Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 16:2/3 (2021) ► pp. 362396
Altenberg, B.
(1998) On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications (pp. 101–122). Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H.
(2008) Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barfield, A., & Gyllstad, H.
(2009) Introduction: Researching L2 Collocation Knowledge and Development. In A. Barfield & H. Gyllstad (Eds.), Researching collocations in another language: Multiple interpretations (pp. 1–18). Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barton, K.
(2015) MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package (1.13.4) [Computer software]. http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=MuMIn
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2014) Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4_. R package (1.1–7) [Computer software]. http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=lme4
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.Google Scholar
Bielinskienė, A., Boizou, L., Bumbulienė, I., Kovalevskaitė, J., Krilavičius, T., Mandravickaitė, J., Rimkutė, E., & Vilkaitė-Lozdienė, L.
(2019) Lietuvių kalbos kolokacijų žodynas [elektroninis išteklius].Google Scholar
Bonk, W., & Healy, A. F.
(2005) Priming effects without semantic or associative links through collocation. 46th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Toronto, Canada.
Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S.
(2015) Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20 (2), 139–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell-Harris, C. L., & Morris, A. L.
(2008) Fast Pairs: A visual word recognition paradigm for measuring entrenchment, top-down effects, and subjective phenomenology. Consciousness and Cognition, 17 (4), 1063–1081. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carrol, G., & Conklin, K.
(2020) Is All Formulaic Language Created Equal? Unpacking the Processing Advantage for Different Types of Formulaic Sequences. Language and Speech, 63 (1), 95–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahlmann, I., & Adolphs, S.
(2007) Pauses as an indicator of psycholinguistically valid multi-word expressions (MWEs)? MWE ’07 Proceedings of the Workshop on a Broader Perspective on Multiword Expressions, Pages 49–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H.
(2019) The grammar network. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P., & Doherty, A.
(2010) Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6 (2), 125–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2006) Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27 (1), 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Simpson-Vlach, R.
(2009) Formulaic language in native speakers: Triangulating psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and education. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5 (1), 61–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ervin, S. M.
(1961) Changes with Age in the Verbal Determinants of Word-Association. The American Journal of Psychology, 74 (3), 361–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, G., Nazar, R., Ramos, M. A., & Wanner, L.
(2014) Towards advanced collocation error correction in Spanish learner corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation, 48 (1), 45–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
(2017) Collocations in Corpus-Based Language Learning Research: Identifying, Comparing, and Interpreting the Evidence. Language Learning, 67 (S1), 155–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
González, A. O., & Ramos, M. A.
(2013) A comparative study of collocations in a native corpus and a learner corpus of Spanish. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95 1, 563–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th.
(2013) 50-something years of work on collocations: What is or should be next …. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18 (1), 137–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th., & Ellis, N. C.
(2015) Statistical Measures for Usage-Based Linguistics. Language Learning, 65 (S1), 228–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Handl, S.
(2008) Essential collocations for learners of English. Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching, 43–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M.
(2005) Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, S.
(2002) Pattern grammar, language teaching, and linguistic variation. In R. Reppen, S. M. Fitzmaurice, & D. Biber (Eds.), Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation (pp. 167–186). John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, K. A.
(2003) Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10 (4), 785–813. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N.
(2013) Conducting reaction time research in second language studies. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N., & Nekrasova, T. M.
(2007) The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers. The Modern Language Journal, 91 (3), 433–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, S., Jiang, X., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A.
(2020) The processing of multiword expressions in children and adults: An eye-tracking study of Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41 (4), 901–931. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, T. A., Neely, J. H., & Forsythe, W. J.
(1999) Dissociated backward priming effects in lexical decision and pronunciation tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6 (1), 105–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiss, G. R., Milroy, C., & Piper, J.
(1973) An associative thesaurus of English and its computer analysis. In A. J. Aitken, R. W. Bailey, & N. Hamilton-Smith (Eds.), The Computer and Literary Studies. University Press. http://​www​.eat​.rl​.ac​.uk/
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Bojesen Christensen, B.
(2015) lmerTest: Tests in Linear mixed effects models (2.0–29) [Computer software]. http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=lme4
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M.
(2012) Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44 (2), 325–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, K., & Blumenthal-Dramé, A.
(2019) Effects of task and corpus-derived association scores on the online processing of collocations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1 1(ahead-of-print). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C.
(2003a) Low-level predictive inference in reading: The influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements. Vision Research, 43 (16), 1735–1751. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003b) Eye movements reveal the on-line computation of lexical probabilities during reading. Psychological Science, 14 (6), 648–652. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Molinaro, N., Canal, P., Vespignani, F., Pesciarelli, F., & Cacciari, C.
(2013) Are complex function words processed as semantically empty strings? A reading time and ERP study of collocational complex prepositions. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28 (6), 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, J. W.
(2007) PsychoPy – Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162 (1), 8–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://​www​.R​-project​.org
Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M.
(2002) 358,534 nonwords: The ARC Nonword Database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 55 (4), 1339–1362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romero, F.
(2019) Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis. Philosophy Compass, 14 (11), e12633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.-J.
(2017) Linguistic entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp. 435–452). De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A.
(2015a) On the ‘holistic’ nature of formulaic language: Corpus linguistics and Linguistic theory. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11 (2), 285–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Collocation in beginner learner writing: A longitudinal study. System, 53 1, 148–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Martinez, R.
(2015) The idiom principle revisited. Applied Linguistics, 549–569. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sonbul, S.
(2015) Fatal mistake, awful mistake, or extreme mistake? Frequency effects on off-line/on-line collocational processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (03), 419–437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spina, S.
(2010) The Dici Project: Towards a Dictionary of Italian Collocations integrated with an online language learning platform. ELexicography in the 21st Century: New Challenges, New Applications, 2731.Google Scholar
Thompson-Schill, S. L., Kurtz, K. J., & Gabrieli, J. D.
(1998) Effects of semantic and associative relatedness on automatic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 38 (4), 440–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, G., Schmitt, N., & Galpin, A.
(2004) The eyes have it. An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing, and Use (pp. 153–172). John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Utka, A.; Rimkutė, E.; Kovalevskaitė, J.; Bielinskienė, A.; Petkevičius, M.; Petrauskaitė, R., & Mikelionienė, J.
(2017) Corpus of the Contemporary Lithuanian Language, CLARIN-LT digital library in the Republic of Lithuania, http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/20​.500​.11821​/16.
Vilkaitė, L.
(2016) Are non-adjacent collocations processed faster? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42 (10), 1632–1642. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vilkaitė-Lozdienė, L.
(2019) First steps towards the Lithuanian word association database. Taikomoji kalbotyra, 12, 226–258.Google Scholar
Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H.
(2011) Collocational links in the L2 mental lexicon and the influence of L1 intralexical knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 32 (4), 430–449. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35 (03), 451–482. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A.
(2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32 1, 231–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, L., Yasunaga, D., & Kojima, H.
(2021) Similarities and differences between native and non-native speakers’ processing of formulaic sequences: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50 (2), 397–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar