Embodied meaning construction
Multimodal metaphor and expressive movement in speech, gesture, and feature film
Hermann Kappelhoff | Department for Film Studies, Freie Universitat Berlin
Cornelia Müller | Faculty of Social and Cultural Sciences, European University Viadrina (Frankfurt/Oder)
In this article, we argue that multimodal metaphors are grounded in the dynamics of felt experiences. Felt experiences are inherently affective, with immediate sensory qualities and an affective stance. We suggest that as such, they ground the emergence and activation of metaphors. We illustrate this idea with analyzed data from a film and face-to-face conversation. Our consideration of expressive movement in speech, gestures, and feature film does not therefore target the analysis of the speech and gestures of actors. Rather we suggest an approach firmly rooted in film theory, and which considers films as composed of cinematic expressive movements. The basic tenet of our proposal is as follows: seeing cinematic expressive movements trigger the same kind of felt experience in the spectator as a bodily expressive movement that comes along with speech. Expressive movements are held to provide the experiential ‘embodied’ grounds for the construction of metaphors.
Published online: 05 January 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.2.02kap
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.2.02kap
Cited by
Cited by 17 other publications
Barnden, John & Andrew Gargett
2020.
In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10],
► pp. 1 ff. 
Bateman, John A
2019. Transmediality and the End of Disembodied Semiotics.
International Journal of Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric 3:2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bateman, John A.
2018. Peircean Semiotics and Multimodality: Towards a New Synthesis.
Multimodal Communication 7:1
Bateman, John A.
2019. Multimodality and Materiality.
Poetics Today 40:2 ► pp. 235 ff.
Bort-Mir, Lorena, Marianna Bolognesi & Susan Ghaffaryan
2020. Cross-cultural interpretation of filmic metaphors: A think-aloud experiment.
Intercultural Pragmatics 17:4 ► pp. 389 ff.
Brückner, Regina & Sarah Greifenstein
2019.
In Handbook of Popular Culture and Biomedicine,
► pp. 157 ff.
Coëgnarts, Maarten
2017. Cinema and the embodied mind: metaphor and simulation in understanding meaning in films.
Palgrave Communications 3:1
Coëgnarts, Maarten & Peter Kravanja
2015. With the Pastin Front ofthe Character: Evidence for Spatial-Temporal Metaphors in Cinema.
Metaphor and Symbol 30:3 ► pp. 218 ff.
Finzel, Anna & Hans-Georg Wolf
2017. Cultural conceptualizations of gender and homosexuality in BrE, IndE, and NigE.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 4:1 ► pp. 110 ff.
Mittelberg, Irene
2019. Peirce’s universal categories: On their potential for gesture theory and multimodal analysis.
Semiotica 2019:228 ► pp. 193 ff.
Müller, Cornelia
2014.
In From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance,
► pp. 127 ff.
Müller, Cornelia
2018. Gesture and Sign: Cataclysmic Break or Dynamic Relations?.
Frontiers in Psychology 9
Müller, Cornelia
2019. Metaphorizing as Embodied Interactivity: What Gesturing and Film Viewing Can Tell Us About an Ecological View on Metaphor.
Metaphor and Symbol 34:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Müller, Cornelia & Christina Schmitt
2015. Audio-visual metaphors of the financial crisis: meaning making and the flow of experience.
Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 15:2 ► pp. 311 ff.
Tong, Lingwei, Sungchul Jung, Richard Chen Li, Robert W. Lindeman & Holger Regenbrecht
2020.
In 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction,
► pp. 45 ff.
Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel
2017. Online Construction of Multimodal Metaphors In Murnau’s Movie Faust (1926).
Metaphor and Symbol 32:3 ► pp. 192 ff.
Urios-Aparisi, Eduardo
2020.
In Performing Metaphoric Creativity across Modes and Contexts [Figurative Thought and Language, 7],
► pp. 97 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.