Article published in:
Bridging the Methodological Divide: Linguistic and psycholinguistic approaches to formulaic language
Edited by Stefanie Wulff and Debra Titone
[The Mental Lexicon 9:3] 2014
► pp. 473496
Cited by

Cited by 30 other publications

Beck, Sara D. & Andrea Weber
2016. Bilingual and Monolingual Idiom Processing Is Cut from the Same Cloth: The Role of the L1 in Literal and Figurative Meaning Activation. Frontiers in Psychology 7 Crossref logo
Beck, Sara D. & Andrea Weber
2020. Context and Literality in Idiom Processing: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 49:5  pp. 837 ff. Crossref logo
Beck, Sara D. & Andrea Weber
2021. Phrasal Learning Is a Horse Apiece: No Recognition Memory Advantages for Idioms in L1 and L2 Adult Learners. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Carrol, Gareth
2021.  In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11],  pp. 307 ff. Crossref logo
Carrol, Gareth & Kathy Conklin
2020. Is All Formulaic Language Created Equal? Unpacking the Processing Advantage for Different Types of Formulaic Sequences. Language and Speech 63:1  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Carrol, Gareth & Jeannette Littlemore
2020. Resolving Figurative Expressions During Reading: The Role of Familiarity, Transparency, and Context. Discourse Processes 57:7  pp. 609 ff. Crossref logo
Cieślicka, Anna B.
2017.  In Psychology of Bilingualism,  pp. 75 ff. Crossref logo
Cieślicka, Anna B., Roberto R. Heredia & Ariana C. García
2021. The (re)activation of idiomatic expressions (La (re)activación de expresiones idiomáticas). Studies in Psychology 42:2  pp. 334 ff. Crossref logo
Cucchiarini, Catia, Ferdy Hubers & Helmer Strik
2020. Learning L2 idioms in a CALL environment: the role of practice intensity, modality, and idiom properties. Computer Assisted Language Learning  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Findlay, Holly & Gareth Carrol
2018. Contributions of semantic richness to the processing of idioms. The Mental Lexicon 13:3  pp. 311 ff. Crossref logo
Grindrod, Christopher M. & Adina L. Raizen
2019. Age-related changes in processing speed modulate context use during idiomatic ambiguity resolution. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 26:6  pp. 842 ff. Crossref logo
Haeuser, Katja I., Shari Baum & Debra Titone
2021. Effects of aging and noncanonical form presentation on idiom processing: Evidence from eye tracking. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:1  pp. 101 ff. Crossref logo
Hubers, Ferdy, Catia Cucchiarini, Helmer Strik & Ton Dijkstra
2019. Normative Data of Dutch Idiomatic Expressions: Subjective Judgments You Can Bank on. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Koleva, Kremena, Mark Mon-Williams & Ekaterini Klepousniotou
2019. Right hemisphere involvement for pun processing – Effects of idiom decomposition. Journal of Neurolinguistics 51  pp. 165 ff. Crossref logo
Kyriacou, Marianna, Kathy Conklin & Dominic Thompson
2020. Passivizability of Idioms: Has the Wrong Tree Been Barked Up?. Language and Speech 63:2  pp. 404 ff. Crossref logo
Kyriacou, Marianna, Kathy Conklin & Dominic Thompson
2021. When the Idiom Advantage Comes Up Short: Eye-Tracking Canonical and Modified Idioms. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Leivada, Evelina
2017. The primitives of the lexicon: Insights from aspect in idioms. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 2:1 Crossref logo
Mancuso, Azzurra, Annibale Elia, Alessandro Laudanna & Simonetta Vietri
2020. The Role of Syntactic Variability and Literal Interpretation Plausibility in Idiom Comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 49:1  pp. 99 ff. Crossref logo
Milburn, Evelyn, Tessa Warren & Michael Walsh Dickey
2018. Idiom comprehension in aphasia: Literal interference and abstract representation. Journal of Neurolinguistics 47  pp. 16 ff. Crossref logo
Pulido, Manuel F. & Paola E. Dussias
2020. Desirable difficulties while learning collocations in a second language: Conditions that induce L1 interference improve learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:3  pp. 652 ff. Crossref logo
Sandmann, Matthias, Sabine Weiss & Horst Mueller
2021. How Idioms Are Recognized when Individuals Are “Thrown Off the Track”, “Off the Rack” or “Off the Path”: A Decision Time Experiment in Healthy Volunteers. Metaphor and Symbol 36:3  pp. 166 ff. Crossref logo
Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna, Kathy Conklin, Sendy Caffarra, Edith Kaan & Walter J.B. van Heuven
2017. Representation and processing of multi-word expressions in the brain. Brain and Language 175  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo
Sprenger, Simone A., Amélie la Roi & Jacolien van Rij
2019. The Development of Idiom Knowledge Across the Lifespan. Frontiers in Communication 4 Crossref logo
Titone, Debra, Veronica Whitford, Agnieszka Lijewska & Inbal Itzhak
2016.  In Cognitive Control and Consequences of Multilingualism [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 2],  pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo
Tiv, Mehrgol, Laura Gonnerman, Veronica Whitford, Deanna Friesen, Debra Jared & Debra Titone
2019. Figuring Out How Verb-Particle Constructions Are Understood During L1 and L2 Reading. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
van Ginkel, Wendy & Ton Dijkstra
2020. The tug of war between an idiom's figurative and literal meanings: Evidence from native and bilingual speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:1  pp. 131 ff. Crossref logo
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana
2020.  In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70],  pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Vulchanova, Mila, Evelyn Milburn, Valentin Vulchanov & Giosuè Baggio
2019. Boon or Burden? The Role of Compositional Meaning in Figurative Language Processing and Acquisition. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 28:2  pp. 359 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Xiaolu, Yizhen Wang, Wanning Tian, Wei Zheng & Xiaoli Chen
2021. The Roles of Familiarity and Context in Processing Chinese Xiehouyu: An ERP Study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 50:4  pp. 901 ff. Crossref logo
Wittenberg, Eva & Roger Levy
2017. If you want a quick kiss, make it count: How choice of syntactic construction affects event construal. Journal of Memory and Language 94  pp. 254 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Abel, B.
(2003) English idioms in the first language and second language lexicon: A dual representation approach. Second Language Research, 19(4), 329–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I., & Snider, N.
(2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(1), 67–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R.H., Davidson, D.J., & Bates, D.M.
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of memory and language, 59(4), 390–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bannard, C., & Matthews, D.
(2008) Stored word sequences in language learning: The effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science, 19(3), 241–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barr, D.J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H.J.
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bélanger, N., Baum, S.R., & Titone, D.
(2009) Use of prosodic cues in the production of idiomatic and literal sentences by individuals with right-and left-hemisphere damage. Brain and language, 110(1), 38–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bobrow, S.A., & Bell, S.M.
(1973) On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory and Cognition, 1, 343–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bortfeld, H.
(2003) Comprehending idioms cross-linguistically. Exp Psychol, 50(3), 217–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P.
(1988) The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 668–683. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caillies, S.
(2009) Description de 300 expressions idiomatiques: Familiarité, connaissance de leur signification, plausibilité littérale, décomposabilité et prédictibilité. = descriptions of french idiomatic expressions: Familiarity, literality, compositionality, predictability, and knowledge of meaning. L’Année Psychologique, 109(3), 463–508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caillies, S., & Butcher, K.
(2007) Processing of idiomatic expressions: Evidence for a new hybrid view. Metaphor & Symbol, 22, 79–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caillies, S., & Declercq, C.
(2011) Kill the song — steal the show: What does distinguish predicative metaphors from decomposable idioms? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 40, 205–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Oxford, England: M. I. T. Press.Google Scholar
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Colombo, L.
(1993) The comprehension of ambiguous idioms in context. In C. Cacciari & 
P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation (pp. 163–200). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1998) Role of context in the comprehension of ambiguous Italian idioms. In 
D. Hillert (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, 31, sentence processing: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 379–404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cronk, B.C., & Schweigert, W.A.
(1992) The comprehension of idioms: The effects of familiarity, literalness, and usage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 131–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B.
(1970) Idioms within a transformational grammar. Foundations of language, 6, 22–42.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., Jr
(1980) Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory and Cognition, 8, 149–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., Jr., & Nayak, N.P.
(1989) Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms. Cognit Psychol, 21(1), 100–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., Jr., Nayak, N.P., Bolton, J.L., & Keppel, M.E.
(1989) Speakers’ assumptions about the lexical flexibility of idioms. Memory and Cognition, 17(1), 58–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., Jr., Nayak, N.P., & Cutting, C.B.
(1989) How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 576–593. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, J., & Gibbs, R.
(1999) Why you can’t kick the bucket as you slowly die: Verbs in idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(1), 25–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R., & Culicover, P.W.
(2003) The semantic basis of control in English. Language, 79(3), 517–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(1997) The architecture of the language faculty (No. 28). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Libben, M., & Titone, D.
(2008) The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1103–1131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lovseth, K., de la Parra, L., Wagner, M., & Titone, D.
(2011) Familiarity and decomposability modulate the prosodic realization of figuratively vs. literally intended idioms during natural speech production. In Proceedings of the Ninth Edition of the International Seminar on Speech Production, Montréal, Canada (pp. 377–384).
Mueller, R.A.G., & Gibbs, R.W.
(1987) Processing idioms with multiple meanings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 63–81.Google Scholar
Nattinger, J.R., & DeCarrico, J.S.
(1992) Lexical phrases and language teaching (Vol. 1, pp. 992). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nunberg, G.
(1978) The pragmatics of reference. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics.Google Scholar
Nunberg, G., Sag, I.A., & Wasow, T.
(1994) Idioms. Language, 70, 491–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papagno, C., Lucchelli, F., Muggia, S., & Rizzo, S.
(2003) Idiom comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease: The role of the central executive. Brain, 126(Pt 11), 2419–2430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papagno, C., Tabossi, P., Colombo, M.R., & Zampetti, P.
(2004) Idiom comprehension in aphasic patients. Brain and Language, 89(1), 226–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A., & Syder, F.H.
(1983) Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. Language and communication, 191, 225.Google Scholar
Peterson, R.R., Burgess, C., Dell, G.S., & Eberhard, K.M.
(2001) Dissociation between syntactic and semantic processing during idiom comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(5), 1223–1237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Popiel, S.J., & McRae, K.
(1988) The figurative and literal senses of idioms, of all idioms are not used equally. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 475–487. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schweigert, W.A., & Cronk, B.C.
(1993) Ratings of the familiarity of idioms figurative meanings and the likelihood of literal meanings among United-States college-students. Current Psychology-Research & Reviews, 11(4), 325–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.M.
(1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N.
(2011) Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research, 27(2), 251–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova, A., & Schmitt, N.
(2007) Native and nonnative use of multi-word vs. one-word verbs. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(2), 119–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swinney, D.A., & Cutler, A.
(1979) The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 522–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tabossi, P., Fanari, R., & Wolf, K.
(2008) Processing idiomatic expressions: Effects of semantic compositionality. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 34(2), 313–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Titone, D., Columbus, G., Whitford, V., Mercier, J., & Libben, M.
(In press) Contrasting Bilingual and Monolingual Idiom Processing. In R.R. Heredia & A.B. Cieślicka (Eds.), Bilingual figurative language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Titone, D., & Connine, C.M.
(1994a) Descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic expressions: Familiarity, compositionality, predictability, and literality. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9, 247–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Titone, D.A., & Connine, C.M.
(1994b) Comprehension of idiomatic expressions: Effects of predictability and literality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Titone, D., & Connine, C.M.
(1999) On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1655–1674. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Titone, D., Holzman, P.S., & Levy, D.L.
(2002) Idiom processing in schizophrenia: Literal implausibility saves the day for idiom priming. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(2), 313–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Titone, D.A., & Connine, C.M.
(1994a) Comprehension of idiomatic expressions: Effects of predictability and literality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1126–1138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A., & Tucker, B.V.
(2011) The effects of N-gram probabilistic measures on the recognition and production of four-word sequences. The Mental Lexicon, 6(2), 302–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C.
(2011) Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61(2), 569–613. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker, D., Canter, G.J., & Terbeek, D.
(1981) Disambiguation of ditropic sentencesacoustic and phonetic cues. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 24(3), 330–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker, D.R., & Kempler, D.
(1987) Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients. Brain and Language, 32(2), 265–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker Sidtis, D.
(2004) When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: Toward a dual-process model of language. International Journal of Language and Communicative Disorders, 39(1), 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A.
(2012) What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 231–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Formulaic language. Language Teaching, 46(03), 316–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S.
(2008) Rethinking idiomaticity: A usage-based approach. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar