Article published In:
The Mental LexiconVol. 4:2 (2009) ► pp.159–193
Masked morphological priming of compound constituents
Robert Fiorentino | Neurolinguistics & Language Processing Laboratory, Department of Linguistics, University of Kansas
Recent masked priming studies suggest that complex words are rapidly segmented into potential morphological constituents during initial visual word recognition. Much of this evidence involves affixation or other formally regular operations, leaving open the question of whether these effects rely heavily on the identification of a closed-class affix or other formal regularity. In two masked priming experiments with English transparent and opaque bimorphemic compound primes consisting solely of open-class morphemes, we find significant constituent priming, but no significant priming for purely orthographic overlap. We conclude that masked morphological priming generalizes across word-formation types to include compounds with no affix or other regular form. These results provide new evidence for across-the-board morphological-level segmentation during visual word recognition and for morpheme-based compound processing.
Keywords: masked priming, compounding, morphology, lexical access, lexical decision
Cited by
Cited by 38 other publications
Arcara, Giorgio, Carlo Semenza & Valentina Bambini
2014. Word structure and decomposition effects in reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology 31:1-2 ► pp. 184 ff. 
Auch, Leah, Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding
2020. Conceptualizing semantic transparency: A systematic analysis of semantic transparency measures in English compound words. Methods in Psychology 3 ► pp. 100030 ff.
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & David Stringer
2017. Unconventional Expressions: Productive syntax in the L2 acquisition of formulaic language. Second Language Research 33:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Beyersmann, Elisabeth, Jonathan Grainger & Anne Castles
2019. Embedded stems as a bootstrapping mechanism for morphological parsing during reading development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 182 ► pp. 196 ff.
Beyersmann, Elisabeth, Jonathan Grainger & Marcus Taft
2020. Evidence for embedded word length effects in complex nonwords. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 35:2 ► pp. 235 ff.
Beyersmann, Elisabeth, Yvette Kezilas, Max Coltheart, Anne Castles, Johannes C. Ziegler, Marcus Taft & Jonathan Grainger
2018. Taking the Book from the Bookshelf: Masked Constituent Priming Effects from Compound Words and Nonwords. Journal of Cognition 1:1
Chung, Wonil, Myung-Kwan Park & Say Young Kim
2019. An electrophysiological investigation of translation and morphological priming in biscriptal bilinguals. Journal of Neurolinguistics 51 ► pp. 151 ff.
Ciaccio, Laura Anna & Harald Clahsen
2020. Variability and Consistency in First and Second Language Processing: A Masked Morphological Priming Study on Prefixation and Suffixation. Language Learning 70:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Ciaccio, Laura Anna, Naledi Kgolo & Harald Clahsen
2020. Morphological decomposition in Bantu: a masked priming study on Setswana prefixation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 35:10 ► pp. 1257 ff.
Coch, Donna, Jianjun Hua & Allison Landers‐Nelson
2020. All morphemes are not the same: accuracy and response times in a lexical decision task differentiate types of morphemes. Journal of Research in Reading 43:3 ► pp. 329 ff.
Fiorentino, Robert, Yuka Naito-Billen, Jamie Bost & Ella Fund-Reznicek
2014. Electrophysiological evidence for the morpheme-based combinatoric processing of English compounds. Cognitive Neuropsychology 31:1-2 ► pp. 123 ff.
Fiorentino, Robert, Stephen Politzer-Ahles, Natalie S. Pak, María Teresa Martínez-García & Caitlin Coughlin
2015. Dissociating morphological and form priming with novel complex word primes. The Mental Lexicon 10:3 ► pp. 413 ff.
Fischer-Baum, Simon & Robert Englebretson
2016. Orthographic units in the absence of visual processing: Evidence from sublexical structure in braille. Cognition 153 ► pp. 161 ff.
Gagné, Christina L., Thomas L. Spalding, Kelly A. Nisbet & Caitrin Armstrong
2018. Pseudo-morphemic structure inhibits, but morphemic structure facilitates, processing of a repeated free morpheme. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33:10 ► pp. 1252 ff.
Gagné, Christina L., Thomas L. Spalding & Daniel Schmidtke
2019. LADEC: The Large Database of English Compounds. Behavior Research Methods 51:5 ► pp. 2152 ff.
Gagné, Christina L., Thomas L. Spalding, Patricia Spicer, Dixie Wong, Beatriz Rubio & Karen Perez Cruz
2020. Is buttercup a kind of cup? Hyponymy and semantic transparency in compound words. Journal of Memory and Language 113 ► pp. 104110 ff.
González Alonso, Jorge, Silvia Baquero Castellanos & Oliver Müller
2016. Masked constituent priming of English compounds in native and non-native speakers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31:8 ► pp. 1038 ff.
González Alonso, Jorge, Julián Villegas & María del Pilar García Mayo
2016. English compound and non-compound processing in bilingual and multilingual speakers: Effects of dominance and sequential multilingualism. Second Language Research 32:4 ► pp. 503 ff.
Huang, Jian, Yiu-Kei Tsang, Wanting Xiao, Suiping Wang & Lori Buchanan
2020. Morphosemantic activation of opaque Chinese words in sentence comprehension. PLOS ONE 15:8 ► pp. e0236697 ff.
Ji, Hongbo, Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding
2011. Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language 65:4 ► pp. 406 ff.
Johnson, Rebecca L, Sarah Rose Slate, Allison R Teevan & Barbara J Juhasz
2019. The processing of blend words in naming and sentence reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72:4 ► pp. 847 ff.
Juhasz, Barbara J., Rebecca L. Johnson & Jennifer Brewer
2017. An Investigation into the Processing of Lexicalized English Blend Words: Evidence from Lexical Decisions and Eye Movements During Reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46:2 ► pp. 281 ff.
Juhasz, Barbara J., Yun-Hsuan Lai & Michelle L. Woodcock
2015. A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience. Behavior Research Methods 47:4 ► pp. 1004 ff.
Kim, Say Young, Melvin J. Yap & Winston D. Goh
2019. The role of semantic transparency in visual word recognition of compound words: A megastudy approach. Behavior Research Methods 51:6 ► pp. 2722 ff.
Ko, In Yeong & Min Wang
2015. Reading compound words by adult Korean-English bilinguals. Writing Systems Research 7:2 ► pp. 202 ff.
LI, MAN, NAN JIANG & KIRA GOR
2017. L1 and L2 processing of compound words: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:2 ► pp. 384 ff.
Libben, Gary, Jordan Gallant & Wolfgang U. Dressler
2021. Textual Effects in Compound Processing: A Window on Words in the World. Frontiers in Communication 6
Libben, Gary & Silke Weber
2014. Semantic transparency, compounding, and the nature of independent variables. In Morphology and Meaning [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 327], ► pp. 205 ff.
Lorenz, Antje, Andreas Mädebach & Jörg D Jescheniak
2018. Grammatical-gender effects in noun–noun compound production: Evidence from German. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71:5 ► pp. 1134 ff.
Marelli, Marco, Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding
2017. Compounding as Abstract Operation in Semantic Space: Investigating relational effects through a large-scale, data-driven computational model. Cognition 166 ► pp. 207 ff.
Schiff, Rachel, Shani Kahta & Ayelet Sasson
2022. Modality Effects in the Representation of the Root Morpheme in the Mental Lexicon of Hebrew-Speaking Adults with Dyslexia. In Developing Language and Literacy [Literacy Studies, 23], ► pp. 627 ff.
Smolka, Eva & Wolfgang U. Dressler
2022. The Influence of Roots and Stems on the Lexical Processing of Complex Words in German. In Developing Language and Literacy [Literacy Studies, 23], ► pp. 231 ff.
Smolka, Eva & Gary Libben
2017. ‘Can you wash off the hogwash?’ – semantic transparency of first and second constituents in the processing of German compounds. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 32:4 ► pp. 514 ff.
Stevens, Patience & David C. Plaut
2022. From decomposition to distributed theories of morphological processing in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 29:5 ► pp. 1673 ff.
Taft, Marcus, Junmin Li & Thasya Aryanti
2021. Why do non-native English speakers show masked form priming when native speakers do not?. Journal of Second Language Studies 4:2 ► pp. 204 ff.
Tsang, Yiu-Kei
2021. Morphophonological activation in Chinese word recognition. The Mental Lexicon 16:2-3 ► pp. 240 ff.
Wang, Xin, Marcus Taft, Jie Wang & Say Young Kim
2021. Finding a “flower” in a “peanut” is as easy as in a “garden”: towards a lemma-based model of bilingual word recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 36:9 ► pp. 1076 ff.
Zeng, Tao, Baijing Han, Menghui Zhai & Yating Mu
2019. The effect of language proficiency on L2 English learners’ processing of morphologically complex words: Evidence from masked transposed letter priming. Neuroscience Letters 704 ► pp. 84 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.