References
Baayen, R. H. (
2007) LanguageR: Data sets and functions with analyzing linguistic data. R package version 0.1.Google Scholar
2008)  Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R . Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (
2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language , 591, 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (
1995)  The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM) . Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Bates, D., & Maechler, M
. (lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes 2009) R package version 0.999375-32.
Butterworth, B. (
1983) Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production , Volume 21, (pp. 257–294). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (
1995) Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes , 101, 425–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (
1991)  Elements of information theory . Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (
2007) Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes , 221, 953– 1000. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagné, C. L., & Shoben, E. J. (
1997). Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 231, 71–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (
2006) Using conceptual combination research to better understand novel compound words. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics , 31, 9–16.Google Scholar
2009) Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language , 60(1), 20–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010) Relational competition during compound interpretation. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding (pp. 287–300). 
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013) Relation diversity and ease of processing for opaque and transparent English compounds. Submitted for publication.
in press). Conceptual composition: The role of relational competition in the comprehension of modifier-noun phrases and noun-noun compounds. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation , Volume 59 (pp. 97–130). New York: Elsevier.
Gagné, C. L., Spalding, T. L., Figueredo, L., & Mullaly, A. C. (
Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (
2011) Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language , 651, 406–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (
2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods , 421, 627–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, V., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (
2010) Processing trade-offs in the reading of Dutch derived words. Journal of Memory and Language , 62(2), 83–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (
2009). Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 351, 876–895. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levi, J. N. (
1978)  The syntax and semantics of complex nominals . New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Libben, G. (
2006) Why study compound processing: An overview of the issues. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 1–21). New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010) Compound words, semantic transparency, and morphological transcendence. In S. Olson (Ed.), New impulses in word-formation (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 17) (pp. 283–315). Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Pham, H., & Baayen, R. H. (
2013). Semantic relations and compound transparency: A regression study in CARIN theory. Psychologia , 46(4), 455–478.
Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (
2000)  Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus . New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandra, D. (
1990) On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 42A1, 529–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spalding, T. L., & Gagné, C. L. (
2008) CARIN theory reanalysis reanalyzed: A comment on Maguire, Devereux, Costello, and Cater 2007. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 341, 1573– 1578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011) Relation priming in established compounds: Facilitation? Memory & Cognition , 391, 1472–1486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spalding, T. L., Gagné, C. L., Mullaly, A. C., & Ji, H. (
2010) Relation-based interpretation of noun-noun phrases: A new theoretical approach. In S. Olson (Ed.), New impulses in word-formation (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 17) (pp. 283–315). Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, P. (
1994) The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes , 9(3), 341–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Benjamin, Shaina & Daniel Schmidtke
2023. Conceptual combination during novel and existing compound word reading in context: A self-paced reading study. Memory & Cognition 51:5  pp. 1170 ff. DOI logo
Creemers, Ava & David Embick
2021. Retrieving stem meanings in opaque words during auditory lexical processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 36:9  pp. 1107 ff. DOI logo
Cruz, Karen Pérez, Chelsa Patel, Jazlynn Steinbach, Mohamed Barre, Holly Kibbins, Dixie Wong, Alexander Taikh, Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding
2022. Is meaning construction attempted during the processing of pseudo-compounds?. The Mental Lexicon 17:2  pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Gagné, Christina L. & Thomas L. Spalding
2016. Written production of English compounds: effects of morphology and semantic transparency. Morphology 26:2  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Günther, Fritz & Marco Marelli
2022. Patterns in CAOSS: Distributed representations predict variation in relational interpretations for familiar and novel compound words. Cognitive Psychology 134  pp. 101471 ff. DOI logo
Hennecke, Inga & Harald Baayen
2021. Romance N Prep N constructions in visual word recognition. The Mental Lexicon 16:1  pp. 98 ff. DOI logo
Marelli, Marco, Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding
2017. Compounding as Abstract Operation in Semantic Space: Investigating relational effects through a large-scale, data-driven computational model. Cognition 166  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Schmidtke, Daniel, Christina L. Gagné, Victor Kuperman, Thomas L. Spalding & Benjamin V. Tucker
2018. Conceptual relations compete during auditory and visual compound word recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33:7  pp. 923 ff. DOI logo
Schmidtke, Daniel, Christina L. Gagné, Victor Kuperman & Thomas L. Spalding
2018. Language experience shapes relational knowledge of compound words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 25:4  pp. 1468 ff. DOI logo
Schmidtke, Daniel, Victor Kuperman, Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding
2016. Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23:2  pp. 556 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.