Article published in:
Bridging the Methodological Divide: Linguistic and psycholinguistic approaches to formulaic language
Edited by Stefanie Wulff and Debra Titone
[The Mental Lexicon 9:3] 2014
► pp. 401418
References

References

Acheson, D.J., Wells, J.B., & MacDonald, M.C.
(2008) New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 278–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I., & Snider, N.
(2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 67–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S.
(2000) Usage-based models of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R.
(2002) Frequency in production, comprehension and acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 209–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S.
(2008) Structural elaboration by the sound (and feel) of it. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 329–353). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J.L.
(2013) Usage-based theory and exemplar representation. In T. Hoffman & 
G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1981/1993) Lectures on government and binding: The pisa lectures. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Church, K.W., Gale, W., Hanks, P., & Hindle, D.
(1991) Using statistics in lexical analysis. In 
U. Zernik (Ed.), Lexical acquisition: Using on-line resources to build a lexicon (pp. 115–164.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Church, K.W., & Hanks, P.
(1990) Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16, 22–29.Google Scholar
Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N.
(2008) Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics, 29, 72–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E.
(2009) Words as constructions. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 201–223). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E.. (in press). Individual differences in grammatical knowledge. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.) Handbook of cognitive linguistics Berlin De Gruyter Mouton Crossref
in preparation). Grammar, vocabulary and collocations.
Dennis, S.F.
(1965) The construction of a thesaurus automatically from a sample of text. In M. E. Stevens, V.E. Giuliano & L.B. Heilprin (Eds.), Proceedings of the symposium on statistical association methods for mechanized documentation (Vol. 269, pp. 61–148). 
Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards Miscellaneous Pubcation.Google Scholar
Douglas-Kozłowska, C., & Dzierżanowska, H.
(2004) Selected English collocations. Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar
Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M.
(1997) Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Durrant, P., & Doherty, A.
(2010) Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6, 125–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P.L.
(2008) High frequency collocations and second language learning. (Ph. D.), University of Nottingham. Retrieved from http://​etheses​.nottingham​.ac​.uk​/622/.
Ellis, N.C., & Simpson-Vlach, R.
(2009) Formulaic language in native speakers: Triangulating psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and education. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5, 61–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erman, B., & Warren, B.
(2000) The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20, 29–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evert, S.
(2004) Computational approaches to collocations. Retrieved 8 February 2014, from www​.collocations​.de.
(2005) The statistics of word cooccurrences: Word pairs and collocations. (Ph.D.), University of Stuttgart. Retrieved from http://​www​.stefan​-evert​.de​/PUB​/Evert2004phd​.pdf.
Gries, S.T.
(2011) Phonological similarity in multi-word symbolic units. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 491–510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, T.
(1996) What are collocations: Sandy beaches or false teeth? English Studies, 77, 379–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J.M.
(1991) Informational constraints on pre-lexical priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 169–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S.
(2002) Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W.
(1988) A usage-based model. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 127–161). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Nation, P., & Beglar, D.
(2007) A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9–13.Google Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1997) Words and rules in the human brain. Nature, 387, 547–548. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Words and rules. The ingredients of language. London: Weidenfeld and 
Nicolson.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Grandage, S., & Adolphs, S.
(2004) Are corpus-derived recurrent clusters psycholinguistically valid? In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences: acquisition, processing and use (pp. 127–151). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shipley, W.C., Gruber, C.P., Martin, T.A., & Klein, A.M.
(2009) Shipley-2 manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & van Heuven, W.J.B.
(2011) Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multi-word sequences. Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 776–784. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M.
(1995) Collocations and semantic profiles: On the cause of the trouble with quantitative methods. Functions of Language, 2, 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C.
(2011) Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61, 569–613. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A., & Tucker, B.V.
(2011) The effects of N-gram probabilistic measures on the recognition and production of four-word sequences. The Mental Lexicon, 6, 302–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M.T.
(2006) The declarative/procedural model and the shallow structure hypothesis. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 97–105.Google Scholar
Verneau, M., van der Kamp, J., Savelsbergh, G.J., & de Loozem, M.P.
(2014) Age and time effects on implicit and explicit learning. Experimental Aging Research, 40, 477–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weir, C.J.
(2005) Language Testing and Validation: An Evidence-based Approach. New York: Palgrave Mac.Google Scholar
Wray, A.
(2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Dunn, Jonathan
2018. Finding variants for construction-based dialectometry: A corpus-based approach to regional CxGs. Cognitive Linguistics 29:2  pp. 275 ff. Crossref logo
Dąbrowska, Ewa
2018. Experience, aptitude and individual differences in native language ultimate attainment. Cognition 178  pp. 222 ff. Crossref logo
Dąbrowska, Ewa
2019. Experience, Aptitude, and Individual Differences in Linguistic Attainment: A Comparison of Native and Nonnative Speakers. Language Learning 69  pp. 72 ff. Crossref logo
González-Márquez, Mónica, Michele I. Feist & Liane Ströbel
2017. Converging on a theory of language through multiple methods. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 Crossref logo
Herbst, Thomas
2018. Collo-Creativity and Blending: Recognizing Creativity Requires Lexical Storage in Constructional Slots. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66:3  pp. 309 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Yu
2019.  In Chinese for Specific and Professional Purposes [Chinese Language Learning Sciences, ],  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Llompart, Miquel & Ewa Dąbrowska
2020. Explicit but Not Implicit Memory Predicts Ultimate Attainment in the Native Language. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo
McConnell, Kyla & Alice Blumenthal-Dramé
2019. Effects of task and corpus-derived association scores on the online processing of collocations . Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0 Crossref logo
Rastelli, Stefano
2019. The discontinuity model: Statistical and grammatical learning in adult second-language acquisition. Language Acquisition 26:4  pp. 387 ff. Crossref logo
Schäfer, Roland
2018. Abstractions and exemplars: The measure noun phrase alternation in German. Cognitive Linguistics 29:4  pp. 729 ff. Crossref logo
Tachihara, Karina & Adele E. Goldberg
2020. Cognitive accessibility predicts word order of couples’ names in English and Japanese . Cognitive Linguistics 31:2  pp. 231 ff. Crossref logo
Voelkel, Svenja & Franziska Kretzschmar
2021.  In Introducing Linguistic Research, Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.