Cover not available
Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 8:2 (2018) ► pp.229–246

Emotion metaphors in Spanish retain aspects of spatial meaning

 | Universidad de los Andes
 | University of Illinois at Chicago
Previous work has shown that the abstract use of the spatial prepositions in and on retains spatial meaning, such as containment and support that includes the control relationship between a located object (the figure) and a reference object (the landmark/ground) (Feist & Gentner, 2003; Talmy, 1983). We extend these ideas to the case of metaphorical descriptions of emotion in Spanish—some of them featuring the emotion as a located entity in the person’s body, others featuring emotion as the ground in which the person’s body stands. Two rating experiments show that people judge emotions in Spanish as more controllable when they are described as located entities (the figure) than when they are described as grounds. We conclude that functional elements of the spatial meaning of the preposition en in Spanish are extended to abstract uses in metaphor, affecting the perceived controllability of emotions.
Keywords: conceptual metaphors, emotion, spatial language, Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Spatial meaning in abstract uses of prepositions
    • 1.2Figure/ground relation in metaphors of emotion
  • 2.Study 1
    • 2.1Method
      • 2.1.1Participants
      • 2.1.2Materials
      • 2.1.3Procedure
    • 2.2Results of Study 1
  • 3.Study 2
    • 3.1Method
      • 3.1.1Participants
      • 3.1.2Materials
      • 3.1.3Procedure
    • 3.2Results of Study 2
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgement
  • References
Published online: 23 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.17015.rea
References (42)
References
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Reinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstomberg, S. (2006). Cognitive linguistic applications in second or foreign language instruction: rationale, proposals and evaluation. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven & R. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 305–358). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bowdle, B., & Gentner, D. (1999). Metaphor comprehension: From comparison to categorization. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-first annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 90–95). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2010). Space for thinking. In B. Bergen, V. Evans & J. Zinken (Eds.), Language, cognition and space: State of the art and new directions (pp. 453–461). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1998). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coventry, K. R., & Garrod, S. C. (2004). Saying, seeing, and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. New York: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crawford, L. E., Margolis, S. M., Drake, J. T., & Murphy, M. E. (2006). Affect biases memory of location: Evidence for spatial representation of affect. Cognition & Emotion, 201, 1153–1169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory and typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demjén, Z. (2011). Motion and conflicted self-metaphors in the Sylvia Plath’s Smith journal, Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 7–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. (2003). Constructions, chunking and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 33–68). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V., & Tyler, A. (2005). Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar: The English prepositions of verticality. Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada, 51, 11–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Spatial experience, lexical structure and motivation: The case of in . In Radden, G. & Panther, K. (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (pp. 157–192). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Feist, M. I., & Gentner, D. (2003). Factors involved in the use of in and on . In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 390–395). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fetterman, A. K., Robinson, M. D., & Meier, B. P. (2012). Anger as “seeing red”: Evidence for a perceptual association. Cognition & Emotion, 261, 1445–1458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S., Ferrier, G., & Campbell, S. (1999). In and on: Investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions. Cognition, 721, 167–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1989). Discourse models as interfaces between language and the spatial world. Journal of Semantics, 61, 147–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Wolff, P. (1997). Alignment in the processing of metaphor. Journal of Memory and Language, 371, 331–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hampe, B. (2005). From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harder, P. (2011). Conceptual construal and social construction. In M. Brdar, S. Th. Gries & M. Žic Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp. 305–324). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Meaning in mind and society: A functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haslam, N. (2011). Genetic essentialism, neuroessentialism, and stigma: commentary on Dar-Nimrod & Heine. Psychological Bulletin, 137(5), 819–824. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauser, D. J., Carter, M. S., & Meier, B. P. (2009). Mellow Monday and furious Friday: The approach-related link between anger and time representation. Cognition & Emotion, 231, 1166–1180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, A. V., & Wakefield, J. C. (2007). The loss of sadness: How psychiatry transformed normal sorrow into depressive disorder. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, D., & Carter, R. (2012). Seeing through the bell jar: Investigating linguistic patterns of psychological disorder, Journal of Medical Humanities, 331, 27–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jamrozik, A., & Gentner, D. (2015). Well-hidden regularities: Abstract uses of in and on retain an aspect of their spatial meaning. Cognitive Science, 391, 1881–1911. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kvaale, E. P., Gottdiener, W. H., & Haslam, N. (2013). Biogenetic explanations and stigma: A meta-review of associations among laypeople. Social Science & Medicine, 961, 95–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, F. (2005). The competent horseman in a horseless world: Observations on a conventional metaphor in Spanish and English. Metaphor and Symbol, 20(1), 71–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Margolis, S. O., & Crawford, L. E. (2008). Event valence and spatial metaphors of time. Cognition & Emotion, 221, 1401–1414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norman, R. M., Windell, D., & Manchanda, R. (2012). Examining differences in the stigma of depression and schizophrenia. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 581, 69–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Read, J., & Law, A. (1999). The relationship of causal beliefs and contact with users of mental health services to attitudes to the ‘mentally ill.’ International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 451, 216–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reali, F., & Arciniegas, C. (2015). Metaphorical conceptualization of emotion in Spanish: Two studies on the role of framing. Metaphor and Social World, 5(1), 20–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reali, F., Soriano, T., & Rodríguez, D. (2016). How we think about depression: The role of metaphorical framing. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 48(3), 127–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Barsalou, L. W., & McRae, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 271, 767–780. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoeneman, T. J., Schoeneman, K. A., & Stallings, S. (2004). The “black struggle”: Metaphors of depression in Styron’s ‘Darkness Visible’, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(3), 325–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. Pick & L. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application (pp. 255–282). New York: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Reali, Florencia
2020. Emotion metaphors in James Joyce’sA Portrait of the artist as a young man. Journal of Literary Semantics 49:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.