Article published in:
Words & Constructions: Language complexity in linguistics and psychology
Edited by Juhani Järvikivi, Pirita Pyykkönen-Klauck and Matti Laine
[The Mental Lexicon 9:2] 2014
► pp. 144169
References
Biber, D
(1995) Dimensions of register variation. A cross-linguistic study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D
(1992) Language and species. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R
(1973) A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blankenship, J
(1974) The influence of mode, submode, and speaker predilection on style. Speech Monographs, 411, 85–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A
(1999) The origins of complex language. An inquiry into the evolutionary beginnings of sentences, syllables and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W
(1982) Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Deborah Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35–54). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chipere, N
(2003) Understanding complex sentences: Native speaker variation in syntactic competence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N
(1959) On certain formal properties of grammars. Information and Control, 21, 137–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B
(1992) Before complexity. In Murray Gell-Mann, & John A. Hawkins (Eds.), The Evolution of human languages: Proceedings of the workshop on the evolution of human languages, held August 1989 in Santa Fe, New Mexico (pp. 193–211).Redwood, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Crystal, D
(2006) A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Culicover, P.W
(2013) Grammar & complexity. Language at the intersection of competence and performance. Oxford: University PressGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ö
(2004) The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deutscher, G
(2009) “Overall complexity”: A wild goose chase? In Sampson, Gil, & Trudgill (Eds.), 243–251.
Dressler, W.U
(1987) Leitmotifs in natural morphology. Studies in Language Companion Series, 10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Einarsson, J
(1978) Talad och skriven svenska. Sociolingvistiska studier. Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap. SERIE C NR 9. Lund: Walter Ekstrand Bokförlag.Google Scholar
Engel, E
(1911) Deutsche stilkunst. Vienna & Leipzig: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky A-G.Google Scholar
Everett, D
(2005) Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology, 46 (4), 621–646 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G., & Sag, I
(1985) Generalized phrase structure grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gibson, E
(1998) Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 681, 1–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T
(2009) The genesis of syntactic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T., & Shibatani, M
(Eds.) (2009) Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, acquisition, neuro-cognition, evolution. Typological Studies in Language, 85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M
(2006) Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics, 42 (1), 25–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J.A
(1994) A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C
(1958) A course in modern linguistics. New York: The Macmillan Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Humboldt, W. von
(1836) Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Druckerei der königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R
(1999) Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3 (7), 272–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R
(1932) Zur Struktur des russischen Verbums. In Charistia Guglielmo Mathesio Quinquagenario a discipulis et Circuli Linguistici Pragensis sodalibus oblata (pp. 74–84). Prague: Cercle linguistique de Prague.Google Scholar
(1936) Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen kasus. In Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague VI1 (pp. 240–288). Praha.Google Scholar
(1942) Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: A.-B. Lundequistska bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O
(1922) Language, its nature, development & origin. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
(1941) Efficiency in linguistic change. Det Kgl. danske videnskabernes selskab. Historisk-filologiske meddelelser, 27 (4). København: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kager, R
(1999) Optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, F
(2007) Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics, 43 (2), 365–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kinsella, A.R
(2009) Language evolution and syntactic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kordmann, B., & Szmrecsanyi, B
(2009) World Englishes between simplification and complexification. In Lucia Siebers, & Thomas Hoffmann (eds.), World Englishes – problems, properties and prospects: Selected papers from the 13th IAWE conference (pp. 265–285). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kusters, W
(2003) Linguistic complexity: The influence of social change on verbal inflection. Ph.D. diss., University of Leiden.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B
(2009) The emergence of linguistic complexity. In Givón, & Shibatani (Eds.), 405–432.
Martinet, A
(1955) Économie des changements phonétiques. Traité de phonologie diachronique. Bibliotheca Romanica. Manualia et Commentationes X. Berne: Éditions A. Francke S.A.Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, W
(1980) Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Linguistische Forschungen, 28. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J
(2001) The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology, 51, 126–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michel, J-B., Shen, Y.K., Aiden, A.P., Veres, A., & Gray, M.K., The Google Books Team, Pickett, J.B., Hoiberg, D., Clancy, D., Norvig, P., Orwant, J., Pinker, S., Nowak, M.A., & Aiden, E.L
(2011) Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331 (6014), 176–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, M
(2008) Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki, & Karlsson 2008a (Eds.), 23–42.
Miestamo, M., Sinnemäki, K., & Karlsson, F
(2008b) Introduction: The problem of language complexity. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki, and Karlsson 2008a (Eds.), Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change (pp. vii–xiv). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G.A
(1987) Some psychological studies of grammar. American Psychologist, 171, 748–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, J
(1992) Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Linguistic complexity: A comprehensive definition and a survey. In Sampson, Gil, & Trudgill (Eds.), 110–125.
Paul, H
(1920 [1886]) Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Fünfte Auflage. Halle a. S.: Verlag von Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Perkins, R.D
(1992) Deixis, grammar, and culture. Typological Studies in Language 24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, N
(1998) Complexity: A philosophical overview. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Sampson, G., Gil, D., & Trudgill, P
(Eds.) (2009) Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schleicher, A
(1863) Die Darwinsche Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft. Weimar: Hermann Bühlau.Google Scholar
Simon, H.A
(1962) The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106 (6), 467–482.Google Scholar
Sinnemäki, K
(2008) Complexity trade-offs in core argument marking. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki, & Karlsson 2008a (Eds.), 67–88.
(2011) Language universals and linguistic complexity. Three studies in core argument marking. Ph. D. diss., Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.Available at: http://​www​.ling​.helsinki​.fi​/~ksinnema​/diss​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming). Complexity trade-offs: A case study. In Frederick J. Newmeyer, & Laurel B. Preston (Eds.) Measuring linguistic complexity Oxford Oxford University Press Crossref
Taft, M
(1979) Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7 (4), 263–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taft, M., & Forster, K
(1975) Lexical storage and retrieval for prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 141, 638–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traxler, M.J
(2012) Introduction to psycholinguistics. Understanding language science. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N.S
(1939) Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P
(2009) Sociolinguistic typology and complexification. In Sampson, Gil, & Trudgill (Eds.), 98–109.
Wells, R.S
(1947) Immediate constituents. Language, 23 (1), 81–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, W.U
(1984) Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit: ein Beitrag zur morphologischen Theoriebildung. Studia Grammatica, 21. Berlin: Akademie-Vlg.Google Scholar
Yngve, V.A
(1960) A model and an hypothesis for language structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 104 (5), 444–466.Google Scholar