Article published in:
Semantic Considerations of Lexical Processing
[The Mental Lexicon 9:1] 2014
► pp. 4866
References

References

Baayen, R. H.. (
2007) LanguageR: Data sets and functions with analyzing linguistic data. R package version 0.1.Google Scholar
2008)  Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R . Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.. (
2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language , 59, 390–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L.. (
1995)  The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM) . Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Bates, D., & Maechler, M.
. (lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes 2009) R package version 0.999375-32.
Butterworth, B.. (
1983) Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production , Volume 2, (pp. 257–294). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.. (
1995) Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes , 10, 425–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A.. (
1991)  Elements of information theory . Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D.. (
2007) Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes , 22, 953– 1000. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, C. L., & Shoben, E. J.. (
1997). Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 23, 71–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.. (
2006) Using conceptual combination research to better understand novel compound words. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics , 3, 9–16.Google Scholar
2009) Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language , 60(1), 20–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010) Relational competition during compound interpretation. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding (pp. 287–300). 
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013) Relation diversity and ease of processing for opaque and transparent English compounds. Submitted for publication.
in press). Conceptual composition: The role of relational competition in the comprehension of modifier-noun phrases and noun-noun compounds. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation , Volume 59 (pp. 97–130). New York: Elsevier.
Gagné, C. L., Spalding, T. L., Figueredo, L., & Mullaly, A. C.. (
2009) Does snow man prime plastic snow? The effect of constituent position in using relational information during the interpretation of modifier-noun phrases. The Mental Lexicon , 4, 41–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.. (
2011) Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language , 65, 406–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M.. (
2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods , 42, 627–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, V., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H.. (
2010) Processing trade-offs in the reading of Dutch derived words. Journal of Memory and Language , 62(2), 83–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H.. (
2009). Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 35, 876–895. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levi, J. N.. (
1978)  The syntax and semantics of complex nominals . New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Libben, G.. (
2006) Why study compound processing: An overview of the issues. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 1–21). New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010) Compound words, semantic transparency, and morphological transcendence. In S. Olson (Ed.), New impulses in word-formation (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 17) (pp. 283–315). Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Pham, H., & Baayen, R. H.. (
2013). Semantic relations and compound transparency: A regression study in CARIN theory. Psychologia , 46(4), 455–478.
Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M.. (
2000)  Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus . New York, NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandra, D.. (
1990) On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 42A, 529–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spalding, T. L., & Gagné, C. L.. (
2008) CARIN theory reanalysis reanalyzed: A comment on Maguire, Devereux, Costello, and Cater 2007. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 34, 1573– 1578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011) Relation priming in established compounds: Facilitation? Memory & Cognition , 39, 1472–1486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spalding, T. L., Gagné, C. L., Mullaly, A. C., & Ji, H.. (
2010) Relation-based interpretation of noun-noun phrases: A new theoretical approach. In S. Olson (Ed.), New impulses in word-formation (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 17) (pp. 283–315). Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, P.. (
1994) The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes , 9(3), 341–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Creemers, Ava & David Embick
2021. Retrieving stem meanings in opaque words during auditory lexical processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 36:9  pp. 1107 ff. Crossref logo
Gagné, Christina L. & Thomas L. Spalding
2016. Written production of English compounds: effects of morphology and semantic transparency. Morphology 26:2  pp. 133 ff. Crossref logo
Hennecke, Inga & Harald Baayen
2021. Romance N Prep N constructions in visual word recognition. The Mental Lexicon 16:1  pp. 98 ff. Crossref logo
Marelli, Marco, Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding
2017. Compounding as Abstract Operation in Semantic Space: Investigating relational effects through a large-scale, data-driven computational model. Cognition 166  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
Schmidtke, Daniel, Christina L. Gagné, Victor Kuperman, Thomas L. Spalding & Benjamin V. Tucker
2018. Conceptual relations compete during auditory and visual compound word recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33:7  pp. 923 ff. Crossref logo
Schmidtke, Daniel, Christina L. Gagné, Victor Kuperman & Thomas L. Spalding
2018. Language experience shapes relational knowledge of compound words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 25:4  pp. 1468 ff. Crossref logo
Schmidtke, Daniel, Victor Kuperman, Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding
2016. Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23:2  pp. 556 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.