Article published in:Bridging the Methodological Divide: Linguistic and psycholinguistic approaches to formulaic language
Edited by Stefanie Wulff and Debra Titone
[The Mental Lexicon 9:3] 2014
► pp. 401–418
Words that go together
Measuring individual differences in native speakers’ knowledge of collocations
Although formulaic language has been studied extensively from both a linguistic and psycholinguistic perspective, little is known about the relationship between individual speakers’ knowledge of collocations and their linguistic experience, or between collocational knowledge and other aspects of linguistic knowledge. This is partly because work in these areas has been hampered by lack of an adequate instrument measuring speakers’ knowledge of collocations. This paper describes the development of such an instrument, the “Words that go together” (WGT) test, and some preliminary research using it. The instrument is a multiple choice test consisting of 40 items of varying frequency and collocation strength. The test was validated with a sample of 80 adult native speakers of English. Test-retest reliability was 0.80 and split-half reliability was 0.88. Convergent validity was established by comparing participants’ scores with measures expected to correlate with language experience (print exposure, education, and age) and other linguistic abilities (vocabulary size, grammatical comprehension); divergent validity was established by comparing test scores with nonverbal IQ. The results of the validation study are then used to compare speakers’ performance on the WGT with corpus-based measures of collocation strength (mutual information, z-score, t-score and simple frequency); however, no statistically reliable relationships were found.
Keywords: language testing, formulaic language, collocation, frequency, age, individual differences, psychological reality
Published online: 23 January 2015
Acheson, D.J., Wells, J.B., & MacDonald, M.C.
Arnon, I., & Snider, N.
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S.
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S.
Church, K.W., Gale, W., Hanks, P., & Hindle, D.
Church, K.W., & Hanks, P.
Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N.
in preparation). Grammar, vocabulary and collocations.
(1965) The construction of a thesaurus automatically from a sample of text. In M. E. Stevens, V.E. Giuliano & L.B. Heilprin (Eds.), Proceedings of the symposium on statistical association methods for mechanized documentation (Vol. 269, pp. 61–148). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards Miscellaneous Pubcation.
Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M.
Durrant, P., & Doherty, A.
(2008) High frequency collocations and second language learning. (Ph. D.), University of Nottingham. Retrieved from http://etheses.nottingham.ac.uk/622/.
Ellis, N.C., & Simpson-Vlach, R.
(2004) Computational approaches to collocations. Retrieved 8 February 2014, from www.collocations.de.
(2005) The statistics of word cooccurrences: Word pairs and collocations. (Ph.D.), University of Stuttgart. Retrieved from http://www.stefan-evert.de/PUB/Evert2004phd.pdf.
Schmitt, N., Grandage, S., & Adolphs, S.
Shipley, W.C., Gruber, C.P., Martin, T.A., & Klein, A.M.
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & van Heuven, W.J.B.
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C.
Tremblay, A., & Tucker, B.V.
Verneau, M., van der Kamp, J., Savelsbergh, G.J., & de Loozem, M.P.
Cited by 12 other publications
González-Márquez, Mónica, Michele I. Feist & Liane Ströbel
Llompart, Miquel & Ewa Dąbrowska
McConnell, Kyla & Alice Blumenthal-Dramé
Tachihara, Karina & Adele E. Goldberg
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.