Article published in:
Metaphor in Mental HealthcareEdited by Dennis Tay
[Metaphor and the Social World 10:2] 2020
► pp. 253–272
A mixed-method analysis of image-schematic metaphors in describing anger, anxiety, and depression
Yating Yu | Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Dennis Tay | Hong Kong Polytechnic University
The importance of metaphor in psychotherapy and counseling has been shown by a growing number of studies.
Image-schematic metaphors, which derive from experience of sensory processes and space, are potential resources for
conceptualizing major themes like anger, anxiety, and depression in therapeutic discourse. To test the potential correlation
between image-schematic metaphors and the themes of anger, anxiety, and depression, this study employs a mixed-method approach,
integrating corpus linguistics techniques, discourse analysis, and statistical analysis, to examine a specialized corpus of
therapeutic transcripts which contains approximately three million words. The findings show that containment, force,
path, and vertical orientation are the most frequent types of image-schematic metaphors for describing the
therapeutic themes of anger, anxiety, and depression in the corpus, and there is a significant correlation between the two
variables (i.e., “types” and “themes”). This study has implications for how image-schematic metaphors can be used to facilitate
the descriptions of anger, anxiety, and depression in therapeutic conversations.
Keywords: therapeutic themes, image-schematic metaphors, mixed-methods
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Research methodology
- 2.1Data collection
- 2.2Analytical procedures
- 3.Discussion of findings
- 3.1Anger
- 3.2Anxiety
- 3.3Depression
- 4.Concluding remarks
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 13 November 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00006.yu
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00006.yu
References
Amen, D. G.
Blenkiron, P.
Boylstein, C., Rittman, M., & Hinojosa, R.
(2007) Metaphor shifts in stroke recovery. Health Communication, 21(3), 279–287. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17567259
Cameron, Lynne, & Maslen, R.
Charteris-Black, J.
Cirillo, L., & Crider, C.
Cohen, J.
Deignan, A.
Hewitt, P. L., Caelian, C. F., Flett, G. L., Sherry, S. B., Collins, L., & Flynn, C. A.
Johnson, M.
Kopp, R.
Kopp, R., & Craw, M.
Kövecses, Z.
Kövecses, Z., Szelid, V., Nucz, E., Blanco-Carrión, O., Akkök, E. A., & Szabó, R.
Lakoff, G.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z.
Leahy, R. L.
Levitt, H., Korman, Y., & Angus, L.
Lyddon, W. J., Clay, A. L., & Sparks, C. L.
Maalej, Z.
Martin, J., Cummings, A. L., & Hallberg, E. T.
(1992) Therapists’ intentional use of metaphor: memorability, clinical impact, and possible epistemic/motivational functions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(1), 143–145. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1556278. 
McMullen, L. M.
McMullen, L. M., & Conway, J. B.
Plug, L., Sharrack, B., & Reuber, M.
Pragglejaz Group
Rasmussen, B. M., & Angus, L. E.
Semino, E.
Silverman, D.
Sims, P.
(2003) Working with metaphor. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 57(4), 528–536. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14735878. 
Sims, P., & Whynot, C.
(1997) Hearing metaphor: an approach to working with family-generated metaphor. Family Process, 36(4), 341–355. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9543656. 
Stine, J.
Stott, R., Mansell, W., Salkovskis, P., Lavender, A., & Cartwright-Hatton, S.
Tay, D.
Walsh, S.
Wilde, J.