène S. & Jonathan Grainger
(2001) Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8(1). 127–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Girju, R., Moldovan, D., Tatu, M., & Antohe, D.
(2005) On the semantics of noun compounds. Computer speech & language, 19(4), 479–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guevara, E. R.
(2012) Spanish compounds. Probus. International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics 24(1). 175–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hennecke, I.
(2019) Internal constituent variability and semantic transparency in N Prep N constructions in Romance languages. In Sabine Schulte im Walde & Eva Smolka (eds.), The role of constituents in multiword expressions: An interdisciplinary, cross-lingual perspective, 131–156. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Hennecke, I. & Baayen, H.
(2017) A Quantitative Survey of N Prep N Constructions in Romance Languages and Prepositional Variability. Quaderns de Filologia: Estudis Lingüístics 221. 129–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jarema, G., Busson, C., Nikolova, R., Tsapkini, K., & Libben, G.
(1999) Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 68(1–2), 362–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L.
(2003) The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 223–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kornfeld, L. M.
(2009) IE, romance: Spanish. In The Oxford handbook of compounding.Google Scholar
Kuperman, V., Bertram, R. & Baayen, R. H.
(2008) Morphological dynamics in compound processing, Language and Cognitive Processes, 231:7–8, 1089–1132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H.
(2009) Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 876.Google Scholar
Lau, E., Rozanova, K., Phillips, C.
(2007) Syntactic prediction and lexical frequency effects in sentence processing. University of Maryland Working Papers.Google Scholar
Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D.
(2003) Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and language, 84(1), 50–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Libben, G., Goral, M., & Baayen, R. H.
(2018) What does constituent priming mean in the investigation of compound processing? The Mental Lexicon, 13(2), 269–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, Phil & Arthur Cater
(2004) Is conceptual combination influenced by word order? 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. http://​www​.cs​.nuim​.ie​/~pmaguire​/publications​/French2004​.pdf (19 Nov (2019) Crossref
Marelli, M., Crepaldi, D. & Luzzatti, C.
(2009) Head position and the mental representation of nominal compounds. A constituent priming study in Italian. In: The Mental Lexicon 4(3). 430–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Masini, F.
(2009) Phrasal lexemes, compounds and phrases: A constructionist perspective. Word structure, 2(2), 254–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B.
(2001) Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 451, 137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1991) Rules of language. Science, 253(5019), 530–535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T.
(2002) The past and future of the past tense. Trends in cognitive sciences, 6(11), 456–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, L., Feintuch, S., Hopkins, E., & Marantz, A.
(2004) Neural correlates of the effects of morphological family frequency and family size: an MEG study. Cognition, 91(3), B35–B45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rainer, F.
(2016) Italian. In: O. Peter Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen und Franz Rainer (Hg.): Word Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Bd. 4. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, S. 2712–2731.Google Scholar
R Core Team
(2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B.
(2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rio-Torto, G., & Ribeiro, S.
(2009) Compounds in portuguese. Lingue e linguaggio, 8(2), 271–292.Google Scholar
(2010) Unidades pluriverbais – Processamento e ensino. In: As interfaces da gramática, 151–165, Araraquara, SP: UNESP Editora.Google Scholar
(2012) Portuguese compounds. Probus, 24(1), 119–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rummelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & PDP Research Group
(1986) Parallel distributed processing. MIT Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaoul, C., Westbury, C. F., & Baayen, H. R.
(2013) The subjective frequency of word n-grams. Psihologija, 46(4), 497–537. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidtke, D., Kuperman, V., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.
(2016) Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 23(2), 556–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidtke, D., Matsuki, K., & Kuperman, V.
(2017) Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(11), 1793–1820.Google Scholar
Shoben, E. J.
(1991) Predicating and nonpredicating combinations. In P. J. Schwanenflugal (ed.), The psychology of word meanings, 117–135. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Snider, N. & Arnon, I.
(2012) A unified lexicon and grammar? Compositional and non-compositional phrases in the lexicon. In Dagmar Divjak & Stefan Th. Gries (eds.), Frequency effects in language representation, 127–164. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Solomyak, O., & Marantz, A.
(2010) Evidence for early morphological decomposition in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(9), 2042–2057. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Štekauer, P.
(2005) “Onomasiological Approach to Word-formation.” In: Pavel Štekauer and Rochelle Lieber (eds.), Handbook of Word-formation. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spalding, T. L., Gagné, C. L., Mullaly, A., & Ji, H.
(2010) Relation-based interpretation of noun-noun phrases: A new theoretical approach. New impulses in word-formation, 283–315.Google Scholar
Spalding, Thomas L. & Christina L. Gagné
(2011) Relation priming in established compounds: Facilitation? Memory & Cognition 39(8). 1472–1486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spalding, T. L. & Gagné, C. L.
(2014) Relational diversity affects ease of processing even for opaque English compounds. The Mental Lexicon, 91, 48–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I.
(1976) Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 15(6), 607–620. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A., and Baayen, R. H.
(2010) Holistic processing of regular four-word sequences: A behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability on immediate free recall. In D. Wood, Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication. London: The Continuum International Publishing Group, 151–173.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C.
(2011) Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language learning, 61(2), 569–613. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. T.
(2001) The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 30(1), 37–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1–2), 231–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Val Àlvaro, J. F.
(1999) La composición. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa, 757–4841.Google Scholar
Villoing, F.
(2012) French compounds. Probus, 24(1), 29–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wood S.
(2017) Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R, 2nd edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwitserlood, P.
(2018) Processing and representation of morphological complexity in native language comprehension and production. In Geert Booij (ed.), The construction of words: Advances in construction morphology (Studies in Morphology 4), 583–602. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar