Article published In:
Bridging the Methodological Divide: Linguistic and psycholinguistic approaches to formulaic languageEdited by Stefanie Wulff and Debra Titone
[The Mental Lexicon 9:3] 2014
► pp. 473–496
Edited by Stefanie Wulff and Debra Titone
[The Mental Lexicon 9:3] 2014
► pp. 473–496
Time-dependent effects of decomposability, familiarity and literal plausibility on idiom meaning activation
A cross-modal priming investigation
We address a core question about idioms relevant to formulaic language generally: are the figurative meanings of idioms directly retrieved or compositionally built? An understanding of this question has been previously obscured by the fact that idioms vary in ways that can affect processing, and also because experimental tasks, which differ across studies, probe different kinds of comprehension processes. We thus investigate how linguistic differences among idioms in semantic decomposability, familiarity, and literal plausibility modulate figurative meaning activation using cross-modal semantic priming, which is ideal for tracking activation of a particular target meaning over time. Across two experiments, we obtained two key findings. First, a comparison of different prime-target delay conditions suggests that figurative meaning activation steadily accrues as the idiom unfolds to 1000 ms later. Second, different linguistic attributes of idioms modulate figurative activation at different time points: increased literal plausibility interferes with idiom priming prior to the offset of the phrase, increased familiarity facilitates idiom priming at phrase offset, and increased semantic decomposability (surprisingly) interferes with idiom priming 1000 ms following phrase offset. These results contradict strong decompositional models of idiom processing and rather suggest that multiple linguistic factors jointly constrain figurative meaning retrieval in a time-dependent fashion.
References
Abel, B.
(2003) English idioms in the first language and second language lexicon: A dual representation approach. Second Language Research, 19(4), 329–358. 
Arnon, I., & Snider, N.
(2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(1), 67–82.
Baayen, R.H., Davidson, D.J., & Bates, D.M.
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of memory and language, 59(4), 390–412.
Bannard, C., & Matthews, D.
(2008) Stored word sequences in language learning: The effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science, 19(3), 241–248.
Barr, D.J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H.J.
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.
Bélanger, N., Baum, S.R., & Titone, D.
(2009) Use of prosodic cues in the production of idiomatic and literal sentences by individuals with right-and left-hemisphere damage. Brain and language, 110(1), 38–42.
Bobrow, S.A., & Bell, S.M.
(1973) On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory and Cognition, 11, 343–346.
Bortfeld, H.
(2003) Comprehending idioms cross-linguistically. Exp Psychol, 50(3), 217–230.
Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P.
(1988) The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 271, 668–683.
Caillies, S.
(2009) Description de 300 expressions idiomatiques: Familiarité, connaissance de leur signification, plausibilité littérale, décomposabilité et prédictibilité. = descriptions of french idiomatic expressions: Familiarity, literality, compositionality, predictability, and knowledge of meaning. L’Année Psychologique, 109(3), 463–508.
Caillies, S., & Butcher, K.
(2007) Processing of idiomatic expressions: Evidence for a new hybrid view. Metaphor & Symbol, 221, 79–108.
Caillies, S., & Declercq, C.
(2011) Kill the song — steal the show: What does distinguish predicative metaphors from decomposable idioms? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 401, 205–223.
Chomsky, N.
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Oxford, England: M. I. T. Press.
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Colombo, L.
(1993) The comprehension of ambiguous idioms in context. In C. Cacciari &
P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation (pp. 163–200). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1998) Role of context in the comprehension of ambiguous Italian idioms. In
D. Hillert (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, 31, sentence processing: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 379–404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Cronk, B.C., & Schweigert, W.A.
(1992) The comprehension of idioms: The effects of familiarity, literalness, and usage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 131, 131–146.
Fraser, B.
(1970) Idioms within a transformational grammar. Foundations of language, 61, 22–42.
Gibbs, R.W., Jr
(1980) Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory and Cognition, 81, 149–156.
Gibbs, R.W., Jr., & Nayak, N.P.
(1989) Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms. Cognit Psychol, 21(1), 100–138.
Gibbs, R.W., Jr., Nayak, N.P., Bolton, J.L., & Keppel, M.E.
(1989) Speakers’ assumptions about the lexical flexibility of idioms. Memory and Cognition, 17(1), 58–68.
Gibbs, R.W., Jr., Nayak, N.P., & Cutting, C.B.
(1989) How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 281, 576–593.
Hamblin, J., & Gibbs, R.
(1999) Why you can’t kick the bucket as you slowly die: Verbs in idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(1), 25–39.
Jackendoff, R., & Culicover, P.W.
(2003) The semantic basis of control in English. Language, 79(3), 517–556.
Jackendoff, R.
(1997) The architecture of the language faculty (No. 28). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Libben, M., & Titone, D.
(2008) The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory & Cognition, 361, 1103–1131.
Lovseth, K., de la Parra, L., Wagner, M., & Titone, D.
(2011) Familiarity and decomposability modulate the prosodic realization of figuratively vs. literally intended idioms during natural speech production. In Proceedings of the Ninth Edition of the International Seminar on Speech Production, Montréal, Canada (pp. 377–384).
Mueller, R.A.G., & Gibbs, R.W.
(1987) Processing idioms with multiple meanings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 161, 63–81.
Nattinger, J.R., & DeCarrico, J.S.
(1992) Lexical phrases and language teaching (Vol. 11, pp. 992). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nunberg, G.
(1978) The pragmatics of reference. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics.
Nunberg, G., Sag, I.A., & Wasow, T.
(1994) Idioms. Language, 701, 491–534.
Papagno, C., Lucchelli, F., Muggia, S., & Rizzo, S.
(2003) Idiom comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease: The role of the central executive. Brain, 126(Pt 11), 2419–2430.
Papagno, C., Tabossi, P., Colombo, M.R., & Zampetti, P.
(2004) Idiom comprehension in aphasic patients. Brain and Language, 89(1), 226–234.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F.H.
(1983) Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. Language and communication, 1911, 225.
Peterson, R.R., Burgess, C., Dell, G.S., & Eberhard, K.M.
(2001) Dissociation between syntactic and semantic processing during idiom comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(5), 1223–1237.
Popiel, S.J., & McRae, K.
(1988) The figurative and literal senses of idioms, of all idioms are not used equally. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 171, 475–487.
Schweigert, W.A., & Cronk, B.C.
(1993) Ratings of the familiarity of idioms figurative meanings and the likelihood of literal meanings among United-States college-students. Current Psychology-Research & Reviews, 11(4), 325–345.
Sinclair, J.M.
(1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N.
(2011) Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research, 27(2), 251–272.
Siyanova, A., & Schmitt, N.
(2007) Native and nonnative use of multi-word vs. one-word verbs. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(2), 119–139.
Swinney, D.A., & Cutler, A.
(1979) The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 181, 522–534.
Tabossi, P., Fanari, R., & Wolf, K.
(2008) Processing idiomatic expressions: Effects of semantic compositionality. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 34(2), 313–327.
Titone, D., Columbus, G., Whitford, V., Mercier, J., & Libben, M.
(In press) Contrasting Bilingual and Monolingual Idiom Processing. In R.R. Heredia & A.B. Cieślicka (Eds.), Bilingual figurative language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Titone, D., & Connine, C.M.
(1994a) Descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic expressions: Familiarity, compositionality, predictability, and literality. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 91, 247–270.
Titone, D.A., & Connine, C.M.
(1994b) Comprehension of idiomatic expressions: Effects of predictability and literality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1126.
Titone, D., & Connine, C.M.
(1999) On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 311, 1655–1674.
Titone, D., Holzman, P.S., & Levy, D.L.
(2002) Idiom processing in schizophrenia: Literal implausibility saves the day for idiom priming. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(2), 313–320.
Titone, D.A., & Connine, C.M.
(1994a) Comprehension of idiomatic expressions: Effects of predictability and literality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1126–1138.
Tremblay, A., & Tucker, B.V.
(2011) The effects of N-gram probabilistic measures on the recognition and production of four-word sequences. The Mental Lexicon, 6(2), 302–324.
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C.
(2011) Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61(2), 569–613.
Van Lancker, D., Canter, G.J., & Terbeek, D.
(1981) Disambiguation of ditropic sentencesacoustic and phonetic cues. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 24(3), 330–335.
Van Lancker, D.R., & Kempler, D.
(1987) Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients. Brain and Language, 32(2), 265–277.
Van Lancker Sidtis, D.
(2004) When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: Toward a dual-process model of language. International Journal of Language and Communicative Disorders, 39(1), 1–44.
Wray, A.
(2012) What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 321, 231–254.
(2013) Formulaic language. Language Teaching, 46(03), 316–334.
Wulff, S.
(2008) Rethinking idiomaticity: A usage-based approach. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Cited by
Cited by 52 other publications
Arnon, Tamar & Michal Lavidor
2023. Cognitive control in processing ambiguous idioms: evidence from a self-paced reading study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:1 ► pp. 261 ff. 
Beck, Sara D. & Andrea Weber
2016. Bilingual and Monolingual Idiom Processing Is Cut from the Same Cloth: The Role of the L1 in Literal and Figurative Meaning Activation. Frontiers in Psychology 7
Beck, Sara D. & Andrea Weber
2020. Context and Literality in Idiom Processing: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 49:5 ► pp. 837 ff.
Beck, Sara D. & Andrea Weber
2021. Phrasal Learning Is a Horse Apiece: No Recognition Memory Advantages for Idioms in L1 and L2 Adult Learners. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Bulkes, Nyssa Z. & Darren Tanner
2017. “Going to town”: Large-scale norming and statistical analysis of 870 American English idioms. Behavior Research Methods 49:2 ► pp. 772 ff.
Carrol, Gareth
2021. Psycholinguistic approaches to figuration. In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 307 ff.
Carrol, Gareth & Kathy Conklin
2020. Is All Formulaic Language Created Equal? Unpacking the Processing Advantage for Different Types of Formulaic Sequences. Language and Speech 63:1 ► pp. 95 ff.
Carrol, Gareth & Jeannette Littlemore
2020. Resolving Figurative Expressions During Reading: The Role of Familiarity, Transparency, and Context. Discourse Processes 57:7 ► pp. 609 ff.
Carrol, Gareth & Katrien Segaert
2023. As easy as cake or a piece of pie? Processing idiom variation and the contribution of individual cognitive differences. Memory & Cognition
Cieślicka, Anna B.
2017. Bilingual Figurative Language Processing. In Psychology of Bilingualism, ► pp. 75 ff.
Cieślicka, Anna B., Roberto R. Heredia & Ariana C. García
2021. The (re)activation of idiomatic expressions (La (re)activación de expresiones idiomáticas). Studies in Psychology 42:2 ► pp. 334 ff.
Costa, Ana Santos, Montserrat Comesaña & Ana Paula Soares
2022. PHOR-in-One: A multilingual lexical database with PHonological, ORthographic and PHonographic word similarity estimates in four languages. Behavior Research Methods 55:7 ► pp. 3699 ff.
Cucchiarini, Catia, Ferdy Hubers & Helmer Strik
2022. Learning L2 idioms in a CALL environment: the role of practice intensity, modality, and idiom properties. Computer Assisted Language Learning 35:4 ► pp. 863 ff.
Findlay, Holly & Gareth Carrol
2018. Contributions of semantic richness to the processing of idioms. The Mental Lexicon 13:3 ► pp. 311 ff.
Grindrod, Christopher M. & Adina L. Raizen
2019. Age-related changes in processing speed modulate context use during idiomatic ambiguity resolution. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 26:6 ► pp. 842 ff.
Haeuser, Katja I., Shari Baum & Debra Titone
2021. Effects of aging and noncanonical form presentation on idiom processing: Evidence from eye tracking. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:1 ► pp. 101 ff.
Hubbard, Ryan, Nyssa Bulkes & Vicky Tzuyin Lai
2023. Predictability and decomposability separately contribute to compositional processing of idiomatic language. Psychophysiology 60:8
Hubers, Ferdy, Catia Cucchiarini, Helmer Strik & Ton Dijkstra
2019. Normative Data of Dutch Idiomatic Expressions: Subjective Judgments You Can Bank on. Frontiers in Psychology 10
Hubers, Ferdy, Catia Cucchiarini, Helmer Strik & Ton Dijkstra
2022. Individual word activation and word frequency effects during the processing of opaque idiomatic expressions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 75:6 ► pp. 1004 ff.
Hubers, Ferdy, Catia Cucchiarini & Nicoline van der Sijs
2022. Knowledge of idiomatic expressions in the native language: Do emigrants lose their touch?. Lingua 271 ► pp. 103242 ff.
Häuser, Katja I., Debra A. Titone & Shari R. Baum
2016. The role of the ventro-lateral prefrontal cortex in idiom comprehension: An rTMS study. Neuropsychologia 91 ► pp. 360 ff.
Koleva, Kremena, Mark Mon-Williams & Ekaterini Klepousniotou
2019. Right hemisphere involvement for pun processing – Effects of idiom decomposition. Journal of Neurolinguistics 51 ► pp. 165 ff.
Kyriacou, Marianna, Kathy Conklin & Dominic Thompson
2020. Passivizability of Idioms: Has the Wrong Tree Been Barked Up?. Language and Speech 63:2 ► pp. 404 ff.
Kyriacou, Marianna, Kathy Conklin & Dominic Thompson
2021. When the Idiom Advantage Comes Up Short: Eye-Tracking Canonical and Modified Idioms. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Lada, Anastasia, Philippe Paquier, Christina Manouilidou & Stefanie Keulen
2023. A systematic review: Idiom comprehension in aphasia: The effects of stimuli and task type. Journal of Neurolinguistics 65 ► pp. 101115 ff.
Leivada, Evelina
2017. Τhe primitives of the lexicon: Insights from aspect in idioms. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 2:1
Lemghari, El Mustapha
2021. Constructing a Broad Model for Proverb Understanding. Metaphor and Symbol 36:4 ► pp. 265 ff.
Lemghari, El Mustapha
2022. On the Role of Source and Target Words’ Meanings in Metaphorical Conceptualizations. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 67:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
LÓPEZ, BELEM G. & JYOTSNA VAID
2018. FácilorA piece of cake: Does variability in bilingual language brokering experience affect idiom comprehension?. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21:2 ► pp. 340 ff.
Mancuso, Azzurra, Annibale Elia, Alessandro Laudanna & Simonetta Vietri
2020. The Role of Syntactic Variability and Literal Interpretation Plausibility in Idiom Comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 49:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Milburn, Evelyn, Tessa Warren & Michael Walsh Dickey
2018. Idiom comprehension in aphasia: Literal interference and abstract representation. Journal of Neurolinguistics 47 ► pp. 16 ff.
Mirgalimova, Liliia Marselevna , Elena Fridrikhovna Arsenteva & Elena Aleksandrovna Nikulina
2022. Deviation of Phraseological Unit Semantic Stability as a Means of Phraseological Transformation. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 9 ► pp. 2638 ff.
Mitchell, Rachel L.C., Kleio Vidaki & Michal Lavidor
2016. The role of left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in semantic processing: A transcranial direct current stimulation study. Neuropsychologia 91 ► pp. 480 ff.
Morid, Mahsa & Laura Sabourin
2023. Role of Affective Factors and Concreteness on the Processing of Idioms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
Muraki, Emiko J., Summer Abdalla, Marc Brysbaert & Penny M. Pexman
2022. Concreteness ratings for 62,000 English multiword expressions. Behavior Research Methods 55:5 ► pp. 2522 ff.
Pulido, Manuel F.
2022. Why are multiword units hard to acquire for late L2 learners? Insights from cognitive science on adult learning, processing, and retrieval. Linguistics Vanguard 8:1 ► pp. 237 ff.
Pulido, Manuel F. & Paola E. Dussias
2020. Desirable difficulties while learning collocations in a second language: Conditions that induce L1 interference improve learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:3 ► pp. 652 ff.
Reimer, Laura & Eva Smolka
2023. The wrong horse was bet on: the effects of argument structure versus argument adjacency on the processing of idiomatic sentences. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Rodríguez-Muñoz, Francisco J.
2022. The pedagogical potential of speech-language therapy materials for the teaching of idiomatic expressions in a foreign language. Applied Linguistics Review 0:0
Sandmann, Matthias, Sabine Weiss & Horst Mueller
2021. How Idioms Are Recognized when Individuals Are “Thrown Off the Track”, “Off the Rack” or “Off the Path”: A Decision Time Experiment in Healthy Volunteers. Metaphor and Symbol 36:3 ► pp. 166 ff.
Senaldi, Marco S. G. & Debra A. Titone
2022. Less Direct, More Analytical: Eye-Movement Measures of L2 Idiom Reading. Languages 7:2 ► pp. 91 ff.
Senaldi, Marco S. G., Junyan Wei, Jason W. Gullifer & Debra Titone
2022. Scratching your tête over language-switched idioms: Evidence from eye-movement measures of reading. Memory & Cognition 50:6 ► pp. 1230 ff.
Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna, Kathy Conklin, Sendy Caffarra, Edith Kaan & Walter J.B. van Heuven
2017. Representation and processing of multi-word expressions in the brain. Brain and Language 175 ► pp. 111 ff.
Sprenger, Simone A., Amélie la Roi & Jacolien van Rij
2019. The Development of Idiom Knowledge Across the Lifespan. Frontiers in Communication 4
Titone, Debra, Veronica Whitford, Agnieszka Lijewska & Inbal Itzhak
2016. Chapter 1. Bilingualism, executive control, and eye movement measures of reading. In Cognitive Control and Consequences of Multilingualism [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 2], ► pp. 11 ff.
Tiv, Mehrgol, Laura Gonnerman, Veronica Whitford, Deanna Friesen, Debra Jared & Debra Titone
2019. Figuring Out How Verb-Particle Constructions Are Understood During L1 and L2 Reading. Frontiers in Psychology 10
van Ginkel, Wendy & Ton Dijkstra
2020. The tug of war between an idiom's figurative and literal meanings: Evidence from native and bilingual speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana
2020. Chapter 1. Familiar phrases in language competence. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 29 ff.
Vulchanova, Mila, Evelyn Milburn, Valentin Vulchanov & Giosuè Baggio
2019. Boon or Burden? The Role of Compositional Meaning in Figurative Language Processing and Acquisition. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 28:2 ► pp. 359 ff.
Wang, Xiaolu, Yizhen Wang, Wanning Tian, Wei Zheng & Xiaoli Chen
2021. The Roles of Familiarity and Context in Processing Chinese Xiehouyu: An ERP Study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 50:4 ► pp. 901 ff.
Wittenberg, Eva & Roger Levy
2017. If you want a quick kiss, make it count: How choice of syntactic construction affects event construal. Journal of Memory and Language 94 ► pp. 254 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. References. In Foundations of Familiar Language, ► pp. 386 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.