In this study we contrast metaphors and metaphorical stories in President Trump’s 2017 inaugural address with those of former President Barack Obama’s first inaugural address. We draw on the concept of ‘rhetorical confinement’ (Patterson, 2011) to show how the contrasting life trajectories of the two leaders are reflected in the contrasting themes and tone established by their metaphorical language. We argue that Obama’s rhetorical tone, including his use of metaphors, was at least in part a response to the compound constraints of race and class. In contrast, Trump’s rhetorical tone and use of metaphors reflects and reinforces his image as a political outsider, as a challenge to the constraints of ordinary political discourse. The contrast between the rhetorically confined politeness of Obama’s discourse (lampooned as ‘political correctness’ by many of his opponents) and the unconstrained crudeness of Trump’s discourse (lauded as ‘telling it like it is’) apparently legitimates the open expression of previously suppressed resentments and encourages an extreme rhetoric that is symptomatic of, and may contribute to, the growing polarization in American political discourse.
Auchenbach, J. (2008). Salad spinning. The Washington Post, Aug.23. [URL] › Arts & Living
Bailey, I. J., (2016). Trump’s not racist, but he is a selective bigot. Charlotte Observer, Mar.03. [URL]
Baker, P., & Bromwich, J. E. (2017). With Civil War remark, a president who doesn’t go by the (history) book. New York Times on-line, May2. [URL]
Blow, Charles. (2017). Trump’s Obama obsession. New York Times on-line, Jun.29. [URL]
Chira, S. (2017). Who likes Trump’s tweets and why. New York Times on-line, Jun.30. [URL]
Dorst, A. G., & Kaal, A. A. (2012). Metaphor in discourse: Beyond the boundaries of MIP. In F. MacArthur, J. L. Oncins-Martínez, M. Sánchez-García, & A. M. Piquer-Píriz (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication (pp. 51–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Douthat, R. (2017). Who Are We?New York Times, Feb.4. [URL]
Economist (2017). American politics: Donald Trump’s Washington is paralysed. And the man in the Oval Office is making a bad situation worse. (Editorial.) The Economist, Jul.1.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2006). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language, 211, 434–458.
Goodman, M. (2016). Make no mistake—Donald Trump’s victory represents a racist ‘whitelash.’ New Statesman, Nov.9. [URL].
Kerner, J., & Fields, D. (1936). Pick yourself up. Santa Monica, CA: Universal Music Publishing Group.
Krugman, P. (2017). Things can only get worse. New York Times on-line, Jan.23.
Levy, G. (2016). Harry Reid: Trump’s election has emboldened ‘hate,’ ‘bigotry’. US News, Nov.11. [URL]
Linkins, J. (2009; updated May25, 2011). Hannity attacks Obama for putting mustard on his burger. Huffington Post, MEDIA, Jul.6. [URL].
Obama, B. (2009). First presidential inaugural address, “What is required: The price and the promise of citizenship.” [URL]
Patterson, R. E. (2011). The ‘Beer Summit’ and what’s brewing: Narratives, networks, and metaphors as rhetorical confinement in the Age of Obama. Communication Studies, 621, 439–455.
Ritchie, L. D. (2010). “Everybody goes down:” Metaphors, stories, and simulations in conversations. Metaphor and Symbol, 251, 123–143.
Ritchie, L. D. (2017). Story metaphors: Narratives and figurative language in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ritchie, L. D., & Cameron, L. (2014). Open hearts or smoke and mirrors: Metaphorical framing and frame conflicts in a public meeting. Metaphor and Symbol, 291, 204–223.
Ritchie, L. D., & Zhu, M. (2015). “Nixon stonewalled the investigation”: Potential contributions of grammatical metaphor to conceptual metaphor theory and analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 301, 118–136.
Sargent, G. (2016). The American people agree with Clinton: Trump is a bigot. This new poll confirms it. The Washington Post, Sept.12. [URL]
Stohr, K. (2017). THE STONE: Our new age of contempt. New York Times on-line, Jan.23. [URL]
2024. University students’ metaphors for Canadian multiculturalism: Diverse perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:3 ► pp. 1046 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.