Cover not available
Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 8:1 (2018) ► pp.81–99

Metaphor-enriched social cognition and spatial bias in the courtroom

| University of Birmingham
| University of California, Merced
| University of California, Merced

It is known that courtroom decisions can be influenced by subtle psychological biases, such as asking leading questions. Informed by metaphor research on the connection between spatial proximity and intimacy (e.g., ‘we are close’, ‘their views are far apart’), this paper reports four experiments that look at the potential role of psychological biases arising from the spatial layout of a courtroom. In particular, we ask the question: Does being close or far to a defendant influence one’s reasoning about who is likely to win or lose a court case? Working with an American (jury-based) legal system as an example, our experiments manipulated the physical distance between the jury box and the defendant’s table as shown on images of a courtroom. Across several manipulations, we discovered that participants judged the defendant to be more likely to win when the defendant’s table was located close to the jury box. These studies are in line with the research on ‘metaphor-enriched social cognition’, showing that the way we talk about relationships in terms of space corresponds to social reasoning in a spatial world.

Keywords: social distance, spatial metaphor, spatial bias, courtroom layout
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Experiment 1
    • 2.1Method
    • 2.2Analysis
    • 2.3Results
    • 2.4Discussion and replication
  • 4.Experiment 2
    • 4.1Method
    • 4.2Results
    • 4.3Discussion
  • 5.Experiments 3A and 3B
    • 5.1Method
    • 5.2Results
    • 5.3Discussion
  • 6.Experiments 4A and 4B
    • 6.1Method
    • 6.2Results
    • 6.3Discussion
  • 7.General discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.17001.win
References
Akerlof, G. A.
(1997) Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica, 651, 1005–1027. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, R. L., Foushee, H. C., Davis, M. H., & Aderman, D.
(1979) Emotional empathy in a courtroom simulation: A person‐situation interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 91, 275–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M.
(2003) Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 291, 819–833. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Noveck, B.
(2006) Courtroom applications of virtual environments, immersive virtual environments, and collaborative virtual environments. Law & Policy, 281, 249–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bishop, B.
(2008) The big sort: Why clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bohannon, J.
(2011) Social science for pennies. Science, 3341, 307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buswell, G. T.
(1935) How people look at pictures: A study of the psychology of perception in art. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D.
(2009) Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1381, 351–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Chrysikou, E. G.
(2011) When left is “right”: Motor fluency shapes abstract concepts. Psychological Science, 221, 419–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H.
(2009) Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. L., & Peterson, J. L.
(1981) Bias in the courtroom: Race and sex effects of attorneys on juror verdicts. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 91, 81–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grady, J.
(1997) THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 81, 267–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 371, 1595–1614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, E. T.
(1966) The hidden dimension: An anthropologist examines man’s use of space in public and in private. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Horowitz, I. A., Kerr, N. L., Park, E. S., & Gockel, C.
(2006) Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: Emotional bias and juror nullification. Law and Human Behavior, 301, 163–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, H., Schnall, S., Do-Joon, Y., & White, M. P.
(2013) Social distance decrease responders’ sensitivity to fairness in the ultimatum game. Judgment and Decision Making, 81, 632–638.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P., & Keefer, L. A.
(2010) A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 1361, 1045–1067. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C.
(1974) Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 131, 585–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matlock, T., Sparks, D., Matthews, J. L., Hunter, J., & Huette, S.
(2012) Smashing new results on aspectual framing: How people describe car accidents. Studies in Language, 361, 700–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, J. L., & Matlock, T.
(2010) The spatial and temporal underpinnings of social distance. In C. Holscher (Ed.), Spatial Cognition VII (pp. 19–31). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Understanding the link between spatial distance and social distance. Social Psychology, 421, 185–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCall, C., Bunyan, D. P., Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., & Beall, A. C.
(2009) Leveraging collaborative virtual environment technology for inter-population research on persuasion in a classroom setting. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 181, 361–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulcahy, L.
(2010) Legal architecture: Justice, due process and the place of law. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, G. L.
(1996) On metaphoric representation. Cognition, 601, 173–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) Reasons to doubt the present evidence for metaphoric representation. Cognition, 621, 99–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, D. M.
(2008) The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 121, 237–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pashler, H., Coburn, N., & Harris, C. R.
(2012) Priming of social distance? Failure to replicate effects on social and food judgments. PloS One, 71, e42510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from [URL].
Schielzeth, H.
(2010) Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 103–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schubert, T. W.
(2005) Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shepard, S.
(2005) Should the criminal defendant be assigned a seat in court. Yale Law Journal, 1151, 2203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sherrill, A. M., Eerland, A., Zwaan, R. A., & Magliano, J. P.
(2015) Understanding how grammatical aspect influences legal judgment. PloS One, 101, e0141181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C.
(2001) White juror bias: An investigation of prejudice against Black defendants in the American courtroom. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 71, 201–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tatler, B. W.
(2007) The central fixation bias in scene viewing: Selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. Journal of Vision, 71, 4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B.
(1982) Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 560–589.Google Scholar
Tversky, B.
(2000) Some ways that maps and diagrams communicate. In C. Freska, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition II: Integrating abstract theories, empirical studies, formal methods, and practical applications (pp. 72–79). New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Spatial schemas in depictions. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 79–111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2010) Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 31, 499–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Bos, K.
(2003) On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 851, 482–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M.
(1997) How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 721, 1034–1046. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A.
(2008) Keeping one’s distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psychological Science, 191, 302–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, B., & Matlock, T.
(2013) Making judgments based on similarity and proximity. Metaphor & Symbol, 28(4), 219–232.Google Scholar
(2017) Primary metaphors are both cultural and embodied. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse. (pp. 99–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Aidonojie, P. A., S. A. Wakili & D. Ayuba
2023. Effectiveness of the Administration of Justice in Nigeria Under the Development of Digital Technologies. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law 1:4 ► pp. 1105 ff. DOI logo
Muir, Bethany R., Eryn J. Newman & Meredith Rossner
2023. The role of video background cues in the virtual court: a psychological perspective. Psychology, Crime & Law ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Bodo, Sarah E. Duffy & Jeannette Littlemore
2020. Power, Gender, and Individual Differences in Spatial Metaphor: The Role of Perceptual Stereotypes and Language Statistics. Metaphor and Symbol 35:3 ► pp. 188 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.