Morphological processing is gradient not discrete in L1 and L2 English masked priming
In recent years, evidence has emerged that readers may have access to the meaning of complex words even in the
early stages of processing, suggesting that phenomena previously attributed to morphological decomposition may actually emerge
from an interplay between formal and semantic effects. The present study adds to this line of work by deploying a forward masked
priming experiment with both L1 (Experiment 1) and L2 (Experiment 2) speakers of English. Following recent research trends, we
view morphological processing as a gradient process emerging over time. In order to model this, we used a large within-item
stimulus design combined with advanced statistical methods such as generalised mixed models (GAMM) and quantile regression (QGAM).
L1 GAMM analyses only showed priming for true morpho-semantic relations (the identity ‘bull’, inflected ‘bulls’ and derived
conditions ‘bullish’), with no priming observed in the case of other relations (the pseudo-complex ‘bully’ or the stem-embedded
‘bullet’ conditions). Furthermore, with respect to the time-course of effects, we found significant differences between conditions
were present from very early on as revealed by the QGAM analyses. In contrast, L2 speakers showed significant facilitation across
all five conditions compared to the baseline condition, including the stem-embedded condition, suggesting early L2 processing is
only dependant on the form.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Evidence from L1 processing
- 1.2Evidence from L2 processing
- 1.3The current study
- 2.Experiment 1: L1 English speakers
- 2.1Materials and methods
- 2.1.1Participants
- 2.1.2Materials
- 2.1.3Procedure and design
- 2.2Analysis
- 2.3GAMM results
- 2.4QGAM results
- 3.Experiment 2: Advanced L2 English speakers
- 3.1Materials and methods
- 3.1.1Participants
- 3.1.2Materials
- 3.1.3Procedure
- 3.2Analysis
- 3.3GAMM results
- 3.4QGAM results
- 4.Discussion
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References (88)
Amenta, S., Crepaldi, D., & Marelli, M.
(
2020)
Consistency
measures individuate dissociating semantic modulations in priming paradigms: A new look on semantics in the processing of
(complex) words.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 1747021820927663.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, S. R.
(
1992)
A-morphous
morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andrews, S. & Lo, S.
(
2013)
Is
morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? it depends on individual differences in spelling and
vocabulary.
Journal of Memory and
Language,
68
(3), 279–296.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aronoff, M.
(
1994)
Morphology
by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H., Chuang, Y.-Y., Shafaei-Bajestan, E., & Blevins, J. P.
(
2019)
The
discriminative lexicon: A unified computational model for the lexicon and lexical processing in comprehension and production
grounded not in (de) composition but in linear discriminative learning.
Complexity,
2019.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D.
(
2008)
Mixed-effects
modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items.
Journal of Memory and
Language,
59
1, 390–412.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipovic Durdjevic, D., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M.
(
2011)
An
amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative
learning.
Psychological
Review,
118
(3), 438–481.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L.
(
1995)
The
CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H. & Smolka, E.
(
2020)
Modeling
morphological priming in german with naive discriminative learning.
Frontiers in
Communication,
5
1, 17.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H., Vasishth, S., Bates, D., & Kliegl, R.
(
2017)
The
cave of shadows. addressing the human factor with generalized additive mixed models.
Journal of
Memory and
Language,
56
1, 206–234.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H., Wurm, L. H., & Aycock, J.
Beard, R.
(
1995)
Lexeme-morpheme
base morphology: A general theory of inflection and word formation. Albany, NY.: State University of New York Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bell, M. J. & Schäfer, M.
(
2016)
Modelling
semantic
transparency.
Morphology,
26
(2), 157–199.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beyersmann, E., Ziegler, J. C., Castles, A., Coltheart, M., Kezilas, Y., & Grainger, J.
(
2016)
Morpho-orthographic
segmentation without semantics.
Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review,
23
(2), 533–539.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blevins, J. P.
(
2016)
Word
and paradigm morphology. Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G.
(
2010)
Construction
morphology.
Language and linguistics
compass,
4
(7), 543–555.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G. E.
(
1996)
Inherent
versus contextual inflection and the split morphology
hypothesis. In
G. E. Booij &
J. v. Marle (Eds.),
Yearbook
of Morphology
1995 (pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, H. & Felser, C.
(
2006)
Grammatical
processing in language learners.
Applied
psycholinguistics,
27
(1), 3.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R.
(
2010)
Morphological
structure in native and nonnative language processing.
Language
Learning,
60
(1), 21–43.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coughlin, C. E. & Tremblay, A.
(
2015)
Morphological
decomposition in native and non-native french speakers.
Bilingualism: Language and
Cognition,
18
(3), 524–542.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crepaldi, D., Amenta, S., & Marelli, M.
(
2019)
For
a probabilistic and multidisciplinary approach to the investigation of morphological
processing.
Cortex,
116
1.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, M.
(
2010)
The
Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of
English.
Literary and Linguistic
Computing,
25
(4), 447–464.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davis, C. P., Libben, G., & Segalowitz, S. J.
(
2019)
Compounding
matters: Event-related potential evidence for early semantic access to compound
words.
Cognition,
184
1, 44–52.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H.
(
2003)
Morphological
resonance in the mental lexicon. In
R. H. Baayen &
R. Schreuder (Eds.),
Morphological
structure in language
processing (pp. 65–88). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E.
(
2011)
Fast
morphological effects in first and second language word recognition.
Journal of Memory and
Language,
64
(4), 344–358.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J.
(
2009)
Semantic
transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words.
Memory &
Cognition,
37
(6), 895–908.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diessel, H.
(
2019)
The
grammar network. Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dijkstra, T. & van Heuven, W. J.
(
2018)
Visual
word recognition in multilinguals.
The Oxford handbook of
psycholinguistics, 118–143.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fasiolo, M., Wood, S. N., Zaffran, M., Nedellec, R., & Goude, Y.
(
2020)
Fast
calibrated additive quantile regression.
Journal of the American Statistical
Association, 1–11.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feldman, L. B.
(
1994)
Beyond
orthography and phonology: Differences between inflections and derivations.
Journal of Memory
and
Language,
33
(4), 442–470.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feldman, L. B. & Basnight-Brown, D. M.
(
2008)
List
context fosters semantic processing: Parallels between semantic and morphological facilitation when primes are forward
masked.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition,
34
(3), 680.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martin, F.
(
2009)
Early
morphological processing is morpho-semantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: evidence from the masked priming
paradigm.
Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review,
16
(4), 684–691.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forster, K. & Davis, C.
(
1984)
Repetition
priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access.
Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Learning, Memory, and
Cognition,
10
(4), 680–698.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giraudo, H. & Grainger, J.
(
2001)
Priming
complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology.
Psychonomic Bulletin and
Review,
8
1, 127–131.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S.
(
2007)
Graded
semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to
morphology.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General,
136
(2), 323.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Günther, F., Petilli, M. A., & Marelli, M.
(
2020)
Semantic
transparency is not invisibility: A computational model of perceptually-grounded conceptual combination in word
processing.
Journal of Memory and
Language,
112
1, 104104.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hasenäcker, J., Beyersmann, E., & Schroeder, S.
(
2016)
Masked
morphological priming in German-speaking adults and children: Evidence from response time
distributions.
Frontiers in
Psychology,
7
1, 929.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hauk, O., Davis, M., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W.
(
2006)
The
time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP
data.
NeuroImage,
30
1, 1383–1400.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heathcote, L., Nation, K., Castles, A., & Beyersmann, E.
(
2018)
Do
‘blacheap’ and ‘subcheap’ both prime ‘cheap’? an investigation of morphemic status and position in early visual word
processing.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology,
71
(8), 1645–1654.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hendrix, P. & Sun, C. C.
(
2020)
The
role of information theory for compound words in Mandarin Chinese and
English.
Cognition,
205
1, 104389.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heyer, V. & Clahsen, H.
(
2015)
Late
bilinguals see a scan in scanner and in scandal: dissecting formal overlap from morphological priming in the processing of
derived words.
Bilingualism: Language and
Cognition,
18
(3), 543–550.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacob, G., Heyer, V., & Veríssimo, J.
(
2018)
Aiming
at the same target: A masked priming study directly comparing derivation and inflection in the second
language.
International Journal of
Bilingualism,
22
(6), 619–637.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jared, D., Jouravlev, O., & Joanisse, M. F.
(
2017)
The
effect of semantic transparency on the processing of morphologically derived words: Evidence from decision latencies and
event-related potentials.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition,
43
(3), 422.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Järvikivi, J. & Pyykkönen, P.
(
2011)
Sub-and
supralexical information in early phases of lexical access.
Frontiers in
Psychology,
2
1.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jiang, N.
(
2000)
Lexical
representation and development in a second language.
Applied
linguistics,
21
(1), 47–77.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kazanina, N.
(
2011)
Decomposition
of prefixed words in russian.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition,
37
(6), 1371.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuperman, V.
(
2013)
Accentuate
the positive: Semantic access in English compounds.
Frontiers in
Psychology,
4
1.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H.
(
2009)
Reading
of multimorphemic Dutch compounds: Towards a multiple route model of lexical
processing.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:
HPP,
35
1, 876–895.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, T., Schriefers, H., Baayen, R. H., Grainger, J., & Zwitserlood, P.
(
2008)
Native
language influences on word recognition in a second language: A megastudy.
Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition,
34
(1), 12.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leminen, A., Smolka, E., Dunabeitia, J. A., & Pliatsikas, C.
(
2019)
Morphological
processing in the brain: The good (inflection), the bad (derivation) and the ugly
(compounding).
Cortex,
116
1, 4–44.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Libben, G.
(
2006)
Why
study compound processing? an overview of the issues.
The representation and processing of
compound words, 1–22.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Longtin, C., Segui, J., & Hallé, P.
(
2003)
Morphological
priming without morphological relationship.
Language and Cognitive
Processes,
18
(3), 313–334.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lõo, K. & Järvikivi, J.
(
2019)
Whole-word
frequency effects in English masked priming: very little CORN in CORNER and CORNET.
Proceedings
of The 11th International Conference on the Mental
Lexicon,
1
1, e072.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lõo, K., Järvikivi, J., & Baayen, R. H.
(
2018)
Whole-word
frequency and inflectional paradigm size facilitate Estonian case-inflected noun
processing.
Cognition,
175
1, 20–25.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lõo, K., Järvikivi, J., Tomaschek, F., Tucker, B. V., & Baayen, R. H.
(
2018)
Production
of estonian case-inflected nouns shows whole-word frequency and paradigmatic
effects.
Morphology,
28
1, 71–97.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M.
(
2017)
Explaining
human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting: A review and
empirical validation.
Journal of Memory and
Language,
92
1, 57–78.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manelis, L. & Tharp, D. A.
(
1977)
The
processing of affixed words.
Memory and
Cognition,
5
1, 690–695.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marelli, M. & Amenta, S.
(
2018)
A
database of orthography-semantics consistency (osc) estimates for 15,017 english
words.
Behavior Research
Methods,
50
(4), 1482–1495.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marelli, M. & Baroni, M.
(
2015)
Affixation
in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional
semantics.
Psychological
Review,
122
(3), 485.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marzi, C., Blevins, J. P., Booij, G., & Pirrelli, V.
(
2020)
Inflection
at the morphology-syntax interface.
Word Knowledge and Word
Usage, 2281.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDonald, J. L.
(
2006)
Beyond
the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language
learners.
Journal of Memory and
Language,
55
(3), 381–401.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morris, J., Frank, T., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J.
(
2007)
Semantic
transparency and masked morphological priming: An ERP
investigation.
Psychophysiology,
44
(4), 506–521.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Bertram, R., Häikiö, T., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H.
(
2004)
Morphological
family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared to Dutch and
Hebrew.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and
Cognition,
30
1, 1271–1278.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mulder, K., Dijkstra, T., & Baayen, R. H.
(
2015)
Cross-language
activation of morphological relatives in cognates: The role of orthographic overlap and task-related
processing.
Frontiers in Human
Neuroscience,
9
1, 16.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mulder, K., Dijkstra, T., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H.
(
2014)
Effects
of primary and secondary morphological family size in monolingual and bilingual word
processing.
Journal of Memory and
Language,
72
1, 59–84.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norris, D. & Kinoshita, S.
(
2008)
Perception
as evidence accumulation and bayesian inference: Insights from masked priming.
Journal of
Experimental
Psychology,
137
(3), 434–455.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plaut, D. C. & Gonnerman, L. M.
(
2000)
Are
non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical
processing? Language and Cognitive
Processes,
15
(4/5), 445–485.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rastle, K. & Davis, M. H.
(
2008)
Morphological
decomposition based on the analysis of orthography.
Language and Cognitive
Processes,
23
(7–8), 942–971.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B.
(
2004)
The
broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word
recognition.
Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review,
11
1, 1090–1098.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raveh, M.
(
2002)
The
contribution of frequency and semantic similarity to morphological processing.
Brain and
Language.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reingold, E. M., Reichle, E. D., Glaholt, M. G., & Sheridan, H.
(
2012)
Direct
lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation
durations.
Cognitive
psychology,
65
(2), 177–206.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sánchez-Gutiérrez, C. H., Mailhot, H., Deacon, S. H., & Wilson, M. A.
(
2018)
Morpholex:
A derivational morphological database for 70,000 English words.
Behavior Research
Methods,
50
(4), 1568–1580.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidtke, D. & Kuperman, V.
(
2019)
A
paradox of apparent brainless behavior: The time-course of compound word
recognition.
Cortex,
116
1, 250–267.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidtke, D., Matsuki, K., & Kuperman, V.
(
2017)
Surviving
blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word
recognition.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and
Cognition,
43
(11), 1793–1820.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schreuder, R. & Baayen, R. H.
(
1995)
Modeling
morphological processing. In
L. B. Feldman (Ed.),
Morphological
Aspects of Language
Processing (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schreuder, R. & Baayen, R. H.
(
1997)
How
complex simplex words can be.
Journal of Memory and
Language,
37
1, 118–139.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silva, R. & Clahsen, H.
(
2008)
Morphologically
complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in
English.
Bilingualism: Language and
Cognition,
11
(2), 245–260.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taft, M.
(
2004)
Morphological
decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect.
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology,
57A
1, 745–765.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taft, M. & Forster, K. I.
(
1975)
Lexical
storage and retrieval of prefixed words.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior,
14
1, 638–647.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tanenhaus, M., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., & Sedivy, J.
(
1995)
Integration
of visual and linguistic information in spoken language
comprehension.
Science,
268
1, 1632–1634.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traxler, M. J.
(
2014)
Trends
in syntactic parsing: Anticipation, bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing.
Trends in
Cognitive
Sciences,
18
(11), 605–611.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tucker, B. V., Brenner, D., Danielson, D. K., Kelley, M. C., Nenadić, F., & Sims, M.
(
2019)
The
massive auditory lexical decision (MALD) database.
Behavior Research
Methods,
51
(3), 1187–1204.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tzur, B. & Frost, R.
(
2007)
SOA
does not reveal the absolute time course of cognitive processing in fast priming
experiments.
Journal of Memory and
Language,
56
(3), 321–335.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ulicheva, A., Harvey, H., Aronoff, M., & Rastle, K.
(
2020)
Skilled
readers’ sensitivity to meaningful regularities in English
writing.
Cognition,
195
1, 103810.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Rij, J., Baayen, R. H., Wieling, M., & van Rijn, H.
(
2016)
itsadug:
Interpreting time series, autocorrelated data using GAMMs.
R package version
2.2.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Viviani, E. & Crepaldi, D.
(
2019)
Masked
morphological priming tracks the development of a fully mature lexical system in L2.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Voga, M., Anastassiadis-Symeonidis, A., & Giraudo, H.
Wood, S. N.
(
2017)
Generalized
additive models: an introduction with R. CRC press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Marzi, Claudia & Vito Pirrelli
2023.
A discriminative information-theoretical analysis of the regularity gradient in inflectional morphology.
Morphology 33:4
► pp. 459 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.