Cover not available
Review published In:
Metaphor in Education: A multilingual perspective
Edited by Katrin Ahlgren, Anne Golden and Ulrika Magnusson
[Metaphor and the Social World 11:2] 2021
► pp. 373–381
Book review

S. Nacey, A. G. Dorst, T. Krennmayr & W. G. Reijnierse (Eds.). Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages: MIPVU around the world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2019. 330 pp. ISBN 978 90 272 0472 1 (HB) / 978 90 272 6175 5 (EB) https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/celcr​.22

Reviewed by
| Macquarie University
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Dictionaries
    • 2.1Dictionary types
    • 2.2Bilingual dictionaries
    • 2.3Senses
    • 2.4Word classes and word-types
  • 3.Demarcation of lexical units
    • 3.1Polywords
    • 3.2Compounds
    • 3.3Complex verb forms
    • 3.4Prepositions
    • 3.5Case markings
    • 3.6Word boundaries
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00025.bia
References (10)
References
Badryzlova, Y., Y. Isaeva, N. Shekhtman & R. Kerimov. (2013). Annotating a Russian corpus of conceptual metaphor: A bottom-up approach. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Metaphor in NLP (pp. 77–86), Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Biernacka, E. (2013). A discourse dynamics investigation of metonymy in talk. (PhD thesis). The Open University, England, UK. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B. & E. Sweetser. (2014). Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Di Biase-Dyson, C. (2017). Metaphor. UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, [URL]
Erman, A. & H. Grapow. (1926–1963). Wörterbuch der ägyptischen Sprache, 131 Volumes. Leipzig: Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2007). Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 2–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2014). Review of Steen et al. (2010) “A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification”. Metaphor and the Social World, 4(1), 138–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Di Biase-Dyson, Camilla
2023. The semantics of a parallel reality. Metaphor and the Social World 13:1 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.