Article published in:
Phonological and Phonetic considerations of Lexical Processing[The Mental Lexicon 8:3] 2013
► pp. 269–294
How robust are exemplar effects in word comprehension?
Iris Hanique | Radboud University Nijmegen / Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen
Ellen Aalders | Radboud University Nijmegen
Mirjam Ernestus | Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen
This paper studies the robustness of exemplar effects in word comprehension by means of four long-term priming experiments with lexical decision tasks in Dutch. A prime and target represented the same word type and were presented with the same or different degree of reduction. In Experiment 1, participants heard only a small number of trials, a large proportion of repeated words, and stimuli produced by only one speaker. They recognized targets more quickly if these represented the same degree of reduction as their primes, which forms additional evidence for the exemplar effects reported in the literature. Similar effects were found for two speakers who differ in their pronunciations. In Experiment 2, with a smaller proportion of repeated words and more trials between prime and target, participants recognized targets preceded by primes with the same or a different degree of reduction equally quickly. Also, in Experiments 3 and 4, in which listeners were not exposed to one but two types of pronunciation variation (reduction degree and speaker voice), no exemplar effects arose. We conclude that the role of exemplars in speech comprehension during natural conversations, which typically involve several speakers and few repeated content words, may be smaller than previously assumed.
Published online: 07 April 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.8.3.01han
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.8.3.01han
References
Baayen, R., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L.
(
1995
).
The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM)
.
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
:
Linguistic Data Consortium
.
Bradlow, A., Nygaard, L., & Pisoni, D.
(
1999
).
Effects of talker, rate, and amplitude variation on recognition memory for spoken words
.
Perception & Psychophysics
,
611
,
206
–
219
.
Craik, F., & Kirsner, K.
(
1974
).
The effect of speaker’s voice on word recognition
.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
,
261
,
274
–
284
.
Dahan, D., Drucker, S., & Scarborough, R.
(
2008
).
Talker adaptation in speech perception: Adjusting the signal or the representations?
Cognition
,
108
(
3
),
710
–
718
.
Faraway, J.
(
2006
).
Extending linear models with R: generalized linear mixed effects and nonparametric regression models
.
Boca Raton, FL
:
Chapman and Hall/CRC
.
Goh, W.
(
2005
).
Talker variability and recognition memory: Instance-specific and voice-specific effects
.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
,
311
,
40
–
53
.
Goldinger, S.
(
1996
).
Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory
.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
,
221
,
1166
–
1183
.
(
2007
).
A complementary-systems approach to abstract and episodic speech perception
.
Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
, (pp.
49
–
54
).
Saarbrücken
,
Germany
.
Hanique, I., Ernestus, M., & Boves, L.
(
submitted
).
Choice and pronunciation of words
:
Individual differences within a homogeneous group of speakers
.
Hanique, I., Ernestus, M., & Schuppler, B.
(
2013
).
Informal speech processes can be categorical in nature, even if they affect many different words
.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
,
133
(
3
),
1644
–
1655
.
Janse, E.
(
2008
).
Spoken-word processing in aphasia: Effects of item overlap and item repetition
.
Brain and Language
,
1051
,
185
–
198
.
Mattys, S., & Liss, J.
(
2008
).
On building models of spoken-word recognition: When there is as much to learn from natural “oddities” as artificial normality
.
Perception and Psychophysics
,
70
(
7
),
1235
–
1242
.
Mattys, S., & Wiget, L.
(
2011
).
Effects of cognitive load on speech recognition
.
Journal of Memory and Language
,
651
,
145
–
160
.
McLennan, C., & Luce, P.
(
2005
).
Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition
.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
,
31
(
2
),
306
–
321
.
McLennan, C., Luce, P., & Charles-Luce, J.
(
2003
).
Representation of lexical form
.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
,
29
(
4
),
539
–
553
.
Oostdijk, N.
(
2002
).
The design of the Spoken Dutch Corpus
.
In
P. Peters, P. Collins, & A. Smith
(
Eds.
),
New frontiers of corpus research
(
pp.
105
–
112). Amsterdam: Rodopi
.
Palmeri, T., Goldinger, S., & Pisoni, D.
(
1993
).
Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words
.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
,
191
,
309
–
328
.
Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. H.
(
2005
).
Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch
.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
,
118
(
4
),
2561
–
2569
.
Schuppler, B., Ernestus, M., Scharenborg, O., & Boves, L.
(
2011
).
Acoustic reduction in conversational Dutch: A quantitative analysis based on automatically generated segmental transcriptions
.
Journal of Phonetics
,
391
,
96
–
109
.
Van de Ven, M., Tucker, B., & Ernestus, M.
(
2011
).
Semantic context effects in the comprehension of reduced pronunciation variants
.
Memory and Cognition
,
391
,
1301
–
1316
.
Cited by
Cited by 10 other publications
Creemers, Ava & David Embick
2021. Retrieving stem meanings in opaque words during auditory lexical processing.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 36:9 ► pp. 1107 ff.
Creemers, Ava, Amy Goodwin Davies, Robert J. Wilder, Meredith Tamminga & David Embick
2020. Opacity, transparency, and morphological priming: A study of prefixed verbs in Dutch.
Journal of Memory and Language 110 ► pp. 104055 ff.
Cristófaro Silva, Thaïs & Matheus Freitas
2020. sC-clusters in Brazilian Portuguese.
Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 19
de Vaan, Laura, Kobie Van Krieken, Winie Van den Bosch, Robert Schreuder & Mirjam Ernestus
2017. The traces that novel morphologically complex words leave in memory are abstract in nature.
The Mental Lexicon 12:2 ► pp. 181 ff.
Dufour, Sophie, Dierdre Bolger, Stephanie Massol, Phillip J. Holcomb & Jonathan Grainger
2017. On the locus of talker-specificity effects in spoken word recognition: an ERP study with dichotic priming.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 32:10 ► pp. 1273 ff.
Kazanina, Nina, Jeffrey S. Bowers & William Idsardi
2018. Phonemes: Lexical access and beyond.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 25:2 ► pp. 560 ff.
Mclennan, Conor T. & Sara Incera
2021.
In The Handbook of Speech Perception,
► pp. 206 ff.
Nijveld, Annika, Louis ten Bosch & Mirjam Ernestus
2022. The use of exemplars differs between native and non-native listening.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff.
Rahmani, Hamed, Toni Rietveld, Carlos Gussenhoven & Iris Berent
2015. Stress “Deafness” Reveals Absence of Lexical Marking of Stress or Tone in the Adult Grammar.
PLOS ONE 10:12 ► pp. e0143968 ff.
Warner, Natasha
2019. Reduced speech: All is variability.
WIREs Cognitive Science 10:4
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.