Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 17:2 (2022) ► pp.178212
Baayen, R. H.
(2010) The directed compound graph of English. an exploration of lexical connectivity and its processing consequences. In Olsen, S., editor, New impulses in word-formation (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 17), pages 383–402. Buske, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., van Rij, J., de Cat, C., and Wood, S. N.
(2017a) Autocorrelated errors in experimental data in the language sciences: Some solutions offered by generalized additive mixed models. In Speelman, D., Heylen, K., and Geeraerts, D., editors, Mixed Effects Regression Models in Linguistics, pages 49–69. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Vasishth, S., Bates, D., and Kliegl, R.
(2017b) The cave of shadows. Addressing the human factor with generalized additive mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 941:206–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., and Tily, H. J.
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3):255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D. M., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., and Baayen, R. H.
(2015) Parsimonious mixed models. Scholar
Chuang, Y.-Y.
(2017) The effect of phonetic variation on word recognition in Taiwan Mandarin. PhD thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei.
Chuang, Y.-Y., Fon, J., Papakyritsis, I., and Baayen, R. H.
(2021) Analyzing phonetic data with generalized additive mixed models. In Ball, M. J., editor, Manual of Clinical Phonetics. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francis, G.
(2012) Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(6):975–991. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harm, M. W. and Seidenberg, M. S.
(2004) Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 1111:662–720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R.
(1990) Generalized Additive Models. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., and Brysbaert, M.
(2012) The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 441:287–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, R. H., and Bates, D. M.
(2017) Balancing Type I Error and Power in Linear Mixed Models. Journal of Memory and Language. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mock, P., Tibus, M., Ehlis, A.-C., Baayen, H., and Gerjets, P.
(2018) Predicting adhd risk from touch interaction data. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, pages 446–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Open Science Collaboration
(2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251):aac4716. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, J. C. and Bates, D. M.
(2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Statistics and Computing. Springer, New York. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N. S. and Segalowitz, S. J.
(1993) Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14(03):369–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thul, R., Conklin, K., and Barr, D. J.
(2020) Using gamms to model trial-by-trial fluctuations in experimental data: More risks but hardly any benefit. Open Science Framework. downloaded October 2020. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021) Using gamms to model trial-by-trial fluctuations in experimental data: More risks but hardly any benefit. Journal of Memory and Language, 1201:104247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rij, J., Hendriks, P., van Rijn, H., Baayen, R. H., and Wood, S. N.
(2019) Analyzing the time course of pupillometric data. Trends in hearing, 231:2331216519832483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., and Judd, C. M.
(2014) Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5):2020. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wieling, M.
(2018) Analyzing dynamic phonetic data using generalized additive mixed modeling: a tutorial focusing on articulatory differences between l1 and l2 speakers of english. Journal of Phonetics, 701:86–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, S. N.
(2013) On p-values for smooth components of an extended generalized additive model. Biometrika, 1001:221–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Just Another Gibbs Additive Modeller: Interfacing JAGS and mgcv. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.02539v1.Google Scholar
(2017) Generalized Additive Models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Johns, Michael A. & Paola E. Dussias
2022. Comparing Single-Word Insertions and Multi-Word Alternations in Bilingual Speech: Insights from Pupillometry. Languages 7:4  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.