Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 4:1 (2009) ► pp.4176
Cited by

Cited by 19 other publications

Bell, Melanie J. & Martin Schäfer
2016. Modelling semantic transparency. Morphology 26:2  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Benjamin, Shaina & Daniel Schmidtke
2023. Conceptual combination during novel and existing compound word reading in context: A self-paced reading study. Memory & Cognition 51:5  pp. 1170 ff. DOI logo
Cruz, Karen Pérez, Chelsa Patel, Jazlynn Steinbach, Mohamed Barre, Holly Kibbins, Dixie Wong, Alexander Taikh, Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding
2022. Is meaning construction attempted during the processing of pseudo-compounds?. The Mental Lexicon 17:2  pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Cui, Lei, Fengjiao Cong, Jue Wang, Wenxin Zhang, Yuwei Zheng & Jukka Hyönä
2018. Effects of Grammatical Structure of Compound Words on Word Recognition in Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo
Gagné, Christina L. & Thomas L. Spalding
2011. Inferential processing and meta-knowledge as the bases for property inclusion in combined concepts. Journal of Memory and Language 65:2  pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
Gagné, Christina L. & Thomas L. Spalding
2013. Conceptual Composition [Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 59],  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Gagné, Christina L. & Thomas L. Spalding
2016. Written production of English compounds: effects of morphology and semantic transparency. Morphology 26:2  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Gagné, Christina L., Thomas L. Spalding, Kelly A. Nisbet & Caitrin Armstrong
2018. Pseudo-morphemic structure inhibits, but morphemic structure facilitates, processing of a repeated free morpheme. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33:10  pp. 1252 ff. DOI logo
Gagné, Christina L., Thomas L. Spalding & Daniel Schmidtke
2019. LADEC: The Large Database of English Compounds. Behavior Research Methods 51:5  pp. 2152 ff. DOI logo
Günther, Fritz & Marco Marelli
2022. Patterns in CAOSS: Distributed representations predict variation in relational interpretations for familiar and novel compound words. Cognitive Psychology 134  pp. 101471 ff. DOI logo
Ji, Hongbo, Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding
2011. Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language 65:4  pp. 406 ff. DOI logo
Jia, Xiaofei, Suiping Wang, Bao Zhang & John X. Zhang
2013. Electrophysiological evidence for relation information activation in Chinese compound word comprehension. Neuropsychologia 51:7  pp. 1296 ff. DOI logo
Marelli, Marco, Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding
2017. Compounding as Abstract Operation in Semantic Space: Investigating relational effects through a large-scale, data-driven computational model. Cognition 166  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Marelli, Marco & Claudio Luzzatti
2012. Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of Memory and Language 66:4  pp. 644 ff. DOI logo
Schmidtke, Daniel, Christina L. Gagné, Victor Kuperman, Thomas L. Spalding & Benjamin V. Tucker
2018. Conceptual relations compete during auditory and visual compound word recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33:7  pp. 923 ff. DOI logo
Schmidtke, Daniel, Christina L. Gagné, Victor Kuperman & Thomas L. Spalding
2018. Language experience shapes relational knowledge of compound words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 25:4  pp. 1468 ff. DOI logo
Schmidtke, Daniel, Victor Kuperman, Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding
2016. Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23:2  pp. 556 ff. DOI logo
Spalding, Thomas L. & Christina L. Gagné
2011. Relation priming in established compounds: facilitation?. Memory & Cognition 39:8  pp. 1472 ff. DOI logo
Spalding, Thomas L. & Christina L. Gagné

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.