Overgeneralization in the processing of complex forms in Valley Zapotec child language
Models of language learning and processing differ in their level of emphasis on the storage of individual meaningful units versus combinations of meaningful units. While there is evidence for the storage of larger stretches of speech, a separate issue is how much such stored forms contribute to processing, as compared to morphologically simpler forms. We examine the acquisition of one aspect of the phonology of Valley Zapotec: complementarity of segmental length based on subsegmental features: vowels before fortis consonants are short (VCː), and vowels before lenis consonants are long (VːC). This complementarity is found for fortis consonants in morphologically simple forms with final stress (simple nouns, verbs with full subject noun), but not in morphologically complex forms with a final unstressed syllable (diminutive nouns, verbs with pronominal subject clitic). During one period of development, Zapotec-learning children overgeneralize the complementarity from morphologically simple to morphologically complex forms (with u-shaped learning likely). The child’s processing of complex forms in language production is based more on simple forms than on the complex forms themselves. We identify five possible explanations of these results. Insofar as combinations of morphemes are stored at this young age, they are relatively ineffective at influencing processing during language production.
References (47)
Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (
1999).
Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections.
Journal of Memory and Language
, 401, 41-61.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arellanes, F. (
2009)
El sistema fonológico y las propiedades fonéticas del zapoteco de San Pablo Güilá
.
Descripción y análisis formal
. Doctoral dissertation. Mexico: El Colegio de México.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benua, L. (
1995)
Identity effects in morphological truncation.
University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics
, 181, 77-136.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bernhardt, B. H., & Stemberger, J. P. (
1998)
Handbook of phonological development: From the perspective of constraint-based nonlinear phonology
. San Diego: Academic Press. (Now Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (
2011)
Praat: doing phonetics by computer
. Version 5.2.16, Retrieved 20 February 2011 from
[URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. (
2006)
Frequency of use and the organization of language
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chávez-Peón, M. E. (
2010)
The interaction of metrical structure, tone and phonation types in Quiaviní Zapotec
. Doctoral thesis. University of British Columbia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chevrot, J.-P., & Fayol, M. (
2001)
Acquisition of French Liaison and related child errors. In
M. Almgren,
A. Barreña,
M. J. Ezeizabarrena,
I. Idiazabal &
B. MacWhinney (Eds.),
Research on child language acquisition
, Volume 21 (pp. 761-775). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (
1968)
The sound pattern of English
. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dell, G. S., Juliano, C., & Govindjee, A. (
1993)
Structure and content in language production: A theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors.
Cognitive Science
, 171, 149-195.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elman, J. L. (
1993)
Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small.
Cognition
, 481, 71-99.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garrett, M. F. (
1976)
Syntactic processes in language production. In
R. J. Wales &
E. Walker (Eds.),
New approaches to language mechanisms
(pp. 231-256). Amsterdam: North Holland.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gordon, P. (
1985)
Level ordering in lexical development.
Cognition
, 211, 73-93.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kenstowicz, M. J. (
1997)
Base identity and uniform exponence: Alternatives to cyclicity. In
J. Durand &
B. Laks (Eds.),
Current trends in phonology: Models and methods
(pp. 363-394). Salford: University of Salford.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kerkhoff, A. (
2007)
Acquisition of Morpho-Phonology: The Dutch voicing alternation. PhD Dissertation.Utrecht: LOT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kristoffersen, G. (
2000)
The phonology of Norwegian
. Oxford: University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuryłowicz, J. (
1945)
La Nature des Procès dits Analogiques.
Acta Linguistica
, 51, 15-37.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lee, F. (
2006)
Remnant raising and VSO clausal architecture: A case study of San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec
. Dordrecht: Springer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lewis, M. P., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D.. (
2013)
Ethnologue: Languages of the World
(Seventeenth edition). Dallas, Texas: SIL International.
[URL].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lillehaugen, B. D. (
2003)
The categorical status of body part prepositions in Valley Zapotec languages
. M.A. thesis. UCLA.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lillehaugen, B. D. (
2004)
The syntactic and semantic development of body part prepositions in Valley Zapotec languages. In
J. Castillo (Ed.),
Proceedings from the sixth Workshop on American Indigenous Languages, in Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics
, 141, 69-92.
Lillehaugen, B. D. (
2006)
Expressing location in Tlacolula Valley Zapotec
. Ph. D. Dissertation: UCLA.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lillehaugen, B. D., Munro, P., Lopez, F. H., Ruiz, R.A., & Ruiz, J.A., with Batten, C., Felker, H., Mannix, A., Donovan McCormick, K., & Weissler, R. E. (
2013)
Tlacolula Valley Zapotec Talking Dictionary
, pilot version. Living Tongues Institute for Endangered Languages. Retrieved from:
[URL] [August, 2013].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T. J., & Xu, F. (
1992)
Overregularization in language acquisition.
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
, 571, whole no. 4.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (
1986)
The TRACE model of speech perception.
Cognitive Psychology
, 181, 1-86.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Munro, P., Lillehaugen, B. D., & Lopez, F. H. (
2008)
Cali Chiu? A course in Valley Zapotec
. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Munro, P., & Lopez, F. H., with Méndez Martínez, O. V., García, R., & Galant, M. R. (
1999)
Di'csyonaary x:tèeʼn dìi'zh sah Sann Lu'uc (San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec Dictionary/Diccionario Zapoteco de San Lucas Quiaviní)
. Los Angeles: UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Naigles, L. R., & Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (
1998)
Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use.
Journal of Child Language
, 251, 95-120.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newport, E. L. (
1990)
Maturational constraints on language learning.
Cognitive Science
, 141, 11-28.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (
1998)
PARSER: A model for word segmentation.
Journal of Memory and Language
, 391, 246-263.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S. (
1984)
Language learnability and language development
. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (
2002)
The past and future of the past tense.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
, 61, 456-463.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (
2004 [1993])
Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar
. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ramscar, M., & Dye, M. (
2010)
Learning language from the input: Why innate constraints can’t explain noun compounding.
Cognitive Psychology
, 621, 1-40.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rose, Y., & MacWhinney, B. (
to appear).
The PhonBank project: Data and software-assisted methods for the study of phonology and phonological development. In
J. Durand,
U. Gut &
G. Kristoffersen (Eds.),
Handbook of corpus phonology
. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Phon (version 1.6.1), downloaded from
[URL]
Rose, Y., MacWhinney, B., Byrne, R., Hedlund, G., Maddocks, K., O’Brien, P., & Wareham, T. (
2006)
Introducing Phon: A software solution for the study of phonological acquisition. In
D. Bamman,
T. Magnitskaia &
C. Zaller (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development
(pp. 489-500). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (
1986)
Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition
. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stemberger, J. P. (
1993)
Vowel dominance in overregularization.
Journal of Child Language
, 201, 503-521.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stemberger, J. P. (
2007)
Children's overtensing errors: Phonological and lexical effects on syntax.
Journal of Memory & Language
, 571, 49-64.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stemberger, J. P. (
2011)
Learning to be variable in Valley Zapotec. Paper presented at the International Association for the Study of Child Language conference, Montreal.
Stemberger, J. P., & Treiman, R. (
1986)
The internal structure of word-initial consonant clusters.
Journal of Memory and Language
, 251, 163-180.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tesar, B., & Smolensky, P. (
1998)
Learnability in optimality theory.
Linguistic Inquiry
, 291, 229-268.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, M. (
2003)
Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition
. Boston: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tremblay, A., & Baayen, R. H. (
2010)
Holistic processing of regular four-word sequences: A behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability on immediate free recall. In
D. Wood (Ed.),
Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication
(pp. 151-173). London: The Continuum International Publishing Group.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Umeda, N. (
1975)
Vowel duration in American English.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
, 581, 434-445.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Umeda, N. (
1977)
Consonant duration in American English.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
, 611, 846-858.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
AMOAKO, Wendy Kwakye & Joseph Paul STEMBERGER
2022.
Acquisition of variability in Akan Phonology: Labio-palatalized consonants and front rounded vowels.
Journal of Child Language 49:5
► pp. 979 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
PYE, Clifton
2021.
Documenting the acquisition of indigenous languages.
Journal of Child Language 48:3
► pp. 454 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bernhardt, Barbara May & Joseph P. Stemberger
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.