Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social WorldVol. 10:1 (2020) ► pp.76–99
Political cartoons portraying the Musha Uprising in Taiwan under Japanese rule
Use of the great chain multimodal metaphors and conceptual blending
This study analyzes five political cartoons published in the Taiwan Nichinichi Shinpo (Taiwan
Daily Newspaper) depicting the Musha Uprising, an indigenous rebellion against Japanese colonial rule that occurred in Taiwan in
1930. The study has produced two important findings and theoretical implications. First, two of the political cartoons deployed
The Great Chain of Being multimodal metaphor, and the artist’s conceptual blending of Japanese kabuki stories with the Musha
Uprising dramatically portrayed the colonizers as humans and the colonized as animals. We analyze the social and historical
context to explain why these cartoons used the boar as a metaphor representing the indigenous people. Second, our results reveal
paradoxical and ambivalent perspectives in the cartoons. On one hand, the metaphor of Human vs. Animal reproduced the unequal
hierarchical relations between the colonizers and the colonized. On the other hand, the cartoonist also portrayed the rulers in a
critical and satirical way. Finally, the research relates the content of this analysis with the post-colonial theorizing of Edward
Said. In sum, the study makes a contribution to interdisciplinary research by applying metaphor theory to the analysis of
political cartoons and colonial discourse, as well as revealing the hierarchical colonial thinking and racial prejudice lurking
behind the metaphors.
Keywords: political cartoons, Musha Uprising, Taiwan under Japanese rule, multimodal metaphor, conceptual blending, indigenous people, colonial discourse
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background information
- 2.1Background of the Musha Uprising
- 2.2About the cartoon, newspaper and artist
- 3.Data analysis and its theoretical implications
- 3.1The Great Chain multimodal metaphor and conceptual blending within the colonial context
- 3.2The thought behind the human is animal metaphor
- 3.3The paradoxical meanings of political cartoons in the Japanese colonial context
- 3.4Facts missing from the cartoons
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (57)
Adas, M. (1989). Machines as the measure of men, science, technology ideologies of Western dominance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
(1997). A field matures: Technology, science, and Western colonialism. Technology and Culture, 38(2), 478–487. 
Bergen, B. (2003). To awaken a sleeping giant: Cognition and culture in September 11 political cartoons. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.) Language, culture, and mind (pp. 23–36). Stanford, CA: CSLI publications.
Bounegru, L., & Forceville, C. (2011). Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10(2), 209–229.
Chiu, R. (1990). Wushe shihjian [The Musha Uprising]. Taipei: Shihbao Wenhua Chuban.
Chiu, S., & Chiang, W. (2012). Representations of the name rectification movement of Taiwan indigenous people: through whose historical lens? Language and Linguistics, 13(3), 523–568.
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (Eds.). (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Coëgnarts, M. (2017). Cinema and the embodied mind: metaphor and simulation in understanding meaning in films. Palgrave Communications. Retrieved from [URL].
Coulson, S. (2002). What’s so funny: Conceptual blending in humorous examples. Retrieved from [URL]
Deignan, A. (2007). “Image” metaphors and connotations in everyday language. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 5(1), 173–192.
Ebihara, K. & Hayashi. (1931). Musha tobatsu shashincho [Musha Uprising photobook]. Taipei: Kyoshin Shokai.
El Refaie, E. (2009). Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 173–96). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2014). Reconsidering “image metaphors” in the light of perceptual simulation theory. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(1), 63–76.
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. London: Routledge.
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2003). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2012). Creativity in pictorial and multimodal advertising metaphors. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), Discourse and creativity (pp. 113–132). Harlow: Pearson.
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(1999). Speaking and thinking with metonymy. In K. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 61–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grady, J. (1997). Foundation of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley, CA.
(1999). A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphors: Correlations vs. resemblance. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2005). Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1595–1614.
Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Holland, D., & Quinn, N. (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lin, Y., & Chiang, W. (2015). Multimodal fusion in analyzing political cartoons: Debates on U.S. beef imports into Taiwan. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(2), 137–161.
Mittelberg, I. (2018). Gestures as image schemas and force gestalts: A dynamic systems approach augmented with motion-capture data analyses. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(1). Retreived from [URL].
Mori, U. (1917). Taiwan banzokushi [An ethnography of the Taiwan aborigines]. Taipei: Rinji Taiwan kyukan chosakai.
Nabeshima, K. (2016). Metafā to shintaisei [Metaphor and embodiment]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Nakamura, H. (1988). Bukkyo dobutsu sansaku [Animals in Buddhism]. Tokyo: Tokyo Shoseki.
Orwell, G. (1936). Shooting an elephant. Adelaide: eBooks@Adelaide. Retreived from [URL]
Oshika, T. (1936). Yabanjin [The savage]. Tokyo: Sorin Shobo.
Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2017). Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam; John Benjamins.
Roy, D. (2003). Taiwan: A political history. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
(1993). Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.
Sakano, N. (2012). Nihon tochika no Taiwan: Fushimanga de yomitoku [Taiwan under Japanese rule: Understand by caricature]. Tokyo: Heibonsha.
Shakespeare, W. (1610/2008). The tempest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shinohara, K., & Matsunaka, Y. (2009). Pictorial metaphors of emotion in Japanese comics. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 265–293). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tai, K. (Ed.). (1981). Taiwan musha hoki jiken; Kenkyu to shiryo [Musha Uprising in Taiwan; Research and data]. Tokyo: Syakai Shisosya.
Taiwan Nichinichi Shinposha. Taiwan Nichinichi Shinpo [Taiwan Daily Newspaper]. Taipei: Taiwan Nichinichi Shinposha.
Taiwan Sotokufu Keimukyoku. (1930). Shinbunshi wo toshite mitaru mushajiken [Musha Uprising described in newspaper]. Taipei: Keimukyoku hoanka toshogakari.
. (1935). Taiwan bankai tenbo [Outlook of Indigenous People]. Taipei: Rihannotomo Hakkosho.
Takeuchi, S. (1935). Kokushigajyo yamatozakura [Collection of Japanese historical paintings]. Tokyo: Seibunsha.
Taniguchi, K. (2003). Ninchiimiron no shintenkai; metafā to metonimī [Development of cognitive semantics; Metaphor and metonymy]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
Tierney, R. T. (2010). Tropics of savagery: The culture of Japanese empire in comparative frame. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Wang, T. (2015). Taiwan falyu shihshangde yuanjhuminzu: Zuowei teshude rencyun diyu yu fawenhua [Indigenous peoples in the legal history of Taiwan: Being a special ethnic group, territory and legal culture]. NTU Law Journal, 44(4), 1639–1704.
Wu, M. (2010). Musha jiken kenkyu no kadai [Future issues for studies of the Musha Uprising]. Nihon Taiwan Gakkaihou, 121, 21–28.
Yamanashi, M. (1988). Hiyu to rikai [Metaphor and understanding]. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Yu, N., Yu, L., & Lee, Y. (2017). Primary metaphors: Importance as size and weight in a comparative perspective. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(4), 231–249.
Zbikowski, L. M. (2009). Music, language, and multimodal metaphor. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 359–381). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.