Although formulaic language has been studied extensively from both a linguistic and psycholinguistic perspective, little is known about the relationship between individual speakers’ knowledge of collocations and their linguistic experience, or between collocational knowledge and other aspects of linguistic knowledge. This is partly because work in these areas has been hampered by lack of an adequate instrument measuring speakers’ knowledge of collocations. This paper describes the development of such an instrument, the “Words that go together” (WGT) test, and some preliminary research using it. The instrument is a multiple choice test consisting of 40 items of varying frequency and collocation strength. The test was validated with a sample of 80 adult native speakers of English. Test-retest reliability was 0.80 and split-half reliability was 0.88. Convergent validity was established by comparing participants’ scores with measures expected to correlate with language experience (print exposure, education, and age) and other linguistic abilities (vocabulary size, grammatical comprehension); divergent validity was established by comparing test scores with nonverbal IQ. The results of the validation study are then used to compare speakers’ performance on the WGT with corpus-based measures of collocation strength (mutual information, z-score, t-score and simple frequency); however, no statistically reliable relationships were found.
(2008) New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods, 401, 278–289.
Arnon, I., & Snider, N
(2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 621, 67–82.
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S
(2000) Usage-based models of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2002) Frequency in production, comprehension and acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 241, 209–213.
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S
(2008) Structural elaboration by the sound (and feel) of it. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 329–353). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 821, 711–733.
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2013) Usage-based theory and exemplar representation. In T. Hoffman & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1981/1993) Lectures on government and binding: The pisa lectures. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Church, K.W., Gale, W., Hanks, P., & Hindle, D
(1991) Using statistics in lexical analysis. In U. Zernik (Ed.), Lexical acquisition: Using on-line resources to build a lexicon (pp. 115–164.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Church, K.W., & Hanks, P
(1990) Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 161, 22–29.
Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N
(2008) Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers?Applied Linguistics, 291, 72–89.
(2009) Words as constructions. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 201–223). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dąbrowska, E. (in press). Individual differences in grammatical knowledge. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.) Handbook of cognitive linguistics Berlin De Gruyter Mouton
in preparation). Grammar, vocabulary and collocations.
(1965) The construction of a thesaurus automatically from a sample of text. In M. E. Stevens, V.E. Giuliano & L.B. Heilprin (Eds.), Proceedings of the symposium on statistical association methods for mechanized documentation (Vol. 2691, pp. 61–148). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards Miscellaneous Pubcation.
Douglas-Kozłowska, C., & Dzierżanowska, H
(2004) Selected English collocations. Warszawa: PWN.
Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M
(1997) Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Durrant, P., & Doherty, A
(2010) Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 61, 125–155.
(2008) High frequency collocations and second language learning. (Ph. D.), University of Nottingham. Retrieved from [URL].
Ellis, N.C., & Simpson-Vlach, R
(2009) Formulaic language in native speakers: Triangulating psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and education. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 51, 61–78.
Erman, B., & Warren, B
(2000) The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 201, 29–62.
(2004) Computational approaches to collocations. Retrieved 8 February 2014, from [URL].
(2005) The statistics of word cooccurrences: Word pairs and collocations. (Ph.D.), University of Stuttgart. Retrieved from [URL].
2022. Collocational knowledge in children: a comparison of English-speaking monolingual children, and children acquiring English as an Additional Language. Journal of Child Language 49:5 ► pp. 1008 ff.
2018. Abstractions and exemplars: The measure noun phrase alternation in German. Cognitive Linguistics 29:4 ► pp. 729 ff.
Tachihara, Karina & Adele E. Goldberg
2020. Cognitive accessibility predicts word order of couples’ names in English and Japanese. Cognitive Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 231 ff.
2022. Editorial: The Notion of the Native Speaker Put to the Test: Recent Research Advances. Frontiers in Psychology 13
[no author supplied]
2021. References. In Foundations of Familiar Language, ► pp. 386 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.