Romance N Prep N constructions in visual word recognition
An eye-tracking study of French, Spanish and Portuguese
N Prep N constructions such as Sp. bicicleta de montaña ‘mountain bike’ are very productive and
frequent in Romance languages. They commonly have been classified as syntagmatic compounds that show no
orthographic union and exhibit an internal structure that resembles free syntactic structures, such as Sp. libro para
niños ‘book for children’. There is no consensus on how to best distinguish lexical from syntactic N Prep N
constructions. The present paper presents an explorative eye-tracking study on N Prep N constructions, varying both lexical type
(lexical vs. syntactic) and preposition across three languages, French, Spanish and Portuguese. The task of the eye-tracking study
was a reading aloud paradigm of the constructions in sentence context. Constructions were fixated on less when more frequent,
independent of lexical status. There was also modest evidence that a higher construction frequency afforded shorter total fixation
durations, but only for lower deciles of the response distribution. The (construction-initial) head noun also received fewer
fixations as construction frequency increased, and also when the head noun was more frequent. The second fixation durations on the
head noun also revealed an effect of lexical status, with syntactic constructions receiving shorter fixations at the 5th and 7th
deciles. The probability of a fixation on the preposition decreased with preposition frequency, but first fixations on the
preposition increased with preposition frequency. The prepositions of Portuguese, the language with the richest inventory of
prepositions, received more fixations than the prepositions of French and Spanish. The observed pattern of results is consistent
with models of lexical processing in which reading is guided by knowledge of both higher-level constructions and knowledge of key
constituents such as the head noun and the preposition.
Article outline
- Introduction
- State of the art in the literature
- Participants
- Materials
- Design
- Procedure
- Predictor variables
- Results
- Fixation counts
- Analysis of fixation durations
- General discussion
- Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (75)
Arnon, I. & Snider, N.
(
2010)
More
than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases.
Journal of Memory and
Language 621. 67–82.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.
(
1989)
Functionalism
and the competition model.
The crosslinguistic study of sentence
processing, 31, 73–112.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H., Chuang, Y. Y., Shafaei-Bajestan, E., & Blevins, J. P.
(
2019)
The
discriminative lexicon: A unified computational model for the lexicon and lexical processing in comprehension and production
grounded not in (de) composition but in linear discriminative
learning.
Complexity.
[URL]
Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R.
(
1997)
Singulars
and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model.
Journal of Memory and
Language, 371, 94–117.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H., Kuperman, V., & Bertram, R.
Baayen, R. H., Hendrix, P., & Ramscar, M.
(
2013)
Sidestepping
the combinatorial explosion: An explanation on n-gram frequency effects based on naive discriminative
learning.
Language and
Speech 561, 329–347.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., & Ramscar, M.
(
2016)
Frequency
in lexical
processing.
Aphasiology, 30(11), 1174–1220.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M.
(
2011)
An
amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative
learning.
Psychological
review, 118(3), 438.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bisetto, A., & Scalise, S.
(
2005)
The
classification of compounds.
Lingue e
linguaggio, 4(2), 319–0.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G.
(
2018)
The
construction of words: Introduction and Overview. In
Gert Booij (ed.),
The
construction of words: Advances in construction morphology (
Studies in Morphology
4), 3–18. Cham: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buenafuentes de la Mata, C.
(
2009)
La
formación de palabras compuestas: del latín al español. In
Diachronic
linguistics (pp. 213–238). Documenta Universitaria.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buenafuentes de la Mata, C.
(
2010)
La
composición sintagmática en español. San Millán de la Cogolla: Cilengua.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J.
(
2010)
Language,
usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N.
(
1965)
Aspects
of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cutler, A.
(
1983)
Lexical
complexity and sentence processing. In
Flores d’Arcais &
Jarvella (eds).
The
Process of Language
Understanding. Chichester: Wiley.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N. C.
(
2002)
Frequency
Effects in Language Processing. In
Studies in Second Language
Acquisition 24 (2). 143–188.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fasiolo, M., Goude, Y., Nedellec, R., & Wood, S. N.
(
2017)
Fast
calibrated additive quantile regression. URL:
[URL]
Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & del Prado Martín, F. M.
(
2009)
Early
morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of
word recognition.
Psychonomic bulletin &
review, 16(4), 684–691.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fradin, B.
(
2009)
Romance:
French. In
Rochelle Lieber &
Pavol Štekauer (eds.),
The
Oxford handbook of
compounding, 417–435. Oxford: University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frost, R., Forster, K. & Deutsch, A.
(
1997)
What
can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological
representation.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory &
Cognition 23(4). 829–856.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gagné, C. L. & Shoben, E.J.
(
1997)
Influence
of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations.
Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory &
Cognition 23(1). 71–87.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gagné, C. L. & Spalding, T.L.
(
2009)
Constituent
integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational
structures? Journal of Memory and
Language 60(1). 20–35.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gagné, C. L. & Spalding, T.L.
(
2013)
Conceptual
composition: The role of relational competition in the comprehension of modifier-noun phrases and noun-noun
compounds. In
Brian H. Ross (ed.),
The
psychology of learning and
motivation (Volume 591), 97–130. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gagné, C. L. & Spalding, T.L.
(
2014)
Conceptual
composition: The role of relational competition in the comprehension of modifier-noun phrases and noun-noun
compounds.
Psychology of Learning and
Motivation 591. 97–130.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gagné, C. L. & Spalding, T.L.
Gahl, S., Garnsey, S. M.
(
2004)
Knowledge
of grammar, knowledge of usage: syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation
variation. In
Language 80(4). 748–774.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraert, K., Newman, J., and Baayen, R. H.
(
2017)
Idiom
variation: Experimental data and a blueprint of a computational
model. In
Christiansen, M., and
Arnon, I. (Eds.)
More
than Words: The Role of Multiword Sequences in Language Learning and Use. Special issue of Topics in Cognitive
Science, 91, 653–669.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gernsbacher, M. A.
(
1984)
Resolving
20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and
polysemy.
Journal of experimental psychology:
General, 113(2), 256.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giraudo, Hélène S. & Jonathan Grainger
(
2001)
Priming
complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology.
Psychonomic Bulletin
&
Review 8(1). 127–131.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Girju, R., Moldovan, D., Tatu, M., & Antohe, D.
(
2005)
On
the semantics of noun compounds.
Computer speech &
language, 19(4), 479–496.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guevara, E. R.
(
2012)
Spanish
compounds.
Probus. International Journal of Latin and Romance
Linguistics 24(1). 175–195.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hennecke, I.
(
2019)
Internal
constituent variability and semantic transparency in N Prep N constructions in Romance
languages. In
Sabine Schulte im Walde &
Eva Smolka (eds.),
The
role of constituents in multiword expressions: An interdisciplinary, cross-lingual
perspective, 131–156. Berlin: Language Science Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hennecke, I. & Baayen, H.
(
2017)
A
Quantitative Survey of N Prep N Constructions in Romance Languages and Prepositional
Variability.
Quaderns de Filologia: Estudis
Lingüístics 221. 129–146.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jarema, G., Busson, C., Nikolova, R., Tsapkini, K., & Libben, G.
(
1999)
Processing
compounds: A cross-linguistic study.
Brain and
Language, 68(1–2), 362–369.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L.
(
2003)
The
effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye
fixations.
British Journal of
Psychology, 94(2), 223–244.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kornfeld, L. M.
(
2009)
IE,
romance: Spanish. In
The Oxford handbook of
compounding.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuperman, V., Bertram, R. & Baayen, R. H.
(
2008)
Morphological
dynamics in compound processing,
Language and Cognitive
Processes, 231:7–8, 1089–1132.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H.
(
2009)
Reading
polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Toward a multiple route model of lexical processing.
Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 35(3), 876.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lau, E., Rozanova, K., Phillips, C.
(
2007)
Syntactic
prediction and lexical frequency effects in sentence processing. University of Maryland Working Papers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D.
(
2003)
Compound
fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness.
Brain and
language, 84(1), 50–64.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Libben, G., Goral, M., & Baayen, R. H.
Maguire, Phil & Arthur Cater
(
2004)
Is
conceptual combination influenced by word order? 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for
Computational Linguistics.
[URL] (
19 Nov (2019)
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Marelli, M., Crepaldi, D. & Luzzatti, C.
Masini, F.
(
2009)
Phrasal
lexemes, compounds and phrases: A constructionist perspective.
Word
structure, 2(2), 254–271.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S.
(
1991)
Rules
of
language.
Science, 253(5019), 530–535.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T.
(
2002)
The
past and future of the past tense.
Trends in cognitive
sciences, 6(11), 456–463.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pylkkänen, L., Feintuch, S., Hopkins, E., & Marantz, A.
(
2004)
Neural
correlates of the effects of morphological family frequency and family size: an MEG
study.
Cognition, 91(3), B35–B45.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rainer, F.
(
2016)
Italian. In:
O.
Peter Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen und Franz Rainer (Hg.): Word Formation. An International Handbook of the
Languages of Europe, Bd. 4. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, S. 2712–2731.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
R Core Team
(
2017)
R: A language and
environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL:
[URL]
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B.
(
2004)
The
broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word
recognition.
Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review, 11(6), 1090–1098.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rio-Torto, G., & Ribeiro, S.
(
2009)
Compounds
in portuguese.
Lingue e
linguaggio, 8(2), 271–292.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rio-Torto, G., & Ribeiro, S.
(
2010)
Unidades
pluriverbais – Processamento e ensino. In:
As interfaces da
gramática, 151–165, Araraquara, SP: UNESP Editora.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rio-Torto, G., & Ribeiro, S.
(
2012)
Portuguese
compounds.
Probus, 24(1), 119–145.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rummelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & PDP
Research Group
(
1986) Parallel distributed
processing. MIT Press, Cambridge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shaoul, C., Westbury, C. F., & Baayen, H. R.
(
2013)
The
subjective frequency of word
n-grams.
Psihologija, 46(4), 497–537.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidtke, D., Kuperman, V., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.
(
2016)
Competition
between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy.
Psychonomic
bulletin &
review, 23(2), 556–570.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidtke, D., Matsuki, K., & Kuperman, V.
(
2017)
Surviving
blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word
recognition.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 43(11), 1793–1820.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shoben, E. J.
(
1991)
Predicating
and nonpredicating combinations. In
P. J. Schwanenflugal (ed.),
The
psychology of word meanings, 117–135. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snider, N. & Arnon, I.
(
2012)
A
unified lexicon and grammar? Compositional and non-compositional phrases in the
lexicon. In
Dagmar Divjak &
Stefan Th. Gries (eds.),
Frequency
effects in language representation, 127–164. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Solomyak, O., & Marantz, A.
(
2010)
Evidence
for early morphological decomposition in visual word recognition.
Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 22(9), 2042–2057.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Štekauer, P.
(
2005) “
Onomasiological
Approach to Word-formation.” In:
Pavel Štekauer and
Rochelle Lieber (eds.), Handbook
of
Word-formation. Dordrecht: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spalding, T. L., Gagné, C. L., Mullaly, A., & Ji, H.
(
2010)
Relation-based
interpretation of noun-noun phrases: A new theoretical approach.
New impulses in
word-formation, 283–315.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spalding, Thomas L. & Christina L. Gagné
(
2011)
Relation
priming in established compounds: Facilitation? Memory &
Cognition 39(8). 1472–1486.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spalding, T. L. & Gagné, C. L.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I.
(
1976)
Lexical
storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words.
Journal of verbal learning and
verbal
behavior, 15(6), 607–620.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tremblay, A., and Baayen, R. H.
(
2010)
Holistic
processing of regular four-word sequences: A behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability
on immediate free recall. In
D. Wood,
Perspectives
on formulaic language: Acquisition and
communication. London: The Continuum International Publishing Group, 151–173.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C.
(
2011)
Processing
advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall
tasks.
Language
learning, 61(2), 569–613.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ullman, M. T.
(
2001)
The
declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar.
Journal of psycholinguistic
research, 30(1), 37–69.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ullman, M. T.
(
2004)
Contributions
of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural
model.
Cognition, 92(1–2), 231–270.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Val Àlvaro, J. F.
(
1999)
La
composición. In
I. Bosque &
V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática
descriptiva de la lengua
española. Madrid: Espasa, 757–4841.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Villoing, F.
(
2012)
French
compounds.
Probus, 24(1), 29–60.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wood S.
(
2017)
Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R, 2nd
edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwitserlood, P.
(
2018)
Processing
and representation of morphological complexity in native language comprehension and
production. In
Geert Booij (ed.),
The
construction of words: Advances in construction morphology (
Studies in Morphology
4), 583–602. Cham: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Hennecke, Inga, Tatiana Perevozchikova & Evelyn Wiesinger
2023.
Multiword units in multilingual speakers.
International Journal of Bilingualism ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hennecke, Inga & Evelyn Wiesinger
2023.
Language contact phenomena in multiword units: The code-switching–calquing continuum.
International Journal of Bilingualism ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.