Article published In:
Semantic Considerations of Lexical Processing
[The Mental Lexicon 9:1] 2014
► pp. 131140
Allen, P. A., McNeal, M., & Kvak, D. (
1992) Perhaps the lexicon is coded as a function of word frequency. Journal of Memory and Language , 311, 826– 844.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
DOI: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., Hardie, A., McEnery, T., & Jayaram, B. D. (
2003)  Corpus data for South Asian language processing . Paper presented at the EACL 2003, Workshop on Computational Linguistics for South Asian Languages – Expanding Synergies with Europe, 12–17 April 2003, Budapest.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (
1998)  Microsoft Encarta 98 encyclopedia . Redmond: Microsoft Corporation. Retrieved from: [URL]Google Scholar
Dash, N. S., & Chaudhari, B. B. (
2001) Paper presented at the SCALLA conference, Bangalore, India. Retrieved from: [URL]
de Groot, A. M. B., Borgwaldt, S., Bos, M., & van den Eijnden, E. (
2002) Lexical decision and word naming in bilinguals: Language effects and task effects. Journal of Memory and Language , 471, 91–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durda, K., & Buchanan, L. (
2006)  WordMine2 [Online]. Retrieved from: [URL]Google Scholar
EMILLE Corpus Documentation
Retrieved from: [URL]
Ethonologue Survey. (
1999)  Summer Institute for Linguistics (SIL) . Retrieved from: [URL]Google Scholar
Everaert, C. (
2009)  Tracing the boundaries between Hindi and Urdu: Lost and added in translation between 20th century short stories. Leiden , The Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
Gordon, B. (
1983) Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour , 221, 24–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985) Subjective frequency and the lexical decision latency function: Implications for mechanisms of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language , 241, 631–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khan, Q. H. (
2006) A study of word frequency in written Urdu. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). University of Windsor, Canada.Google Scholar
2012) Lexical representation and processing in cross-script Urdu-English bilinguals: The case of frequency-balanced and frequency-unbalanced cognates and noncognates. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Windsor, Canada.Google Scholar
Khan, Q. H., & Buchanan, L. (
2006)  A study of word frequency in written Urdu . Poster presented at the Fifth International Conference on the Mental Lexicon, Montreal, QC.
Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (
1967)  Computational analysis of present-day American English . Providence, R. I.: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Martynyuk, S. (
2003) Statistical approach to the debate on Urdu and Hindi. The Annual of Urdu Studies , 181.Google Scholar
Monsell, S. (
1991) The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148–197). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., & Haggard, P. N. (
1989) Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 118(1), 43–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paap, K. R., McDonald, J. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Noel, R. W. (
1987) Frequency and pronouncibility in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 221–243). Hove, E . Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Russell, R. (
1996) Some notes on Hindi and Urdu. The Annual of Urdu Studies , 111, 203–208.Google Scholar
Weber, G. (
1997) Top languages: The world’s 10 most influential languages. Language Today , 21, 12–18.Google Scholar