Cover not available
Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 10:1 (2020) ► pp.121–140

Violence metaphors for cancer

Pragmatic and symptomatic arguments against

| University of Amsterdam
| University of Amsterdam
| University of Amsterdam

The use of violence metaphors for cancer has been widely criticised both in academic and non-academic contexts (see Harrington, 2012; Semino et al., 2015). Whereas previous research on violence metaphors for cancer has focused on the use and functions of these metaphors by and for different stakeholder groups, no studies to date have examined the (various) arguments that are raised in public discourse that is critical of said metaphors. Applying concepts from pragma-dialectical argumentation theory (Van Eemeren & Grootendorst, 1992), this paper sets out to analyse types of argumentation occurring in critical public discussions of violence metaphors for cancer. Close argumentative analyses of actual discourse examples will be provided in order to illustrate the differences between two types of argumentation in particular, i.e. pragmatic and symptomatic argumentation.

Keywords: metaphor, public discourse, argumentation, argumentation theory, pragma-dialectics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature
  • 3.The pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation
  • 4.Case studies
    • 4.1Pragmatic resistance
    • 4.2Symptomatic resistance
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.19005.wac
References
Chiappe, D., Kennedy, J. M., & Chiappe, P.
(2003) Aptness is more important than comprehensibility in predicting recognition bias and preference for metaphors and similes. Poetics, 311, 51–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dean, J.
(2015, September 23). Why fighting isn’t always the way to survive cancer. Western Daily Press, p. 18.Google Scholar
Demmen, J., Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Koller, V., Hardie, H., Rayson, P., & Payne, S.
(2015) A computer-assisted study of the use of violence metaphors for cancer and end of life by patients, family carers and health professionals. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(2), 205–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, S.
(2008) Language and Medicine. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gerritsen, S.
(2001) Unexpressed premises. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial concepts in argumentation theory (pp. 51–79). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Goatly, A.
(2007) Washing the brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, K.
(2014, April 25). Having cancer is not a fight or a battle, The Guardian, p. 11.Google Scholar
Haines, I.
(2014) The war on cancer: Time for a new terminology. The Lancet, 383(9932), 1883. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrington, K. J.
(2012) The use of metaphor in discourse about cancer: A review of the literature. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 16(4), 408–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, V.
(2008) Brothers in arms: Contradictory metaphors in contemporary marketing discourse. In M. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use (pp. 103–125). (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1996) Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M.
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marqusee, M.
(2009, December 30). Comment & debate: I don’t need a war to fight my cancer – I need empowering as a patient: Using the martial metaphor for something as complex as this disease makes it ripe for political and financial exploitation. The Guardian, p. 30.Google Scholar
Mongoven, A.
(2006) The war on disease and the war on terror: A dangerous metaphorical nexus? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 15(4), 403–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2004) Metaphor and political discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E.
(2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., & Demmen, J.
(2016) An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 625–645.Google Scholar
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Demmen, J., Koller, V., Payne, S., Hardie, A., & Rayson, P.
(2015) The online use of Violence and Journey metaphors by patients with cancer, as compared with health professionals: a mixed methods study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 7(1): 60–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R.
(1992) Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M.
(2014) Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Van Poppel, L.
(2013) Getting the vaccine now will protect you in the future! A pragma-dialectical analysis of strategic maneuvering with pragmatic argumentation in health brochures. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wilson, A.
(2017, July 21). Obama’s tweet on McCain’s cancer diagnosis is the last thing survivors want to see. The Independent, p. 35.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Wackers, Dunja Y. M. & H. José Plug
2022. Countering Undesirable Implications of Violence Metaphors for Cancer through Metaphor Extension. Metaphor and Symbol 37:1 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.