Cover not available
Article published In:
Metaphor in Education: A multilingual perspective
Edited by Katrin Ahlgren, Anne Golden and Ulrika Magnusson
[Metaphor and the Social World 11:2] 2021
► pp. 279–301

Second half part of the apple

Friendship metaphors in second language writing

| Stockholm University
| Stockholm University
This article investigates the use of friendship metaphors in texts by adult second language writers, in relation to the occurrence and function of metaphor and the writers’ discursive constructions of identity. The texts come from the final assessment in Swedish for Immigrants (SFI), a language program in basic Swedish. The analysis confirmed the initial assumption that the emotional and existentially loaded theme of friendship allows for the use of metaphor. The results also showed that the experience of writers as newcomers in Sweden played out in the metaphors that were used and their contexts.
In order to categorize the found metaphors, a model was developed to show how systematic metaphors reflect functions and values related to three thematic categories: guidance and help, belonging and inclusion, and sharing and solidarity. For several metaphors, the metaphoricity was created through novel and unidiomatic wording, i.e. a kind of neologism that can be considered a communication strategy.
The importance of using universal and abstract themes in language testing is emphasized, to enable second language writers to express different facets of experience and knowledge through existential thoughts and attitudes – not only as language learners and newcomers, but also as social agents who create and keep transnational relations through friends.
Keywords: second language writing, friendship, systematic metaphors, linguistic creativity, metaphor as strategy, language testing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framings and previous research
    • 2.1Metaphor in second language writing
    • 2.2Friendship metaphors and a systematic theoretical framework
    • 2.3Performed identities, positioning and agency
  • 3.The SFI context
  • 4.Data collection and analysis
  • 5.Findings and analysis
    • 5.1Functions of metaphors
    • 5.2Thematic categories and systematic metaphors
      • 5.2.1Guidance and help
      • 5.2.2Belonging and inclusion
      • 5.2.3Sharing and solidarity
  • 6.Conclusive discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 12 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00019.ahl
References (51)
References
Ahearn, L. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 301, 109–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahlgren, K. (2014). Narrativa identiteter och levande metaforer i ett andraspråksperspektiv (Narrative identities and living metaphors from a second language perspective) (PhD thesis). Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
(2016). Teoretisk utveckling och framtida utmaningar: Nationella prov i svenska för invandrare. Kieli, koulutus ja yhteiskunta – Language, Education and Society, 7(6), 1–8.Google Scholar
(2020). ”Un voyage sans fin”: expressions métaphoriques et mudes linguistiques de nouveau locuteurs suédois, Language et société, 170(2), 209–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahlgren, K. & Rydell, M. (2020). Continuity and change: migrants’ experiences of adult language education in Sweden. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 11(3), 399–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthias, F. (2016). Interconnecting boundaries of identity and belonging and hierarchy-making within transnational mobility studies: Framing inequalities. Current Sociology Monograph, 641, 271–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L., & Palmer, L. (1996). Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Birdsell, B. J. (2018). Creative Metaphor Production in a First and Second Language and the Role of Creativity. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2001). Self-making and word-making. In J. Brockmeier & D. Carbaugh (Eds.), Narrative and Identity Studies in Autobiography, Self and Culture (pp. 25–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in Educational Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2004). Metaphor clusters in discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 107–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse and Society, 18(2), 179–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Metaphor in the construction of a learning environment. In E. Berendt (Ed.), Metaphors for Learning (pp. 159–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. & Besser, S. (2004). Writing in English as an Additional Language at Key Stage 2. Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 241, 63–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 11, 1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language in language teaching. In E. Alcón & M. P. Safont Jord (Eds.), Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning (pp. 41–57). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, A. (2015). Narrative and identities. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The Handbook of Narrative Analysis (pp. 351–368). Malden, MA: John Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, A. (2015). Positioning. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The Handbook of Narrative Analysis (pp. 369–387). Malden, MA: John Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekberg, L. (1997). Diskursiva och syntaktiska mönster i återberättelser hos invandrarbarn i Rosengård (Discursive and syntactic patterns in immigrant children’s recounts in Rosengård). In G. Håkansson, L. Lötmarker, L. Santesson & J. Svensson (Eds.), Svenskans beskrivning 221. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Grammatik och lexikon i svenska som andraspråk på nästan infödd nivå. In: Hyltenstam, K. & Lindberg, I. (eds.) Svenska som andraspråk i forskning, utbildning och samhälle (Swedish as a second language in research, education and society). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2002). A metaphorical analysis of learners’ beliefs. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske & A. Rohde (eds.), An Integrated View of Language Development: Papers in Honor of Henning Wode (pp. 163–197). Triser: Wissenschaftlig Verlag.Google Scholar
Golden, A. (2017). Emotions negotiated in L2 texts: A corpus study of written production by adult learners on a Norwegian test. In A. Golden, S. Jarvis & K. Tenfjord (Eds.), Crosslinguistic Influence and Distinctive Patterns of Language Learning Findings and Insights from a Learner Corpus (pp.188–230). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, R. (2007). Private pleasure, public discourse: reflections on engaging with literature. In D. Miller & M. Turci (Eds.), Language and Verbal Art Revisited. Linguistic Approaches to the Study of Literature (pp. 13–40). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hinkel, E. (2003). Simplicity without elegance: Features of sentences in L1 and L2 academic texts. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 275–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoang, H. (2019). Metaphorical language in second language learners’ texts: Additional baggage of the writing journey? Observing writing. In E. Lindgren & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (pp. 236–257). Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holzberg, B., Kolbe, K., & Zaborowski, R. (2018). Figures of crisis: The delineation of (un)deserving refugees in the German media. Sociology, 52(3), 534–550. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jörgensen, N. J., Karrebæk, M. S., Madsen, L. M. & Møller, J. S. (2011). Polylanguaging in superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2), 22–37.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (1995). American friendship and the scope of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(4), 315–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Metaphor in Culture. Universality and Variation. New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kristensson Uggla, B. (1999). Kommunikation på bristningsgränsen. En studie i Paul Ricœurs projekt (Communication on the breaking point. A study of Paul Ricœur’s project). Stockholm: Brutus Östling.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2001). Metaphoric competence: A language learning strength of students with a holistic cognitive style? TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 459–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J., Krennmayer, T., Turen, J., & Turner, S. (2014). An investigation into metaphor use at different levels of second language writing. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 117–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Figurative Thinking and Foreign Language Learning. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Tim. 2001. Language assessments as social practice: challenges for research. Language Testing, 18(4), 333–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nacey, S. (2013). Metaphors in Learner English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
National Agency for Education. (2017). Skolverkets föreskrifter för kommunal vuxenutbildning i svenska för invandrare (Regulations for municipal adult education in Swedish for immigrants). SKOLFS 2017:91.Google Scholar
. (2019). Elever och studieresultat i kommunal vuxenutbildning i svenska för invandrare år 2018 (Students and study results in municipal adult education in Swedish for immigrants 2018). Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar
Pitzl, M-L. (2017). Communicative ‘success’, creativity and the need for de-mystifying L1 use: Some thought on EFT and ELT. Lingue e Linguaggi, 241, 37–47.Google Scholar
(2018). Creativity in English as lingua franca: Idiom and metaphor. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prentice, J. (2010). På rak sak. Om ordförbindelser och konventionaliserade uttryck bland unga språkbrukare i flerspråkiga miljöer (On conventionalized expressions among young language users in multilingual settings) (Ph.D. thesis). Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.Google Scholar
Ricœur, P. (1975). La métaphore vive. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Rydell, M. (2018). Construction of Language Competence. Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Assessing Second Language Interaction in Basic Adult Education (PhD thesis). Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Sabet, M. K. & Tavakoli, M. (2016). Metaphorical competence: A neglected component of communicative competence. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 4(1), 32–39.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. (2011). Assessing multilingual competencies: Adopting construct valid assessment policies. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 418–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanotto, M., Cameron, L. & Cavalcanti, M. (2008). Confronting Metaphor in Use: An Applied Linguistic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar