Cover not available
Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 9:2 (2019) ► pp.155–176

Resources not rulebooks

Metaphors for grammar in teachers’ metalinguistic discourse

 | Brunel University London
This paper explores the way that teachers use metaphors to think and talk about grammar and what this means for classroom practice. It does so by employing conceptual metaphor theory to analyse teachers’ metalinguistic discourse, focusing particularly on construals of grammar and grammar teaching. Based on a series of interviews with 24 UK-based secondary school English teachers, the findings suggest that teachers make extensive use of metaphor, often mapping the abstract domain of grammar with concrete domains such as construction material and rulebook. The discipline of English studies itself was often construed as a series of separate parts, with grammar occupying a physical space that was often seen as disconnected to other aspects of the curriculum. The findings are discussed in relation to sociocultural contexts, including the current climate of English teaching in the UK, educational policy discourse, public and professional views on language, and the place of grammar on the curriculum.
Keywords: grammar, metaphor, metalinguistic discourse, grammar pedagogy, teacher identity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Metaphor in metalinguistic discourse
  • 3.Conceptualisations of grammar in schools
  • 4.Interview design
  • 5.Analysis method
  • 6.Metaphor in the interview data
    • 6.1The grammar target domain
      • 6.1.1 rulebook
      • 6.1.2Breaking rules
      • 6.1.3 physical structure
    • 6.2Grammar and the curriculum
  • 7.Reflection and discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.18022.cus
References (43)
References
Aarts, B. (2011). Oxford modern English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnden, J. (2015). Metaphor, simile and the exaggeration of likeness. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(1), 41–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beger, A. (2011). Deliberate metaphors? An exploration of choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures. Metaphorik.de, 201, 39–60.Google Scholar
Bermel, N. (2007). Linguistic authority, language ideology, and metaphor: The Czech orthography wars. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blake, J., & Shortis, T. (2010). Who’s prepared to teach school English? The degree level qualifications and preparedness of initial teacher trainees in English. London: Committee for Linguistics in Education.Google Scholar
Board of Education. (1921). The teaching of English in England (The Newbolt report). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cajkler, W., & Hislam, J. (2002). Trainee teachers’ grammatical knowledge: The tension between public expectations and individual competence. Language Awareness, 11(3), 161–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2008a). Metaphor and talk. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 197–211). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008b). Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. In M. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach. Pragmatics & Beyond (pp. 45–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cushing, I. (2018). Language change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Department for Education. (2011). Independent review of key stage 2 testing, assessment and accountability (The Bew report). London: DfE.Google Scholar
. (2013). National curriculum in England: English programmes of study. London: DfE.Google Scholar
Gavins, J. (2007). Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giovanelli, M. (2015). Becoming an English language teacher: Linguistic knowledge, anxieties and the shifting sense of identity. Language and Education, 29(5), 416–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). The value of linguistics to the teacher. In M. Giovanelli & D. Clayton, (Eds.), Knowing about language: Linguistics and the secondary English classroom (pp. 13–24). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. (2016). The impact of policy on language teaching in UK schools. In M. Giovanelli & D. Clayton (Eds.), Knowing about language: Linguistics and the secondary English classroom (pp. 25–35). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. & Walmsley, J. (2005). The English patient: English grammar and teaching in the twentieth century. Journal of Linguistics, 43(3), 593–622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2017). Metaphor use in educational contexts. In E. Semino & S. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 283–295). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Locke, T. (2010) (Ed.). Beyond the grammar wars: A resource for teachers and students on developing language knowledge in the English/literacy classroom. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, B. (2017). The politics of testing. English in Education 51(1), 27–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myhill, D., Jones, S., Lines, H., & Watson, A. (2012). Re-thinking grammar: the impact of embedded grammar teaching on students’ writing and students’ metalinguistic understanding. Research Papers in Education, 27(2), 139–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Saraceni, M. (2015). World Englishes: A critical analysis. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snell, J. (2013). Dialect, interaction and class positioning in school: From deficit to difference to repertoire. Language and Education, 27(2), 110–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. (2008). When is metaphor deliberate? In G. Steen. (Ed.) Selected papers from the Stockholm Metaphor Festival (pp. 43–63). Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
(2009). Three kinds of metaphor in discourse: A linguistic taxonomy. In A. Musolff, & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and discourse (pp. 25–39). London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Deliberate metaphor affords conscious metaphorical cognition. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 179–197.Google Scholar
(2015). Developing, testing and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 901, 67–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Deliberate metaphor theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, A. (2015). Conceptualisations of ‘grammar teaching’: L1 English teachers’ beliefs about teaching grammar for writing. Language Awareness, 24(1), 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Healey, Brett
2024. ‘Let me see it through your eyes’: Teaching grammar‐for‐writing as imaginative embodiment. Literacy DOI logo
Liu, Guoqiang, Wan Farah Wani Wan Fakhruddin & Tianli Zhou
2024. Functional stylistic studies to pedagogic discourse: a systematic review of literature. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mason, Jessica
2022. Teachers’ Intertextual Identities and English Education. In Pedagogical Stylistics in the 21st Century, ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Cushing, Ian
2019. Prescriptivism, linguicism and pedagogical coercion in primary school UK curriculum policy. English Teaching: Practice & Critique 19:1 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Cushing, Ian
2020. The policy and policing of language in schools. Language in Society 49:3 ► pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Slowing Metaphor Down [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 26], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.