Article published in:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 11:1 (2021) ► pp. 98–120

The #ReframeCovid initiative

From Twitter to society via metaphor

| University of Navarra
| Lancaster University
| University of Zaragoza
| University of La Rioja
| Lancaster University
From the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, governments, health agencies, public institutions and the media around the world have made use of metaphors to talk about the virus, its effects and the measures needed to reduce its spread. Dominant among these metaphors have been war metaphors (e.g. battles, front lines, combat), which present the virus as an enemy that needs to be fought and beaten. These metaphors have attracted an unprecedented amount of criticism from diverse social agents, for a variety of reasons. In reaction, #ReframeCovid was born as an open, collaborative and non-prescriptive initiative to collect alternatives to war metaphors for COVID-19 in any language, and to (critically) reflect on the use of figurative language about the virus, its impact and the measures taken in response. The paper summarises the background, aims, development and main outcomes to date of the initiative, and launches a call for scholars within the metaphor community to feed into and use the #ReframeCovid collection in their own basic and applied research projects.
Keywords: COVID-19, pandemic, war metaphors, alternative framings, open-source initiative
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Why #ReframeCovid? (Mis)use of war metaphors in public and health discourse
    • 2.1Communicating an emergency
    • 2.2Limitations and drawbacks of the war frame in political and health discourse
  • 3.Who is behind the #ReframeCovid initiative and what are its main outcomes so far?
    • 3.1Linguists on Twitter
    • 3.2The #ReframeCovid collection
      • 3.2.1Overview of the collaborative document
      • 3.2.2Alternative metaphors: Main source and target domains
  • 4.How did the initiative develop and how can it keep growing?
    • 4.1Beyond the “academic echo chamber”: Media and social impact of the initiative
    • 4.2How to use and credit the #ReframeCovid collection
  • 5.Final remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 08 September 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00013.olz
References
Benziman, Y.
(2020) “Winning” the “battle” and “beating” the COVID-19 “enemy”: Leaders’ use of war frames to define the pandemic. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 26(3), 247–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J.
(2020) The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet, 3951, 912–920. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, D.
(2020) How will COVID-19 affect the health care economy? The JAMA Forum (Journal of the American Medical Association), 323(22), 2237–2238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Pedemonte, D., Casillo, F., & Jorge-Artigau, A. I.
(2020) Communicating COVID-19: Metaphors we “survive” by. Tripodos, 47(2), 145–159.Google Scholar
Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H.
(2017) Metaphors for the war (or race) against climate change. Environmental Communication, 11(6), 769–783. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) War metaphors in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(1), 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gillis, M.
(2020) Ventilators, missiles, doctors, troops. The justification of legislative responses to COVID-19 through military metaphors. Law and Humanities, 14(2), 135–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J.
(1997) Foundations of meaning. Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N.
(2015) The war on prevention: Bellicose cancer metaphors hurt (some) prevention intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1), 66–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, R. K., Demjen, Z., Semino, E., & Boroditsky, L.
(2018) Emotional implications of metaphor: consequences of metaphor framing for mindset about cancer. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(4), 267–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Honigsbaum, M.
(2013) Regulating the 1918–19 pandemic: Flu, stoicism and the Northcliffe press. Medical History, 57(2), 165–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E.
(2005) Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 371, 1555–1577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2003) The scope of metaphors. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 79–91). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson, B. M. H., Nerlich, B., & Wallis, P.
(2005) Metaphors and biorisks: The war on infectious diseases and invasive species. Science Communication, 26(3), 243–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Brawley, E., & Gualda, E.
(2020) Transnational social implications of the use of the “war metaphor” concerning coronavirus: A bird’s eye view. Culture e Studi del Sociale, 5(1), 259–272.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rajandran, K.
(2020) “A long battle ahead”: Malaysian and Singaporean prime ministers employ war metaphors for COVID-19. GEMA Online. Journal of Language Studies, 20(3). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Rey, R., Garrido-Hernansaiz, H., & Collado, S.
(2020) Psychological impact and associated factors during the initial stage of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic among the general population in Spain. Frontiers in Psychology 23 June. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rojas, D., & Fernández, L.
(2015) ¿Contra qué se lucha cuando se lucha? Implicancias clínicas de la metáfora bélica en oncología. Revista Médica de Chile, 1431, 352–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, I.
(2018) Between horror and obscene beauty: The passion of photojournalism during the War on Drugs in Mexico (2006–2012). Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, 27(2), 215–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sabucedo, J. M., Alzate, M., & Hur, D.
(2020) COVID-19 y la metáfora de la guerra. Revista de Psicología Social, 351, 618–624. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E., Demjen, Z., Hardie, A., Rayson, P., & Payne, S.
(2018) Metaphor, cancer and the end of life: A corpus-based study. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sontag, S.
(1979) Illness as metaphor. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, B. J., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wicke, P., & Bolognesi, M. M.
(2020) Framing COVID-19: How we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on Twitter. PLoS ONE, 15(9), e0240010. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zappettini, F.
(2019) The Brexit referendum: How trade and immigration in the discourses of the official campaigns have legitimised a toxic (inter)national logic. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(4), 403–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
The #ReframeCovid initiative