Article published In:
The Mental LexiconVol. 16:2/3 (2021) ► pp.240–270
Morphophonological activation in Chinese word recognition
Evidence from heteronymic characters
The role of morphophonology during Chinese visual word recognition was investigated in three masked priming lexical decision experiments. The primes and targets were Cantonese Chinese bimorphemic words. In Chinese, most characters correspond to morphemes, but sometimes the mapping between character and morpheme is not one-to-one. Specifically, some characters are heteronymic, which had one visual form associated with multiple pronunciations and meanings (e.g., “長” is pronounced as /coeng4/ and /zoeng2/ in Cantonese, which means “long” and “senior”, respectively). In Experiment 1, facilitative priming was found when the primes and targets shared heteronymic characters of identical (e.g., “長遠-long term” /coeng4jyun5/ and “長短-length” /coeng4dyun2/), but not a different, pronunciation (e.g., “長官-senior official” /zoeng2gun1/). Sharing word-level phonology only (e.g., “場景-scene” /coeng4ging2/) had no effects. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1, and further indicated that the effects could not be attributed to sharing word-level meanings (e.g., “即時-immediate” /zik1si4/). Experiment 3 compared the priming effects produced by the two alternative pronunciations of the heteronymic characters. The results showed that the strength of priming was statistically comparable in the two pronunciation-congruent conditions. Together, this study provided evidence that morphophonology was activated to facilitate the ambiguity resolution of heteronymic characters. The lemma model was modified to accommodate the results.
Keywords: morphological processing, visual word recognition, Chinese, Cantonese, morpho-phonology, heteronymic morphemes
Article outline
- Introduction
- Experiment 1
- Participants
- Materials
- Procedure
- Results and discussion
- Experiment 2
- Participants
- Materials
- Procedure
- Results and discussion
- Experiment 3
- Participants
- Materials
- Procedure
- Results and discussion
- General discussion
- Limitations and future studies
- Notes
-
References
References
Allen, M., & Badecker, W.
(1999) Stem homograph inhibition and stem allomorphy: Representing and processing inflected forms in a multilevel lexical system. Journal of Memory and Language,
41
1, 105–123. 
Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D.
(2012) Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in psychology,
3
1, 232.
Amenta, S., Marelli, M., & Crepaldi, D.
(2015) The fruitless effort of growing a fruitless tree: Early morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic effects in sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
41
1, 1587–1596.
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language,
59
1, 390–412.
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language,
68
1, 255–278.
Bertram, R., Laine, M., Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., & Hyönä, J.
(2000) Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even for inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition,
74
1, B13–B25.
Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Harald, R.
(2000) The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
26
1, 489–511.
Beyersmann, E., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A.
(2012) Parallel processing of whole words and morphemes in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
65
1, 1798–1819.
Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E.
(2003) Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
10
1, 645–652.
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M.
(2010) SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE,
5
1, e10729.
Chen, H. C., & Shu, H.
(2001) Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
8
1, 511–518.
Cohen-Goldberg, A. M., Cholin, J., Miozzo, M., & Rapp, B.
(2013) The interface between morphology and phonology: Exploring a morpho-phonological deficit in spoken production. Cognition,
127
1, 270–286.
Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K.
(2010) Form and meaning in early morphological processing: Comment on Feldman, O’Connor, and Moscoso del Prado Martin (2009). Psychonomic bulletin & review,
17
1, 749–55.
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J.
(2005) Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes,
20
1, 75–114.
Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M.
(2008) Does darkness lead to happiness? Masked suffix priming effects. Language and Cognitive Processes,
23
1, 1002–1020.
Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A. & Moscoso del Prado Martin, F.
(2009) Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,
16
1, 684–691.
Fiorentino, R., & Fund-Reznicek, E.
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C.
(2003) DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,
35
1, 116–124.
Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A.
(1997) What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
23
1, 829–856.
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J.
(2001) Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
8
1, 127–131.
Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S.
(2007) Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
136
1, 323–345.
Hyönä, J., Heikkilä, T., Vainio, S., & Kliegl, R.
(2021) Parafoveal access to word stem during reading: An eye movement study. Cognition,
208
1, 104547.
Hyönä, J., Yan, M., & Vainio, S.
(2018) Morphological structure influences the initial landing position in words during reading Finnish. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
71
1, 122–130.
Jaeger, T. F.
(2008) Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language,
59
1, 434–446.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H.
(2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of statistical software,
82
1, 1–26.
Lavric, A., Clapp, A., & Rastle, K.
(2007) ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
19
1, 866–877.
Leybaert, J., & Alegría, J.
(1995) Spelling development in deaf and hearing children: Evidence for use of morpho-phonological regularities in French. Reading and Writing,
7
1, 89–109.
Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A.
(2003) Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes,
2003
1, 313–334.
Luke, S. G.
(2017) Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods,
49
1, 1494–1502.
Marelli, M., & Baroni, M.
(2015) Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. Psychological Review,
122
1, 485–515.
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L.
(1994) Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review,
101
1, 3–33.
Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D.
(2017) Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of memory and language,
94
1, 305–315.
Morris, J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J.
(2013) Tracking the consequences of morpho-orthographic decomposition using ERPs. Brain Research,
1529
1, 92–104.
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H.
(2008) Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes,
23
1, 942–971.
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K.
(2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes,
15
1, 507–537.
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B.
(2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
11
1, 1090–1098.
Research Centre for Humanities Computing
Shen, W., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A.
(2018) The processing of Chinese compound words with ambiguous morphemes in sentence context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
71
1, 131–139.
Taft, M.
(1994) Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes,
9
1, 271–294.
Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M.
(2010) A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes,
25
1, 277–296.
Tsang, Y. K., & Chen, H. C.
(2013a) Early morphological processing is sensitive to morphemic meanings: Evidence from processing ambiguous morphemes. Journal of Memory and Language,
68
1, 223–239.
(2013b) Morpho-semantic processing in word recognition: Evidence from balanced and biased ambiguous morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
39
1, 1990–2001.
(2014) Activation of morphemic meanings in processing opaque words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
21
1, 1281–1286.
Tsang, Y. K., Huang, J., Lui, M., Xue, M., Chan, Y. W. F., Wang, S., & Chen, H. C.
(2018) MELD-SCH: A megastudy of lexical decision in simplified Chinese. Behavior Research Methods,
50
1, 1763–1777.
Tse, C. S., Yap, M. J., Chan, Y. L., Sze, W. P., Shaoul, C., & Lin, D.
(2017) The Chinese Lexicon Project: A megastudy of lexical decision performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character compound words. Behavior Research Methods,
49
1, 1503–1519.
Van den Bussche, E., Van den Noortgate, W., & Reynvoet, B.
(2009) Mechanisms of masked priming: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,
135
1, 452–477.
Wong, A. W. K., Wu, Y. & Chen, H. C.
(2014) Limited role of phonology in reading Chinese two-character compounds: Evidence from an ERP study. Neuroscience.
256
1, 342–351.
Wu, Y., Tsang, Y. K., Wong, A. W. K., & Chen, H. C.
(2017) The processing of homographic morphemes in Chinese: an ERP study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience,
32
1, 102–116.
Xu, J., & Taft, M.
(2014) Solely soles: Inter-lemma competition in inflected word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language,
76
1, 127–140.
Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., Yusupu, R., Miao, D., Krügel, A., & Kliegl, R.
(2014) Eye movements guided by morphological structure: Evidence from the Uighur language. Cognition,
132
1, 181–215.
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W.
(2000) The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
26
1, 1245–1265.
Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H.
(1999) Morphology, Orthography, and Phonology Reading Chinese Compound Words. Language and Cognitive Processes,
14
1, 525–565.