Cover not available
Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 17:1 (2022) ► pp.132–153

Effects of phonological and talker familiarity on second language lexical development

 | University of South Carolina
 | Carnegie Mellon University
Previous research has shown that second language (L2) learners of Mandarin learn new words more easily if the new word is homophonous with a word they already know (Liu and Wiener, 2020). That research involved word learning in which speech was produced by a single-talker with a specific pitch range. The present study examines whether the observed tonal homophone advantage is dependent on familiarity with the talker. Adult learners of Mandarin Chinese as an L2 were taught 20 new tonal words for three consecutive days. To manipulate phonological familiarity, 10 words had homophones already known to the learners and 10 words did not. To manipulate talker familiarity, participants were trained on a single talker but tested on 16 new talkers or trained and tested on 16 (multi)-talkers. Daily testing involved a 4-alternative-force-choice task. Both groups showed increased accuracy and faster response times on Day 2 compared to Day 1, but this learning was independent of homophone status or talker group. No other effects were found. These results suggest that the tonal homophone advantage in L2 word learning observed by Liu and Wiener (2020) may have been partially driven by an exceptionally high level of talker familiarity, since that study used a single speaker both for training and testing.
Keywords: lexical development, phonological learning, acoustic variability, second language acquisition
Article outline
  • Phonological overlap and L2 lexical development
  • Talker variability and L2 lexical processing
  • The present study
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Materials
    • Procedure
    • Data analysis
  • Results
    • 4-AFC mouse click accuracy
    • Correct 4-AFC mouse-click response times
  • Discussion
  • References
Published online: 18 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20024.liu
References (75)
References
Barcroft, J., & Sommers, M. S. (2005). Effects of acoustic variability on second language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27 1, 387–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Effects of variability in fundamental frequency on L2 vocabulary learning: A comparison between learners who do and do not speak a tone language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36 1, 423–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer Program]. Version 6.0. 431.Google Scholar
Bowles, A. R., Chang, C. B., & Karuzis, V. P. (2016). Pitch ability as an aptitude for tone learning. Language Learning, 66 (4), 774–808. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. & Pisoni, D. (1999). Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106 (1), 2074–2085. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekaran, B., Sampath, P. D., & Wong, P. C. M. (2010). Individual variability in cueweighting and lexical tone learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128 1, 456–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B., & Bowles, A. R. (2015). Context effects on second-language learning of tonal contrasts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138 (6), 3703–3716. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chao, Y. R. (1965). A grammar of spoken Chinese. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L., Steele, J., Escudero, P., & Neyra, P. R. E. (2015). Second Language Speech. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, H., Clayards, M., Brown, H., & Wonnacott, E. (2019). The effects of high versus low talker variability and individual aptitude on phonetic training of Mandarin lexical tones. PeerJ, 7 1, e7191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, Y., Gui, S., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Shared and separate meanings in the bilingual mental lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8 (3), 221–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duanmu, S. (2007). The Phonology of Standard Chinese. 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dumay, N., & Gaskell, M. G. (2007). Sleep-associated changes in the mental representation of spoken words. Psychological Science, 18 (1), 35–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elgort, I. (2011). Deliberate learning and vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 61 (2), 367–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Benders, T., & Wanrooij, K. (2011). Enhanced bimodal distributions facilitate the learning of second language vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130 (4), 206–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 92 1, 233–277.Google Scholar
Hardison, D. M. (2003). Acquisition of second-language speech: Effects of visual cues, context, and talker variability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24 1, 495–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Second-language spoken word identification: Effects of perceptual training, visual cues, and phonetic environment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26 (4), 579–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ho, A. T. (1976). The acoustic variation of Mandarin tones. Phonetica, 33 1, 353–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N. (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21 (1), 47–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). Form–meaning mapping in vocabulary acquisition in a second language Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (4), 617–637. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Conducting reaction time research in second language studies. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Second Language Processing: An Introduction. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44 (2), 137–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Michael, E., Tokowicz, N., & Dufour, R. (2002). The development of lexical fluency in a second language. Second Language Research, 18 (2), 137–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5 (11), 831–843. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leach, L. & Samuel, A. (2007). Lexical configuration and lexical engagement: When adults learn new words, Cognitive Psychology, 55 (4), 306–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leather, J. (1983). Speaker normalization in perception of lexical tone. Journal of Phonetics, 11 1, 373–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, C.-Y., Tao, L., & Bond, Z. S. (2009). Speaker variability and context in the identification of fragmented Mandarin tones by native and non-native listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 37 1, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Effects of speaker variability and noise on Mandarin tone identification by native and non-native listeners. Speech, Language and Hearing, 16 (1), 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, C.-Y., & Wiener, S. (2020). Acoustic-Based and Knowledge-Based Processing of Mandarin Tones by Native and Non-native Speakers. In: Liu, H., Tsao, F., Li, P. (eds) Speech Perception, Production and Acquisition. Multidisciplinary approaches in Chinese languages (pp. 37–57). Springer: Singapore. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation (Vol. 11). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993). Lexical access in speech production. In Knowledge and language (pp. 241–251). Springer, Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J. F. (2008). Cross-language lexical processes and inhibitory control. The Mental Lexicon, 3 (3), 349–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Speech production and speech modelling (pp. 403–439). Springer, Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, J., & Wiener, S. (2020). Homophones facilitate lexical development in a second language. System, 91 1, 102249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. The Journal of the acoustical society of America, 94 (3), 1242–1255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19 1, 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandell, J. (2018). Tonometric. [URL]
McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (2006). Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science, 30 (6), 1113–1126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitterer, H., Chen, Y., & Zhou, X. (2011). Phonological abstraction in processing lexical-tone variation: Evidence from a learning paradigm. Cognitive Science, 35 (1), 184–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, C. B., & Jongman, A. (1997). Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1021, 1864–1877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. G. K., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Jusczyk, P. W., & Cassidy, K. W. (1989). How the prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning. Journal of Child Language, 16 (1), 55–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nygaard, L. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 60 (3), 355–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science, 5 (1), 42–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Packard, J. (2000). The Morphology of Chinese: A Linguistic and Cognitive Approach. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pelzl, E. (2019). What makes second language perception of Mandarin tones hard?: A non-technical review of evidence from psycholinguistic research. Chinese as a Second Language. The Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, USA, 54 (1), 51–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrachione, T. K., Lee, J., Ha, L. Y. Y., & Wong, P. C. M. (2011). Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. The Journal of The Acoustical Society of America, 130 1, 461–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qin, Z., & Zhang, C. (2019). The effect of overnight consolidation in the perceptual learning of non-native tonal contrasts. PloS one, 14 (12). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadakata, M., & McQueen, J. M. (2014). Individual aptitude in Mandarin lexical tone perception predicts effectiveness of high-variability training. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 1, 1318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommers, M. S., & Barcroft, J. (2011). Indexical information, encoding difficulty, and second language vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32 (2), 417–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). An integrated account of the effects of acoustic variability in first language and second language: Evidence from amplitude, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate variability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28 1, 231–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stamer, M. K., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2012). Phonological similarity influences word learning in adults learning Spanish as a foreign language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15 (3), 490–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storkel, H. L. (2001). Learning new words: Phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44 (6), 1321–1337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storkel, H. L., Armbrüster, J., & Hogan, T. P. (2006). Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49 (6), 1175–1192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sunderman, G., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). First language activation during second language lexical processing: An investigation of lexical form, meaning, and grammatical class. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 (3), 387–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talamas, A., Kroll, J. F., & Dufour, R. (1999). From form to meaning: Stages in the acquisition of second-language vocabulary. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2 (1), 45–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, L. H., & Perfetti, C. A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts. Reading and Writing, 10 (3–5), 165–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28 (4), 735.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S., & Storkel, H. L. (2013). Examining the acquisition of phonological word forms with computational experiments. Language and Speech, 56 (4), 493–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wade, T., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2007). Effects of acoustic variability in the perceptual learning of non-native-accented speech sounds. Phonetica, 64 (2–3), 122–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106 1, 3649–3658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50 1, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiener, S., Ito, K., & Speer, S. R. (2018). Early L2 spoken word recognition combines input-based and knowledge-based processing. Language and Speech, 61 (4), 632–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Effects of multi-talker input and instructional method on the dimension-based statistical learning of syllable-tone combinations: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43 (1), 155–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiener, S., & Lee, C. Y. (2020). Multi-talker speech promotes greater knowledge-based spoken Mandarin word recognition in first and second language listeners. Frontiers in Psychology, 11 1, 214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiener, S., Lee, C. Y., & Tao, L. (2019). Statistical regularities affect the perception of second language speech: Evidence from adult classroom learners of Mandarin Chinese. Language Learning, 69 (3), 527–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiener, S., & Tokowicz, N. (2021). Language proficiency is only part of the story: Lexical access in heritage and non-heritage bilinguals. Second Language Research, 37 (4), 681–695. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, A., & Medina, A. (2013). Effects of semantic and phonological clustering on L2 vocabulary acquisition among novice learners. System, 41 (4), 1056–1069. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolter, B. (2001). Comparing the L1 and L2 mental lexicon: A depth of individual word knowledge model. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23 (1), 41–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Lexical Network Structures and L2 Vocabulary Acquisition: The Role of L1 Lexical/Conceptual Knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 741–747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, P. C. M., & Perrachione, T. K. (2007). Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28 1, 565–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zareva, A. (2007). Structure of the second language mental lexicon: how does it compare to native speakers’ lexical organization?. Second Language Research, 23 (2), 123–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1995). Morphological Structure in the Chinese Mental Lexicon, Language and Cognitive Processes, 10 (6), 545–600. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhu, J., Chen, X., Chen, F., & Wiener, S. (2022). Individuals with Congenital Amusia show degraded speech perception but preserved statistical learning for tone languages. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65 (1), 53–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Bao, Wenfu, Anja Arnhold & Juhani Järvikivi
2024. Phonology, homophony, and eyes-closed rest in Mandarin novel word learning: An eye-tracking study in adult native and non-native speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics 45:1 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Gao, Zhe, Seth Wiener & Brian MacWhinney
2022. Acquisition of Chinese Verb Separation by Adult L2 Learners. Languages 7:3 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Wei, Yanjun, Lin Jia, Fei Gao & Jianqin Wang
2022. Visual–Auditory Integration and High-Variability Speech Can Facilitate Mandarin Chinese Tone Identification. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 65:11 ► pp. 4096 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.